rnd

Trump has been simultaneously claiming that he - has won the war, - is currently winning the war, - needs help to win the war, - doesn't needs help to win the war. All of this - to destroy the nuclear program - he claims to have already destroyed last year. Hormuz: - is open - but under a threat so no one may pass (the definition of closed)

"Just a report". For some future. What a coincidence that most of those points HAVE ALREADY BEEN executed on, for the last ... 10 years or so.

As far as I've learnt from others who know better - vise versa. It's about to accelerate.

If you wonder why Russia, apparently out of the blue, attacked innosent Ukraine. And what it has to do with the US. "Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground" Provision of weapons

It's not "Israel has dragged USA into the war" No bullet or missile that Israel strikes it does on its own, but with full support or rather approval from the US. Israel alone is hardly capable of anything. Nor is it "Trump being especially audacious", and "other president" wouldn't have started the war. The war has been planned for a decade or so. The arab spring was about this. For instance, this work from a US think-tank: inurl:06_iran_strategy.pdf The same goes for the war in Ukraine - planned for a decade if not multiple decades. And there're analogous papers too. It's the continuity of agenda of encircling of Russia and ultimately China. No matter who is in charge in the oval office. They are talking heads destructing your attention, pretending to discuss, decide something in debates. Everything has been decided for, and well before, Trump already. Whether they succeed is another matter.

1) It's none of your, not that of the USA, business who rules Iran, what kind of people. I won't even mention that all of your information about that you receive is from the Western sources. Or have you been to Iran yourself? Lived they? 2) Nor is USA, being barely a 250-year old country, capable of understanding the 3000-year old one. 3) Why Iran hate Israel? Because the latter is an extention of USA in the middle East. Rather Israel hates Iran because it's its purpose. Why does USA hate Iran? Because it's the only country that: - has a lot of natural resources in the region - relatively large and powerful - AND hasn't and won't submit to USA - AND - it sells oil to China - AND it's an ally of both China and Russia

@Leo Gura 1) Heavy metals are toxic, in ANY quantity - you've said it yourself. 2) Any vaccine contains heavy metals - according to the gov website. You have a video about de-contamination from the heavy metals too. What will you say?

And you're prox-vax and Trump opponent. Is that your point? That's a definition, your own, that you've used as explanation, without addressing any of his points.

By the same token, he could call you a drug-addict and lunatic.

I always wonder: why is it, according to the Western analytics, that when any country turns to Russia, China and any non-Western country, it's always "a country has SOLD itself". Whenever, by the contrast, it turns to any Western country, it's "finally it's consciously, with wisdom, vicely, with the choice of ITS people, with heart, made the right choice". Who, the collective West (UK, Spain, Portugal, France, USA) or China, Russia, Iran... is known to have had colonies? That is, enslaved the whole countries for centuries. In case of USA it's Liberia.

Recall @Leo Gura what you said a couple of years ago -- "Ivermectin doesn't work" -- to my own statement. As well as "We need to wear masks. Look at me, I've just injected a 2nd dose of a vaccine, here's a photo of me." Publicly, that is, so that others would repeat after you. Here you go - everything in reverse. One might call this another conspirasy theory and give a list of other doctors who'll debunk it. Except that Dr Bret Weinstein is a) biologist himself, and b) who dared to speak against the mainstream message. A doctor who speaks against, when he knows he should because he can't remain silent any longer, won't get a raise on his job. Instead, he'll get fired.

I've looked for the articles dated priour to 2020 by the keywords "vaccines heavy metals". This is from "United Kingdom National Health Service" Notice that it's a government organisation which aren't, or shouldn't be like those uneducated flat-earthers who even dare to raise a question about the recent vacciness. And - for 70 years. On the website they still say, however: "yeah, but it's still safe. Small amount - no problem" @Leo Gura you were the one who's detoxicated himselves from the heavy metals as well as claimed that "no amount of any heavy metal in any kind of food" and by extention, treatment or medicine injected, "is safe". Right? What's intereting, among those results in general, more so among the ones of 2020-24, there will be "fact checks" here and there that will claim "ahhhhh, no, it's a conspiracy theory! No metals are present in vaccines". Are they fact-checks or the sources of the conspirasy-theories rather?

What Biden has done for Russia is unpriceable. So much so that it's become more resilient and immune to sanctions of which there're 15k already, left many US and West-led intituations wherein it'd always be an unfair situation, eliminated trade in dollar as much as possible, increased trade in local currencies with the friendly countries, even prohibited trading with it and EUR within the country, prohibited SWIFT, started to use its alternative (SPFS), created its own sea fleet for oil and gas, make stronger allies with other, non-Western, countries, has obliged to get paid in RUB to the unfriendly countries (basically EU and US), although only in some cases. BRICS has become stronger too, so much so that there's a queue of 30-40 countries that want to join it; is about to create an exchange for grain, as the biggest grain producer - its own, uncontrolled by US/Europe, finally. Some chips and computer components - motherboards, smartphones, laptops - are beginning to get manufactured in the country, although not as advanced as the ones in China and US. Tourbines too, engines. Yandex, VK and a few other big tech companies have returned into the russian jurisdiction, as well the money of the oligarchs. The majority of this, during the last 2-2.5 years. And all the while, listening to the western voices predicting its own, of Russia, collapse -- if not today, then the next week with certanty. Ah, also, it has ascended in the ranking of countries by GDP surpussing Germany; and Japan, or about to. In Africa, in Sahel - too, but that's not because of Biden, though. Ah, yeah -- US military has been expelded from Niger. And who comes onto its place? Yes. Biden... has let Saudi Arabia abandon the petro-dollar agreement; has worsened the relationship with China and, to a lesser degree, with India; with the Global South in general too; has fled Red Sea from the hutíes. He's done many things, Biden. I wish Biden would be the president of USA his next term. And the next. And 6 more.

50 years ago, on 9th june 1974, Petro-dollar came into existence. And 2 days ago it ceased to exist because Saudi Arabia didn't extend the contract with the US. Hence, the end, at least on paper.

Circular logic: Leo says that Trump is bad therefore Trump is bad. Why is Trump bad? Because Leo says so. Why does Leo says so? Because Trump is bad therefore Leo says so. Russell Brand goes MAGA therefore it's bad. Why? Because it's about Trump. So what? But he's bad. Why is he bad? Because Leo says so... Why does he...? Compared to whom Trump is bad? If one were more objective, he'd have also hightighted the ways the other side, whom Trump is compared to, is bad, in some or other ways. Has this ever been done on this forum?