Anderz

I did a search for Q posts about the international banksters and found: WW I think means worldwide. My interpretation is that Q says that the international banksters have worldwide government control. Very much the same as in my previous post! Actually the Q post is more clear than my previous post. It's the governments who control the people and it's the international bankers who have the power over the money and thereby can control the governments. And it's made even more clear in Q post 275: "Banks control Gov'ts Gov'ts control people" Wow. I think I'm onto something. I hadn't seen those Q posts before.

It seems that it's the private bankers, the international banksters, who have the power, not governments. But the top power is still the governments. Because the laws can be changed! And the power that the private banks have to create money out of thin air through fractional reserve banking can be removed through new legislation. In the past, governments have been powerless against the private bankers because governments haven't been able to replace the complicated and huge management of money for the nation as a whole. Until now, that is. I've got four words for you: say hello to CBDC! Well, that's an acronym, and it stands for central bank digital currency. This is The Storm and the Awakening of the victorious One:

Also, it's important that the universal basic income (UBI) is transferred from the government to e-money accounts in the central bank. Otherwise it becomes money in bank account in private banks and when people spend that money it becomes toxic. If my interpretation of the situation is correct we should expect governments to combine a UBI with e-money.

The private banks must be super bloated with money by now. In my proposal, the private banks cannot convert their money to e-money via the UN. Only central banks are allowed to convert money into e-money directly. A private bank must convert its money to e-money via its central bank. Money when circulated in and out of private banks becomes loaded more and more with debt. Because private banks don't just hand out money for free. There is always hefty interest attached to the loans and credits. And money that circulates back to the private banks generally already has lots of debt attached to it, and when the private banks lend that money additional debt is added. Only central banks have e-money accounts. So even the private banks' e-money is stored in the central bank and with negative interest, the central bank can suck money out of the private banks. My guess is that's very healthy for the economy or else the bloated and increasingly debt-ridden money in the private banks would continue to expand until it fricken explodes!!!

I doubt that governments will be able to ban cash, but I'm expecting incredible fear mongering about cash to start soon. Cash itself is useful, but it's on the same level as the fractional reserve money created by the private banks. All money as I understand it is created as debt. And it's impossible to repay all the debt! Why? Because look at the total money supply M. In order to repay the dept, M + I money is needed but M < M + I, where I is the interest, so it's impossible to repay all money which means that new money needs to be created to pay the dept and more money to pay the new debt and so on in a vicious and expanding cycle of dept.

The Rockefellers, who may very well be a part of the deep state, donated land for the UN headquarters in New York City. So can the United Nations really be trusted to handle all the global e-money conversion? And the World Health Organization (WHO) which is a UN agency seems suspicious even to me. I have strong doubts about vaccines and the WHO has been pushing vaccines a lot. We will see. If the Trump administration trusts the UN for handling e-money conversion, then that's good enough for me. One has to set the trust at some level or every institution on the whole planet will be distrusted. For practical reasons it may be BIS who will do the e-money conversion and in that case if Trump and the other leaders of major countries trust BIS then that's good enough in my opinion.

If Q posted on a Russian website, how can that be trusted? It can be trusted because as Jordan Sather explains from about 19 minutes in this video the deep state is international and there are white hats (good guys and gals) even in Russia: And Jordan also showed an interesting statement by China's President Xi Jinping: "The sun will come out after the storm." Sure, could be a coincidence that he used the word "storm" but top leaders choose their public words carefully.

Q wrote in post 513: "NO comms made outside of this platform." So can the Q posts posted after the shutdown of 8chan be trusted? Yes, I think they can be trusted. I found that one replacement website for 8chan has an IP address in Russia! Haha. And I believe that even if Q posts for example on a Russian website the posts can be trusted. Why? Because in my estimation the Q posts are genuine and they wouldn't let the deep state or someone else hijack the Q posts. Trust the plan.

New Q posts today! Here is a part of a long post (3905): And interestingly it seems that Google is moving in a good direction and recently removed censorship for Google Search and YouTube:

Q used to post on 8chan. I use QMAP which aggregates the Q post for easier access: https://qmap.pub/ 8chan has been taken down:

Someone may ask, can't each nation develop their own e-currency and then let for example the BIS to provide a safe currency exchange system? In theory yes, in practice no, because China now has a huge first-mover advantage when it comes to e-money. The risk is that a lot of smaller countries with unbanked populations would adopt the e-yuan which would be seen as a threat to the other big nations. And international business-to-business and financial transactions could become dominated by the e-yuan making China too dominant in the global market. Without the UN system based on open source, it would take many years for most countries to develop and implement a system that can complete with China's e-money system. And adding to that is the slow political and regulation processes in different countries, and also, a large information technology infrastructure is needed that smaller countries would have difficulty dealing with. The big tech company Huawei could help smaller governments to set up an e-money system, but if that's for the e-yuan only, or with Chinese tracking and surveillance, then again that's a threat to the rest of the developed world.

Hmm... For my idea of the Chinese government making their e-money platform open source to come true, then China will have to wait with launching their e-yuan. Vice President Mike Pence said in a video that Q linked to that China's leadership can change. And the Chinese rulers making their e-money platform open source will be a huge change compared to the usual selfish policies in politics. Even with an open source system China can still use the e-yuan in the same way as intended. It's only the money conversion that needs to be moved to the UN to allow other countries to have their own e-money in the same way. If China keeps their e-money system to themselves then that will actually limit the international use of their e-yuan since other big nations will refuse to let it replace their own currencies. As a use case example, let's say that someone wants to convert e-yuans to e-dollars. If those are two different systems then it would require a "middleman" conversion system making the money transfer less efficient, less safe (middleman attacks etc) and more costly. With the UN system the e-yuans can automatically and directly be transferred to e-dollars in a digital wallet, with the exchange rate automatically determined by the UN system, and ideally with zero transaction fees.

Aaron Abke has a new video where he mentions that ACIM says that there is only the will of God. And indirectly it sounds that he also says the same as Ramesh Balsekar and my model that God's will is changeless. In the Bible it says the same: "I the Lord do not change. So you, the descendants of Jacob, are not destroyed." - Malachi 3:6

The latest Q post (3904) has a link to a tweet quoting a financial article: "This scheme essentially merges the Fed and Treasury into one organization. So, meet your new Fed chairman, Donald J. Trump." and the hashtags #WWG1WGA #QAnon #EndTheFed #Freedom. Trump taking the power back from the Federal Reserve! And if I'm correct about the private banks being the corrupt deep state power hub and that the Fed is owned by private banks, this is a good move. Even people on the political left will probably approve of the move since as it says in the Bloomberg Opinion article (Mar 27, 2020): "In other words, the federal government is nationalizing large swaths of the financial markets."

Is there is a risk of an Orwellian New World Order with e-money? Tracking and surveillance will get a huge boost, but I think it will stay within democratic norms and mainly be used for tracking things like child trafficking, terrorism and other forms of organized crime. And also there will in my scenario be a competition between several kinds of currencies: fiat money with cash and credit/debit cards, e-money and open source cryptocurrencies. I do believe that in the long run e-money will dominate but there will always be alternative methods for payments, even for micropayments such as IOTA and for storing value like Bitcoin.

Amen!

A radical idea I came to think of, which will show if the Chinese government really is concerned about the good for all of humanity, is that China makes its digital currency platform open source. Then all central banks around the world can use the platform if they want to. And also, the control of issuing new money is moved from the central banks to the UN. And each nation's central bank can convert their fiat currency into an electronic version of the same currency by sending fiat money to the UN where the fiat money received is destroyed and the equal amount of the electronic version of the money is created ex novo by the UN and sent to the central bank. For example the Federal Reserve can send amounts of U.S. dollars to the UN and receive the equal amount of e-dollars in return. France can send euros and receive e-euros in return, China can send yuans to the UN and receive e-yuans in return and so on. The electronic versions of the fiat currencies can be used in parallel with the traditional fiat currencies that continue to function as usual, including physical cash etc. Additionally and optionally the UN can also provide a global digital currency simply by pegging it to a basket of existing fiat currencies.

The central banks can be owned by private banks which is the case for the U.S. central bank, the Federal Reserve. So a global digital currency is necessary to ensure independence from private ownership. I'm a fan of free market economy but there also needs to be government regulations. And also, having monopoly on creating money out of thin air and demanding interest on it is not exactly free market economy, to put it mildly. And the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) is owned by central banks, which means that the digital global currency should be issued by some other institution without private ownership. I looked up United Nations (UN) to check if it had any private ownership and it looks like UN is independent and is therefore a potential candidate for issuing a digital global currency.

Nasty! It's not the central banks or the BIS who are the "Illuminati" capstone of the money pyramid. It's the private banks! Because the private banks control the actual money in circulation in society. What China is doing with the e-yuan is actually helping the rest of the world with taking the money power from the private banks. And the major purpose of the coronavirus lock down around the world is then to facilitate the introduction of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). The private banks, THAT's the real deep state power hub. And a worldwide lock down is necessary in order to deal with that power structure. This is The Storm, this is the beginning of the harvest in the Law of One.

The following is even more speculative because I don't know much about it yet, but I want to log it here as something to develop further and modify if need be. One expert said something curious, that the central banks actually don't have much control over the money, and that has been the situation for almost a century, maybe even longer. My amateurish interpretation is that ordinary banks borrow money from the central bank in the form of high-powered money which is different than the amount of money in circulation in society. An ordinary bank takes the high-powered money and multiplies it say 10 times through fractional reserve banking and then lends it out to customers. It's the ordinary banks that determine the interest rate for the money in public circulation. With a central bank digital currency (CBDC) the central bank can more efficiently regulate the money, even the money in public circulation. In theory it's even possible to bypass the ordinary banks altogether. That's a monumental power change. Today the ordinary banks have the power and with a CBDC that power can be moved to lesser or greater extent to the central bank. In practice ordinary banks will still be necessary because the central bank cannot deal with all the issuing of credits and loans to citizens and companies etc. However I wonder if fractional reserve banking still will be necessary. It seems to me that with a CBDC the central bank can issue the monetary base (the total amount of money in circulation in society) directly to the ordinary banks, and that the central bank can hold all the accounts for citizens. For example, with a CBDC, when an ordinary bank lends out money to a citizen then the money is transferred to the citizen's account held by the central bank, not by the ordinary bank. I doubt that citizens would be happy if the central bank was able to have negative interest rates for the accounts. On the other hand the accounts for ordinary banks could have the possibility of interest rates going from positive to negative, depending on the regulations the central bank needs to do.

What if the U.S. has been developing a digital dollar in classified projects? How else could they have proposed that so fast? It's still the same problem with the e-dollar as with the e-yuan. Other big nations would still use their own currencies. The plan I predict is to have the e-yuan launched before the G7 meeting this June. Because they all want a global digital currency! That's my current theory.

The e-yuan will NOT be able to replace large currencies such as the U.S. dollar, euro, pound sterling and yen. But the e-yuan will I believe become big enough of a competitor to make the other big nations demand a global digital currency. And that may be one of the issues that will be discussed during the G7 Summit 2020 (teleconference due to the coronavirus). The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) could issue a digital currency based on a basket of existing fiat currencies. And the global currency could function similar to the e-yuan with a two-tier system where countries directly can convert their own currencies into the BIS currency. And because of the efficiency and size of the new global currency, nations would more and more convert their national currencies and then start using only the BIS currency.

China has a centralized government and free market economy. The U.S. almost has the opposite: a centralized market controlled by big corporations owned and created by the same deep state, and free politics. But it's even worse than that. Even the politics is controlled by the deep state in the U.S. so it's actually centralized too in the form of a puppet show of fake opposition. What this means is that China will become more powerful in the long run because the U.S. is too centralized, ironically similar to communism, with the politburo replaced by deep state agents. My guess is that China has falsely been accused of human rights violations. Fortunately I think Wanderers are in control of the top power, both in the U.S. and in China, so the changes happening in the world right now will turn into something good. There is real corruption that has to be dealt with and organized crime, Trump and QAnon will play a key role in sorting out the mess is my guess.

Micropayments are already possible but since the infrastructure for currency transactions beneath the surface is so old, for example Apple and Google have a whopping 30% transaction fee on micropayments: And even with Facebook's Libra currency, since it's centrally issued by a private company instead of by a central bank, governments will likely ban the currency, or at least there is a risk of it being banned in the future.

Will for example the U.S. use the e-yuan? Maybe! The e-yuan is a two-tier system and it has several different types of wallets. So a U.S. bank could connect to the e-yuan and have its own wallets with full U.S. control. And U.S. citizens can have digital e-yuan wallets in the U.S. bank. As a use case, let's say that The New York Times wants to use micropayments, so that when a user wants to read an article, with a single click a small payment of e-yuans is made from the user's wallet to The New York Times. Similar things with gaming apps and other services using micropayments. I read that e-yuan has one type of wallet that is anonymous, so then users can pay for services and goods conveniently and directly without the need for clunky credit card registrations, application forms or subscriptions.