Anderz

Hey! It could be a good thing from a bigger picture that pharma companies can't be sued because of damage caused by vaccines. Why? Because if it's true as one expert said that there aren't even any viruses and that for example polio is caused by DDT, not by a virus, then vaccines too are a hoax. Another expert said that HIV is an exosome is every sense of that word. What it seems to me what he said is that HIV is an exosome, not a virus. The polio vaccine was then just a smokescreen to avoid having to deal with DDT - which is a poison - lawsuits etc. And I heard that DDT wasn't banned until the 70s, but if the vaccine was a hoax, then they could have started removing the DDT already in the 50s without the public being aware of it. And by preventing lawsuits against vaccines, the whole vaccine scam can theoretically be exposed without causing the whole legal system to collapse. Although, there might be other laws in other countries, so I'm not sure yet, but for the U.S. at least it would work. If the public could sue pharma companies and/or the government for vaccines, then it would be practically impossible to reveal the truth.

Hmm... I have been thinking of Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel as a white hat, but now I found something alarming: I still believe Netanyahu is a white hat and that what he suggested, which sounds like a precursor to the mark of the beast, is not meant to happen. If it does happen I may have to revise my position.

Q has this new post about social distancing for the power elite: Cameras on = masks on Cameras off - masks off Q" - Q post 4222

From a collective consciousness perspective the kinds of homes we have today must appear creepy as f. Even if we live in a big mansion, that's still a very lonely, sad and isolated place. And since most money today is created as dept in the form of mortgages, when humanity moves into the next evolutionary stage of a collective consciousness, the value of those mortgages will collapse since all buildings today will become uninhabitable basically. That's probably decades into the future yet still a short period of time from today seen historically. So not only will most of the jobs disappear due to automation. Most homes as we think of them today too will disappear! The homes we have today are only fit for ego consciousness.

What may happen on the internet is that people will start to FEEL the truth in the information. Manipulation of information is very fragile and huge effort by armies of gatekeepers on the internet is needed to keep the disinfo intact. When people start to sense the truth directly, through all the layers of deception, the whole wall of lies crumbles to dust in an instant. ACIM says:

Q's latest post (4218) has a link to this tweet: Social distancing for the elite?

Information war!!! This if fun. As long as it can be kept on a harmless level.

Just for fun, a speculative conspiracy theory. On May 1, which allegedly is an Illuminati special day, the U.S. government introduced a new bill named H.R.6666 - COVID-19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act - https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6666/ Even Snopes.com which is an anti-conspiracy theory website wrote about the bill: "was assigned the ominous-sounding number H.R. 6666". For a more pro-conspiracy theory interpretation, here is Dr. Buttar talking about the bill: My own conspiracy theory is that H.R. 6666 is targeting the medical industry! How? By being overly Orwellian and using COVID-19 too much as an excuse for that. This is according to my theory meant to backfire on the medical industry.

There is talk about Obamagate. I haven't looked into it yet, but I found this article: I doubt that Obama is guilty of corruption, but we will see. My bet is still on the DNC being corrupt and Q recently posting about the DNC email "hack" strengthens that bet in my opinion.

And here I found another new video by Bentinho Massaro about infinite love. It will be interesting to compare how he explains it to Leo's explanation.

Interestingly, Aaron Abke now posted this video about anger, love and relationships:

ACIM makes a clear distinction between fear and love while Leo has a nondual explanation of love. I think they are the same since ACIM says that "fear arises from lack of love." So fear and its derivatives such as frustration and anger can thus be seen as a low level of love, similar to how Leo describes it in his video about love.

I read that hatred is a more permanent state than anger. My new approach to hatred is to focus on feeling trapped. Because it seems that my hatred is related to a pressure of some kind, which is a kind of shell that my feelings and thoughts are trapped in. And trying to shatter the shell by building up more anger and hatred will only make the shell stronger since the anger is caused by the shell. What is needed instead is to cultivate love, not through external means, because that's again to be struggling with the shell. The love needs to increase within oneself. So that's the more universal kind of love that Leo has talked about instead of the ego love of separation.

Yay! Aaron Doughty's latest video is about how the Great Awakening is about moving into fourth density. It may sound like woo woo but I believe it's extremely important and that's what actually is what is happening.

Then what about sadism? Someone wrote that the ego is sadistic. My theory is that the ego actually needs pain and suffering to evolve out of itself. The ego has lots of inner conflicts that become numbed out leading to more and more shutting down of the life force. So when people are sadistic, they are actually helping others to evolve very quickly by inducing suffering that cuts through the increase of numbness. So even sadism can be forgiven by recognizing the purpose behind it. It's a part of ego development. It's a blunt, crude and low-level consciousness tool and there is a better method which is to ignite the spark of inner peace within oneself. Then the inner peace generated dissolves the suffering and numbness without the need for inflicting pain and suffering on oneself and others.

But then what about forgiving oneself? I have a new very radical practice for this. I think of ALL my memories as valuable yet made in sin. meaning a misperception of reality. And I can observe my memories as a single chunk. And then I can compare my chunk of memories to for example Hillary Clinton's personal memories and notice that her memories too are valuable and can be treated as a single chunk of information. The deeper meaning of forgiveness is to be able to observe both one's own personal memories and the memories other people have as a necessary stage of development. That means full acceptance and also acceptance of one's own sins, which are perfect. What?! Perfect sins? Yes, the sins have been necessary. Why? Because they happened. That's why. And from there we can move towards transcending sin.

ACIM says a lot about forgiveness. Here is one example: Personally I attempt to observe my anger, even subconscious angers such as tensions in my face. My anger doesn't seem perfect to me, but according to my own theory it is perfect! But it's only perfect as long as the anger is there. I believe we are to transcend the serious kind of anger. And instead of forgiveness I started using another practice which is to see everything as already perfect. That is I believe what Jesus meant when he told us to be perfect as the Father in heaven is perfect.

Those in power have put a lot of pressure on people with the (hoax?) coronavirus crisis. I even read news articles about people starting to protest. And people in general are grumpy! I too feel a heaviness. It's useful to be able to forgive even those in power. How to do that? My approach is similar to the advanced form of forgiveness Leo talked about in this his latest video. That from a nonduality perspective there isn't anyone to forgive! And I even use the idea that everything is happening with perfect order. In practice this means according to my theory that even the nasty things are happening for a greater good reason. Easier said than done, but I find it useful to have this approach.

Ralph Smart has this new video where he talks about how we are entering into a golden age. And he said that this year is 2012 according to the Ethiopian calendar. That's the Mayan calendar end date. Ralph said that this is the Great Awakening and also that there is a Great Distraction going on.

Brad Johnson has this new video from the collective consciousness of humanity. Sounds very much like the Great Awakening although they don't use that term in the video. They talk about a collective front of humanity which I believe includes our whole civilization as it still appears to us in third density. It's a fake front, a facade! A layer of control upheld by what in the video are called the Elitists.

Many spiritual people say that life is a dream and at the same time they say that physical death is inevitable. What do they mean by that? Do they mean that physical death is the awakening out of the dream of life? Awakening into some astral realm? Heaven? Reincarnation? That kind of reasoning seems inconsistent to me. I now have the opposite idea that life is real and physical death is an illusion! Talk about recontextualization. In a way my idea is similar to the claim that life is a dream since my idea is that physical death is an illusion, which makes our current life and society where people die a fake scenario.

The Nano cryptocurrency looks promising. They didn't do the usual ICO where a few rich people can grab most of the initial coins. Instead with Nano they distributed the coins over a period of two years to people around the world by having them solve a capta puzzle online. Many people in poorer countries got coins. And Nano is very fast and with zero transaction fees and is already more proven than IOTA which is a more complicated technology that still isn't fully developed. For example I think IOTA still has a centralized function that they haven't removed yet. Nano has more limited functionality than IOTA so both will probably be used for different use cases, but Nano is very useful and efficient for basic money transactions.

I think it would be good that have decentralized open source cryptocurrencies competing with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Bitcoin is mainly useful as an investment currency, like digital gold. I found two other cryptocurrencies that would be better for practical use: IOTA and Nano. These are based on a faster and more scalable graph technology instead of the clunky blockchain solutions. What I like about IOTA and Nano in addition to speed and scalability is that they have zero transaction fees! Maybe the CBDCs also will have zero transaction fees, we will see, but the CBDCs will most likely all be centralized and tracked. I will do some more research about it. There might be a risk of decentralized currencies being used for lots of criminal activities, so there still needs to be a balance between full anonymity and government tracking.

Wow, I didn't know that China had so short lockdown period. From Q's latest post (4171): "How is it possible the source Country of the virus (minus Wuhan) was on lockdown for only 16 days? How long has the US been on lockdown?" It doesn't compute. It all seems very politically determined to me. But then again, I now even suspect that there isn't any virus at all. But it's useful to add additional facts. As Q has posted about: When does the probability become mathematically impossible. If we take impossible here to mean infinitesimally small probability, then that can be achieved by adding uncorrelated probabilities of events together, meaning multiplying all the individual probabilities together. And this information about the China lockdown period is something that adds to the improbability of the coronavirus crisis being what the establishment claims it is.

I wrote earlier about how Bitcoin would be bad as a global currency for practical use. I came to think of an additional potential problem with Bitcoin. Just a speculation, but I want to document it if someone manages to achieve this (or has already achieved it in secret). Bitcoins are mined using a hash function, and miners use extremely fast hardware that calculates vast numbers of hash values per second. My speculative idea is to use machine learning to mine bitcoins. The criteria for mining bitcoins is that the hash value is low enough. It's impossible to reverse a hash function since its output has less data than can be used as input. However, since the criteria in Bitcoin is only about getting a low enough value I imagine that machine learning can be used for producing hash values that meet the difficulty target much faster than traditional bitcoin mining equipment.