Anderz

If God is infinite timeless information, then what is the Word of God? Is that the Bible? Well, the Bible is just a tiny part of the full Word: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it." - John 1:1-5 "The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth." - John 1:14 What the Bible describes is symbolism for reality. I have doubts about Jesus even existing as a historical person (although I'm not sure, Jesus might have been a real person and even the miracles might be real). In the BEGINNING the Word was God. This means that the Word in its unmanifested form is the same as the infinite timeless information. Interestingly, today we have information technology, and the Word can be represented by a single binary string of information, such as 011011110101001001110111110001000011010110... Christ is the Word made flesh, not only in human form but also as the manifestation of all of creation and that's why Jesus said: "“Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!”" - John 8:58

Is God dead, as Nietzsche said? Well, not exactly, unless timeless information, like Pi is considered dead. God is changeless. And God cannot do anything. God cannot choose. God cannot act. God cannot dream. God cannot experience. God cannot create. God IS. God says in the Bible: I am that I am. While God is inanimate, Christ on the other hand is alive. Because Christ is the son of God in the form of experiencing the timeless information in the now moment. God is endless. Christ is the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the END. What? Christ has an end? Yes, the end is the ongoing edge of creation in the now moment. So Christ contains all the past up to the present moment, but not the future, and therefore Jesus said that he and the Father are one, but also that the Father is greater than him and Jesus also said in one situation: not my will but Thy will be done.

I forgot to mention what the point of life is. My take is that the purpose of the universe is to create purpose. I believe our universe is a part of an ever expanding quantum computer, but the bigger reality, that's changeless information! Whoa, you may think, changeless information, how can that produce change? We often say that we "move through time". And in a sense that's correct. So how can changeless information produce time? As a simple example think of experiencing all decimals of Pi = 3.141592654... in a single timeless moment. All the decimals are experienced instantly, yet the decimals never end! So the experience of the decimals of Pi will go on forever in a single now moment. Voila! Time out of timeless information. So there is no external creator of our reality. Our reality IS the process of creation itself. There is nobody doing anything, nor was our reality created, reality just timelessly is timeless, changeless information, yet our free will is real in the sense that our personal choices and actions are a part of the process of creation, not separate from it. Our actions are a part of the purpose of the universe to create purpose.

From my direct experience I only experience the now moment. The past is timeless information in the now. We cannot move away from the now. In fact, there IS only the now moment. How could one jump away from the now moment into a another timeline? Who would do the jump? The universe or the person? Similar with time travel. Try traveling back 1 hour into the past and meet your past self, and then travel back with both your past self and present self into the present moment. Impossible as I see it. And again, how can one move away from the present moment? (Einstein's relativity is a hoax btw.)

The separate ego is built on fear. As it is today when we are identified with the separate ego we are afraid of everybody and everything, even afraid of our own actions. Fear is a necessary survival mechanism BUT fear is only needed as a primitive alternative to knowledge and capacity to deal with situations safely. When we know how to deal with a situation safely the need for fear is removed. Imagine having ZERO fear. Some people put on a tough facade and claim that they have no fear. And in some way that may be true on their surface conscious level, but on the subconscious level the fear remains, stronger than ever. And the person with the tough facade who claims to be fearless is in reality stern, rigid, protective, isolated and prone to anger: he or she is full of fear! True freedom from fear means that we are as one with everybody on earth. Removing fear from the separate ego doesn't work and would just cause havoc. People would do crazy things and even evil deeds without fear as long as they remain on the separate ego level. What is needed is a giant leap into a planetary consciousness where we achieve the capacity to remove fear while at the same time being able to function constructively together.

Nassim Haramein was asked about time travel and interestingly he didn't answer the question directly. I think he knows that actual time travel is impossible. Instead he said that the past is memory. That seems logical to me, and it explains how several people can claim to have been the same person in the past; they tap into the collective memory of humanity. Bruce Lipton has explained our next evolutionary stage with what he calls fractal evolution. "We are not humans until we create humanity", Lipton said in this short video:

The Dalai Lama said that there is reincarnation but it's not personal. And as I see it nirvana cannot be reached because we can never reach infinity. Time is always moving forward in a single timeline that never ends. All talks about multiple timelines, time travel, several personal lifetimes, the universe reaching an end(?) and repeating itself and so on are just New Age delusions. Yesterday will never be experienced again by anybody. Instead what will happen is that we will reach eternal life here on earth. For example Christians it seems to me often fail to recognize what the Lord's Prayer says: Thy kingdom come ON EARTH as it is in heaven. It's symbolism for our next evolutionary stage as humanity.

If evil is defined as the inability of participating in a harmonious whole, then how can I fix that with my separate ego? I can't! Because I have no effin' clue how to participate in harmony with all of humanity. It's way too complicated and with vast numbers of butterfly effect interrelated relationships between all actors in the world. For me trying to be good with my separate ego doesn't cut it. What I BELIEVE is good for all can be, and probably often is, a total disaster in reality, both for myself and others. What I can do instead is to use the autopilot practice because then my separate ego is just an observer. Not a passive nonjudgmental observer but a proactive and monitoring observer examining what my autopilot self is doing and looking for significant improvements in how I deal with things in everyday life.

How can evil be removed by a global collective consciousness? First we can define what evil is. Eckhart Tolle said iirc that evil is a result of unconsciousness. By unconsciousness he means lack of presence, lack of conscious awareness. In this video from about 19 minutes Leo says the same thing basically, that evil is ignorance: Evil, one can say, is the inability of participating in a harmonious whole. Like cancer cells inside the body. The global collective consciousness is a harmonious whole, so evil will automatically be removed.

Yes, yet the separation in the mind still exists for most humans. That's described in the Bible as the fall of humanity. It was not a mistake as many people believe, but a deliberate plan. Metaphorically speaking, God KNEW that Adam and Eve would eat of the forbidden fruit. This separation from God was necessary so that we would develop a unique civilization on our own. The tree of the knowledge of good and evil is symbolism for our struggle throughout history. When we have reached a certain level of development there will be an "apocalypse" (which means unveiling). Sin means to miss the mark, meaning the ego separation you mentioned. With the apocalypse comes a return back to the "tree of life", not back the simple state of humanity as in the garden of Eden but to a "new earth" with humanity having gained knowledge, experience and skills. The evil in the world is simply a result of this "fall" of humanity and is just a temporary stage for developing civilizations.

@Aakash Yes, fear serves a necessary function. But remember that we humans here on earth are still at a very primitive level of development. With knowledge and experience fear can be removed. When we know how to handle a situation safely fear is removed. That's the difference between the ego will and God's will.

That's what needs to change. As Leo said in the video, our ego will based on fear is actually different from God's will. Okay, that doesn't necessarily mean that we need to think intellectually from a large cosmic perspective, but it does mean in my opinion that humanity as a whole here on earth needs to remove the fear-based ways of living.

There is also a good purpose behind hiding simple truths because it forces our civilization to come up with creative alternatives. THAT's seemingly crazy yet logical from a bigger cosmic perspective.

Haha, yes I expected that conspiracy theories wouldn't go too well here. And probably for a good reason. Going down the conspiracy rabbit hole is a real trip. But I have math to support my claim: https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research Papers-Relativity Theory/Download/1813

Maybe I shouldn't mention this on this forum, but it could be important: Einstein's relativity is a deliberate hoax to mislead the public scientific community into false research. That's why mainstream science hasn't been able to unify their laws of physics. The expert scientists surely know this, but they have to keep the charade going to uphold their ivory tower appearance of status and credibility. They are trapped basically. Sad.

No, because time has an arrow. Imagine counting all numbers from 1, 2, 3, .. to infinity. That process of counting has a beginning but is endless. The past is all the numbers from 1 to how many have been counted, and the future is all numbers after that.

If you can show me the actual future I will believe you. But more seriously in a sense the future does exist as a potential. I often think of it as with the very simple example of Pi = 3.14159265... For sufficiently large decimals their values are unknown! Because the decimals must actually, factually be calculated for them to become manifested (known). The past is then similar to the known decimals and the future as the unknown decimals.

The entire past is squeezed into the now as a huge chunk of information. And the amount of information is growing all the time in the now. So the future doesn't exist yet. Time travel is impossible. Multiple timelines are impossible. Siddhis on the other hand are possible. Paranormal phenomena are possible, and so on.

I like that definition. I even think of my individual eternal soul as a point within infinity. A point is noting by itself and is just a reference position. The process of creation is one single infinite unit and we as humans are highly complex views within that process. So there are individual selves but they don't consist of anything! We are just views, although we have free will in the sense that our personal choices and actions are a necessary part of manifesting reality.

Infinity began now! Or IS now, one might say. There is only the eternal single now moment. And the process of creation is endless since infinity has no end. Time is simply a result of infinite information unfolding in the now.

@Inliytened1 But when did time begin? The obvious answer as I see it is that time began now. The entire past is compressed into the single eternal now moment. So there is an actual past, such as billions of years since the Big Bang but the entire past manifests instantly in the now. And the motion of time is because the process of creation is infinite. There is no "external clock" or anything like that, no entity or process outside our reality able to change reality blasting into existence moment by moment in the single eternal now.

I don't see how the universe can repeat itself. Time is always moving forward, without end. For time to have an end there must be a limit. It seems to me that the process of creation is limitless and therefore endless.

In this latest video from about 43 minutes Leo said something important related to the autopilot: If we run on autopilot without awareness we would just create out of our conditioned ego habits. That's why it's important to be judgmental in the autopilot practice. Otherwise it's just a nonjudgmental observation of the ego conditioning acting out its habits. And also, and this is what I think Leo was referring to, that when we act without mindfulness, such as going on with our daily lives without awareness, that's also autopilot mode. With the autopilot practice, a state of alertness and awareness is a necessary part of it. And also great expectation is needed. The goal of the autopilot practice is to transcend and include the separate ego mind, not to remain trapped in it, nor to just nonjudgmentally observe habitual thoughts, emotions and actions.

The Dalai Lama actually said something similar, that there is reincarnation but it's not personal. Something like that. And I have been thinking about several people claiming to having been the same person in the past. In theory that could be possible if they can tap into the collective memory of humanity.

Leo also said in the video that his most powerful teachings are yet to come, and I'm looking forward to that because I have been amazed by many of his other videos and I'm curious about whether I will agree or not with the new teachings.