Danioover9000

@Leo Gura Not just open minded, but empathetic, which is why some psychopaths are well trained liars with good body language, tonality and can adjust theor communication styles to each person they talk to. Sometimes they even have a great energy or vibe they give off, like they have extra energy. For example, apparently Tom Cruise is very likely a psychopath because I think in Jim Carry's or John Travolta's interview about him they do mention that he really does give too much energy or friendliness, too forwards to the point it felt 'forced'.

@Leo Gura I agree, it's getting more obvious that IDF has to be reigned in and disciplined. Netanyahu has to prepare a scapegoat to blame and punish a few IDF soldiers to at least signal he's in control internationally, or it just looks like he has little control of the IDF and it can do anything it wants witb no recourse.

@MellowEd Yes, in so far as my experiences go, spirits and psychic phenomena existz which means some of the supernatural and paranormal experiences do exist.

@woohoo123 75% of the planet has Spiral dynamics stage blue values of religion and nationalism, and about 20% etage orange mostly in 1st world countries.

@Bobby_2021 I predict they'll postpone again until March 5.

Yo @Merkabah Star ,@Karmadhi , @zazen has this thread calmed down a bit? What have I missed from my week off?

Such a funny body language analysis😂:

This takes the cake, so immature by the reactors, can't blame them too much cuz they ignorant of the UFC and MMA. But the deeper immaturity is Dana White and Sean Strickland, bunch of fucking clowns and snake oil salesmen, especially Dana White that bitch lies and is a hypocrite, doesn't discipline fighters when they say or do criminal things and are too disrespectful: And of course, from my body language and tonality analysis, Dana White here's being defensive and evasive, he KNOWS that he let's a few fighters who are cash cows get away with immature and downright immoral disrespectful behavior( When Adyashanti was being racist using racial slurs against a white fighter, and when Connor Mcgregor went cosmic levels of trash talk and disrespect dealing with Khabib)

Well, this also doesn't sound good: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/netanyahu-goes-against-biden-and-reiterates-there-s-no-space-for-palestinian-state/ar-BB1h0Wtt?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=8cf934a897e748cf8bac98ce083b382c&ei=150

Will do some body language analysis, some verbal, discourse and statement analysis as well from the film maker to the people reacting to him filming them, this'll be a short one: So generally throughout, dark humour and satire, undertones of racism and condescension towards some of the pro Palestine supporters, and some police too. At 18:35 to 18:45 minutes you see, after his statement of 'the government has banned the river to the sea business(referring to the Palestine, not HAMMA originally, slogan of 'from the river to the sea Palestine will be free)', some chin jutting and head tilt back, indicating he's 'looking down' on viewers, and on those he's speaking about, and a micro expression of contempt and moral/intellectual superiority which IMO likely is moral superiority and contempt for Pro Palestinians here. throughout that speaking he emphasizes with head while 'looking down' and he then tilts his head downwards, forces a frown and disgusted face when he says 'slow motion crystal gnat' or something like that which I assume is some negative metaphor here. A quick check of his YouTube Channel and he's 'one of THOSE GUYS' that does reactionary content and chases clout/drama. From about 20:00 minutes to the end, this guy deals with a masked guy and another black raincoat guy. This is a good case study for verbal escalation, and touching, which almost leads to a confrontation. IMO, this YouTube guy invited that kind of energy when he's here being mister moralizer, mister 'I'm so morally superior to you lot'...just fucking unbelievable and irresponsible IMO, like what if he encountered an actually crazy person there, and he actually escalates to eventual assault? Well, him being a father to his children, meaning he has at least a wife and kids at home to feed and provide/protect, yet here he is making these videos of protests and saying these ridiculing dark humour lines at them...just pure numbers game here, probability is low but eventually he'll encounter that guy you 'fuck around and find out.' IMO that's a stupid Dad to put himself in such a legal situation.

Jesus Christ, what a disgusting video, got Steven Crowder vibes from this guy filming. However, putting aside my biases here, this is a look into the pro Palestinian protestors in Manchester area and what a Zionist would think, or someone who's ignorant of this situation would believe: The consequences of democracy and ideology. This guy filming is a great example of using dark humour to dehumanize a political movement. So ignorant. In fact, some states in the USA allows American citizens the right to ask the film maker to not take video or pictures of their faces or them without their permission, and if refused, they can sue the film maker. This guy if he's in the USA, in those states he'd be in trouble.

Yeah, Imma pass on vacation/holiday to Israel until this conflict settles down.

@lina They're gonna be the next North Korea at this point. Why not also implement the intranet while you're at it?

@Heaven Ah, you're thinking of the mass killing part of genocide, but genocide also includes deaths and killings of armed combatants and civilians alike, population displacement of natives, destruction of civilian homes, restriction of resources to said population like money, food, water, and finally genocidal intent and dehumanizing language like how Palestinians are 'animals', as Netanyahu here said the Amalek word 4 times in his footages addressing IDF and Israel, and other ministers of his administration also said. Enough evidence there to show from IDF propaganda to the media for genocidal intent, which the ICJ and South African case is about. See, it's false to reduce genocide as mass killing only, but then to discount the other 4 parts to make up genocide as you're doing here.

This is another interesting video of this comedian: Due to the video presentation, I'll try to do body language analysis from the limited clips shown, but it seems like it'll be more tonality/verbal analysis, discourse, and especially statement analysis on each person's word choices here. Discourse/framing analysis:

@Heaven I'm sorry to say that history will remember this man as the one who leads this genocidal intent/acts from IDF onto Palestinians today. I'll grant that Netanyahu is hard working and smart, and sacrifices his life for his country but this event will be a stain in his rhyme book. I'm sure there were good parts to Donald Trump too, but again these men are more evil than good, you know? So, best not to venerate one man too much, and balance his good parts with his evil parts, remind yourself they're human animals who are capable of evil here and there.

@Leo Gura I'm sure most people here, 'we', know very well Netanyahu been trying to get USA to go to war with Iran since 9/11, but does the average American outside this forum know? Is this general knowledge in the USA of 'we' the American people?... Also not virtue signaling Donald Trump, just saying it's funny how he's also saying that Netanyahu was trying to get him to go to war with Iran too.

I will do some body language, tonality, statement and discourse analysis of this guy who calls himself Shaun: Prior context and simple background: YouTube fight commentator, part fight instructor in martial arts. Here he's covering Sean Strickland and his extreme right wing views: Discourse: He makes quite a bit of edits/jump cuts, fast paced speaking and illustrators more with his left than right hand, so a bit harder to get a more authentic read of his behavior just from the jump cuts. Has a purple hue background, which in colour psychology purple in western culture associates to relaxation, in UK/Europe purple signifies royalty. He also has a black board with those mini LSD ball lights and a similar set up to live streamers. Combined with lots of jump cuts is his coverage of taking pictures or reacting/commentary(which I have biases against due to React community doing legal plagiarism and piracy of small content creators, another video on that), Shaun'll do his commentary while show pics or shorts, reacts to them, sometimes changes camera so it zooms to him, gives his opinions, then zooms out to show footage or the picture or headline he's reacting to. Verbal/tonality: This person has a Scottish accent and dialect, so he's origins are from Scotland, which currently has a more left wing party political leadership. Also my bias is I am part UK/Britain, so I'm likely to not like this person due to my biases and preferences against Scotland people, sorry. Body language: So far, his baseline's average, generally expressive with face, some head movement and hand illustrators, which I generally assume is typical for most YouTubers who film themselves going into performance mode, playing for the camera. In this instance it's 50/50 for me, I don't detect high-mid narcissism from him in terms of dramatic performance in verbals/non-verbals. Interesting to note that part of his baseline is that his cheeks rarely activates or rises up, but when he refers to 'Woke', 'Canadian', 'reporter'(referring to the left wing biased social media reporter asking questions to Sean Strickland in a bad framing for gotcha moments and for clout about LGBTQ issues, knowing what kind of answer he'll get from Sean who's IMO right wing biased and copies Donald Trump) his cheeks raise up, likely micro disgust or some emphasis from him as a negative. Also prior to this edit he was also waving his hands around in that shrugging position, while similarly shaking his head in similar fashion to emphasize, in a negative, about the 'LGBTQ community' as if it's 'THOSE GUYS', to insinuate it's be the typical annoying left wing liberal democrat. Also, around 0:46 to 0:48, very brief moment of self soothing gestures, when he's saying 'the reporter in the audience asked Sean Strickland about the comments he made in Twitter a while ago' we see his left hand rub right shoulder, while his right hand rubs left elbow, brief scratches, but this micro expression of defensiveness and closed off body language to me indicates non-verbally he's uncomfortable thinking about this reporter, or what he represents, or the Twitter mob, and some nonverbal worry. Plus, when he said the word 'comments' Shaun had a eyebrow flash(which in body language analysis eyebrow flashing may indicate surprise, emphasis, and social approval/connection). In this moment, I feel like he's mostly surprised about the 'comments' made by Sean Strickland in Twitter, or maybe the reporter's framing, but very likely surprise, and less emphasis or social approval. Also when he said 'I said to everyone in that video LIKE the video if you agree with this, or DISLIKE if you disagree with this(referring to Sean Strickland's comment of 'not wanting a gay son because it'll end his bloodline and he wants grandchildren') on this part heavy emphasizing using karate chop motions of left hand, and head/face followed by prolonged eyebrow flashing which very likely emphasizing here too. IMO manipulative to reframe likes/dislikes as a political issues, when the purpose of a like/dislike is for viewers to rate based on VIDEO CONTENT/VIDEO PRESENTATION! Here I'll admit I got triggered because NOBODY SHOULD POLITICIZE THE RATIO OF LIKES/DISLIKES! Just not cool and unethical IMO. Okay, maybe for further context I'll add that video here, maybe do a mini body language analysis of that too, a miso analysis within this analysis beneath the video(miso is basically the opposite of meta, similar to micro): As stated, I will do this analysis of this video, but before that body language analysis of this video, I must preface first: IMO it's really fucking funny that this Shaun shouts that he 'LOVES THIS GUY!'(Sean Strickland) when to me Sean's a copycat of Donald Trump, who's not such a good male role modal for, so if a male person says that they love someone who's so bravado and machismo in behavior, says outlandish things to media to 'stick it up to them', then this alone gives me all the clues to this person's worldview, their Spiral Dynamics stages of development and values, their cognitive and moral development, their personality types/traits, their ego development and shadow aspects, their other lines of development in life and society domains, their ideological beliefs indoctrinated by cultural/societal programming, their self image and biases, and many other developmental factors. I've been a pundit and studied enough sociology, psychology, body language, and have a more open minded nature, and am more intuitive/emotional than rational to intuit this Scottish guy's characters flaws DEEPLY, In my beliefs, it's so twisted and ironic. However, it is what it is with this guy, and in his video descriptions you could reverse engineer his psychographics from his word choices and word values what he values and biases for. Another fake rationalist/objectivist fake agnostic when actually his far more conservative/traditional...maybe Neo Nazi if he likes Sean this much? Food for thought.

@Raze Smoking gun right there. If the man himself Donald Trump, who everyone in this forum hates, is saying Netanyahu was kinda suspect, that's the biggest piece of evidence of intent anywhere that Netanyahu was trying to manipulate Trump to be used against Iran.

@Ishanga I assume Lex Fridman looking up to Joe Rogan is for clout, but even more than that is Elon Musk, like for real??? You want to look up and role modal a billionaire narcissist who's right wing biased, and had a dysfunctional relationship with the father and potential mother? In fact I find it fascinating that Lex Fridman chooses to ban and silence those who ask about his father relationship or his family dynamics mentioned here, so similar to Elon Musk: And yes while I do IMO like and dislike Joe Rogan, he's like 56 years old trying to act like in his early 20's is a bit weird to me.

@Tech36363 Really? A politically correct Joe Rogan? I thought Lex Fridman, at that time looked up to Joe?

@The Renaissance Man That's good English, @Leo Gura was using a metaphor to compare my hatred for Lex Fridman to hatred for white bread. Also maybe has racial undertones and discrimination cuz why compare my hate to white bread? White bread, out of all other types of bread out there? Really???

@Leo Gura I expected a real, authentic robot.😪 JKs aside, This is a good point: I had in the past, putting aside strong language and hate opinions of Lex Fridman, I had an intuition or precognition that this guys...a bit iffy, just from his body language and tonality. Yet it's so perplexing to me that this guy got popular and stayed relevant for this long, for just associating hard with Elon Musk and Joe Rogan. Another important lesson here: If this guy got away with being popular despite the iffy, then professional scammers, con artists, swindlers, grifters, fraudsters, hustlers, liars, snake oil salesmen get away with WAY MORE! This situation makes me and reminds me to stay vigilant with deceptions of all kinds. Aside note I do like few bits of Lex Fridman, like how he at least looks professional and slow speech and listens to his guests a bit, but ain't a fan of his style overall outside of YouTube. That MIT is also fishy to me.

@Yog Actually dope music and rock in roll.

@Leo Gura Same with me, I like Chris Langan for his smarts but not his politics.