Danioover9000

Is Lex Fridman just a fake MIB lookin grifter? Why does he sound so slow and monotone and just bored with life, like he's suffering CBT? IMO decent roast of him. Man, I'm so high with my pettiness of him I'd drop a diss track on him, in a dark room retreat. I'm feeling inspired!!!😛

A more light hearted body language and tonality analysis, one of my favorite Youtubers who's also an entertaining hater. I will analyze in terms of discourse/presentation/framing, tonality/verbals, body language of facials/head/neck/shoulders/arms/hands/posture/legs, and word choice/statement analysis: Discourse/presentation: Verbal/tonality: Body language: Statements, word choices, words of power/value: Conclusions/summery:

@Twentyfirst Yeah, a strong defined border would've helped a bit, it's tricky especially when both sides are a bit guilty, and one is obviously more guilty, and both sides hate each other for so many hundreds of years.

@Carl-Richard My best guess from @Schizophonia's post here: Is that he's referring to psychological distancing from the mind, which is part of derealization/disassociation as a disorder, and also as a psychological state of mind. Easy example is the words 'rapist', and 'pedophile'. Almost NOBODY likes these labels due to heavy negative implications to one's self image, and the assumed behaviors and thinking patterns, which is why most mind slayers or scammers who want to defame and smear a person, just use these negative labels to create thought terminating cliche. Now what @Schizophonia could mean here is that when the self is deeply disassociated or de-realized, that psychological/mental space creates a lot more of those mental boxes where that ego can just funnel whatever negative ideas effecting it into another neat little box, and store it away out of conscious mind.

@kenway I'll be watching that UN later, as I'm watching the Ben Shapiro and Destiny debate. First impressions is the UN being the UN, and looks like they did some renovating of the place last time I remember. Good English speakers also.

Yes, Thank you new gen mods @Carl-Richard, @Thought Art, @OBEler, @Space, @Sincerity, @NoSelfSelf, @Osaid, @UnbornTao, @Bhavachakraand several more I don't know. Also thanks to old gen mods @Forestluv, @Nahm, @cactus, @Michael, and a few more I forgot. Even though a few times I head butted some of you, most of you were helpful and patient, and sometimes helped me in one way or another like locking threads and settling disputes. Also, self thanks to @Danioover9000 for also shadow mod for troublesome users who don't follow guidelines, and being a good sport. I and you lot need more flowers and smiles!💐🥰

I'll be doing a body language and tonality analysis of this verbal conflict in TYT:

Good example of verbal fighting:

@Twentyfirst What? Have I triggered you accidentally?

Interesting debate on Israel:

Also, the body language between the debaters is strange. Firstly Ben's is quite solid and confident, while Destiny just looks away for most times, as if he's attack Lex Fridman. Such a weird body language and posture to have for a debate, feels like to me Destiny is a bit insecure and faking his confidence, while Ben's a bit more sure and confident.

After several minutes in, both men are quite fast paced with their debating. Just that I disagree with Lex Fridman's framing that Destiny is the 'liberal' side, and Ben is the 'conservative' side. Fine with Ben being framed as the 'conservative side' although lately his mind's poisoned by the online space and online variations of tradcon, were I'd disagree a bit more is labeling Destiny as representative of 'liberals' when his entire 12 years of being an online gamer, streamer, political commentator and debate bro online debater, relies on him being a bit outrageous and play the online drama games with the online political spaces, and Destiny's survival and career solely relies on para socializing and online toxic dynamics. Plus, Destiny's a bit neurotypical and in the autism spectrum, so does this mean that most Liberals and Democrats are in the autism spectrum and neurotypical? I jighly doubt that. Also, based on Spiral Dynamics stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, 9 stages of ego development by Jane Loevinger, Carl Jung's shadow aspects and Architypes, Ken Wilbur's Integral Theory and other lines of development in life and societal domains, and ideological beliefs indoctrinated by culture and social programming, and information ecology we consume via social media like Tik Tok, Twitch, Kick, YouTube, Facebook and other social media sites, news from mainstream/alternative news, books, radios, tv shows, and other points of information manufactured by big tech companies, also biases and preferences per person. So far, IMO technologies that are digital, and funding for schools is THE BIGGEST ISSUE for education, which both arguers seems to just talk around in circles here. They haven't talked about how tech companies and digital technology is causing an increase in shorter attention span/more distractions from school tasks and homework, or increases in self entitlement and narcissism from automatic picture beautification, and many other corrosive effects from using too much digital technologies like phones, and computers. Good showcase of when two ideologies, two minds with differing metanarratives, propaganda, get ideological and argue back and forth. I just felt it's a misleading framing to say these two represent the majority of conservatives and liberals. No, one MASSIVELY represents the online variation of liberals and left wing ideology, while the other is about 50/50 with online right to real world conservative. Both are effected by technology and the corruption of the internet, misinformation campaigns. So so far IMO good back and forth, could've been interesting if Ben pins and attacks Destiny on the negative effects of the internet.

OMG! WTF?! Dude just STOP!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll listen to debate later with the two men I at least don't like lately. Maybe good debate? But Andrew Wilson from Crucible still stomps on these guys it's insane, on just arguing and debating Andrew is really solid, he'll make these two look soft AF!

@Girzo I don't like him either, but his roast is correct. What can I say? Lex Fridman just opens himself up to stuff like this:

@bebotalk The main problem is it's clearly a grift to me, and hypocrisy runs deep. Apparently if this video's research is true: And Lex Fridman bans and deletes user's messages asking about his father-son relationship, then why does Lex Fridman get the right to ask Daniel Schmachtenberger his father son relationship? Just because Daniel talks about his relationship, that Lex thought it's fine, yet Lex doesn't talk about his relationship with his Dad??? I call CAP, CAP, CAP!!! You have no right asking others of something you yourself BAN and delete user messages of! That's intellectually dishonest, double standards and kind of swindler to do. Also finish your MIT first before assuming public figure role.

Cringiest mile long star ever:

@Nivsch Is it always their problem, and never Israel's fault?

Another video of the SNEAKO and Mikey situation and drama, reactor shown decent body language and tonality, has his biases though: Honestly still IMO Mikey getting this triggered is not a good look for him, especially him being world champion 4 times in BJJ and some MMA. Proof that Accolades and trophies and accomplishments don't protect your ego from trolling. Your thoughts and opinions? How would you handle getting clowned on? Or if you're SNEAKO what would you do if Mikey ambushed you?

Another video of the SNEAKO and Mikey situation and drama, reactor shown decent body language and tonality, has his biases though: Honestly still IMO Mikey getting this triggered is not a good look for him, especially him being world champion 4 times in BJJ and some MMA. Proof that Accolades and trophies and accomplishments don't protect your ego from trolling.

Oh this is fun video. I'll be breaking down the body language, verbal, tonality, and discourse of this situation: prior context: Mind Smash YouTube Channel is about fight commentary and some martial arts breakdown, one of those soft types where he dabbles in react content, then fight commentary, or some breakdown analysis of fighting techniques. Here he's reacting and addressing this SNEAKO vs Mikey, and obviously will bias in favor for Mikey against SNEAKO. Start of this is in SNEAKO'S Streaming and Chat, where he belittles, mocks, and taunts Mikey, making fun of him being a nerd/geek, an autistic, like Mark Zuckerberg, and BJJ is for monkeys(IMO kinda agree, got a few laughs). So the following are clips of SNEAKO reacting to clips of Mikey: Body language: SNEAKO is likely more in performance mode, as a streamer and social media influencer role, but I do pick up on some mannerisms and micro expressions here and there. At 0:01 to 0:03 you see SNEAKO briefly scratch chin(likely just irritation) but when he heard 'Aoki lock' and Mikey describing his technique, quick eyebrow furrow to main screen, then to chat window(furrowing signifies frustration, or concentration/focusing, the mind trying to figure out and sort it's confusion) and SNEAKO says 'Jiujitsu is(jump cut here, in fact throughout many jump cuts of this short)for autistic people' and looks at chat. Here feels way more performative, and to provoke. Next, we see SEANKO give a quick smiled and a quick lip retraction, typically lip retraction is distress but also could mean withholding an opinion, then he gives his performative statements and voice mocks Mikey's nerd tonality. Repeats this again on the master and student line that Mikey was giving, brief smile then nervous laughter, laughter here that SNEAKO finds hilarious and unbelievable Mikey thinks of the master and student line, again very performative and demeaning Mikey's tone and nerdiness while using his right hand to illustrate this mock master and student relationship. Last 0:30 to 0:32 SNEAKO responding to a chatter saying Mikey would make you tap, to which SNEAKO responds with, after recovering from laughing and a big smile, 'he probably would' followed by shoulder shrugging his left shoulder and eyebrow flashing(feeling surprised, emphasis, or social approval/connection seeking, IMO likely felt surprise) which is also an 'epistemic shrug' meaning feelings of uncertainty and an 'I don't know', sometimes meaning dismissive and a 'I don't know much, nothing to add here to what you're saying chatter', but IMO this is him going 'I don't know the outcome of a boxing/wrestling match, probably would tap me out, probably, not feeling too certain about that' like this or could have been him shrugging in a 'it is what it is, nothing to add here of Mikey tapping me out in a wrestling match, you're probably right'. I believe it's the later because the second 'probably would' is SNEAKO shrugging again, but this time both shoulders shrug and his head lowers, not tilts low, but lowers, as if he's turtling, protecting his vulnerable neck in admitting that yes Mikey probably would tap me out followed by slight side tilt of head. I feel like the second repeat is his shoulders emphasizing this, Mikey's response, and body language: I generally felt Mikey's frustration and anger here is genuine, as you can see plenty of facial tensions, some eyebrow furrowing, some micro expressions of disgust, and eyebrow flashing here which IMO likely is emphasis on SNEAKO's bullying behavior. At 0:34 micro expression of disgust/revulsion towards SNEAKO/his behavior of bullying him. Baseline of him is when he emphasizes he uses some eyebrow flashing and almost like a head jut forwards here, maybe a micro chin jut. Also IMO, at the last 1:02 to :05 after his tense statements of SNEAKO being a boxer and Mikey being an MMA fighter/BJJ guy, and challenging SNEAKO to an MMA match we see a almost satisfied small smile, small grin, almost like a 'dubious delight' which to me is like a gloating or guilty pleasure of trapping SNEAKO, which IMO he subconsciously believes he got SNEAKO into his framing, but IMO Mikey is still caught under SNEAKO'S framing. Also, let Mikey be an example of achievements and trophies and pathos appealing as not enough to protect one from mockery and jokes and trolling.

This Levy guy's losing it. They should have trained their propagandists better so they don't do this:

Did cover this Levy guy, and may give some body language and tonality breakdown here:

@BlueOak This is a great post. Reminds me of the problems with BLM not having a centralized system and headquarters instead of decentralized throughput America. Just look at the funds they received from donations and fund me, the female leader split them to fund other LGBTQ groups, and a larger chunk on her private properties and family members, while a fraction just goes to black community it's supposed to represent and prioritized over the others and ANTIFA.

@Devin Interesting enough, Donald Trump's political strategy was like this before. Early on in the primaries he had charisma and made himself the more dominant man in there, but when it came time for presidential debate with Hillery he switched and toned down a bit to appear more calm and reasonable than her, still has some good retorts but he made himself appear a centrist and was thus able to win the presidency.

@StarStruck Seems fine to me, has his biases but he's realistic. Also I take offence to your issue with coke. Nothing wrong witb drinking the original Coke Cola in a glass bottle...😏