Danioover9000

@Francis777 I definitely agree, he's the epitome of mumble rap done right, with strategic intent that uses both modernism and post modernism, at least that's my feeling with Denzel Curry's catalog, it's deliberate chaos. It's just that because mumble rap, like most art forms that leans too post modernism, mumble rap as a genre is too abstract or too arbitrary and too liberal with lyrical patterns and even musical patterns that it gets a bad wrap for just gun bars and gang bars and money bitches lines or whatever. You could make a parody that's like mumble rap and it'll be mumble rap easy. Now here I disagree with Eminem's critique and diss of the whole mumble rap genre, like he one to talk when he MADE KAMIKAZE AND MUSIC TO BE MURDERED BY AS A DISS RESPONSE TO SOME CRITICS OF HIM! Or at least that's part of the motivation.🤣

And similar content and communities out there. Also Chat GPT 3 takes: What are some ethical issues with Reactors on YouTube? ChatGPT ChatGPT The term "Reactors" on YouTube typically refers to content creators who react to and provide commentary on various videos, music, memes, or other forms of media. While Reactors may not specifically relate to React.js or web development, there can still be ethical issues associated with their content and practices. Here are some potential ethical concerns with Reactors on YouTube: Copyright Infringement: Reactors often use copyrighted material in their videos without obtaining proper permission or licensing. This can raise ethical concerns about intellectual property rights and fair use, especially if Reactors profit from their videos through advertising or sponsorships. Exploitation and Appropriation: Reactors sometimes react to sensitive or controversial content without considering the impact on the original creators or subjects. This can lead to the exploitation or appropriation of someone else's work, experiences, or cultural heritage for entertainment purposes, which may be viewed as unethical. Lack of Attribution: Reactors may fail to provide proper attribution or credit to the creators of the content they are reacting to, leading to issues of plagiarism or misrepresentation. Ethical concerns arise when Reactors claim ownership or originality over content that is not their own. Misleading or Sensationalized Reactions: Some Reactors may exaggerate or manipulate their reactions for dramatic effect, potentially misleading their audience or distorting the original intent of the content they are reacting to. This can contribute to the spread of misinformation or reinforce negative stereotypes, which raises ethical questions about honesty and integrity. Privacy Violations: Reactors may inadvertently violate the privacy of individuals featured in the content they react to, especially if the original videos contain personal information or sensitive material. Ethical concerns arise when Reactors fail to obtain consent or respect the privacy rights of the people depicted in the videos they are reacting to. Monetization and Exploitation: Reactors often monetize their reaction videos through advertising, sponsorships, or merchandise sales. While it is legitimate for content creators to earn income from their work, ethical concerns arise when Reactors prioritize profit over the well-being of the original creators or the integrity of the content they are reacting to. Ethical Responsibility to Their Audience: Reactors have a responsibility to their audience to provide accurate information, thoughtful analysis, and respectful commentary. Ethical concerns arise when Reactors engage in harmful behaviors, promote offensive content, or contribute to online toxicity without considering the potential impact on their viewers. Overall, while Reactors on YouTube may entertain and engage audiences with their reactions and commentary, it is essential for them to adhere to ethical principles, respect the rights of content creators, and prioritize integrity, authenticity, and responsibility in their content and practices. How would you make the react community more ethical? ChatGPT ChatGPT Improving the ethics of the react community on YouTube involves several steps: Respect Copyright Laws: Reactors should ensure they have permission to use the content they're reacting to or adhere to fair use guidelines. This means obtaining permission from content creators or using content in a transformative way that adds significant commentary, criticism, or parody. Provide Value: Reactors should strive to add value to the content they react to by offering insightful commentary, analysis, or entertainment that enhances the viewer's experience beyond just watching the original content. Transparent Attribution: Reactors should always credit the original creators of the content they're reacting to, providing links or references to the original source whenever possible. This helps promote the original creators and ensures transparency with the audience. Authenticity: Reactors should aim to be genuine and authentic in their reactions, avoiding exaggerated or fake responses that mislead viewers. Authentic reactions build trust with the audience and contribute to a more positive and ethical community. Engage with the Community: Reactors should actively engage with their audience and the broader creator community, fostering constructive dialogue, collaboration, and mutual respect. This can help build a more supportive and ethical community culture. Educate Viewers: Reactors can educate their viewers about copyright laws, fair use principles, and ethical considerations in content creation. This helps raise awareness and encourages responsible behavior among both creators and viewers. Self-Regulation and Accountability: Reactors should hold themselves accountable for their actions and adhere to ethical standards, self-regulating their content and practices to ensure they align with ethical principles. By promoting transparency, respect for creators' rights, authenticity, and value-added content, the react community can become more ethical and contribute positively to the broader YouTube ecosystem. Collaboration between reactors, content creators, and viewers is key to fostering a culture of ethical behavior and mutual respect within the community. Great take by Chat GPT 3. Do you guys agree or disagree, or your thoughts?

Here's a nice example recently: A Reactor titling his diss track to Benzino using the words 'Clout Cobain' by Denzel Curry here: And Knox Hill for some reason or another chose not to give credit or mention that other music video. Is that an ethical issue here?

Here's another good example of what I mean. Disclaimer dark subject matter, maybe there's another version of this in YouTube but IMO hell of a masterpiece, got every element of Hip Hop down, and definitely an Emcee and should have been top 10 artists, definitely a GOAT: I definitely suggest the Vevo version for visual themes and metaphors, it's deep and hits the bigger picture of things covered in Actualized.org. Of course, a reactor called Knox Hill has proclaimed the title 'Clout Cobain' as his own, as a diss track to Benzino, with no mention or attribution to Denzel Curry, due to the drama between Eminem and Benzino dissing each other, and the drama between Benzino and Cliff Beats: I may have to make a thread to discuss this issue, it's just ridiculous on a moral and ethical level.

@Francis777 I actually agree with this, definitely some battle rappers could have harder hitting bars. For example, most don't know Lunar C, but here in the UK he's extremely vicious in the battle rap scene, extremely brutal with his bars and straight up curses at you, a IDGAF attitude through and through while clowning on a rapper. I can't even link him here cuz I'd definitely get a warning for very graphic violent lyrics!🤣

@Princess Arabia I agree, I have a similar take a feel towards Eminem at this point.

@Thought Art I agree, partly why Eminem's a GOAT is also the factor of him being a pop artist too, and knowing some good marketing as well. I was more focused on as a Rapper why he's GOAT. Also Kendrick I agree he'd be up there with say Little Wayne and Nas for me. So...who has the best verse on Forever? Eminem or Little Wayne?

@Francis777 That's a very good question, at least for me it'll have to be above a a7/10 because there are other albums I do prefer, and some songs not covered in Music To Be Murdered By. Obviously just IMO Revival is vile, like I get the message and it's good, but goofy features and goofy lyrics to music relationship, easily the weakest album in Eminem's catalog and he can't say anything about that, he can't even diss me about it cuz he knows I'm right, it's just meh and maybe it's meh because he wasn't taking meds or meth or whatever that allowed him to be Slim Shady.

@meta_male I definitely agree, on specifically the cadence switches, rap flow, especially word play, and good use of multisyllabic rhyme schemes he's great. Still don't understand his beef with Christopher Reeves or even Michael Jackson though, like WTF?!🤣 I also agree here, he can do accents and has good musical senses as well. Nice freestyle, similar to how I freestyle, albeit not as crisp or clean, sometimes off beat, I like to do it acapella, can definitely go crazy, and I do love his word plays and how he'll take it to any direction, just for me can't sustain a faster pacing to my freestyles.

@Nivsch Sure, but isn't the key difference in terms of morality and other lines of development, is the government and rulership of Israel compared to the government and rulership of local NYC government, up to the USA's government? It's clearly from Israel a bit more right wing than NYC or USA, at least with Zionism it's far more right wing in Israel's rulership than with NYC right? And this is just within government and rulership, not the general society of Israel to NYC, don't jump context.

A very interesting interview of Cashis, a rapper who diss track Benzino twice. Will do a body language analysis, tonality and discourse analysis of him as this interview is asking decent questions to get him to answer more frankly: Body language: Tonality:

A very interesting take:

@zazen Good explanation of Zionism. It's basically a call against the Israel alt right that demand a greater Israel.

Interesting take from the video: Are they good, bad, or is this part of a plan, between the USA/Russia hegemony fad lands?

@bebotalk True, and while I agree we may not know the EXACT degree of emotional state, we do FEEL the type of emotional state. For example, body language and tonality of people getting defensive and feeling anger would make you feel a little bit similar thanks to mirror neurons in the brain, and life experiences of seeing angry and frustrated people.

@bebotalk No wondr most of Europe and UK is depressing, and sometimes most faces are a bit hollowed around the cheeks. Sometimes Chinese face reading is right.

@UnbornTao But just like the Tao, balance is key. I also like direct communication, but too much truth too frankly, without good social proof, you may end up like Jesus Christ, or that very unpopular witch doctor who got out rhetoric by some demagogue more persuasive in story, communication and body language. And vice versa, being way too indirect, funny, witty, dramatic, and too entrapped into personalities, in body language and tonality, letting yourself lost in these details but overlook truth and authenticity, creates a 'fake it till you make it' or 'make believe like reality.', and in turn you lose yourself in too mucb socialization and otherness.

@Carl-Richard This is actually a decent list of good speakers on the similar listung, although the antonym listing needs further elaboration as those are also decent speakers. Naturally if you brought up Ben Shapiro, I'd also include Destiny. Hate to admit, Destiny is a good speaker and fast paced. My list would look something like this: 1. Bruce Lee(in his interview he speaks really good English). 2. Arnold Schwarzenegger(also good speaker, knows how to be motivational). 3. Bill Burr, also Rick Gervais(as comedians they have great social intelligence and know how to communicate and perform on stage, how to add drama and emotion, use of humor et ceters) 4. Guy who has pod saves america, at least decent speaking and clear. Also ex speech writer for Obama, another great speaker. 5. Alex Jones, Nick Fuentes, and Adolf Hitler(obviously for the speaking, don't kill me). 6. Andrew Wilson from the crucible(same in 5, but this guy deserveshis own number place. Great speaker and debater, solid body language, tonality and knows how to reframe arguments) 7. Eminem, and some lyricists and rappers, some. Common denominator for why the above are great speakers is at least social proof: body language, tonality, discourse, communication styles, personality, drama, humour style and so on. Also experiences and knowledge base for languages can be a factor.

@mojsterr OMG that's a cringe look. Why on earth Biden even thinks this is fine? Any other context it's a PR nightmare.

@Rafael Thundercat Like I said to @Thought Art, but reading it again it also looks a bit scammy, like a sales pitch from a Morman or some other persistent seller.

@Thought Art Seems to me that Youtuber is a classic example of new age thinking, alternative medicine and having Stage green values like the anti culture movement, environmentalism, Veganism, animal welfare and so on up to post modernism.

@OBEler I think it's good, although new to me it isn't as there's Oculus before. Personally gives me motion sickness so I won't buy. Agree with Leo has to be non apple and more democratised to others. Would be nice if they combined this with holographic technology too, just imagine scrolling through Tik Tok like feeds but holographic? Good bye freedom, hello digital prison.

@Twentyfirst Coolest Guru IMO. The only one with 100 something Rolls Royce, and a libary of about 150,000 books, just amazing!

Great conversation from Chat gbt3: https://chat.openai.com/c/527a8b15-1672-48a5-b5e6-4081884b97fc

@Vrubel Technically the PLO/Palestine was formed by the KGB from Russia, and with some help from both Britain and the USA Israel formed, therefore it's a proxy war on the grander scheme of things between Israel/Palestine, which is why I agree with OSHO here: I never tagged you, yet you felt the immature need to jump on in. Please behave yourself, I don't want to argue or fling personal attacks back, it's a bad look to Actualized.org. Please stop insulting me here and m.