Danioover9000

@Rafael Thundercat You merely guess I would like this? Lucky for you mortal, I find it very interesting! Thanks for the share, I already have intuitions about the negative effects of podcasts. And Leo, sorry you're not an authority here as you merely did 4 podcasts in total, one with the dating guy, one with Charlie from Charisma on command, and twice with Curt Jaimungal, and not to mention the later podcasts were making clips and highlights which IMO some aren't as favorable to you.. Clearly there's something fishy with how Joe Rogan and Lex Fridman and other modern podcasts are moving nowadays, influencing the culture in their own ways.

Interesting takes, what are your thoughts on this?

@Nilsi Yeah, he really is an honorable man, died for what he believes in.

Plenty of examples of maturity and immaturity here:

@Nilsi Of course because the majority of fans demographic that Eminem has is white suburban young males, some spoiled brats who think Eminem is the mainstream of what rap culture is.

@zazen I agree here. Definitely the political spectrum and political center of gravity in Israel has shifted to the right much more than the middle.

OH HO HO HO, Diss track season is here! Your thoughts? IMO Eminem really shouldn't be doing this, I mean the beef is so many decades ago, just let it go man. But then Benzino answered back: IMO nice thumbnail, symbolism of either Marcus Aurelius or a Greek philosopher, maybe a play on the naked emperor. However within is a skull of gold which to me means you dead is more valuable than alive, or you got severe heavy metal poisoning or something. Meh lyrics but that proof scheme was a heavy hit. Your thoughts? Finally, Benzino's 'Rap Elvis'... Sounds WAY BETTER! Especially the music, and the lyrics also have improved. Plus many references and IMO a solid diss track, damn Eminem may have to write seriously for this. ATM GG Benzino! Thoughts?

Lupe Fiasco gives a good lecture about rap in an MIT media lecture: Actually good to learn, and does have several overlaps here in Actualized.org. What do you guys think about it?

@Nivsch Simple, Ireland was conquered and subjugated first by Vikings, then by GB, and part of it fell under GB rulership, then the whole catholic vs Protestants. Long history of conflict there too, with generational trauma. They, just like South Africa, know what that's like when a people's is humiliated generational. Same 2ith Mongolia and the Russ.

@zazen That's true to a degree. Even in Scandinavia's or Sweden's history they have to be Vikings and do the slaving and pillaging first before they grow past all that. Very hard to be that one higher consciousness Viking when most of your clan's built a culture around all that, and took many wars and skirmishes, and organized religion to program that out of them.

@Nivsch Or it's difficult to sit on the fences when clearly in one situation one side is more wrong that the other? Also, how does one do themselves a dopamine message?

@rnd Oh, Russel Brand hasn't worn his sexy white dragonfly shirt, the one he used addressing the sexy allegations. Very curious...🤔

My goodness, after listening to Benzino's 'Arch Nemesis' album, YouTube auto played this album, what a banger!

'The greatest hatred and evil you could ever inflict upon those you dislike, is to completely ignore them, to deny their existence, and to boycott those you hate. Stop feeding the demons you hate with your precious attention and energy, and watch as those you despise die of starvation.'. Quote by Mystic.

@Vrubel So basically they're more right wing than NYC local government? Blind murderers of civilians?

@Leo Gura True, in fact when this guy said about Tucker's take in a BBC news video, and I paraphrase 'Almost no western journalist wants to interview Putin since the war' and he says well he and other wanted to interview him: That he may have forgotten that sometimes the BBC can send a pretty biased interviewer: good review and analysis: True, Actually found a good video about this, sort of debunking the 'facts don't care about your feelings.':

@Francis777 I definitely agree, he's the epitome of mumble rap done right, with strategic intent that uses both modernism and post modernism, at least that's my feeling with Denzel Curry's catalog, it's deliberate chaos. It's just that because mumble rap, like most art forms that leans too post modernism, mumble rap as a genre is too abstract or too arbitrary and too liberal with lyrical patterns and even musical patterns that it gets a bad wrap for just gun bars and gang bars and money bitches lines or whatever. You could make a parody that's like mumble rap and it'll be mumble rap easy. Now here I disagree with Eminem's critique and diss of the whole mumble rap genre, like he one to talk when he MADE KAMIKAZE AND MUSIC TO BE MURDERED BY AS A DISS RESPONSE TO SOME CRITICS OF HIM! Or at least that's part of the motivation.🤣

And similar content and communities out there. Also Chat GPT 3 takes: What are some ethical issues with Reactors on YouTube? ChatGPT ChatGPT The term "Reactors" on YouTube typically refers to content creators who react to and provide commentary on various videos, music, memes, or other forms of media. While Reactors may not specifically relate to React.js or web development, there can still be ethical issues associated with their content and practices. Here are some potential ethical concerns with Reactors on YouTube: Copyright Infringement: Reactors often use copyrighted material in their videos without obtaining proper permission or licensing. This can raise ethical concerns about intellectual property rights and fair use, especially if Reactors profit from their videos through advertising or sponsorships. Exploitation and Appropriation: Reactors sometimes react to sensitive or controversial content without considering the impact on the original creators or subjects. This can lead to the exploitation or appropriation of someone else's work, experiences, or cultural heritage for entertainment purposes, which may be viewed as unethical. Lack of Attribution: Reactors may fail to provide proper attribution or credit to the creators of the content they are reacting to, leading to issues of plagiarism or misrepresentation. Ethical concerns arise when Reactors claim ownership or originality over content that is not their own. Misleading or Sensationalized Reactions: Some Reactors may exaggerate or manipulate their reactions for dramatic effect, potentially misleading their audience or distorting the original intent of the content they are reacting to. This can contribute to the spread of misinformation or reinforce negative stereotypes, which raises ethical questions about honesty and integrity. Privacy Violations: Reactors may inadvertently violate the privacy of individuals featured in the content they react to, especially if the original videos contain personal information or sensitive material. Ethical concerns arise when Reactors fail to obtain consent or respect the privacy rights of the people depicted in the videos they are reacting to. Monetization and Exploitation: Reactors often monetize their reaction videos through advertising, sponsorships, or merchandise sales. While it is legitimate for content creators to earn income from their work, ethical concerns arise when Reactors prioritize profit over the well-being of the original creators or the integrity of the content they are reacting to. Ethical Responsibility to Their Audience: Reactors have a responsibility to their audience to provide accurate information, thoughtful analysis, and respectful commentary. Ethical concerns arise when Reactors engage in harmful behaviors, promote offensive content, or contribute to online toxicity without considering the potential impact on their viewers. Overall, while Reactors on YouTube may entertain and engage audiences with their reactions and commentary, it is essential for them to adhere to ethical principles, respect the rights of content creators, and prioritize integrity, authenticity, and responsibility in their content and practices. How would you make the react community more ethical? ChatGPT ChatGPT Improving the ethics of the react community on YouTube involves several steps: Respect Copyright Laws: Reactors should ensure they have permission to use the content they're reacting to or adhere to fair use guidelines. This means obtaining permission from content creators or using content in a transformative way that adds significant commentary, criticism, or parody. Provide Value: Reactors should strive to add value to the content they react to by offering insightful commentary, analysis, or entertainment that enhances the viewer's experience beyond just watching the original content. Transparent Attribution: Reactors should always credit the original creators of the content they're reacting to, providing links or references to the original source whenever possible. This helps promote the original creators and ensures transparency with the audience. Authenticity: Reactors should aim to be genuine and authentic in their reactions, avoiding exaggerated or fake responses that mislead viewers. Authentic reactions build trust with the audience and contribute to a more positive and ethical community. Engage with the Community: Reactors should actively engage with their audience and the broader creator community, fostering constructive dialogue, collaboration, and mutual respect. This can help build a more supportive and ethical community culture. Educate Viewers: Reactors can educate their viewers about copyright laws, fair use principles, and ethical considerations in content creation. This helps raise awareness and encourages responsible behavior among both creators and viewers. Self-Regulation and Accountability: Reactors should hold themselves accountable for their actions and adhere to ethical standards, self-regulating their content and practices to ensure they align with ethical principles. By promoting transparency, respect for creators' rights, authenticity, and value-added content, the react community can become more ethical and contribute positively to the broader YouTube ecosystem. Collaboration between reactors, content creators, and viewers is key to fostering a culture of ethical behavior and mutual respect within the community. Great take by Chat GPT 3. Do you guys agree or disagree, or your thoughts?

Here's a nice example recently: A Reactor titling his diss track to Benzino using the words 'Clout Cobain' by Denzel Curry here: And Knox Hill for some reason or another chose not to give credit or mention that other music video. Is that an ethical issue here?

Here's another good example of what I mean. Disclaimer dark subject matter, maybe there's another version of this in YouTube but IMO hell of a masterpiece, got every element of Hip Hop down, and definitely an Emcee and should have been top 10 artists, definitely a GOAT: I definitely suggest the Vevo version for visual themes and metaphors, it's deep and hits the bigger picture of things covered in Actualized.org. Of course, a reactor called Knox Hill has proclaimed the title 'Clout Cobain' as his own, as a diss track to Benzino, with no mention or attribution to Denzel Curry, due to the drama between Eminem and Benzino dissing each other, and the drama between Benzino and Cliff Beats: I may have to make a thread to discuss this issue, it's just ridiculous on a moral and ethical level.

@Francis777 I actually agree with this, definitely some battle rappers could have harder hitting bars. For example, most don't know Lunar C, but here in the UK he's extremely vicious in the battle rap scene, extremely brutal with his bars and straight up curses at you, a IDGAF attitude through and through while clowning on a rapper. I can't even link him here cuz I'd definitely get a warning for very graphic violent lyrics!🤣

@Princess Arabia I agree, I have a similar take a feel towards Eminem at this point.

@Thought Art I agree, partly why Eminem's a GOAT is also the factor of him being a pop artist too, and knowing some good marketing as well. I was more focused on as a Rapper why he's GOAT. Also Kendrick I agree he'd be up there with say Little Wayne and Nas for me. So...who has the best verse on Forever? Eminem or Little Wayne?

@Francis777 That's a very good question, at least for me it'll have to be above a a7/10 because there are other albums I do prefer, and some songs not covered in Music To Be Murdered By. Obviously just IMO Revival is vile, like I get the message and it's good, but goofy features and goofy lyrics to music relationship, easily the weakest album in Eminem's catalog and he can't say anything about that, he can't even diss me about it cuz he knows I'm right, it's just meh and maybe it's meh because he wasn't taking meds or meth or whatever that allowed him to be Slim Shady.

@meta_male I definitely agree, on specifically the cadence switches, rap flow, especially word play, and good use of multisyllabic rhyme schemes he's great. Still don't understand his beef with Christopher Reeves or even Michael Jackson though, like WTF?!🤣 I also agree here, he can do accents and has good musical senses as well. Nice freestyle, similar to how I freestyle, albeit not as crisp or clean, sometimes off beat, I like to do it acapella, can definitely go crazy, and I do love his word plays and how he'll take it to any direction, just for me can't sustain a faster pacing to my freestyles.