Danioover9000

@BipolarGrowth You could also include the act of saving the victim as a selfish act as well. Instead of the motive being that you are god or out of compassion, instead the more seflish motive is because you have been training in the gym, or martial arts, and saving is justification for all the training you did finally, the struggles were worth it. Or to be seen as a heroic person, like in a movie, and get back than manly feeling you lost. Or to hook up with the hot chick, because, well, you payed the guy earlier to attack the woman, to create that situation in the first place for her to see you in an empowering light, a very dependable partner in the future. And so on.

@Danioover9000 Also, this man's content is pretty good for physiological health of the body. At times I'm reminded of people who do taichi, and seeing his movements they are nicely flowing. If most people are like this, then there would be less need to instigate conflicts with each other. Less need to fight physically, and less need for people to argue and bicker.

@Paul5480 I remember this guy. He was talking shit to one of the pigs he owns, feeding it a fish carcas, and making a speach about how people are like this pig, so switch to eating fruits. For a supposed 'sage', I guess the behaviour is fitting. The wild pig on the other hand is just being, enjoying chomping on some meat. I wonder what it thinks and feels if it understood the owner's attitude to it? Also, it's actually not massive, for a Hawaii wild pig.

@anxious_turtle She communicates usually by either touching the plant, patting it, smelling, and looking. At least this is how it seems to me. Mushrooms she communicates the same, and to her they are more different than flowers or other veggies and fruits she interacts with, when I'm around or while I'm busy and unavailable for play. Her favourite movies are Avatar and Jurassic park. She also likes b rated movies and sometimes movies that are bad yet entertaining, like Sharktopus and Velocipreacher. Depending on mood, what movies she watches would change as well. She thinks that humans killing each other, or for food, is a basic thing for humans to be in, living in the physical. Plus, they are a weird bunch. If she had to survive, she'd piggy back on me to help her survival. Generally, she doesn't have deep thoughts about people, other than me, and also she wouldn't mind being a human if it means she'd spend more time with me. Otherwise, she's not interested. Her favourite games tend to be colourful and platform, like Mario or Super metroid. She also tends to like the first games if those games are a series, as to her the first games are higher quality and more creative than the other releases. She also borrows some of my memories of video games I've played. She sometimes likes board games, as long as she could take breaks frequently to do other things as she feels bored quicker than me. The majority of physical objects and other creatures don't scare her much, as they just pass through her. Losing me, or fading away, is probably her main fears. Other fears are shared by me, so if I see a spider, or a bee flying past me, the feeling of fear I feel she feels similarly.

@Willie This is useful information to some extent, for letting go of hurt for being falsely accused, negative feelings like vengefulness, and for the thought stories that maintain a victim mentality, in either case. However, this should not be the only method used. There are many ways other than forgiveness and letting go that can address specific features of this problem, and other methods that could go deeper into the problem, resolve it at it's roots.

@Bogdan My main point is that an elimination diet solves the problem temporarily. Temporarily. It provides some relief. That is much better than being in agonizing pain. This does not mean being in carnivore diet for your whole life. Leo is doing this temporarily. Dog analogy is bullshit, sorry. Humans have selectively bred wolves with traits desirable for humans to utilize, hence we have dogs. I get your point, that if you had your way, humanity would be so much simpler to understand. That is not the case. Humans are complex bull shitting animals. Have you considered that Leo has tried Gojiman's approach, and the treatment didn't work, and out of not causing you stress and depression, that he decided to not explicitly say otherwise, to not hurt your ego?

@Jacob Morres I do agree that both sides, the accused and the accuser(s), need to be heard, in court. There can be too much faith put into believing the ones doing the accusing, vs believing the accused side. Or sometime the other way around. We could implement changes in court proceedings, from gathering poofs and evidence for each side, to include lie detector tests as valid piece of evidence, to consider body language analyses as valid evidence in trail. We could also consider recorded video tapes, text messages, online posts, emails, letters, and any recordings, digital or analogue, as relevant pieces of evidence in the case of proving either the truthfulness or untruthfulness of the accusation in question. Let's not forget that eye witness testimony, expert testimonies, and recordings from interrogation can count in the trail. However, there are challenges in implementing each change. When it comes to using lie detector tests as valid proof of truth, in proving the accuser was lying, or the defendant was lying, is not 100% full proof evidence. For example, the procedure in conducting the lie detector test is not in controlled settings, like the subject was under duress by one of the detectives, or the specialist operating the machine, which could influence the recording. Also, first few questions either fail to establish baseline, or some questions were open ended, or assume certainty, that could influence the subject's physiological reactions. Prior to conducting the lie detector test, the subject might be stressed beforehand. It is therefore important that if this is considered valid to be used as evidence, that the procedure is conducted properly such that it would not be ruled as invalid evidence to be used by either the accused or the accuser. Also, body language analysis, will it may have approximately a 75% chance of proving likelihood of proving truthfulness or deception in either subjects responses to questions, the remaining 25% of uncertainty could leave room for errors and doubt that either lawyer could use to prove their case. For example, if there was trauma that resulted, either in actual rape, then the subconscious signals in the body, from the face, to the arms, to breathing, hand gestures, muscle tensions in responses, quality of voice, and general positioning of the legs and feet, while sitting or standing, in context of being in trial, could only be considered maximumly as likelihood of trauma that a lawyer could argue, from deeper probing into the accuser's personal history, that likely resulted from child abuse rather than from the rape in question. There's also the case that body language analysis is highly context sensitive, and still open to some degree of interpretation, such that if there was rape, and if the experience was intense, then the general state the accuser would be in, let's say states of apathy like depression, solitude or defeat, as the new normal state their consciousness would be in. This leads to many more variables that complicate body language analysis, such that the signals might be misinterpreted as deception. Another issue is considering the range of evidence that is valid evidence to be used in body language analysis in proving or disproving the claims of rape, If there were 100 hours of footage, voice call recordings (for vocal analysis), and prior interview and interrogation footage, would this be considered valid instead of the other 10,000 hours of footage, and other pieces of recordings? Should we also consider Chinese face reading as a valid form of evidence to be used? While body language analysis has promising potential, it's more open to misinterpretation. Also, we could use forensic pieces of evidence as a valid way of proving guilt or innocence, from photos taken in physical examinations , to DNA tests. These are more commonly used and does have a higher percentage of proving or disproving a case. However, these pieces of evidence can be subject to recontextualization. For example, DNA test can prove that the accused is the one that had sexual intercourse with the victim in question, this does not exactly prove rape. The lawyer could argue that the accuser is known to be promiscuous, prone to having one night stands. Or there was already intimacy in the relationship between the accused. Or that both are known, from witness testimonies to recordings, to roleplay in rape scenarios as their way of having a different sexual intercourse, and have written consent, or vocal consent. The photos taken also suffer from changes in context. The accuser could have inflicted self injuries, or hired somebody to inflict injuries, then file a report of sexual abuse. Regarding witness testimonies, we also have to be careful as well. For example, if there's incentive for a favorable outcome, then the prosecution, or defense, or corrupt police could pay people to come forward, to favor the accused or the accuser.

@Opo You can still take action while in a state of apathy. Clearly the long term solution is to hire guys like this to train cops.

@Willie I highly doubt the legitimacy, and the timing of such a report.

@Origins Do you have any proof of this? Otherwise, it's just conspiracy.

@Opo That's right. A person whose state is commonly apathy will treatvthe situation as a typical one. Derek looking down, and around after shows me that this is normal for him. While states and emotions related to apathy have their proper place and use, this is the one that does more harm than good. Or Derek is a psychopath. I don't think it's accurate to say he's racist, because you'd have to care about that difference in race. Psychopaths don't care for the most part, unless it effects their image to others, as this quite a large frame of reference for the psychopath to lose, like he'd pretend to be racist in a racist group to maintain membership.

@neutralempty You have know idea how much pain Leo is in when he's diet was mostly plant baesd. If the carnivore diet offers him some relief, he has every right to pursue the diet short term. If the carnivore diet, by your logic, is causing him pain in his gut, then he would be in so much pain he couldn't make that blog video throughout, and would have said so. What Leo is going through is a good example that human bodies are different and integrate foods differently. I happy that he's found some temporary relief from this, and hope this new approach to his elimination diet will heal him fully.

@Bogdan Is all your research only videos?

If the carnivore diet is working for Leo, then it's working for Leo. I don't see why Vegans need to be triggered over this. Leo himself said it's temporary, and will be introducing vegetables and fruits slowly, eliminating types that flare his conditionz and keeps the ones that don't. Is it just because people who are short to long term vegans have weaker egoes?

@krockerman So, you're taking an agnostic position to the issue of false accusations? If so, which side are you more leaning to, the falsely accused, or the accusor? Firstly, rape is a disgusting act of crime, yet I disagree on this being the most horrific because there are far more damaging crimes than rape, for example child murders that leave traumatized families, kidnapping and torture, and also crimes that scale to groups such as genocide, pyramid schemes that wipe out life savings and cult like dynamics. Secondly, this sounds like you are leaning more on men being falsely accused, and that women are more to blame for tuis. Is this a correct assumption on my part? If this is true, then you can't Maintain your agnostic position. If this is not true, then why do you put more blame on woman for false accusations? Do you have the link that shows the statistics on men falsely accused of rape?

@Tetcher I gotten that impression as well, seeing him kneel on his neck like it's a typical day for him, very much apathy. The problem with Crowder is that this was not his main intent, to accurately show how to properly retrain someone on the prone position because if this was his main intent he would be more controlling and directing the guy acting as the police to apply his knee on his neck exactly like the photo. Also have other people take notes. He would be more serious with this and test it out more properly. Otherwise, why would the demo be done poorly? Maybe it's because Crowder wants to appeal to racists and extremists of the alt right as the main goal of this demo? If he really wanted to assess this, then he should go to this guy for the demo of properly restraining somebody on prone position.

@Tetcher Steve Crowders's assessment of George Floyds death and situation is impartial and at best lazy. He should have gone to this person to help him test out his theory. This man knows how to properly retrain individuals resisting an arrest, and would properly provide a more accurate assessment of the situation with George Floyd's death, and show Crowder proper application of force. Might as well have this person training police as well. Fantastic demonstration of restraints. He's also a pretty good practitioner of russian systema and other systems of combat.

@Parththakkar12 I would say it depends on who is more persuasive, the accused or the accusor. If either one has greater status, money, and communication skill, the higher one tends to control how they are perceived in public, and the lower one tends to not be viewed favorable in the public eye. To some extent, we do have case studies and developments in psychology that understand why the false accusations occur. For example, sociopathy now is a spectrum, that is exhibited both in men and women, and that women who have innate sociopathic traits are more likely to falsely accuse anyone and blame anything but themselves, which also means they can falsely accuse their partners of rape. Similarly, women who are psychopaths are more effective at exploiting other men and women due to them having to study human behaviour far more to make up for their lower emotional intelligence. Like sociopathy, psychopathy has degrees as well, and both are also influenced by outside factors as well. The main issue is that there's not that much incentives for court systems to have harsher sentences of false accusation relative to the crime the person is falsely accused of.

@Emerald I will address your points, as you were quoting my post to another user I addressed, not you. You are initiating this exchange with me, so I'll respond and clarify once. I'm speaking about some men who are falsely accused of raping a woman, and having to deal with repercussions of such allegations on their family and community, and I'm not speaking for all men, or for guilty men, only for the small percentage who are later proven to be innocent after years of jail time, and some won't have decent lives later on. I'm not speaking about all women who come forward, to then be accused of the crime of false accusation. The point of that post is to get him to imagine what it's like dealing with a false accusation hanging over your head for others to see, so I see no reason why you needed to interject here in our dialogue. Your second point about a community preferring one narrative over the other is irrelevant, because I don't know what community you are referring to, in which country, in which culture, in which society, and the epistemic framework of which legal system applies. This is left too ambiguous that I can't properly provide a response, and also this point is misaligned with my dialogue with that other user, and my position that some men are falsely accused. I'm well aware that cultures, societies and communities shape individuals and laws enforced, and that there are differences from country to country, culture to culture, so I see no reason why you should lump me with sexists and misogynistic users here, and no reason why you belittle my understanding, when I'm only focused on the small percentage of men falsely accused of rape, by a lying woman. Why do I have to understand that ALL women who come forward will get falsely accused of the crime of false accusation, when I'm in dialogue with another user about the small percentage of men who are falsely accused of the crime of rape, coming from one woman lying and taking advantage of social movements like Metoo and feminism? You see, my main gripe is localized only to the few women that take advantage of social movements to snare a guy, and take away half or more of his property and money regardless of lasting damages and repercussions to family and community. The topics on political issues are seperate to the false rape problem here, but I will comment and say that political movements like metoo and feminism are great to have for women. I have no gripe over such movements, only to the relevant issue for me: that a guy gets falsely accused of the crime of rape, by a lying woman. My main issue is not how all or most men get falsely accused by all or most women. Don't frame me as a misogynist generalizing, I'm focused on the cases that are relevant to being falsely accused of a crime you didn't commit, and having to deal with later social ramifications of such misjudgment by court systems. How does society compensate for victims of false accusations? I'm not addressing this rock analogy because I made myself clear above, as it's not aligned with my position that a small percentage of men are being falsely accused of the crime of rape by a few women. The main issue is an innocent man having to deal with a false accusation and stigma over his head, jail time, and harder living in a community that views you and people related to you as vile, when it's in fact not true and is a lie. The issue is not about rocks, and comparing risk factors between men and women. I repeat, the main issue is that a small percentage of men are being falsely accused of the crime of rape by women who are lying. In conclusion, I can't speak for other male users here about their positions on the topic of false accusation by a woman onto a man, either for monetary gain or selfish motives. The aim of my position, and the thread, is about solving the problem of flalse accusations, and answering the kew question: How does a society handle false accusations, and compensate victims of such false allegations? However, you seem to lump me with such types of people like sexists and misogynists, and assume without any substantial proof things about my character you don't know. How is this any different from lyers that falsely accuses a person for crimes they did not commit? Please be mindful of such presumptions. For example, I'm also assuming things about you in regards to your interjection between me and another user, which could alsk be false or true, so from those I've decided to not continue future dialogues involving you. I hope you also assume you do the same to me, to not involve me in discussions with little substance, and to not frame me in a bad light. Have a good day.

@Gesundheit Unless I'm mistaken, but this is one example. There are far worse ones that can't be posted.

@Gesundheit Ok, the culture shapes societal views of men and women. So, what if the guy got accused of rape, gets jailed for 20 years, and is found out to be innocent? How does that society help this man transition back into life in one of it's communities? He was falsely accused, found innocent, but spent 20 years in jail.

@The0Self This is getting closer to the main issue! Great, now where do we go from here?

@Gesundheit The maun question then, is how do we sort out the false accusation from ones that are genuine? How does society handle false accusations? None of the other topics, just what does it take to stop the fales rape problem?

@Parththakkar12 The False Rape Problem. Can I get a cookie?