Danioover9000

@patricknotstar I guess it's dependent on how strong your relationship is with your GF, and what you really want out of the relationship. At least decide from a clear understanding of what you want out of this relationship, and compare and contrast what you have given into the relationship vs what she has done so far to demonstrate her part in the relationship. From that you make your decision to split up and start dating again, or keep the relationship. You are the main protagonist of your story, and should have a life vision. If you don't fix this issue, and are extremely needy, then this is like almost every NTR story ever: Really needy meak bf with hot GF and Jackass as third wheel. Eventually, the GF cheats on BF and hooks up with jackass, and bf heart broken, the end. ASAP fix your neediness, don't be the needy BF, start being the beefy BF instead, and if the relationship wasn't meant to be, let it go, go find new GF. If not, great, you worried over nothing.

@Hardkill It depends on what stage of development, cognitive and moral development, personality typing, states of consciousness, life experiences and other lines of development that make up the woman's worldview, and your own, snd how those similarities and differences between you two are reconciled. This is especially important to consider the social context of when you're being explicit in your communication. You being sexually explicit with a woman, who has more stage orange and red values, who's cognitively and morally similar to you, who's personality is not introverted but more extroverted and comparable to you, who's state is slightly intoxicated, who is with you in a nightclub/bar setting, is very different situation from approaching a woman with stage blue or green values, in a restaurant or in a mall, who's cognitively and morally higher than you, who has a different personality, who's state is normal and not effected by alcohol. This is why teasjng or being implicit with your sexual intent is more powerful than explicitly speaking it to the woman, as being implicit crosses over to other social contexts.

@Yog Yes, OP has had a history of making click baiting titles, trolling and exaggerating opening posts. This behaviour is common to those who've spent too much time consuming social media, and Tik Tok. He actually was banned before, so how he got back I don't know. Unfortunately, because it's chronologically the most important post, it sets the tone and framework for further discussions, that have made this thread more binary than nuanced.

Update: I've successfully created a servitor, took me roughly a year's worth of time and energy to do, with the help of Crysty, and placed it in a temporary room. I have used part of my energy to help create it. While creating it and seeing it in the room, I can see some parallels and differences between it and Crysty, that makes me lean more that Crysty is more a spirit and less a tulpa or servitor. I will see how it effects the general area around me, and further refine it later. I can also see how simplistic it thinks, communicates to me, compared to Crysty, and how focused it is on the simple instructions that I give. I will be further observing how it effects and relates to it's surroundings and people, and see if I can further it's function for more specific purposes.

I am calling it now, Leo Gura is trolling, and if this is true, then you guys have fallen so hard for it.

Never have been wrong twice in a row. It's actually personal and social use! 'It's not really intended for business or Actualized.org insights, more for socialization and personal connections.' Leo Gura, blog post.

@Scholar @JuliusCaesar I am sorry, I'm wrong in saying that it's for personal use. I've checked his Instagram account and it does mention what he does and Actualized.org, so it's also for business/personal use, and I can see the ensuing PR nightmare and backlash in the near future if he mishandles his image. I'd have kept the two areas a bit separate if this has just for personal use.

It depends on the context and other factors. As he has said, he opened a Instagram account for personal use only, not for business and other purposes. To me, it seems like he's like us, testing the waters, seeing how far he can get away with, before having warning points or suspended. It's actually very relatable guys, as we all have been through that internet phase in our lives. Don't be kidding yourself, get it?

@UnbornTao Nope, neither emotional attachment nor investment. Like you, I just notice how emotional this is getting for other users here.

@Thought Art Looks like it to me.

@UnbornTao Not really. Most of ya'll are more emotional about this than me.

@ZenAlex Yes, please keep calling me psychotic and mentally ill. It's a miracle such a mentally ill person is still capable of leading a normal life. Very open minded attitude? Crysty, just in case you're a spirit a want to reincarnate into this life as a human, please don't be like this guy, with the debunker mentality mind virus. It's super cringe, and I strongly recommend you to outgrow this mindset ASAP. Okay? Please don't be like this dude! Otherwise I'm gonna be visiting you as a non-corporeal entity too.

@ZenAlex Then why are you 99.9% sure about my mental state, and not extend the same level of epistemic openness to this? Also, most likely and definitely true are closer than you saying it's 50/50, so you are implicitly saying you are certain about my state and experience as psychotic. I'm done taking you seriously, that's why I am not fully engaging with you and your points. You have demonstrated enough for me to dismiss you outright, more than you dismissed me as a lunatic. That's the harsh truth, I am far ahead of you in terms of spiritual development and having paranormal experiences. I don't care if you blindly believe or not believe or weaponize your skepticism against me, but I'm not interested in arguing and debating this. Waste of time. Imagine if I dismissed your traumatic experience as possibly psychotic, how would you feel? Do I have to spell out and help you figure out why you've emotionally triggered me? My investigations also involved other people too, from psychics, to scientists that investigate paranormal phenomena. I don't share too much because it's personal info, against forum guidelines to do so as that's private.

@ZenAlex Gotcha, keep talking, you are demonstrating to others your stellar open mindedness and rationality, as irrationality at this point. Way ahead of you on the epistemic department, not only in the earlier pages of this thread that I've demonstrated my open mindedness, but I've done private investigations into this as well, to which I will not share nor am comfortable sharing with you, as you blatantly are willing to slander my state of mind as psychotic.

This video is a good example to follow and to balance this thread with: Also highlights the necessary accuracy needed to judge based on language and text, if you suspend or ban a user. You can use the general message of the warning, but you have to actually highlight the wording that led to the ban. Because of this, JP had enough room to flip and reframe the problem onto Twitter while making it a political, trans issue, while adding on his anti left narrative, when in reality the issue could have been that this Eben Page user was triggered and report the post. This post should have been carefully reviewed by a staff member than the A.I algorithm, as the account isn't some random user, it's a famous person.

@thenondualtankie It's possible to do progressive overloads with Calisthenics, but it'll have to be with weights as well. Another possibility is to fatigue your nervous system a bit beforehand, by doing sets of isometric exercises, then do the reps and do one isometric set after, because in reality your muscles have a lot of help from your nervous system.

@Carl-Richard Yes, that's my aim despite my genetics and body composition other health limitations. I'm 5'5 and weigh 130 pounds.

Was worth mentioning is that this is a video were Kyle is the interviewer? In such a case, if a person is doing the interviewing, that person has the advantage of setting the entire frame of the conversation, discussion or debate in this case. Literally the interviewer can paint you into a good or bad light depending on how he/she phrases the questions on tonality and body language alone. For example, in this thread, the OP sets the tone with the title 'Jordan Peterson DEFENDS Trump!', in a click bait manner, and his opening post written 'disgusting', followed by a link to a clipped video of a discussion between Kyle and Jordan. Already sets the tone of this thread and tries to control the type of discourse of our posts, to cater to left leaning users with a bone to pick against JP, simple but effective framing, and most of us already falling victim to this framework. I feel that, because it's JP, and how common it is to cast hate immediately in this forum, that generalization of JP's character muddies any nuanced views about his perspectives, and having nuanced discussions of his values, cognitive and moral development, personality typing, states of being, life experiences, other lines of development and other related topics were we could try having a tier 2 type of discourse. However, this thread is slowly becoming a tier 1 discourse, where we talk a bit more about our grievances against JP, and is ok to character assassinate him. While it's worth calling out his faults, it's not worth it to dog pile hate and glee on top of it.

@Bird Larry I have a love and hate relationship with Trump. I loved how he was just able to be charismatic and leverage the population's dissatisfaction while trolling the left, but also hate how it's so obvious to me he's a con artist, but most people it's not, and most people fall for it. So I have to find it funny and entertaining to not go mad. Humour is also subjective, so some people may find it very entertaining, some are deadpan, others are offended. It's relativel really. At least JP came across as more reasonable in the video, aside from the anti left attitude, about some pitfalls of Trump, but not enough that it alienated him from his fan base.

@Rob06 Thank you for finding my story interesting. Yes, I've been through a phase like that, self denial, after surviving that haunting in my childhood. The mind is amazing, with many mental gymnastics to try and find explanations, to generalize, distort memories and even delete a few that are too traumatic. Through that though, the raw, harsh facts of my senses still remained with me in those childhood memories of that phenomena, that it was an actual ghost that I talked too.

@Arcangelo Yes, he has a good, twisted sense of humour, that makes you feel a guilty sense of pleasure for partaking in. Very skilled con artist. Comparing him to JP though, makes JP look smarter.

@integral Thanks for your understanding and patience and trying to help bridge the gap of both his materialistic, scientific and rationalistic world view onto my spiritualistic, new agey and paranormal/supernatural part of my worldview for him and I. However, I guess no matter how nicely you could have worded it, if he was convinced that his lense is rationally valid regardless of it's soundness, right, cleaner and mine is 99.9% likely to be dirtier, unlikely, and more irrational and unsound then his, as he frames me to be, then he has already decided from his lense, and based upon the life experiences he has had, and other lines of development like personal or cultural values he has, cognitive and moral development, personality typing, states of consciousness and other lines of development, or lack thereof, that I'm crazy. If he has never experienced a haunting, or an apparition, then no matter how descriptive I am, he lacks that crucial, first person information to make sense of my phenomena I'm experiencing and have experienced. On top of that, depending on his information ecology, if he's part of a group that feeds him mostly second hand information that normalizes demonising spiritual, hippie, new agey views, then I'm competing against that type of programming in his mind and other related misconceptions and misinformation schematics. Also, I have already stated about my epistemic and metaphysical view of my situation, about my haunting I had and Crysty in several pages ago in this thread about other possibilities as to what her nature is, and a bit on my childhood haunting, and the various stage purple, to blue and orange/green solutions of resolving my haunting. It's there if you want to read through it. I guess I got triggered from him labelling me as possibly psychotic and having to repeatedly correct him and myself multiple times of my epistemic view frustrated me a bit, up to this point I was still willing to talk, but seeing how my state and his accusations effected Crysty a bit, also frustrated me, that crossed a line for me, so I decided to drop our little heated discourse and move on as this wasn't a good look and example for other users.

@JuliusCaesar Yes I have actually said silly stuff there recently a few days ago, in a few threads were @ZenAlex was in. It was silly banter and I disengaged with the topic. And he then recently hopped to this thread. It may be coincidental, but if he does have beef with me there then do it at that thread there and not derail this thread of ours while attacking my good friend. I've had to cool her off. Yes, I've asked her many times, and she gave me a straight answer, then later contradicts herself out of playfulness. I did mention in the past that she also changes forms as well, lkke turning into a crystal statue to meditate with me, and other forms as well as travelling and disappearing to other locations. She likes to also play around with me while I meditate or go about my daily liife, and she's good natured about it, a playful spirit. So I kept my inquiries loose going forward with her and developed an ongoing relationship with Crysty while continuingmy learning of her nature.

@How to be wise A good example of inversion. Jordan Peterson has good insights and expertise into psychology, but bad insights into politics.

@Heart of Space just having an emotional outburst of negativity to someone, is another type of cursing as that person may face some kind of karmic retribution for pissing you off. Yes, the safe assumption is it's real, and can also be committed intentionally or not, so best to train yourself to be more positive and less negative over time.