Danioover9000

True.

Interesting video

@Someone here Why so many questions? Are you thirsty for a quest of knowledge, or to quench one's need for leggings, horny conquest? Hard to comprehend, that every bend and ends you go, every moral, is relative to every mortal? Morbid, I know, to consider, that morals are relative than absolute. The morals of a creature alien stage beige, to tribes like the Viking stage purple/red, Native Americans stage purple to red, businesses like hip hop industry and oil to tabaco industries staged orange and some blue, hippie communes, SJWs, leftie leaners, a pinch of orange to a dollop of stage green, guaranteed to make you leap to the greener side of the fence. Meanwhile, Star Trek's stage yellow space systems quite complex, until we discover an alien intelligent hive mind hybrid artificial intelligence, stage turquoise and beyond maybe. I know, so many colors, it's insane this rainbow array of morals like the coral reefs of old, so much so, that these moray eels rather prefer their muralled enclaves as the best for the whole coral reef system, to the death, good grief, ignoring the glaring hole of their whole mental prism they call home. Rather champion their standards, blind bastards, with their double standards and banters making even lib-tards pleasant like strawberry tarts! Technically, historically absolutist morality originally started in every birth and growth of empires/civilizations, to bind their peoples together some more, to bid farewell to older systems that don't work anymore to forward survival agendas way better than before, while keeping the pleasing aspects of those past systems be. So, what would it take, to make these moral nihilists wake up from their denial? Drag a fishing net, by a mile, for a while? Or maybe do a bit of sea mining? How would we develop from my/our morals to higher more inclusive morals? How many mourns of other morals do we need to suffer more? Until we survive the transformation of the globe, as our one true home? Or are we really alone? I don't know, so, we gotta shoulder on forward, warding off evil as we go.

@JTL Amazing, either it's a real image or a deep fake image.

@ArcticGong Fantastic example of someone who felt empowered to talk shit when an important person dies. Again, choose: to attack the royal family, or the Queen? Either one I recommend you make a thread and go crazy with it.

@Silodium That's nice!

@Someone here Yes, you can, although that means you have to be good with the contradictions you encounter in yourself. However, as soon as other people are around you, in practice it's going to be difficult, and you might wish that there are enforced ethics and morals for how those people behave around you.

@Sugarcoat I completely agree, I was lucky to have discovered athleanx and elliot hulse, and did some of their mobility and stretching routines beofre and after lifting heavy weights. I can thrust up 250 pounds above my head, and still be flexible enough to put both my hands and elbows behind my ears. I also suggest way more static training than dynamic training, as it's more common to damage your joints or ligaments or pull a muscle when doing dynamic training.

This statement is true, and this statement is false.

It's an exception to the rule though, despite how inspiring that is.

???

While the professor could have had a point, the way it was presented was very untactful, and makes stage green look unhinged. Is this the new standard for society? I hope not, as this gives all the excuses to shut down stage green even further.

@Vrubel That's true to some extent. You can't have a dry state at all. Nobody in the commons is built for a solitary boring life, there needs to be some distractions or else society wouldn't function as smoothly. You need sentimentality or almost all of that society would be harming itself.

Feel free to share yours, and your thoughts on why. I think this one by Destiny is great, as it shows so many rhetorical tricks and mental stamina to keep on debating like this:

I don't like Jeff Bazos, but this is an article of him tweeting, and getting roasted apparently: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjl4cTN34j6AhX6SkEAHc93BfAQFnoECAcQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.independent.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworld%2Famericas%2Fjeff-bezos-under-fire-after-tweet-about-queen-s-b2163071.html&usg=AOvVaw1wKeNBGUZ_ILoPk2WuLejk As if that's gonna do anything to a multi billionaire man?

@D2sage That's the sacrifice you got to pay, for trying to lead a very successful millionaire like life, working away in some room, allocating most of your time and energy into projects. For example, I am not at celebrity level fame, I am reasonably famous, but the process of writing my stories, creating my backgrounds and sprites, finding the right music, and especially coding my Visual Novels, while doing my comic books, and on top of that doing my business and marketing stuff for my projects, takes so much time and energy, that it's no different from a 9-6 work in reality, really. It's just you slightly like this work versus the other, even though this work is more restrictive for the sake of higher quality content. I guess I'm very lucky, to have had a small circle of friends in the past, but now very few to sometimes no contact, which gets me much more time and energy to do what I want to do. Success is the hell you go through, to make the heavenly content.

@Guru Peter Jordanson That's not the topic actually, the topic, from the title, is 'Queen Elizabeth II has passed away'. You are projecting things that aren't really there, in the OP'S post, at all.

@Fleetinglife Alright, I see.

One of my lists of potential users, is maybe @Oeaohoo , because I roasted him with a crazy rap diss about him using Hegal and flipping that back at him, and maybe the music and Daniel Schmachtenberger in the video, is topics I've recently posted is just to get back at me. But that's intuitive speculation.

@Nilsi I have a good idea who, but am not telling.

@Tyler Robinson The Monarchy is already done with for the most part, and they do still bring in more tourist money, but that's a tangent that's better discussed in another forum. Same argument could be had with India, they need to do away with their patriarchy, and those temples as well, so antiquated. Or with the USA, what and why the hell do we keep the white house? or the statue of liberty? or those historic sites in the southern states? It's far more complex and bigger of an issue than merely trimming away what makes that culture unique, and don't Pikachu face when it's collective peoples come after you for threatening to take away their identity from them.

@trenton True.

@trenton To the overall system? Not too much. I see the death penalty improving parts of the system in the short term, making it clear that the state would not tolerate extremely horrendous acts of humanity and to its citizens. However, I do see more trickier applications of the death penalty to some of the types of offenders: Children to adolescent, aged roughly between 8 to 12, and 13-17, committed homicide of horrific nature, victims being toddlers, early adolescence and late adolescent years old. The offenders in question are considered minors in the legal system, so the majority of incarcerations would be at juvenile prisons, or to other facilities that house child offenders. Offenders, who are not as neatly categorized as complete psychopaths, sociopaths or other. Those with sociopathy, who know what and how to pass psychology assessments, can be tricky to determine the likelihood of repeat offence. Those who are falsely accused of a horrific crime, manufactured evidence and state bias against such individuals due to avoidance of paying false imprisonment reparations and to not look bad in the eyes of politicians or the public at large.

@DocWatts That was specifically focused on the worst offenders getting that lavish treatment instead of the death penalty, rather than the general offenders of a prison system. If the topic was about the USA's prison system and whether we should or shouldn't increase or decrease humane treatment for the general prison population, then yes, it's likely we can agree on increasing humane treatment and including rehabilitation facilities. But the main focus is on the most worst offending types of prisoners, who don't care about the well-being of the general population at large and are at high of offending again and whether we should death penalty them or not. A stage yellow individual can give nuanced takes on both sides of the debate and discussion, and unpack most of the ramifications of those decisions, and trolley problem you at almost every corner, until you see the limits of your own logical constructions back at you.