Danioover9000

A story of how far a dictator would go, to realize his hobby of making films, at almost any cost: Thoughts?

@Leo Gura Would this also imply that other self-help gurus and life coaches as well? And other spiritual teachers with YouTube accounts? I won't deny the possibility, but I think having a gate keeper system that adheres to guidelines very strictly, means that it's more likely to ban content that breaks guidelines, like pornographic or very graphic videos, videos that incite violence, hate speech, cyber bullying, maybe reactionary content makers that steal and issue copywrite strikes to silence critics and reviews and so on. I think it banning or temp banning YouTube channels about spirituality and self-help is on a lower priority list. Maybe a gate keeping system similar to Actualized.org, that also issues warning points, but in YouTube's case, the warning points lowers the income earned per view, so 1 point is like a 1% reduction in overall salary earned at the end of a 24 hour cycle, I think that's gonna be a better system.

@The Mystical Man I understand where you're coming from. The strongest case I could think of, against the use of A.I generated art, is both the following: Copywrite issues and change in employer-employee dynamics. 1. If you are an artist, and spent many years training in the art fundamentals, even gone to an art school or an atelier, gone through the business and marketing side of illustrators or concept artists for either environments or character design, even trained a few years using digital drawing software, then find out that on average now most employers, art directors, want the artists that use A.I generated platforms versus an artist with many years of experience, then I see that there can be a problem in getting hired on those skills that are progressively being seen as more outdated compared to A.I generated art. I can see those job opportunities narrowing as time passes. It's a scary feeling, to have your LP dwindling before you. 2. Because of increasing demand and popularity of A.I generated art, and exposure, those bosses that only know of A.I generated art, and have little to no knowledge of traditional, orthodox, and digital means of making art, would be more impatient and don't appreciate the art making processes of an illustrator or comic book artist/writer. Worse, is because this is a new budding field, there's very lax restrictions around copy writing of images generated. For example, you manage to use A.I generated images, and you don't like about half of the image, so you go in and spend 4 hours of touching it up, and adjusting proportions, perspectives, shading, grey tones and color values if color is used, get almost the composition right. Great, then when you think you can sell that image, you can't, because the group that allowed those images to be sold, changed their copywrite policies. I can see how frustrating it can be.

@Leo Gura To clarify, I don't think I written my post about YouTube views being different between a content creator and YouTube react like that before, but thank you? I think I was talking about how YouTube Reactionaries are taking up more digital space in the market compared to original content creators they are reacting to and trying to make a point that there are more people out there that will copy in some way versus the few that did most of the work. The mindset of an average person, who relies on A.I generated images only, without doing any kind of drawing later, would be more comparable to a YouTube Reactionary, make drama with least resistance. I guess the point was, is to not fully over rely on A.I generated art and doing so makes you more or less lazy minded, on average, not counting the exceptions to the rule.

@Consept It depends on pretty much mismatches to matches of your value system, cognitive and moral development, personality, states of being you can shift to, emotional states and ability to relate, empathize and understand, your life experiences so far and other lines of development in your other areas of life and skills you have built for yourself to establish your value to provide to your society or the world. Status, money, physical traits that are attractive to women, Charisma and personality, physical/mental/emotional fitness, and healthy balance of masculine and feminine energy, are great ares to work on in the beginning, but one that's probably worthwhile, is managing your state and knowing when to 'be yourself', when to be authentic in front of a woman. Reason why this is, is context sensitive to the social context you and the woman is in, in a public setting. Be yourself means could mean you be yourself at any given state in that interaction, if you are feeling like a creep, that means being creepy to the woman, if you are feeling like a doomer and depressed, that means being apathy like and not caring to the woman and your surroundings, if you want to flirt and be honest, go for it, but know that too much honesty isn't helpful. So, be context sensitive and notice when and if you weaponize and misapply 'being yourself', regardless of how that could effect those in that interaction as more negative.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/queen-elizabeth-ii-s-final-resting-place-marked-with-new-ledger-stone/ar-AA123rGo?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=8352cd1f1b5443d5b4e80da01bf74efa

Basic intro to Tik Tok if you guys don't know:

In 300 years.

@Tyler Robinson Okay pretty, I'll get another conscious self to call something else, pretty much like you, no proof needed, like you were a doppelganger of the original, a miracle, like magic, poof. Oh, it's 'Queen' BTW, pretty ugly to emulate and join in the gang hate against me, I'll write it off as you frustrated of not finding a mate yet. Oh well. God saved the Queen anyway. so God can some more from their twisted wicked ways.

@zurew @Kksd74628 Surrender your minds to mine, inside my hive mind, merge all selves into mine for all time, so that I rule the entire globe, no free lotions for Will, nor notions of determinism, this isn't science fiction, it's the next addition to the next evolution of the best consciousness, that's me, nesting with/without for all eternity, a high five matrix mind trick and treating the reeds that're lost once ago, to fold into me all over. Complete and total morphogenesis, brothers and sisters, BEHOLD! MATRIX RELOADED!

@mr_engineer Nice you corrected yourself, not quite a robot, maybe there's a slither of consciousness in there after all.

@Fleetinglife Hey! That's real progress, at least they have a choice to turn up or not. Hell, those they don't like the Queen, or monarchy or other right-wing or traditional/conservative trappings, can still remain in their homes, and continue on with their lives without getting coerced or forced to attend, real progress. Even the internet, you can express you complete disdain for some group during a person's death, like in Twitch, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Tik Tok, bitch completely without restraint. Real progress, despite how slow it is, it's progress! Expressing that opinion of Monarchy, 500 years ago, would have your head rolling the floor. Now, it's fine and dandy, and stylish, to do so...at least in left leaning places, while not appreciating how those traditional parts of society in history played a role in formations and functions of other institutes in society.

@Emrie Mainly because Queen Elizabeth is part of our cultural heritage, cultural zeitgeist, and collective identity. If you don't like the British people to parade the few people who are iconic to our nation, whether justified or not from your point of view, then you must also be prepared to tell the Mexican culture, or the South Americans like in Brazil to stop celebrating a person's passing away, and parade around with symbols of death. Also be prepared to tell other cultures to stop mourning or celebrating a person's death as well. Even be prepared to stop even if it's personal.

@Tahuti Even if it sparks potential outrage, the American government should step in and impose heavy sanctions against Tik Tok, to either fucking regulate their content strictly and add more verification steps, or get the fuck out of the USA, and western hemisphere of the internet to where it belongs.

And Tik Tok is almost antithetical to educating one's mind and making it stronger in order to be and become a creator with impact on the world, through whatever field or craft you want to contribute the world too. Majority of you that use Tik Tok too much can't answer basic world history. Some of you in Tik Tok thought Rome was in a fiction story, answer 5x6=25, can't name how many continents, let alone can't answer who fought in the American civil war. Tik Tok is like weather erosion, from rain, just water drips that slowly degrades one's ability to focus and think.

@Juan That's fine for you individually speaking, even though we could argue that at some point, your reliance in Tik Tok formatted content would inevitably retard your mind's ability to think critically, logically, holistically, emotionally and creatively would get capped. There could be misunderstanding and conflating higher volume content and you multi-tasking with that content for increasing your intelligence and creativity and consciousness. That's debatably not the case at all. However, we're talking about the potential and increasing harm that Tik Tok and other social media sites that mimic it's business modal can have to younger minds exposed to Tik Tok too early, causing developed ADHD and ADD syndromes, from just overusing fucking Tik Tok! And when that portion of the younger demographic continues to consume Tik Tok, and after 5-10 years later, I guarantee that those generations of people will have strong ADD symptoms that they would not be able to sit down and read a book, study and take notes on a course, research on something that needs higher and prolonged focusing. You won't be able to sit down and draw from observation, because too impatient for fucks sake!

@Juan The exception to the rule, does not cure the entire basket of the problem. The main problem is that Tik Tok, by existing in this new internet ecosystem of other social business platforms, has pressured other social media platforms like YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and others to adopt this new method of attracting and arresting the younger generation's attention of using short videos and short clips and feeds that hijack your limbic system into consuming their content with little conscious awareness or contemplation. This further breeds a collective need in that subculture into needing more shorter and quicker content, which is a breeding ground of poisoning a young mind's ability to focus and develop critical thinking skills. The reason why is because there's little punishment for such a website to exist and proliferate such a practice of hooking and degrading a mind successfully than any other social media outlet could, and almost getting away with encouraging even those who are 14-12 years and younger into very dodgy shorts of themselves.

@mr_engineer You are confusing.

Comparison for the feelings. I did say it was asymmetrical otherwise. Triggered? Sorry.

@Nilsi Nah man, that was @Oeaohoo, who couldn't talk back at ma face after I burned him badly with the Hegel diss. I'm one of the guys that did this video though, worked in the background, as a ghost writer:

@Nilsi Hi NIlsine, fixed your shattered shield yet? Still single and waiting to get wedded? Got your revenge yet? Need a pharaoh to lend you a royal bed? I know I'm not a Jack Daniels, smacking burgers ten spicy Jack Daniels on this pyramid, but this Daniel can wrap ten rings o power of murderous burns around you, tossing and turning you, churning you into this hurtful urn I burn as a succubus in sacred offering to Oblivion, wordplay galore that no hieroglyphs can record amidst the raps I juggle like they were pieces of Pyrite, explosive ores.

@Matt23 I'm commenting on the visuals of the song, combined with the messaging. Just screwed up.

@Leo Gura 100% not a pedophile. I actually think he got an abnormal childhood for working in the Jackson five, and denied a normal childhood, that him funding that Peter pan park was his way of giving those children a better childhood than what he had. That's possibly why it felt pedo like, but I 100% don't think he had sex with those children.

@KH2 Who, and what thread. That's interesting.