Danioover9000

@Leo Gura Mr. Girl now has another Channel. Hopefully he starts to at least consider how he'll speak later on, as it all started with him going a bit too strongly against Nike Fuentes. My intuitive speculation here, is that Mr. Girl's part Jewish identity, even though he's mostly an atheist, was triggered, which made him give a more sensitive and emotionally charged take onto Nike's worldview, so much so that he was willing to hash it out against Destiny, because at that time Destiny was seen buddying up with Nike and that also probably triggered him. I think how they managed the mass reporting and reasoning it to YTV staff is to Mr. Girl's album and the song about him being a pedophile is an offensive song. However, it's just a smoke screen and Destiny went to them on stream and gentle called it out. Now Mr. Girl and Destiny have a strong common ground now: Both experienced getting canceled, now can deepen their friendship. ?

Interesting video, by a professional artist, on the topic of A.I generated artwork:

@Thought Art Here's one example:

@Thought Art Conor WAY more unhinged than Kanye, Kanye at least still has good marketing and promotion than him, and a much better life purpose than Conor, or Conor Mcgregor.

Kanye still making high quality music though. I'm fine if it's his decision alone to stop the meds, in order to produce amazing music, that's his choice going forward in his LP. Most of you all not familiar to rap culture, hip hop culture and hip hop industry, an Emcee is a professional rapper, that has to for the majority of the time market and promotion themselves to the audience. I think Kanye acting this crazy, unhinged is part of the image he wants to portray to his listeners, like Eminem, 50-cent, so on. If this is where he sources his creativity from, that's a tough place to work from and don't envy anyone in that position, so, despite any future fuck ups from him, props to his music.

@Ethan1 That's the gentle, feminine explanation of why and why not to use Tik Tok for your LP. Here's the masculine explanation: FUCK TIK TOK AND THE BRAIN ROT IT CAUSES TO THE YOUTH!! Those who use Tik Tok for the long term, 5-10 plus years thinking it's an amazing LP, are deluding themselves. Content creators in Tik Tok are participating in spreading and infecting this mind virus called Tik Tok into children to adolescents. Recently Tik Tok was sued for hosting parts of its content creators twerking and under aged Only Fans. The Algorithm is sus AF, suggesting sexual content to your feed, again, without your FLIPPING PERMISSION! auto modifies your profile picture without your permission. and engineers the increase in chasing novelty and chasing quick fix gratification. Guaranteed to decline your mindfulness and focusing abilities if you over consume this app, and increase your resistance to personal development, discipline and peace of mind. Also guaranteed to develop narcissism in your mind too as your pretty profile picture can make you self-conscious, and pretty profile pictures of others further increases your lack of self-esteem and confidence. The Chinese businesspeople and HUA WUE that designed Tik TOK really know what to do to weaken people's minds, JESUS CHRIST! TIK TOK is a very dangerous app that preys on your reptilian brain and gets you chasing quick rewards while degenerating your moral integrity. If you still value your life, your human life, and those around you, tell them to abandon this vile APP IMMEDIATELY!?

@aurum Banning fracking is a legit aim to go for. There's already not that much land left, and fracking is further creating weaknesses and small to large spaces inside the nearby land that increases the potential of sink holes to happen. Of course, going about it without careful consideration for who or what groups you are up against is gonna backfire. Also, the same could happen in conservative/republican parties and right-wing groups, a few do swing to the moderate-to-moderate left.

@Leo Gura Link?

@something_else Can't win an argument, so you resort to reporting my profile pic? GTFO. Whoever reported my pic, if any of you are reading, is dawg shit. Double standards as hell. You jealous or what?

@thepixelmonk Feel free to keep assuming I'm just some person crying on internet and not a professional artist threatened by this technology. P.S. Whoever reported me for my pic, you dawg shit.?

@Leo Gura The ban back then was because Nick Fuentes's side and those related to right-wing ideology didn't like Mr. Girl 'attacking' Nick Fuentes and calling him an actual Nazi, so they launched a coordinated weekly attack of mass reporting his content as being dangerous. Happened around the time when he and Destiny were talking about Nick Fuentes and him potentially sneaking in Nazi ideas. Destiny also talked to the same right-wing group that got Mr. Girl banned.

@something_else Those chess players performing much better than me, by cheating using A.I. chess programs to pick the best variations. They're real chess players. Why does gatekeeping exist?

@something_else If you're still pedantic and struggling, the key question I want you to answer, is, is it justified to condemn people for being associated in a brief moment?

@something_else Hypothetically, Epstein comes to me, in a random street, in a vacation site, and we small chat and chat it up, says he's a social media influencer and I say I'm an online designer and wants a pic with me, maybe says he'd pay me for it and whatever. Fast forward years later, Epstein scandal comes out, I'm in those pics smiling with him and laughing. Now, is it justified to cancel me for sharing a moment with him? Justified guilty by association? And yes, I'd condemn him for those scandals too.

Nice video of Destiny reacting to Sneako and Andrew Tate debate/discourse:

@something_else So, if, for example, hypothetically, Epstein was into selfies, and almost takes selfies wherever he goes. Sometimes involves random people on the street in his holidays and travels. Some of those people have social media profiles, some have online small businesses, and few times Epstein wants to help a little bit of those people, by association. Now, bring to mind all the Epstein scandal, and all of the sudden those photographed by him, in his parties, in his plane, in his social gatherings in vacation spots, and those selfies randomly taken while holidaying. Should those who have little idea, and little association with Epstein, get canceled and banned from social media and have their online small businesses ruined and ridiculed, from association?

@something_else However, by oversimplifying my issue as some form of gatekeeping is ridiculous. Life is a series of tradeoffs, and while it's noble to try to make one field of human endeavor accessible and easier to get into, the tradeoff is that some values like work ethic, patience, observation, skill, competency, understanding, beauty, excellence, are now more difficult to teach and train as those 'obstacles' and 'gate keeping elements' are no longer there, while fostering an attitude of the quick fix from just the sudden increase in convenience. Yes, I agree that convenience is increased, but at what cost? Contemplate that before giving me a cookie generic answer.

@Osaid MOTHER GAIA!!!?

@thepixelmonk Side tangent, but it's true. Leo's been experimenting with A.I. drawing programs and seems to disregard those artists that designed his thumbnails and is okay pushing some of those types of illustration jobs out of the market for more people to become artists. The problem is that it's like supporting A.I. programs that analyze chess and other board games into the market, and some to most abuse those tools and cheat instead of properly learning chess. It just doesn't raise the overall standards of quality of drawing and performance; it retards it a bit and encourages short cut taking and quick fix chasing than developing skills of observation and patience and work ethic.

@aurum Also looking forward to his take on environmentalism, as the energy bill here and its cost is becoming more and more a drain in the UK's economy.

@AtheisticNonduality Nobody is full stopping this thread!?

@StarStruck I was obviously joking. C'mon.

@Tyler Robinson I pick up on that too, when he talks about women to those men. I view it as Andrew Tate giving generic, tough advice to insecure young men, and view him like I view pick-up, it works for only a couple of years, until the young guy grows up a bit and survives his rite of passage from being a boy to being a man. At that point, those men that outgrow pick up don't need pick up, just as those men eventually will outgrow Andrew Tate. I'm sure he does, some people are that desperate and really struggle with dating and really want financial security that they'd extra follow Andrew Tate. That's fine, I guess how you view his face or other physical features may or may not make him uglier or sexier. I'm more aware of the marketed Andrew Tate and business Andrew Tate. The two to me are mostly separate, and he's definitely trolling SJW types and hardcore feminists. If you want me to be a man, I guess I can't talk you out of viewing me that way, from the bottom...of my heart.

BTW, very good video @Leo Gura released this week: P.S. The motivation of starting this thread wasn't from progressivism reasons, it was a reaction to your flippant attitude on the death of England's Queen Elizabeth, But thanks anyways for telling me there were much less slaves in the past. Can't top Rome's 40% slave population though.

Why is it a wonder? Is the civilization a wonder, when the majority of its constructions is done by slaves, directed by the few who had a vision against those who had weaker vision?