Danioover9000

@Majed Plausible and possible, but not [probable and absolute, until we find another planet to go and colonize and terraform to our needs and standards.

@Oeaohoo Ring of Power, The Wheels of Time, Star Wars, majority of western movies, comics, music videos being too woke cultured, to name a few, although it's largely stage orange big companies tailoring their marketing towards LGBTQ communities, SJW's and the loudest leftist activists screaming virtue signaling and victim shaming. Even Netflix is starting to get corrupted and a few writers made the actor in The Witcher quit due to them not caring enough of the source material, and others. Am I close enough?

@spiritual memes Wait a minute, wasn't he also a user here a while back? is he @Aaron p? I remember the profile pic was him with a beach background.

@eggopm3 Put that way, I can see why a discord of that type is problematic.

@Nilsi I tend to type slower so that 2 minute minimum isn't an issue to me. @Tyler Robinson @Leo Gura What type of discord are we not allowed to participate in the future? Like the discords found in the streaming community, aka Destiny, Vaush, and so forth? Is it all types of discord? Asking for clarity, and I don't even participate in chat groups as my fingers are too slow and am not part of the chatter/streaming community.

@Scholar Good for him, let this be an example of integrity.

@Godhead That's fine, as I am wrong in the little details, but him losing his older brother and joining the DAP and other areas of his life back then played a significant part when taken as a whole. That and I was just using Stalin and Hitler as extreme examples of traitorous behavior which contrasts strongly to Senator Sinema's apparent betraying of the Democratic party.

@DrugsBunny To be clear, and to clarify for the hundredth time, I'm not here to argue or debate a cultist rationalist/scientist filled with intellectual hubris, so I'll say this one more time and address each point you bring up in as good faith as I can humanly muster, without cursing. Yes, about 50% of my threads and mostly posts in other user threads in the political/career sub forum starts with 'depending on your stage of development, cognitive and moral development, ego development, personality typing, life experiences and other lines of development, and worldviews and beliefs systems and ideologies indoctrinated into your mind.', and other variations of that phrasing mainly because the issue being discussed and who is in discussion is relative, that there's much needed nuance and big picture thinking and holistic understanding needed before being reductionist with your view of any issue. This way of me starting is to frame myself as a complex moral person, and to signal to others here that I think more in abstract and complex patterns. 40% of my posts consists of me posting spiritual/paranormal topics in the spiritual sub forum. 10% involved rapping and freestyle rhyming, on the other hand, were me joking about, and I have a short list of users I rap about who are dogmatic, close minded and tend to have demonizing and patronizing language, and it also happens to include you as I found your judgmental posts close minded and insulting. Majority of my posts had little intention of demonizing or name calling. Yes, I am cognitively, morally, psychologically and intellectually superior compared to you because I don't engage with debates and arguing as strongly as you do to humiliate other users. That's your problem to resolve, not mine, only I can mention your blind spot and it's up to you to fix that psychological codependency of arguing and debating. Now that could be seen as me not fully engaging with a subject matter and maybe being a jerk, and that's fine, because as soon as you see me engage with a subject matter less, that's a sign that there's not much to continue discussing when a person's mind is closing down. For example when you stereotyped Senator Sinema as a traitor, it seems like a progressive caricature, so I was pointing out how you might have characterized her inaccurately as she may have instead discovered a political alignment more accurate to her, that of being a moderate Republican rather than a Democrat. Maybe that seems traitorous to you, or to those with different biases, opposing biases or even to those in-groups or out-groups, but personally to her that may not be betrayal, in fact remaining inside a political party that's less aligned with your interests is more traitorous than leaving and joining one with closer alignment. I've found it useful to peg and put other individuals and other groups into these modals for my own observations and personal heuristics. However, sometimes I can be inaccurate and that's fine as I continue refining my heuristics of stereotyping people and cultures first, then refine later on into more accurate mental representations. I will own up to my potential mistakes here, as I stated many times in the past I suck at arguing and debating, maybe I'm not as equipped at debating, but I'm not here to debate, I'm here to talk with an open mind and humbleness, while also having some fun. I actually don't have much IRL or internet friends as you think I have, so me stating your intellectual hubris is an observational statement based on your writing style at me and how you tackle topics here, it's just too dogmatic and argumentative for an open minded, good faith and charitable discussion, which I could be wrong for assuming. If you don't mind, with whatever remaining level of attention you have, could you clarify to me where I'm wrong, or being uncharitable or bad faith to you? Also, to @Leo Gura and @Carl-Richard, where in my discussion with @DrugsBunny and other users here am I being uncharitable or bad faith, or am I more good faith and charitable?

@StormLight I like to think of myself as a concerned citizen of the world, and saying that how she treats children in her shoots are very suspect, especially when children can be groomed to agree to go along with it.

@Oeaohoo I agree somewhat, the both of them are failed artists in the technology, economy, social infrastructure and political epoch of their time, mostly a product of the environmental and socio-economic pressures and changes. This is especially true for Hitler, given his earlier grief and dealing with the lose of his older brother, dealing with an overbearing father figure, dealing with the lose of his mother who he could seek emotional shelter and safe haven,, struggling to gain clarity for his passion for design and painting, and surviving WW1 and living the mass consequences of Germany's fallout and very high inflation rates. For a patriot/nationalist, nothing hurts more than seeing your home country humiliated like that. Plus a lost sense of direction opened him up for influence from the Nazi party that recruited him as their front man and speaker. Well, you are not the only failed artist.

@Godhead I agree, I was using Stalin and Hitler for that specific user, yes there are degrees to being a traitor, along with it being relative to other factors. Universally most people wouldn't consider a child stealing a cookie from the cookie jar as a brutal traitorous snake, so I opted to use a more extreme example instead to compare and contrast claims of senator Sinema being a traitor or not.

@Tyler Robinson Hopefully, if Leo is still interested in doing podcasts, he should do them partly with people like Lex Fridman, just to see how they would think, feel and react to Leo's takes and insights he has gained in his life. At least Lex Fridman is open minded enough to handle Leo, but his materialism and scientific/rationale bias versus Leo's bias is important to be seen in a conversation. Would it end up like Charisma on command podcast, and the majority of the viewers confused or demonizing Leo in some way? Likely, but it must be said anyway, after all Lex Fridman interviewed Daniel Schmachtenberger and some other spiritual gurus and intellectuals, so eventually it has to happen.

Seems like an interesting video. What are your thoughts and feelings after watching: I feel like @Leo Gura is ready to be interviewed by Lex Fridman. Question is, is Lex Fridman ready for GOD?

@DrugsBunny Notice here, your use of language to straw man those other users: Name calling, demonization, inflammatory use of language, accusation of a user being a conspiracy theorist knowing the consequences for that user, using hateful words, trolling via refutation and rebuttals, trying to debate and argue and generate heated conversations. You are so hubris that you even try to walk that fine line of what bends or breaks forum guidelines.

@DrugsBunny Thank you, you just emphasized the weaknesses of those who are at Stage orange and are strongly identified as rationalists, atheists and scientists, who are hard core, hyper logical and full of hubris and full of being judgmental. The fact you claim that Senator Sinema is a complete traitor means you are at least a Democrat, if not a democrat liberal or progressive, and the idea of a member of your ideological camp leaving for some other camp disturbs you, that you needed to make a post about the situation as a coping mechanism, or to shit talk about a political figure for clicks and trolling is telling about how you are triggered by this situation. When I brought up Hitler and Stalin, I'm making a comparison of how different the level of treason is. Stalin made himself appear ideologically aligned with communism, until he saw an opportunity to overtake the party and lead it ruthlessly, thus betraying the principles and values of communism, which is an ideology that arose for the need to make everyone, the monarchs to the peasants, equal, but the principles of selflessness and love and equality were too advanced at that time that was rife with selfishness and survival and revolution, so Stalin defaulted to being a dictator out of necessity, which at the same time betrayed principles of communism. With Hitler, I meant that in the earlier parts of him raising to power, and even before that he felt betrayed by the then German establishment and blamed it on them, and the aftermath of WW1 brought huge inflation rates to Germany that basic survival was much harsher. Notice you are straw manning me and every point I'm making as if I'm the deluded one...but not you?

@StormLight She into pedophilia and putting children modals into compromising photo shots. She should at least get fined, if not jail time for that BS. This challenges our western hemisphere bias of thinking only white men got to be Pedophiles only. Well, other men and women are capable and culpable too.

Brutal examples of masculine love:

@Someone here England, Netherlands or France. I'm for England winning against Neverlands in the finals.

@DrugsBunny @Hardkill Can you two pack it in with the bullying of moderate centrists? At this point you guys will never ascend to Spiral Dynamics stage yellow with all this demonizing, name calling and inflammatory use of language, for somebody you hardly know. Come on, be respectful, senator Senima is not a traitor as she is a moderate, in Arizona as a purple political state. Communism, Nazism, Adolf Hitler and Stalin are way more accurate for being traitors.

@DrugsBunny Depending on one's stage of development, cognitive and moral development, personality, psychology, ego development, states of being, life experiences and other lines of development in other areas of life, along with beliefs systems and ideologies imprinted and programed into a person's mind from culture that largely shapes how every bit of information is interpreted. Because of the many asymmetries with their worldviews and how their minds are structured, is where I see the many differences. First off, she seems to have a values system that is stage blue, with some from stage green spirituality and perhaps some regression of stage green back into stage blue religion such as her referring to Christianity, holy spirit, Christ and so on to justify and simplify this large sets of asymmetries between her and Leo. She seems to be more conservative minded and moral absolutist than liberally minded but lacks the higher levels of cognitive and moral development to more understand where Leo is coming from. The key area of life/line of development she seems to lack significantly are in spirituality and psychedelics, although she stated she has done DMT, but only that and having not mentioned any other psychedelics, natural/synthetic, nor mentioned how often and how she does her psychedelics, and also similarly with her spirituality. Contrasting this, is with Leo's various videos on psychedelics and spirituality. Another thing I've noticed is from her body language, facial and hand gestures, that she is mostly genuine in her belief of Leo and his teachings being that of Lucifer and about demons, with some deceptive/defensive gesturing from face, hand and eyes when it got to the sovereign part and the sexual part. This could be her conservative/religious framework getting challenged and, because her mind perceived a threat, subconsciously it protects itself through subtle gestures. Note that I'm not suggesting she's mostly deceptive, but she mostly believes in what she says. I'm more specifically worried of a smaller relative domain, that of copyright and infringement of Leo's video, as she plays various parts of his video longer than 5 seconds without any transparency or water marks to protect from copyright infringement. Has she asked for permission to use some of his clips? Was she aware of breaching copyright? If she hasn't provided enough of a convincing or persuasive case of Leo being a devil worshipper and his teachings encouraging those to mingle with demons, then how can she argue and defend herself from copyright claims? On the issue with argumentation and debate of this topic, it still stands, that it's mostly fruitless and a bunch of mud fighting, designed with the purpose of keeping those locked in a gridlock of debating each other rather than doing the work and exploration needed to understand deeper and broader truths. And, it largely depends on what you consider as compelling/convincing evidence, and how persuasive your rhetoric is, which mostly centralizes around your survival and the survival of your ideas and the ideas imprinted into you, rather than for truth's sake.

Arguable one of the most terrifying games of all time, from the story to the game mechanics it's almost always going to keep the players on edge. Here are a list of games: Fatal Frame 1 Fatal Frame 2, also in my opinion peak Fatal Frame: Fatal Frame 3, to me it's roughly in the middle of 1 and 2 in terms of quality: Fatal Frame 4, very low quality and bad, almost as bad as Nintendo's Metroid other M, also the point of decline for the Fatal Frame series in game mechanics because it converted from PS2 to Nintendo Wii, and given the soul drained wolves of Wall street treatment by big companies: Fatal Frame 5, slightly better than 4 in terms of graphics and a little bit of game mechanics, but that's nothing. Still no soul and at this point safe to assume the entire franchise is dead. But hey, Nintendo says it's much better at least they included sexily clad female attires, mind numbing super easy gameplay, nonsensical lore and story threads, ruining character development of Mio, and high frame rate graphics, because that's what really is at the heart of what makes Fatal Frame so good and I don't care about the original vision of the game I want more money and attention while marketing this game as family friendly. I wish a company or the customers sues me to death so that I wise up to my idiotic attempts at cash grabs, min-maxing, for profit and western marketing because I can't understand legal copyright issues between western countries and difficulties playing with the Wii and this game, so I hope I receive karmic retribution for not just Fatal Frame but all the other small franchises I bought and milked to death for mere cash grabs because I'm also empty inside: What do you guys think the lesson is here?

@JuliusCaesar Yes, I tend to see this problem myself. I sometimes think that the ideal situation, is to vacate to that foreign country and see for yourself, but I do recognize that it's not always available to do, so here we are discussing.l

@LordFall Is it all generally superstition? All BS? Or is there some wisdom in enforcing no premarital sex? Could there be some function that traditional values serve for the greater collective? It could be, but maybe it has to do with preventing rape culture from spreading? Maybe they're trying to reward socially acceptable behavior? I agree it sucks for the LGBTQ communities, but unfortunately the largest chunks of human history has been native tribes, Dynasties, imperial empires, civilizations expanding, and fighting and fending off threats to it's survival, which always in this scales of conflict emerge some cultures more superior than other cultures, which then dictates and enforces it's own survival standards onto it's own population, so, through this iterative process and trial and error it found that heterosexuality, for the majority of the time, proved more successful for it's survival than any other type of sexual orientation as those don't reproduce it's own populations. Adding to that limited resources of food and land and labor, it fuels the need to explore and conquer lands and assimilate other peoples into it's own culture. Community policing might be a better form of policing in the distant future, but I think it's a bit too advanced compared to state established policing, for now. May change overtime depending on the SD level of the population.

@Sucuk Ekmek No, that's an assumption you are making that the average person mostly lives in cities. Parts of the world population also live in villages, towns, rural places. We are definitely not living anywhere near the USA, maybe you are, but not me, nor some of the people I know live ANYWHERE in the USA. You're assuming all of mankind lives in cities and the USA, which is false. Yes, you say you are being realistic, but where is that realism coming from? USA bias? The western hemisphere bias? English bias? See, based on your stage of development, cognitive and moral development, personality type, ego development, states of consciousness and emotions, life experiences and other lines of development in your other areas of life, your worldview belief system and cultural upbringing, your mind is largely shaped by those factors and many more. What it seems to me is your mind has a liberal leaning bias and doesn't like an idea of enforcing no pre marital sex in Indonesia. What if, if you are genuinely interested in discovering why, that you find out something. For example, in India there's a large problem with rape culture, so, in the eyes of those conservative minded, enforcing a rule or law to encourage marriage before sex forces some of their male population to develop social intelligence, to behave and conform to their social standards in order to discourage rape and other sexual deviances that would put a tribe or a small village at greater risk of not surviving. Your 'approval' of whether Indonesia should or shouldn't enforce no premarital sex, is largely your bias and your cultural bias speaking. The question is do you understand that, and why not? I may have worded myself inaccurately. Yes, I don't know the entire situation as a whole, but I lived in Indonesia for a short time, and through my life experiences understood their way of thinking and dong things, so to me it's less speculation and more understanding from me, but it seems to me what you and the OP are coming from, is way more speculation than I am.

Best to do your research and study, and even go vacationing to Indonesia. You better understand why the majority are conservatively minded, yet also be exposed to a lot of paradoxical ways of thinking about their world and the world in general. A news article ain't enough to give you the rest of the picture.