Danioover9000

Member P3
  • Content count

    12,494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Danioover9000

  1. @Leo Gura After enforcing these changes though. Nice post though.
  2. @something_else The caveat being, that those people fucking at higher volume must be more responsible for what they're doing and saying to their sexual partners. Conversely, you can have a high sex count with many people in low conscious ways, whilst others have high conscious relationships long term with one partner. Regardless of if your top priority is sex as a value, it's possible to pursue high volume sex and one night stands in a low conscious manner as well, not just a high conscious manner. Arguable if it's possible at all to pursue sex high consciously, because to me it simply means that there's a lot of alignment in terms of values and developmental factors between you and your sex partner, and both of your self identities are congruent with each other, basically you view yourself as a polygamous person, and your sex partner also views themselves as polygamous, which doesn't mean high consciousness right away. Big, metaphysical and epistemic claims of all women should do this or that is too over simplistic. Based on stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types, ego development, states of consciousness, life experiences and other lines of development and ideologies indoctrinated into your psyche, more care should be taken. Especially when there's still the male/female mind psychology here still. Yes, experiences are needed via dating and pursuing short-long term relationships, and arguably before that social interactions to increase one's social and intrapersonal to interpersonal intelligence, I'd also advice to not over extend and pursue many relationships too fast and at high volume when you can't handle small talks and conversations with strangers. The point of marriages, in traditional/conservative societies, and even in the ancient world of kingdoms, dynasties, emperors, is to bind the two kingdoms/dynasties/empires, and civilizations together collectively. Also the purpose of marriages later on, after we moved on from the ancient world into the medieval dark ages, and even pre industrialized societies, is that that marriages is a further social mechanism to influence young men's behaviors towards members of society, by having to work and prove their social status, mostly controlled by religions as to engineer men into behaving themselves and conforming into whatever social standards where the ideal back then. To do that, they took the ancient forms of marriages that where used to bind kingdoms and empires together, and leveraged the massive desires to fuck into such a way that the majority of men had to conform to their social standards or risk losing out, as dating and having relations outside wedlock was perceived as weak and taboo, especially having children out of wedlock. This also was effective in placing a checks and balance power against jerk and selfish ehaviors in single men just fucking and trying to sow their seeds so to speak, so this became less and less overtime. Of course, over time, especially when the world experienced WW1, WW2 and the other wars that followed, which costed many lives plus other developmental factors that effected population growth they had to relax a bit and at these time periods is when dating became a bit more acceptable especially in the USA where Liberalism and Neo Liberalism and being more liberal and laisse fare was slightly okay. This decrease in controlling and influencing young men into marriage early and raising the family unit lead to an increase in jerk behavior towards women, which leads to the PUA and mystery man movements. I would disagree with the high volume of sex, as that can lead to several negative outcomes for the individuals to a collective society, and high sex count /=/ high consciousness, which is another justification for questionable behaviors.
  3. @lxlichael A fusion between Andrew Tate, Elon Musk and Nikola Tesla, would result in Female androids being created. Maybe.
  4. @lxlichael Likely would be both, motor mouth electro chicks! Also, Andrew Tate's stage of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types, ego development, states of consciousness, life experiences, other lines of development in different areas of life, worldviews and ideologies indoctrinated into you from family and upbringing, made him who he is today, both nature and nurture, so, if there's more similarities in developmental factors, likely Nikola Tesla would be similar to Andrew Tate, but due to there being more differences in developmental factors, then Nikola Tesla is much more different than Andrew Tate.
  5. @lxlichael Nikola Tesla?
  6. So, any updates on the Andrew Tate case? innocent or guilty?
  7. ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? Lex, you need Adderall ASAP.
  8. @Osaid Oh, right, in that case I agree in this specific instance Keem reported correctly. Ideally any other third party, but other than that sorry if I went too hard.
  9. @Osaid A clip without the narration: Enough said for me.
  10. @Osaid Most credible news sources, amongst most influencers in his field? Without CNN reviewing his sources or how he writes his articles? All because of an opportune moment to say that is the most trending and fad situation in the news cycle: Andrew Tate's arrest? Are we even talking about the same person here? Because lying and gossiping around a domestic terrorist event, being with a person that became a mass shooter event in New Zealand, makes him less credible if not untrustworthy as a news source. However, if he's your cup of tea, fine. I don't like him and how he even abuses doxxing for drama gains, so to me he's shady.
  11. @Osaid Probably a failed attempt at his life. And dude, why are you posting stuff from KEEMSTAR?
  12. @Carl-Richard He has an eye condition?
  13. I am trying so hard to not be so evil and uncharitable to Lex Fridman and to not straw man him or anything, but I think he gave a good enough review of the Orwell stuff. Xanax though, honestly I've said WAY MORE nasty things, in a diss track about Lex Fridman, that Xanax addiction is a compliment compared to what I've written about him, but that aside, I hope this is a stylistic choice of presentation and not that he's hardwired to speak in such a slow slurred way. Maybe watching Leo's videos and a few podcasts, maybe even some Destiny videos has inoculated me to a slower paced form of speaking., or at least a longer form of delivery and presentation of a video. The moment he interviewed Kanye West, I knew his integrity was questionable.
  14. @mr_engineer What good role modelling program do you suggest for these young minds to aspire to, away from this disempowered position of thinking themsleves as susceptible to manipulations, into one where they are wise enough to feel they can own their position and go away from a gas lighting/grooming situation?
  15. @Carl-Richard Why are you asking? I'm assuming too much exercising of muscles and heart, to burnout, over working the cardiac system may lead to more heart attacks no? Plus lack of sleep and nutrition eventually as well. I'm lucky to not be an athlete like most people, and over worked myself in the past too. And I have heart problems as well as myocarditis, but you'll never find me advocating anti vax talking points! I've already taken Pfizer jabs regardless of possible heart issues and the mRNA technology is in me, so it's too late for me anyways as I'm fucked either way, by vaccine or by COVID.
  16. @Rafael Thundercat I agree, millions of rats, mice and vermin love the mad piper's music, to be bothered to check if they're drowning in misery, thank god there's so much variety in rodents, and rabbits. Also, that woman is a classic scammer, a pimp artist that uses COVID as the greatest obfuscation of responsibility. I'm willing to bet every crime she commits, will blame it on COVID.
  17. Oh, and never thought that it's possible to have female pimps snare young teens into being 'influencers'. Crazy it's not illegal yet.
  18. @Rafael Thundercat I am so thankful that I'm just a millennial conservative, and not sucked into the Tik Tok ideology going on. And at the same time, I am sad that there's little hope left for humanity to reform itself. High probability that EQ/IG averages are declining as time goes on, due to over consumption of social media sites, predator algorithms catering to every bias and preferences of users designed to capture and syphon your attention into passivity and degrading attention.
  19. @KH2 From words, thoughts, emotions and actions. Swords falling in motion creates fractions, with each faction acting their facts, the fact is traction is gained by blame every faction not yours, so, welcome to the world and society, where we sicken minds by design via digital swords falling down on thy minds, emulsifying immiscible liquids that never meant to be mixed in union, mates, the devil is in the details!
  20. A number of insights and lessons of epistemology in this video, the good and the bad: From stupid, to intelligent people, are deluded and are not immune to ideology, including the guy speaking. High IQ, even high EQ /=/ immunity to dogma and ideology.
  21. @Carl-Richard Holy shit, I never knew that athletes were more like to die of heart attacks. Maybe too much exercise is too much?
  22. @Rafael Thundercat I can't believe you can still post in Twitter while in jail, maybe it's his social media team? Also, nice examples of echo chamber ideology, group think and denial.
  23. @Gesundheit2 No, I'm saying there are greater dangers in the world than getting canceled and censored, like the following that mankind has done: 1. invented nuclear energy, that no other animal has done. 2. weaponized nuclear energy to wipe out millions of square miles, and make the zones radioactive and uninhabitable, no animal could do this. 3. invent and weaponize cyber technologies, such as cyber attacks and drones with guns and bombs, no animal could do this but humans. 4. Create algorithms, A.I programs that can win in board games, and can create deep fake accounts nearly accurately, no animal could copy. 5. CRISPER and genetic modification of organics, designing Nano technology and bio weapons such as viruses. 6. Created the internet, and many social media sites and forums, which creates furthermore echo chambers for ideological proliferation. 7. Invented guns and other weaponry in history, that no animal could have invented. 8. Algorithms and A.I programs that auto correct your profile picture, make it more pretty, without your consent, thereby increase Narcissism worldwide for heavy internet users of social media websites. 9. Social complexity and our minds' capacities to re-imagine reality to suit our needs and wants. 10. Invented the car, which influenced how we designed city environments to be more car friendly. 11. Invented the plow, which changed our relationship to nature, declining animal worship and made agriculture more valuable than other ways of tribal life. 12. created the GPS system, which further changed how we thought about how we navigate, orientate and develop spatial awareness, which incentivized having a GPS if one is in unfamiliar territory versus looking in a map, or even paying more attention to landmarks. 13. Invented the mobile phone, and phones with touch screens and many pre installed apps, and ability to install other apps, and how nowadays very dependent we mostly are with using our phones for information intake and information gathering and how we obfuscate our original thinking in favor of quickly looking up answers. 14. Social media sites, and online streaming community echo chambers, which further degrades attention span, promotes predatory para social relationships between streamers and fans and even general viewers. Plus many other historical atrocities that mankind has committed that makes all this culture war between right and left today a childish tantrum, a walk in the park, a nothing burger. We may have a lot of technological development today, but we are still in the dark ages. If you want to speak your truth, fine, do so in a disciplined manner, and no more than that, don't be an Alex Jones or Donald Trump and be inflammatory with how you communicate, name calling and demonizing the other side, speak plainly and to the point and only defend necessary points, and nothing more, whilst trying to be good faith and charitable to the other side.