Danioover9000

@Leo Gura Godling?

@Leo Gura So true, hard agree here.

@Hardkill Grounded in common sense and IRL reality. But of course, all that can be relative, but still, grounded in IRL and especially not in the internet, which adds to the confusion and bigotry of both sides involved.

@Spiral I don't think so. It's still, fundamentally, in the nature of the mind, conservative minds are different to liberal minds. Progressives/socialists are a subset off of the liberal mind, so while you are partly right in saying progressive vs conservatives, actually progressive/social minds are a more niche type of mind even in liberal mind standards. Actually, common sense liberal minds are more in conflict with progressives than conservatives, because of the internet factor and other developmental factors! Some conservatives can be liberal minded, true, but requires further context. No, Spiral Dynamics stages of development, by Don Beck and Claire Graves, is a modal for human cultural values over time. It's got little to do directly with politics, and no political group has any monopoly of Spiral Dynamics. Most political groups here are mostly at tier 1 cognitive development, they have no idea what a real stage yellow value system looks in n individual/group or society. Such a stage yellow valued person/group is and can be mistaken for a radical group similar to progressives/socialists, however they are really that advanced in cognition that it's insulting to consider any political group having monopoly on these terms.

@Emerald That's just impossible to do in America now. 40%+ voted For Trump and most of the remainder voted for Biden. THEY ARE NOT COMFORTABLE WITH THIS WOMAN.

@Leo Gura Basically they want a Donald Trump, but without the extreme language and has Leonardo Da Vinci levels of genius, with the charism to boot and backup their intelligence. Yeah, that's an impossible leader to find..

@Gesundheit2 That's not just a joke, that actually did happen when they tried to create a hidden base there.

@BlessedLion Dude, stop being a Vax apologist. That choice has mostly been a net negative for the pandemic, millions of lives killed and hospitals overloaded just because of idiocy. Yeah very positive!

@confused people EU sucks for dating and sexual experiences in general. For sex experiences though, there's red light districts in Amsterdam and Holland. You're better off travelling to Los Vegas in USA, or even in Canada for dating experiences.

@Swarnim There could be miscommunication for sure. I think in this case both the police and Google should have worked and communicated together, especially after banning him, like within a month. This situation has me a bit worried, because I draw various subject matters, in comic or manga styles, and some of those images are saved in my google account. Gonna be considering moving them in a more secure folder or something.

@Leo Gura Side tangent, every time you post or make a new video, you always end up using a few exotic English words, that's nice. I agree, because of Google's scale of billions, that there's statistical likelihood of 100,000 or 10,000 getting a mod mistake. It sucks especially if those people rely on google accounts for their work.

@Gesundheit2 I see two possibilities: The pilots saw a very advanced weapons technology being experimented by the USA. The pilots saw actual aliens in UFOs running scouting and reconnaissance missions. Or trolling you never know.

@player1995 That's true, especially for non physical entities like machine elves, mushroom beings, or other types like spirits or ghosts or some other entities.

@Nilsi Assuming past encounters of UFOs in human history are true, then it's reasonable they learn overtime to be more secretive.

@Lila9 Me too, it'll be a cool experience. I'd invite one over to my home for a cup of tea, maybe talk about how Aliens do their philosophy, metaphysics, epistemology, spirituality, I'd have many questions.

@aurum @Finax Then I guess the next question, if your google account is banned or terminated, what are your alternatives then? What are alternative accounts other than Google to make?

@StarStruck The first one, although nothing stopping you from imagining another creation of the universe where it's the opposite.

Another really good video of how both sides weaponize language, such that it muddies the meanings of Nazism and Facism:

@Roy True, ir's sometimes important to preserve the definitions of words because wrong usage and meaning over time dilutes the word itself. Semantics and syntax issues over time, the phone philosophy game, lost in translation and so on. Good video that highlights this issue:

@DocWatts Another good example of a healthy conservative.

@aurum What if they did know exactly what those images were used for though? If they knew that the Dad sent them under medical confidentiality reasons, and Google knows that, does it still justify them for banning the image knowing what they were used for? This my key issue here, unless they didn't know, in which case the Dad has legal right to take Google to court. In fact, I think he has to to rectify his account, and make them apologies for their mistake. After all, the context was potential child porn why would Google willingly rectify and apologies first?

@Finax I agree, although I have very little context going into this situation regarding Google's banning of Dad sending son's penis picture to doctor. If it's under medical confidentiality, and patient to doctor relationship, then sorry Google you're in the wrong specifically for this, but in other contexts google is correct for overreaction of child nudity. I also disagree how Google may have profiled this person just from potential criminal records, that in this specific issue the police found him innocent for, so descrimination, or slander is potential lawsuit that the Dad could pursue. And shame on you all users who read my anecdote and only complaining of the cut and the nudity image. Of course I screwed up in the comparison, but ya'll stuck in the content of the comparison, but not look for the STRUCTURE of WHAT I'M SAYING, look past what I've written, see the underlying issue...also Stop bullying me in my DMs please, you know who you are, now stop. Funny then but now it's annoying.

@Epikur Really?

@aurum Forget the shitty analogy. My point, is is it justified that Google did this when it's a confidential patient-doctor relationship? Was it in the medical confidentiality context? I agree Google doing the banning is justified, but what I disagree is them not unbanning until now which is years still, and whether it's a medical confidential setting that the image was being used under.