Danioover9000

@Rigel So that justifies him making defamatory content against Actualized.org?

@CARDOZZO Nice!

@Thought Art Yes, world is dangerous, but how does that address and justify @AdeptusPsychonautica's behavior and reactionary content against @Leo Gura's content in YouTube when he already has warnings and disclaimers of his content being advanced and not suitable for viewers with mental disorders and psychosis? Leo's work is only dangerous, or are there other dangers that follow that type of work? User error? People come into this work, mostly forgetting to read the warnings and disclaimers for every video, and within this forum. Is @Leo Gura responsible for a viewer's/user's forgetfulness and obfuscation of responsibility onto Leo? Yes, danger is not limited to Actualized.org content, but how does that tie back to this specific issue that some reactionary content makers make of Actualized.org? So, all of a sudden, when I'm going through a hard patch I conveniently forget there's therapy and emotion professional services that I can contact and go to. How is that @Leo Gura's fault when I didn't go and contact those services myself?

@Rigel How does that point justify @AdeptusPsychonautica's making defamatory reactionary content against Actualized.org?

@Breakingthewall I think the main issue is not that no one wants to understand or misunderstand his teachings, it's that some will try to weaponize and create a propaganda against @Leo Gura and Actualized.org content. I think the specific issue lies on those that give a bad faith interpretation of his content, and tell other people what they should think beforehand, which can be mostly misinformed, especially those who just want to profit from the money and attention and gossip that comes about. For example, almost all of @AdeptusPsychonautica's content is him making sensational content against Actualized.org, among other YouTube Reactionaries that latch onto attacking and defaming Actualized.org as their life calling, willingly dig themselves into a grave position of sunk cost fallacy that as time goes on will become harder to course correct. So, the real question, is that should Actualized.org content be allowed to be shown in YouTube? And should Actualized.org be held responsible even if with the legal warnings and disclaimers beforehand? Or, if you're willing to place restrictions on Actualized.org content, should there be restrictions of these types of reactionary content that defames his content?

@Thought Art So, if I'm open minded to new perspectives of Leo's teachings being dangerous, does this make me more open to influence by people who have a bias against Actualized.org? Is it solely because of @Leo Gura 's content and his delivery that makes this work dangerous, or the majority of people and some who are into personal development and spirituality that forget to check the description box for warnings and disclaimers, that forget to take responsibility for their own weaknesses?

@Rigel Too over simplistic and bad faith.

@Squeekytoy Because @AdeptusPsychonautica 's career and job, is being a YouTube Reactionary creating drama content, within the psychedelic and spiritual community. It's both a sunk cost fallacy, as he's had several + years investing time and energy into making content of this nature, therefore any admittance of fault significant enough to question the integrity of his position and standing in society and life will be avoided or obfuscated. The other reason is that he latched onto @Leo Gura and the outlandish nature o his claims, as it's a now reliable source of income and drama farming that now it's meaningful to keep on making tabloid, sensational exposes of his spiritual teachings. So, for him back out and change his trajectory and make content that actually he likes and is helpful, is no longer an easy choice to make.

@Leo Gura True, although you may want to consider changing a bit of your rhetoric in delivering these insights, you're one of the few that tells of these insights in such a direct manner. If anything, besides how easily people misunderstand these insights, they're probably hung up on the bluntness of the presentation, thinking it's very little comapssion.

@ThermalTide The problem is you haven't contemplated enough about the train problem, and having to choose whether a few di or many die. In context this has been addressed here before, there are risks to the vaccine, but the risks of Covid are way worse and of higher volume, so you're stuck choosing which of the two evil outcomes: To vax and risk the side effects, or to not vax and risk the Covid-19 effects, which are far worse than vaccine risks?

@Emerald Better than a Totalitarian?

@soos_mite_ah I'm just stating a likely probability, based on the current mainstream American voters and who they vote for typically, that it may be unlikely that Marianne Williamson my reach the finals to debate with Biden. Only small chunks of America vote for socialists/progressives, typically within cities under their own ideological loyalties. Not just MLK, but Ghandi, Jesus Christ, and others.

@Leo Gura 100% agree, Buddhists are so annoying.

@abundance Not going to work.

Another example:

@JTL I think it's problematic to label them as such, as it kills any good faith and charitable takes you can have with them. You can attack a person's actions and behavior, but as soon as you attack a person's identity, that kills discussions quickly.

@Emerald I'm surprised you agree with how Vaush is straw manning the right and think it's okay. Donald Trump nor DeSantis would be sending people to death camps in current era or anytime soon. This rhetoric is problematic due to it being a thought terminating cliché and majority would not engage with good faith and charitability. Don't you mean gravel?

@Carl-Richard You have good taste in music, for heavy metal.

@Waken How do you know it's cheating or not? Who gets to decide? What group/who gets to decide what's work and what isn't? Is it justified to create and introduce technology, that ends up disrupting and destroying a person's job/career when in their life story they spent 5-10-20 years of education and training to be that role and excel at that field? Of course, what you consider cheating, work, justified creating for joy, is largely relative and based on your stage of development, cognitive and moral development, personality type and traits, states of consciousness, life experience and other lines of development in different domains of life. Even ideologies indoctrinated into your mind by your culture shapes what you feel and think, that you falsely think you have agency, and falsely think you are right in certain cases, when in the grand scheme of the world you are fundamentally wrong. While I do have some values in stage yellow, and because of how good I am at visualizing places and people and time of passage, I can ultimately see the net positives of this A.I technology, but also can ultimately see the net negative if humanity doesn't put in place ways to regulate these disruptions in technology, because we now are godlike in how we imagine and utilize tech. We have created nuclear plants, strategic/tactical nukes that can wipe out natural environments within seconds that no animal could naturally do. We can develop GMO and CRISPER to develop stronger strains of food types, or mutations of viruses like in gains of research, that is faster than in natural biomes. We can now do cloning technology, create copies of an organ or even a whole human body, and we can splice genes together to create human hybrids and other human variations not normally found in nature, with unknown consequences if such hybrids are allowed to breed and proliferate. We have already seen some extent to how disruptive this A.I program can get, eventually outplaying GM chess players and world class talents in Chinese Go, to playing music to a highly reasonable above standard, and creating nearly photo realistic pictures that make my skin crawl.

A.I is just so scary now, it's not just going to settle down at creative arts and jobs related to that, it's going to go after knowledge work jobs and even more labor jobs. So, what's the ultimate consequence this technology has for the human race? Get the majority to meditate and be hippies? Even that and spirituality the A.I is going to take away from humanity. What a dark future we're heading to:

@mmKay An incredibly skilled visualizer, and very strong imagination powers, you might as well call him a son of God for how powerfully he can imagine and sustain that level of visualization. He's one of my role modals, and I work everyday on my visualization to someday be able to design an art piece in my head, complete with landscapes and characters, all in perspective and all the other art fundamentals. Maybe even design a machine as well. Also thanks to him I play chess even more in my mind, even trying out blindfolded chess games.

@The Mystical Man Decent enough podcast, voices do need improving. It's now a thing in YouTube , making ChatGPT related content?

@The Mystical Man Perfect for a BGM or Title menu song.

@vindicated erudite That's interesting, if they can pull it off.

@Osaid ??‍♀️