Danioover9000

@r0ckyreed That depends on culture, country, SD stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types and traits, states of consciousness, life experiences and other lines of development in life domains to societal domains, and ideology indoctrinated from upbringing and culture. It's mostly cultural whether it's western/eastern cultures, even country and environment play a role. What do you mean 'overlook the confound of privilege? You mean the factor of privilege? Are you assuming in general most conservatives being privileged, white, cisgender, heterosexual and Christian, within the USA? What about within Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the UK, European countries, or eastern division ones like Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, Thailand? Why is it that hard to be happy in society? Because of what? Lack of fundamental rights to safety, liberty, and pursuit of happiness? Are you still talking about the USA or some other country? What if the 1-5 percent of the population, acts too self entitled, endangers others, too libertarian, and in their pursuit of happiness demands the 95-99 percent of the population, with so many worldviews to cater to their own worldview, but doing so undermines mainstream standards?

Oi, I shared a video about transgenderism here, and that woman's on it. WHO TIPPED OFF DESTINY ABOUT THIS VIDEO HUH?!

I think it's better to shut down temporarily and test and see what happens.

@Joel3102 Nice, will be reading them.

@Joel3102 That's right, especially if you factor in which is more grounded in reality, and not corrupted by the internet and the social media sites like Twitter, Twitch gamer/streamer political spheres and sub communities, they're the ones screaming all conservatives are Nazis are the ones more crazier than IRL versions.

@Roy Exactly man, I've been to enough places that different countries have different flavors o conservatives and other ideologies, guess it's really cultural, and thanks to the internet it's a bit corrupted.

@Roy Yeah, I do agree here. Have been to Canada in the past, chill place. As long as you know how to behave socially, you'll get along with people either political spectrum, just say what they want to hear and BOOM! Instant rapport. Conservatives tend to be much easier to get along, def agree, especially in Quebec, they got the best Poutines, and some good places to eat. People don't know how to get along, and the online internet have tik tok brained them, increases in ADD/ADHD, neuroticism, narcissism, self image issues, yeah forget the online variations of these political takes they're more crazy than IRL.

What a fascinating discussion: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=514098727426393

@RebornConsciousness Ideally life SHOULD COME WITH A MANUAL. Also, conservatives, especially more religious folks, and community going people tend to be actually more happier than Liberal minded people, as they already have an established routine they like, and already meet their belonging needs, whilst liberally minded people tend to struggle with meeting their belonging needs because sometimes they don't even like their in-groups, and focus too much on the out-groups and other communities versus their own. Also, how liberal minds are shaped are such that they pot the differences all the time, mostly seeing problems versus solutions, whilst conservative minds, yes not as big picture and outside box thinking and do see fewer problems and solutions, more see how to implement solutions, and design more rigid systems and boxes to manage a problem and even implement solutions. There are weaknesses and strengths from both conservative and liberally minded people, it's just a matter of aligning so many factors that accentuates strengths and minimalizes weaknesses, that's all. No need to demonize or dehumanize conservatives or liberals, just come together, negotiate, and implement solutions, and record the results, and improve upon them, whilst implementing flexibility in the system.

@ryandesreu I agree, first age like wine before making choices that are final.

@Roy It's an interesting trend, I do have my pet theories about this, but even @Leo Gura's liberal mind and conservative mind videos do a decent job of explaining about this: and IMO are fantastic, worth watching and listening to, and contemplating.

@lostingenosmaze Nah man, that was my thread, but it's the other way around. This guy wants to bully and slander me in this forum, and again I'm getting personally attacked and it's kinda silly and annoying at this point. Like, just in this thread how many rules and forum guidelines is that guy breaking compared to me? I'm not being a jerk, am willing to learn from different perspectives, and watch myself and behave, while this guy is the exact opposite. But I digress, I don't want to derail this thread about transrace and Transgenderism, nor participate in hating and trolling attacks against me, calling me rapist, racist, pedophile, and murderer sympathizer? Yeah yeah yeah, you're going to the ignore and getting reported for immaturity yo. So, going back to this topic of the thread, what do you think about Transrace and Transgenderism? Do you think Michael Jackson was a good example, and why/why not?

@JJfromSwitzerland Yo, what's up? how are you today? Have you learnt anything new from this thread?

@DrugsBunny I will iterate again, notice how I'm chill and just responding, and all you're doing is personal attacking me, calling me transphobe and all, being a jerk, being dogmatic and having a heated discussion with me. Again, what post and thread are you referring to? That's taken down, but I remember you're the one citing the Nashville shooting and making that conflation first, not me. Also, stop putting words into my mouth, you were the one talking about Nazi and stuff in that thread. Maybe you are too heated and addicted to being right and being mean and dehumanizing me? Maybe you need to touch grass. Calling me schizophrenic is one thing, but imagining me typing some transphobic thread is another. Yes, I can call you intolerant, but I'm superior in honor compared to you to stoop that low. Again, you're attacking me, not the other way around, and it's getting childish.

@Enlightement I do agree, as I'm sensing the temperature of this thread increasing, but I'm not the admin or moderator and don't have that privilege to lock threads and issue warnings and bans you know? However, let's keep this thread longer for maybe 2 more days, hopefully it'll calm down like this music:

@Roy Yeah, I do agree that you may have needed to articulate yourself more, but if you're dealing with some people who have already made up their mind to demonize you, no amount of articulation, persuasion and charm would change their minds about you. Your simple and straight forward posts here is more than enough in this case. Can't be helped if there's miscommunications, but if you're dealing with someone already bad faith towards you instead of good faith, then it'll be a slippery slope thing.

@DrugsBunny Again, @Leo Gura and @Roy, you both and all users reading this are my witness, I swear I'm not breaking any forum guidelines right now, I'm just responding to this person attacking me. Again, instead of personally attacking me, slandering me in forum by calling me transphobic, rapist, racist, and pedophile sympathizer in the Dalai Lama thread, and being a jerk, why not just chill and stop attacking me for no reason? Also, in that thread which is gone, I didn't cite the Nashville shootings, you did, and edited your posts and misinterpreted my intentions and writing as if I'm transphobic when I'm just making the point that we need more data in science about gender dysphoria in born versus indoctrinated by ideology and group think, that's all. Let moderators watching be my witness, and see that I'm not breaking or bending forum rules, but bunny is. Please stop this juvenile behavior bunny, maybe this transgenderism and transrace topic is triggering you?

@DrugsBunny Again, notice how you're now doubling down and attacking me, yet again threatening forum guidelines. Instead of being a smart ass, a jerk, close minded, dogmatic, cynical person, why not try to be more open minded, willing to learn, and curb the derogatory remarks of me, and slander of me being transphobic when it's fundamentally your delusion at this point? Again everyone reading, notice I'm just responding, I'm not attacking this bunny guy. he's bullying and attacking me, calling me a transphobe and other horrific name callings at me like rapist and schizophrenic. And I'm chill and indifferent. If any of you are being bullied and stalked like this, you should report the user every time,

This is the more dangerous side of dysphoria, not so gender dysphoria but this dysphoria is seriously dangerous: Now multiply that towards a growing collective problem, and we end up with mass neurosis and psychosis. There's good reason why on average people most identify as heterosexual, cis gender, whilst aligned with their biological sex as the most average, then those who still are their biological sex but are gay, then the LGBTQP minorities. On an individual level this person should seek help to correct their dysphoria of whatever, but if we have groups of people and cultures okaying this behavior and thinking, and trying to program and manufacture consent in the population that it's fine for people to become blind if they feel they're supposed to be blind, even when biologically they're fine, even when some are just confused with their feelings, they want to be blind but not sure, yet they're circumstances are fine, they're going through SD stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality and psychological development, but are peer pressured into doubling down into their confusion and make the wrong choice then we will start having issues that can grow and multiply. Again, it's the ratio of group conformity and ideology that's concerning more so than the inborn gender dysphoria.

@RendHeaven This does seem to factor in and correlate to the increase in the transgenderism in some schools, but it's not clear how it effects transrace. A possible issue I have with this is that it's heavily drawing from inferences and inductive reasoning. For example, just because a person/group is constantly blasted(needs specific timeframe, too general) by estrogenics, heavy metals, hyper processed foods, lack of sunlight, sleep, non-native EMFs, plastics, increase in malnutrition,(these factors need more specifics like time and amounts) for decades, does not necessarily means the direct consequence of a biological man slowly identifying as a woman, at best it's either strongly correlated or mixed correlation towards increases of transgenderism and transrace. Why isn't anxiety and trauma not the leading factor in a biological man to identify as a woman? Or as another race? I partly agree with both @Roy and your take on this point, to me it's dependent on stage of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types and traits(I think with Roy here he's referring to higher neurosis and higher scores in agreeableness, messiness and introversion, and lack of boundary enforcement which allows outside peers and group conformity to effect this personality far more), states of consciousness, life experiences, fear barriers, other lines of development in various life domains up to societal domains, and ideological indoctrinations.

@Schizophonia Yeah, it's worth noting and recording in a scientific database.

@DrugsBunny I think the implication is that I've pledged this vow to myself, and have kept it in that thread about Dalai Lama this far, only limiting myself to responding to you and not initiating the argument, shows I have more honor than you. Since then I kept my promise, but because you didn't agree to that vow also, and mentioned me here in this thread, now you're the initiator of this sub conversation we're having, which means I have the moral high ground of either choosing to engage with you or not. unlike the other thread, but keep in mind I adhered to my pledge, and have never initiated the discourse with you, until you initiated this here. My showing some support for a moderator here in a joking manner is my business and the Mod, which didn't warrant any concern from you. Remember, you decided to involve yourself here, you are the attacker and initiator here, not the other way around bunny. I disagree, what makes you think I'm going to be banned similarly or the same way as you might be banned? Or be warned similarly or the same as you? Why assume I'm as faulty as you? As far as I can tell, you have infringed upon the following guidelines: 1. Don't be a jerk. So, from this thread, seeing how you word your posts implies you being a jerk, not nice, and not polite. You word your posts as if you are being judgmental and cynical, negative traits very similar to being a jerk. Compared to me here, I have yet to communicate in a jerk way, so why do you assume I'm going to be warned and banned like you in this instance? 2. Unwilling to learn from different perspectives. In this thread you have initiated exchanges between you and @Roy and some other users, worded such that you believe in your position and assertion that your position is right, followed by superiority style justifications, then assume I'm and users here who don't support your view and show difference in opinion are bigots, then assume because of some unrelated context between my recent posting style and thread topics in this sub forum of tabloid like material and posting drama baited drivel that @Leo Gura may warn or even ban me, is implying that I'm going to be banned and warned like you, which the two contexts have little in connection. You are drawing and extrapolating from some other context to jump the conclusion that I'm as fallible as you, which is false because I've also heeded Leo's warning and toned down my rhetoric and posting style a bit recently. However, have you heeded Leo's warning or a moderator's warning of toning your communication style down? By your admission, it implies that you haven't and will continue to communicate like the above, and I differ in that I adjust myself when necessary while you seem to not want to. 3. No personal attacks, or heating a discourse and having heated debates and arguments. This rule you've also are mostly bending and in some cases do break due to your communication style, and almost disregard for being respectful to Leo and moderators here. Ever since the Dalai Lama thread, and the transgenderism thread I started months ago which was taken down, you have been accusing me of bigotry and being a pedophile sympathizer and racist sympathizer and transphobic in those other threads. You then took the time to misconstrue my statements when I'm joking with another user, and twist it such that I'm now the bad guy, and since then you've been posting about me and baiting me into engaging with you, which caused some of the users that have been following me to unfollow me, and some of the thread I'm starting to not be as replied as much in the past due to you bad mouthing me behind my back to other users. This is also slanderous within this forum, another rule you're breaking. Also hijacking some of my older threads to also state and claim I'm a schizophrenic that needs help without any basis for such claims. At this point I have yet to infringe upon these guidelines and much more. At this point a public apology from you from some of your defamatory statements about me that are clearly no true might be in order, and would be nice given the grief you're causing me lately. As Michael Jackson famously sang in 'Man in the mirror', that change begins with you taking a hard look at yourself in the mirror, and asking why am I not so nice lately?

@integral Speaking of ideas and perspectives, let's go back to the start, what is transgenderism and transrace, and are the two sometimes connected? Perfect example of this, to me, is the case with Michael Jackson, who has suffer some situations, and due to the SD stage of development, cognitive and moral development, personality type and trait, states of consciousness, ego development, life experiences and other lines of development in his life, and other influences from culture and society, that he ultimately undergone surgery to change his skin pigmentation into white, and changed his nose a bit. To me he wanted to transcend his own race because he was both tired of it, and the lack of love by his family, mother, father, siblings(because the Jackson family was both a family and business as well, and under the father's over strict discipline has beaten out some of the childhood within Michael, creating a shadow aspect of the child within him, which had haunted Michael Jackson up to the point of the fire accident and having to do the surgery) drove him mad enough, that when he can no longer suppress and deny that ego part of himself, it manifests as deep longing to have that childhood back, that innocence and magical experiences as child back, combined with what he was exposed to culturally, seeing another race group getting and performing much better, and the perceived successfulness they got, made him want to become like the successful white group. Just so happens that he got the excuse to do the pigment change via fire accident. Combined with societal expectations and desire for his high performance art, which was taxing for him to do. I also suspect that most of his N.O.M.A.P tendency is rooted in deep lack of love and full development of and acceptance of that childhood, which was denied and limited by the overbearing father figure. I suspect there's far more going on behind closed doors that distorted his sexuality, but I don't know. Do you think this example is a good one? Yes there's little to do with transgenderism, although you could argue that there's some degree of gender dysphoria or dysphoria of the false self image created earlier in his life, that could tie in with transrace because he was undergoing or trying to transcend his physical limitations like his race, and even his own sex if he could, So, good example, or is there a better one? What do you think and feel on this topic?

@Enlightement Yes, it's the internet world, and we're becoming more and more neurotic over time.

@Phil King Patrick David is a scammer, fraudster, swindler, con artist and hustler, who ran an MLM pyramid scheme in the past, credit goes to Coffeezilla. Tucker should stay away from the guy if he did his research on him, not worth the deal.