Danioover9000

Member P3
  • Content count

    12,494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Danioover9000

  1. Feel free to answer any of these questions, because being silent is not always golden.
  2. @Hatfort Assuming you can survive the mistreatment of the cinema staff. Apparently they're making the viewing experience uncomfortable by leaving the lights on, turning up the AC and so on.? That's why I am waiting on the guys here to go in there and tell me what the movie's like.
  3. @charlie cho I'd love to fight him in the ring, but I'm a JKD martial artist, so he'll probably get lots of injuries so... Easy win on the debate, cuz I'm just going to keep bringing up that one clip of him snitching himself as a rapist scamming pimp. Easy win GG.
  4. @charlie cho If you have no personal feelings for @Leo Gura and love him, then why are you still talking about Andrew Tate in this way, knowing how Leo doesn't like him? Do you talking about people your family or friends hate while with them? Yes, Andrew Tate may not be a great actor, musician, businessmen. What's the point your making here with this statement? So in terms of fighting and playing chess to demonstrate his forward thinking skills, the artistic parts of this fighting/war aspect, he's great? Isn't fighting and martial arts meant to train one's discipline, same with chess and thinking? If that's true, then why did Andrew Tate start affiliate program hustler's university, and recruit young girls into his illegal web cam business using a bottom bitch, and behave like a pimp scammer instead of a disciplined critical thinker? So because Andrew Tate accomplished far more short term success than @Leo Gura, person you love and respect here, that justifies he's treatment of women and being a sexist and misogynist, even when he hasn't made a course that out competes against Leo's life purpose course, or even shared books and exercises better than Leo's? If all your argument rests on that Andrew Tate is a Muay Thai champion(or is it kickboxing?), and a chess champion, because he's soo successful, then you can take that argument to also argue and justify Jimmy Savile behaviors in the BBC, or Jeffrey Epstein's actions, just because they were highly valuable successful males short term. If that's your entire argument you can easily do that to most evil successful males, right?
  5. @Yali I think he meant 15% of Americans are overt racists. The 20-30% are more covert Racists.
  6. Also, I'm sorry, but 20:53 to 21:36, dying 4 times to that quick time button pressing...first time ever, as I've seen many other playthroughs they survive that quick time, I'm calling BS. Also few minutes afterwards IMO that reactions was suspicious, like you just witnessed Ellie(and you the player) kill in self defense a pregnant lady, and you give that type of reaction? That's super weird AF.
  7. Another video of hers I'm analyzing: Really odd to me is at 15:40 to 16:00, very odd emotional reaction to killing the dogs, from her facials to tonality. Maybe she has different values? Another assumption, what's really bugging me, is I intuitively feel like her target audience is 12 year old and below due to her exaggerated expressions and emotional outbursts. Kind of reminds me of Markiplier's persona and energy, maybe that's why? But if this is the case then I'm a bit disturbed by it because if you look at her body language, facials, mannerisms, tonality throughout these videos, if her target viewers are much younger, and her banner art in her channel being classed as Chibi art(Which in Japan chibi a genre of art that has cute like features emphasized, intended for children from pre school, to elementary and middle school) then most of her content is inappropriate for that age group because the Witcher, and TLOU1 and 2 contain mature themes, graphic violence and gore, and suggestive sexual themes not suitable for that demographic. I don't know, probably will focus on another person for body language analysis for now. This person gives me strange vibes. What do you guys think in terms of body language? Am I a bit off or am I close to being right? Any inputs @Carl-Richard, @Roy, @Leo Gura, @itsadistraction, @Yimpa
  8. @Majed Maybe @Leo Gura should make a power differential video?
  9. @Juan People's opinions about you are irrelevant.
  10. @Majed @OBEler @StarStruck It seems likely, plus on average they do have sexual fantasies. He may have googled it. And some don't. These are high quality posts, keep'em coming!
  11. @Leo Gura Hey! One thing you and Mr. Girl can agree on: Power differentials.
  12. @Leo Gura Not only that, but the mass hysteria is just going to be too much, if any government takes this seriously enougb to try and legitimize this sexual orientation, that's probably enough to spark domestic terrorist attacks and a civil war from the right to the left. Also, probably a huge increase in taxpayers to set up more rehabilitation programs, to try and correct or manage people of this nature, and other programs to help them, this might be expensive to do to hire high quality doctors to work with such people.
  13. @Majed The main problem is not that men/women, in their 30s and up, are having a dating or casual relationship with a 12 to 16 year old boy/girl, the main problem is scale, when thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of minor attracted people have relations with so many pre teens. BTW yes this is a legitimate sexual orientation, but it's not pedophilia you're referring to as that attraction is to prepubescent bodies, it's hebephilia, an attraction to mid to late adolescent bodies and bodies somewhere in the middle of developing puberty. In either sexual orientation, at scale it's just very difficult to manage safely, as likelihood of not just physical but mental and emotional harm, at scale, is far greater multiplied per person. That plus changes to the demographics, psychographics, and many other developmental factors makes this a very challenging task to solve at the deepest root level possible. If you're argument is concerning personal or individual scale, there's leeway here for maybe a healthy relationship, but what does that look like at the individual level, between an adult and a pre teen still developing psychologically? Especially factoring in exploitation and manipulations of the ego, and the more unethical behaviour and views from male and female psychology in dating?
  14. A short and nice analysis: https://youtu.be/6CcKdWGjNFA
  15. @Hardkill It's incredibly complicated due to other developmental factors like Spiral Dynamics stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, 9 stages of ego development, life experiences and other lines of development in one's life and societal, plus ideological indoctrinations grooming and gaslight from upbringing and culture, self biases and preferences in regards to sex, sexuality, dating and relationships. If we factor in technological advancement, the internet is like a multiplication factor that increases ADD/ADHD like symptoms, narcissism, self image and self esteem problems, decreasing attention spans, and filling the majority of the newer generation with shitty information intake, garbage in garbage out with over sensationalized social media content. Tik Tik is a prime example of everything wrong with the internet, the dark web, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, the influencer culture. The internet is like a bad mediator, going in between necessary life experiences like dating, intimacy, socializing, making and maintaining family and friend relationships, face to face not just within the internet. Just too much bad and misinformation out there that pollutes our current information ecology and ecosystem, making our systems sicker and retarded over time if we don't get this social media issues and the negative effects of overusing the internet under control.
  16. @Rishabh R Both are fine to do. If you want to find out yourself quickly, then the next time you contemplate, keep asking yourself 'why' questions, and only why questions for every answer. After that, switch to asking in different ways. Compare just asking yourself whys versus asking a variety of questions. Do you like to be super linear, or super creative when contemplating?
  17. @StarStruck My first edict as dictator, is to enforce everyone to properly title their threads, or never use social media again.
  18. What a nice example of immaturity, probably a stage red also: Pro tip: If you're going to be that disrespectful, you better be prepared with speed, strength and skills to actually deliver on that disrespect and be an animal in the ring, or just don't and stick to some trash talking.
  19. What a great example of isometrics strength, and speed, and great boxing movement and muscle coordination. I'm definitely guessing that the source of his strength and speed is isometrics, plus other factors in fitness. Of course it could be genetics and body compositions as well, but his build is very similar to Bruce Lee's, not as ripped, but for a smaller frame he's generating a lot of speed and power.
  20. @Rishabh R Here's a much better examples to ask @Leo Gura : First scenario: I ask What is insight? I answer it in multiple parts: 1) A deep penetrating vision and mental gaze. 2) A deep understanding of a thing or situation, the true nature. 3) intuition signals, emotional signals and implicit, pre cognitions of a TRUTH. I then make questions based on what I've answered and flower those questions, so for 1) A deep penetrating vision and mental gaze I question: What is penetration? What is vision? What is a mental gaze? What are some examples? What are and answer them like a primary tree or like a brainstorming session and just ask a big list of questions per answer. Almost like arm chair philosophy here. Second scenario, While I'm answering a question, I visualize and IMAGINE MYSELF becoming the question, or becoming the answer, or becoming those examples I'm providing, like what does it mean to be VISION ITSELF? What does it feel/look/sound like? What is like to become LIGHT and SPACE itself? So here I'm including my emotions and intuitions into answering these questions. Third scenario: I'm contemplating whilst living my day to day. So, if I'm contemplating insights, and I'm in the shop, and I feel an intuitive insight into packaging, I'd pick a product and contemplate it, whilst engaging my senses of that thing I'm contemplating. This is more a location and event based contemplation, when I'm within a situation that aligns with my contemplation. Another example of this, is contemplating masturbation or sex, this way I'm contemplating them when I'm ACTUALLY DOING THE ACTS I'M INTERESTED IN QUESTIONING! Epistemically speaking, you're basically asking @Leo Gura which methods of contemplations work more: Rationalizing or heavy logical usage in a private room, a more emotional/intuitive/creative feelings approach, using visualizations to become that which you seek deeper answers from, or an in-field location solely based contemplation, whilst in the situation you're contemplating? So which one is it? Should how my contemplation methods be tailored to my own biases, preferences, ideological beliefs, states of consciousness, cognition, morality, my own values, my own strengths and weaknesses? Should my contemplations be very personalized to me only and be modified versions of @Leo Gura's way of contemplating, or is it fine as is to use his methods in the beginning?
  21. @Majed Yes, religion makes most people happy.
  22. Don't take dating advice from Charlie and Destiny, they almost sound as bad as Andrew Tate:
  23. @Blackhawk Likewise, if you don't see the problem with your tit for tat thinking, of causing massive massacres with your ideological biases and simplistic thinking, then no discourse would make you open minded.
  24. @Tanz Basically what I've been saying, all they care about is making an ideology out of this without solving the deeper root problems, systemically, that create sex trafficking in the first place, and even this hebephilia/pedophilia attraction because a small percentage of the population are literally attracted to prepubescent to post pubescent bodies. All that Jordan Peterson did was mostly emphasized the psychological side of it, whilst that's piss poor IMO, he conveniently skips that a few are hardwired this way, and skips over that there are benign types, not just only malicious types, and is only interested in signal boosting and virtue signaling to his fanbase and conservative/traditional viewers getting thought terminated cliched here. Not only is pedophilia no a thought terminating cliche for the masses, so is anything resembling this qAnon conspiracy theory or even trafficking. Naturally these are dark subject matters almost nobody wants to engage fully with, which is actually the main reason why mainstream media is acting this way because it's too uncomfortable to engage with, not mainly because there are a few elites and syndicates connected to these activities.