Danioover9000

@Karmadhi Didn't Trump in the past visited the Jerusalem wall? I also think it's likely he'll be able to manipulate and make himself more viable if he took a more proactive stance on the whole Israel Palestine conflict. If Trump choses to be for Israel, he'd use rhetoric to involve more American Troops in that region and flex more of the American might on 'helping Israel' but really to extend more American influence in that region, creating opportunity to be the one in history to try and nation build Palestine and get the credit for it. On the other hand, if he's against Israel and wants to show more support for Palestinians, he'd make up some rhetoric about how inefficient Israel's military is, and that it needs more assistance, which gives him plausible deniability in sending troops there to deal with HAMAs, but also to exert more power against Israel and to increase control in that region. After all, Biden and America showed some interest in that region, so Trump could capitalize on looking good by being the one to spearhead into that region. Of course all that is speculative, and will depend on how he gains more votes and wins more confidence and favors from the American people come political time and election season.

@Vrubel Okay, so you acknowledge that you're more biased and preferential to Israel and not Palestine, and less unbiased and objectively looking at this whole situation, which means you can't list the pros and cons of Palestine, and pros and cons of Israel, in this entire conflict. Given that, could you at least list 3 things that are wrong from Israel's actions towards Palestinians, and 3 things that are right from Palestinian's response to Israel? Or are you too biased that you cannot do a basic list of rights and wrongs from either side? Also, it's a contradiction that you're so unbiased, yet you are biased to Israel in this particular war going on, were you like this when you look at the history of the Israel Palestine conflict?

@HMD She's showing off plenty of leg skin, can't blame them for feeling horny... jk jk, no surprise they are being sore losers. Hurts to be a fan of a losing team so they'll be immature, deflect and blame anyone and anything else but themselves and take no ownership of the feelings of defeat they feel, among other negative emotions. Good example of low consciousness and pettiness.

I would concur with Leo, as I've traveled the world and visited several countries. New experiences and new places can be informative to your consciousness.

A museum relabels a roman empower as a trans woman: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-67484645.amp Conveniently forgetting that in those ancient times, for a man to be called a woman, or effeminate, or have feminine qualities is a treat insult. It's the equivalent to a black man getting called the n word. plus LGBTQ groups think thag most roman and Greek are gay at that time. Well, they also skip over the fact that cuckoldry, and same sex relationships then, are severely punishable, and sometimes executed as a deterrent against such behaviour to them leading to soft effeminate men, as back then developmental factors are lower in terms of Spiral dynamics stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality typing and traits, ego development, Integral Theory, ideological beliefs indoctrinated by culture, family upbringingz self biases and preferences, as well as a more limited information ecology. It's a very different world, mostly stage red/blue, compared to today's Era. The question, should thiw be allowed to happen? This was also Marcus Aurelius's son they're doing this too.

@Nabd Sure, I heard that there are mud baths in Israel you can go to, they're nice to take.

@Vrubel I'm not asking if your unbiased or biased, I'm asking you to demonstrate your attempt at being unbiased by listing the wrongs from Israel's side first, before listing the wrongs from Palestine's side. BTW, this is one example of why it's important to have enforcement arms for ideologies, as a ramification from feminism, egalitarianism and westernized secularist countries that have declining birthrates and high divorce rates, and also an example of why patriarchy is important. If Palestine had it's enforcement arm, like a military, it could defend it's own self determination and it's own biases from Israel, but due to the 100-70 years of the Israel Palestine conflict, and Israel having superior technological and mechanized army, and having some outside support, it can enforce it's own bias onto Palestinians.

@Lila9 Patriarchy is based on men ruling, and men providing and protecting their tribes from other tribes, kingdoms from other kingdoms, civilisations from other civilisations, countries from other countries. Patriarchy also is deeply based on genetics and biology, that most males are hardwired for fighting and defending their own women from their own tribe from outsiew male tribes that want to sexually reproduce throgb them. The majority of rights for women, feminism and egalitarianism principles are enforced and protected by men, meaning that if all men decided to abolish feminism and egalitarianism, there's little women can do about it. Feminism and egalitarianism exists because some men defend and enforce those ideologies, just like how autocratic rulers defend their lands. Women depending on men is the average then, and even now, when it comes to survival and defense from other men. Women's personal and spiritual growth, again, only possible because men protect them from other men that would enslave them and force breed with them from another tribe. What are you talking about? Laws come from theocracy and patriarchy. Saying that patriarchy and theocracy isn't required is inaccurate because they are what made society today. If you get to say that, then feminism and matriarchy also isn't required for society. Wht is feminism required for the continuation of society and civilisation, when men from patriarchy are needed to defend women from other men? Can feminism enforce it's own ideology absent patriarchy and military? And hyper individualism, Neoliberalism, multiculturalism, feminism and egalitarianism have given women so much individualism in choosing male partners, in putting career first over marriage and family, that it has massively contributed to the birthrate declining within westernized secular countries in Japan, South Korea, and other western countries. Even China and Russia, secularist countries, that jave legalized abortions decades ago, have sufered the consequences of that decision. You say there should be health balance with the feminine and masculine, that societies should honor both for human flourishing, yet how is this a good direction when there's too much individualism and feminism in women and birthrates are decluning currently? How is it good when secularism trans and LGBTQ ideologies when theg are reproductive dead ends that won't advance human flourishing? How is any of this current situation balanced? How is this a human evolution development when these ideologies are antithetical to human flourishing, declining birthrates and increasing divorce rates, and indoctrinating future generations to continue believing in feminism, egalitarianism and secularism?

@zazen This is a good post, people here should read anf contemplate this.

@Vrubel To prove you are unbiased, can you list all the shortcomings of Israel in this conflict, and what theh did wrong for the past 100 years that lead to this conflict?

@Basman I think that monarchy and traditional structures are necessary for the formation of kingdoms, civilisations, countries and nations historically. I think patriarchy is a must, as all rights made onto man is created and enforced by men, otherwise the rights are null and anyone can violate those rights. I think that feminism, egalitarianism and neoliberalism in westernized secular countries have contributed to the massive birthrates declining, look at South Korea, Japan, and the European countries and even the USA. I think that no fault divorce and separation of state and church, and too much PUA and sexual compatibility, too much individualism, dating, and immature promiscuity has lead to high divorce rates and broken homes and the decline of the nuclear family, and a rise in sintle parent and alternative homes and detached homes that are inferior to intaked households, which all will lead to higher narcissism and sociopathy in conjunction with high social media consumption which cripples future generations.

@Raze It's so obvious when you look at 80 years of Israel increasing it's territory and taking more land from Palestinians that ignoring the map and their increasing power is just lame. How anyone blindly supports those Zionists, and silences criticism of them is crazy, it's delusional.

@Karmadhi I think it's getting thag bad that Donald Trump has a higher fhance of winning. Yes rhetorically Biden's support for Israel despite it's territorial exploitation to Gaza, the west bank and mistreatment of Palestinians in Israel, despite it's 2 party ethnostate lead by Zionists wishing to convert or oppress Palestinians, isn't so surprising. Consider that America did very similar to the Apache and Comanche, Native American tribes, because the early settlers needed more land, and buffalo fur and meat which the tribes also needed, and other events such as Neoliberalism and capitalism becomung predatory and proselytising to other countires, sometimes destabilizing them and making the immigration crisis worse. When two collective egos have a shared historical pattern of behaviour, they tend to want to support them.

@Cireeric Contraction? You mean attraction? Ir it's attraction, it's after I'm👻.

Since @Leo Gura has made the learning=behaviour change, learning=observation, and learning=making distinctions, it'll be nice to get a learning=construction, as that can dovetail with true versus false skepticism and deconstruction videos. What is deconstructed will entail construction, so a video on what and how to construct in healthy ways is a great follow up.

@zazen Great example of propaganda, narrative, and ideological warfare, grooming and indoctrination. So, how do we deal with such indoctrination in the middle of an asymmetrical warfare, between two collective cultures?

Interesting video of the conflict:

This is a great example of immaturity between two arguers arguing for their worldviews, not knowing the developmental factors like spiral dynamics stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality typing and traits, ego development, Integral Theory and other lines of development, and ideological indoctrination from family upbringing, culture and information consumed in the information ecology plagued by narrative, information and ideological warfare: This is why the true nature of argumentation is the survival of your ego mind attached to the topic argued for or against, and does many disingenuous manipulation tactics, fallacies and appeals to logos, ethos and pathos. As a result we get bad faith uncharitable takes and little good will discussion. Both sides of this argument have heated, bad faith and distorted and dishonest framing of secularism qnd of religion, both egos defensive and not for TRUTH, but for truth that serves their biases and preferences.

@not-a-faerie So you submit yourself as an example of immaturity here?

Dungeons and dragons for the win, goo potential for self actualisation and role play simulates social relationships and teamwork dynamics, makes the players and the dungeon master imagine and think/feel into the perspective of the character they role play.

@UnbornTao Sure, but I mean learning = construction, as in how to get healthier conceptual understanding and knowledge of something. Yes there's overlap with making distinctions because making distinctions in the mind leads to more robust mental representations of reality, more distinct categories and classifications in one's mind. That's the question of how does our learning lead to better construction after rhe deconstruction of an older outdated modal of reality?

@Juan I don't like Lex Fridman, as you can tell so far of what I said in this thread. The fact I have to explain such a simple thing to some social media addict delinquent is beneath me. First get yourself off of a Tik Tok mind slavery before criticising and attacking me.

Why do we think that Jordan Peterson is 'losing it' is a good or bad thing? That he is being more phobic as a bad thing? Hypothetical, transphobia is considered a bad phobia, but phobia of a sexual assault or murderer is a good thing, why is one phobua considered bad, but another fear good to feel?

Good video by backpacker Steve, of part of my mother country:

Monarchies and traditional societies and religions are neither good nor bad, but thinking makes it so.