Nah... women will always downplay their numbers because it increases your value.
Your friend who fucked 55 dudes will never tell that to her future husband.
So why are you rebuking me for the cock carousel? There it is.
I totally get that.
Men and women both struggle, just in asymmetrical ways. That's my whole point. Neither side has it easy.
I'm all for it. I promote conscious relationships. But I am also realistic about how survival works.
Statiatical surveys show that women consistently downplay their number of sexual partners, just as guys upplay theirs.
Don't take it personal. I didn't slut-shame anyone here. I merely said I won't blindly trust a woman's self-reported numbers. I'm not a fool. Women play games too. Your game is playing coy.
Haha! And how do I deal with the fact that I wasn't born with a foot-long cock and a perfectly muscular body that would allow me to be a world-class porn star?
You can raise your value but only so far. Genetics is a big factor.
You ain't ever gonna land Leonardo De Caprio. Just like I will never land a supermodel.
Tough titty.
But here's the silver lining: you can find someone near your level of sexual value.
You deal with it by loving who you are regardless of who you are.

Of course I understand that.
You are describing the female sexual agenda. I totally get it.
But men are under no obligation to cater to your agenda.
Well, that's beyond the scope of what most men are interested in learning. Most men want to buy advice for how to get more sex, not how to be nice to their girlfriend.
Again, you are expecting men to want to suit your female sexual agenda. But of course men have their own agenda. Why should men work towards your agenda when you don't care about fulfilling their agenda?
Men are merely doing to you what you are doing to them.
Notice your self-bias here.
Haha! And if women would freely open their legs for men when the man wanted it, then men would be much happier with no frustration or burden.
You are not understanding that women and men have conflicting agendas. You expect the man to align to your agenda while you will not do so for him. So here we are stuck in sex wars.
The nature of sexual relations is adversarial. This needs to be understood.
Yes, but you will never give your love to a man you don't find attractive.
Neither will a man.
You expect the man to bend over backwards for you. Which is selfish. But when you act selfish, why are you surprised when the man acts selfish too? He's merely mirroring your own selfishness.
Your desire to lock down a high quality man is selfish and that is your agenda. A man is not under any obligation to do that. Maybe he wants that. But maybe he doesn't. And there is noone to say which is right or wrong because this is a purely relative matter.
And what if he wants sex but you don't give it to him?
High quality women will attract strong men, which is what they want.
Where in the universe is it written that a man should have one woman. See? The universe doesn't revolve around your needs.
Then don't sleep with players. Sleep with some shy nerd who has zero game. There are millions of them around so you will have no problem finding one.
But you see, you don't want to sleep with such a man. You are not attracted to that. You are attracted precisely to strong men who are players who would sleep with lots of women. But you selfishly want to lock him down for yourself exclusively.
So you are creating your own problem.
Likewise for a man. A hot woman can easily be an awful human on the inside. The hottest women tend to be spoiled and emotionally fucked up.
You don't like asshole men, and we men don't like emotional nutcase women. So we're even. Dealing with a crazy emotional woman's drama is no walk in the park.
Of course. But you must have heard of hot women who were insane spoiled brats.
Let's not pretend that men are the only cheaters in the game. Women cheat too. Women use men too.
No, that's highly relative. Like I said, you are free to date whoever you want. Date a socially clueless and humorless man. Go date an incel. They got zero game. But they also have zero value.
But of course you will never be attracted to an Incel.
You see, you are trying to steal sexual value. What you really want is this: you want a super attractive high value man who will never leverage his value. Well, good luck. The more value a man has, the more he will leverage it. Likewise, the more value a woman has, the more she will leverage it. A hot women will not hesitate to leverage her value to get the best man she can. Don't act like only men do this leveraging. All hot women do it.
If a woman has enough value, she will be able to leverage it to get the man to be loyal to her. But if she has insufficient value, she won't. And this is what really pisses you off. Because you want to be able to lock down a man with higher value than you, and you see how easily that fails. But you still want it because you are greedy. You want value for free. This is otherwise known as stealing value. Your ego-mind wants to steal sexual value. Well, that doesn't work so well. So stop doing it.
I know plenty of players and PUAs who ended up settling for one woman. For most guys, pickup is a phase they go through. They sleep around with a handful of girls until they find one and settle down. Few guys want to be hardcore players for life. This is an exception, not the rule. It's also not very sustainable or even desirable. Dating multiple women gets exhausting and time-consuming.
But also, don't pretend like women don't go through a slutty phase. Women sleep around as much if not more than men, but you love to deny it.
No and no.
Sometimes people are just not compatible or properly aligned with each other. In fact this is more often the case than not.

Don't forget that guys with serious game are like 2% of the population.
So if you don't want a player, you can easily avoid them. As long as you can keep your legs closed for them
The thing about players is.... you want to open your legs for them real bad. That's what makes them a player.

It can still be difficult for them. Plenty of spiritually gifted people have harrowing journeys to awakening (like the many classic shaman stories). So don't get the idea that being spiritually gifted makes this process a walk in the park. You can be spiritually gifted and still have a lot of shadow material to work through.
But the biggest thing is, most people will never even attempt to awaken or know about awakening otherwise, unless they are lucky enough to stumble upon it.
A big secret to successful awakening is have the right motivation, curiosity, and desire for it. That in itself is a very rare thing which already requires a certain degree of spiritual attunement. If you motivation is strong, the rest is just a matter of time. If you motivation is weak, almost nothing can help you. So getting your motivation straight is crucial. Which is where psychedelics can be especially helpful. People would be a lot more motivated to awaken if they had a direct experience of God or Infinite Consciousness. It's very hard to build motivation off hearsay and fairytales. It's crucial to experience God for yourself so you know that it is more real than a brick wall. It's very hard to be motivated to pursue a thing for years which you doubt is real.

Yes, it's worth it.
It certianly won't get you awakening, but at least it will be a gateway to more serious spiritual pursuits in years to come.
If you want a chance at awakening via meditation you will have to do at least week-long retreats where you meditate nonstop all day long, every day. Month-long retreats would be more realistically necessary.

The mistake you're making is confusing psychedelics with makyo. Psychedelics are precisely NOT phenomenal distortions but pure insight, deeper than the insight of Zen meditation. The visual distortions that some psychedelics cause are to be completely ignored. The visual distortions arise with psychedelics precisely for the same reason they arise in meditation. They arise even more with psychedelics because they are like meditation x100. So you get 100 times stronger visual distortions but also 100 times deeper insight. Ignore the distortions and keep the insight, just as the Zen masters advise.
There is no mistake in the Zen advice, but the way you are applying it to psychedelics is precisely backwards.
You should dismiss makyo whether you're meditating or tripping balls. And don't forget, all of physical reality is makyo. So don't forget to dismiss that while you're at it
This can vary for different people.
In my view yoga is signficantly more powerful because it is a bio-chemical-mechanical change of the body-mind organism. Much moreso than meditation. Yoga leads to effortless meditation by a mechanical silencing of the mind.

No, it's not useless. But it just cannot compare to a powerful psychedelic.
It's the difference between a bow & arrow and a nuclear bomb.
But also appreciate this: if you don't have a nuclear bomb, a bow & arrow is still damn useful.

Like someone wants me to do something and I could just say “There is no doer-ship”
Or someone’s worried about something and I say “The future is imaginary”
Or someone insults me and I say “The boundary between self and other is imaginary, so you’re really just insulting yourself”
I would take the time to correctly explain these ideas to someone who was interested, but for people who aren’t, is there any harm in trolling them in this way?

Wv Golf 1.4 Fsi. A second-hand (or more like 4th hand). Manufactured in 2009 and works well. I had to replace a few things that were just worn out and change a water pump after leakage but haven't had any other issue. The car cost me 2600 British Pounds. 
If you don't know anything about cars, it is a good idea either to buy from an authorised reselling dealer or go with someone who knows more about this stuff to help you review the state of the car if buying from previous user. 
Things to keep in mind: 
diesel cars are being pushed out of the market in Europe & UK, I wouldn't buy one consider cost of fuel if you are going for bigger engine especially if you're gonna be driving in cities a lot (costs of fuels are skyrocketing across the world and are only gonna go up from now on)  consider how common that car is (spare parts & repairs cost)  consider utility - no point buying pickup if you're gonna be commuting. Unless you want an exceptional performance something with 1.4-1.6 engine volume should do the trick. Go for the best fuel consumption you can get while not completely sacrificing for performance (Golf, Polo etc). Also, I think 6th gear is a nice thing to have if you do a lot of long-distance travel but I don't know enough about cars to really be sure this makes that much difference  check if you'll have to pay emission tx where you live check the annual cost of car tax beforehand  check the annual cost of car insurance beforehand make sure the car you bought is not reported as stolen or previously crahsed  (authorised dealers will know this)  Generally second hand car purchase is probably a better idea if you are on a budget just make sure to buy from reliable seller. You can't usually go wrong with German cars, Toyota, Honda or Ford (ppl who know more about cars may disagree) The more complex the engine (e.g. turbo and that sort of stuff) the higher the likelihood of issues (from what I've been told) 

Slavery was popular just two lifetimes ago.

It doesn't have to be hard. Your mind is creating that. It could be fun and effortless. But this takes practice of putting yourself in the right state.

That's going to be a subjective and relative judgment call everyone will have to make for themselves.
I'm not saying she is a racist. I don't know. I'm just saying that most people judged her as a racist for that language she used, and I don't see that changing even if the dude threatened her.
People do over use the "racist" label these days. You need to be extra careful to notice whether your calling someone a racist isn't just your own projection. It probably is in 50% of cases or so.

I call BS on this.
Everyone craves to be close with others. They just have trauma which obscures intimacy or they lack the skills.
It is not true that introverts don't value intimacy and closeness to others. They value it a lot, they just prefer it with fewer people but deeper. Whereas extroverts prefer it more shallow with more people.
I am extremely introverted but I love intimacy and closeness with very select people. I don't like juggling a bunch of shallow friendships.

Nothing in life is achievable for everyone.
But if you want to get really good with girls, you can, and your height will not stop you.
There's no simple answer to this question. Obviously having natural social skills makes it easier. But you can develop your game a lot regardless of where you start.
Notice that your mind is hunting for excuses to justify your limiting beliefs.
Girls taller than me virtually do not exist.
And I personally don't find any girl over 5'11" attractive. I don't want to sleep with a fucking giraffe. Girls in the 5'6"-5'9" range are ideal for me. Short girls are also not a good fit for me because of the height difference. If you are a shorter guy, you can find tons of girls in the 5'0" to 5'5" range that I would rather avoid.
Stop making excuses and go build your game properly.
Height is not your problem. Your problem is your shitty mind full of victim excuses, your lack of skills/experience, and your lack of serious commitment to getting good. All which you can correct.

You can screen out tall girls just by looking at them, so this is moot.
And furthermore, if you stop being so weak, you can date tall girls too. One of the best pickup friends I had was 5'4". He got laid more than me at 6'2". So spare me your BS excuses.

Stage a fucking coup and corrupted faith in our election system for decades to come.
And that's just one out of 100 other shitty things like deregulating EPA protections, massively cutting corporate taxes, and filling the Supreme Court with religious ideologues for the next 30 years. Oklahoma just passed a total ban on abortions without exception for rape or incest.
The list of damage the Trump admin did is staggering. You don't even know 10% of it.
A lot happened. You just aren't paying attention to actual policy as you get lost in Trump's stupid antics. Beneath all the antics and drama is a very dangerous and toxic set of policies.

Don't make it about hot chicks, make it about something deeper: human connection and personal development.
You can form deep connections with people. It doesn't just have to be about chasing pussy.
You're not gonna grow from watching Netflix. You will regress.

One of the RSD instructors said that if you go out long enough eventually you'll get stabbed.
But it will be worth it.
So stop being a pussy and approach
I have a 2-inch scar on my neck from when a drunk girl clawed me. Wounds of love
You're a man, you're not as fragile as you think.
It's not that there are no risks, it's that part of becoming a man is learning to tolerate and handle risk. That in itself is an attractive quality. When you can walk up to a table of dudes and hit on their girl, that takes balls and girls want that kind of man.

You are overthinking it. Just talk to every girl you are attracted to.

I don't think so.
He's just a typical conservative American Jewish white boy who was indoctrinated from birth to be an obedient boy.
He's not a sociopath, he's an ideologue/fundamentalist.

Don't pussyfoot around. A man must be comfortable doing a direct approach.
When you hide your genuine intention and sexual desire for her, you're losing your attractiveness and power.
Stop inventing false reasons for talking to a girl you like. This is unbecoming of a real man. You should feel entitled to talk to any girl you like with no pretense or justification.
"If my dick likes you, I'm gonna talk to you." << That's the proper frame.

That's what I've heard as well.
In my experience attracting Asian girls as a tall white dude works quite well, even in America. It would work even better in a 3rd world Asian country.
In general it should be easier to get laid in 3rd world countries as a Westerner because you are perceived as having way more value than a local 3rd world dude. Girls are attracted to value.

They are pretty different for most people.
For me there is a lot of overlap.
DMT is terrifying at higher doses. Then again, so is 5-MeO or any psychedelic at high enough doses.
The dose is crucial. You have to find your sweet spot.

I have always told you that awakening says nothing about what actions you take or how "good" you are.
I could go murder someone tomorrow. And it would not diminish my realizations of God one bit. Might even enhance it.

Even with a hot girl, jerking off is often just better.
Quality of your orgasm is a function of mind, not body. My best orgasms were via text message or imagination.
Your mind can imagine things which no physical girl can give you. You can't fuck a girl in every hole at once within physical reality. But you can in your mind. And you can make her feel any way about you that you want in your mind. A real girl can't compete with that. But she can offer you a sense of "other".