Rokazulu

Enjoy the outcome of your approach.

Like everything that most anyone says, they speak truthfully and yet assume it is applies objectively in all cases. To say the idea that "thoughts create reality is new age BS" is assuming that it has no truth to it at all, which even the writer quickly reveals that it does have some truth to it, if we clarify the understanding with action. Its so easy to cut a concept down completely, by saying a single word. Yet, growth rarely occurs that way. Better would be to trim the edges.

Even so, it did nothing to limit their influence. With that known, why do we continue to support these actions, as though they are helping us?

It would be wise to tell them the dangers of both, because it allows them the opportunity to find a new choice, like say, food. Omitting information places all involved, in a far more precarious situation. There are always an infinite number of choices constantly present. Even on the level of voting there is more than two parties, but beyond that, is organizing in entirely new and innovative ways.

You go wherever you need to go. If you desire physical sense perceptions, know this: You will have it again. Again and again.

Cyanide is also worse for the body than Arsenic. Are we really making a case that continuing to ingest arsenic, is going to end well? And yet, Democrats still believe in a Russiagate conspiracy. They also believe in war now, apparently. They are to the right of some republicans on that issue and yet, they are the obvious choice? Bush started a war that killed millions based on a lie. A literal war crime. Yet, why do we ignore that and focus on Jan 6th? Voting for a 40 (now 41) Billion dollar weapons package to Ukraine to fight a superpower in a losing proxy war? Instead of spending that money on housing, stimulus checks, healthcare, green energy infrastructure? What is reasonable about any of this? Why would anyone vote for either party? They say: Vote Republicans To Stop Democrats; Vote Democrats To Stop Republicans. Not a solution. It's a death wish.

What you say is true, but I would not be so hasty to give up on the reality of Enlightenment. Thought is not a requirement to function. Everything thought can do, insight can do better.

There are lots of beings I am aware of. Lots of beings I am not. All of which may be aware of me. And most that are not. But, control me? Haha! What could they control? They could lead me, just as say, propaganda leads one to believe it the truth, leaving the real truth to be slandered as propaganda. But, so what? It still remains my preference on where I go. It is my choice of role. So it was said before me: I am the master of my fate. The captain of my soul.

Do you fear sleep? Because essentially your vision of death is no different than that, and lo, you are unafraid of sleep, thus unafraid of death. Your fear is an illusion. The fear itself, is the very death you speak of. Best to remove it.

I would second the suggestion of limiting your dense foods; ideally you would eliminate them. Primarily, this is about meditation. It is about understanding your body on a subtle level. Attempt to defocus from your thoughts towards your body. Just sense the body.

Interesting, I haven't heard of that Babaji before. But the stories of Mahavatar Babaji seem to point to something a bit higher. I also like to mention Barry Long (died 2003). He was supposedly a teacher of Eckhart Tolle, and like Tolle, claimed a type of "conclusive Enlightenment". Of course such conclusion is only in the idea of ending suffering. Nvertheless, his words can allow some deep insight.

They could start by fulfilling a single significant promise of the myriads that they campaign on. But, that never seems to be their main priority. Which is why it means almost nothing whether they regain their advantage or lose it.

Interesting to me, Is one who awakens to 'no other minds' or 'one mind' And knows what other minds imagine or don't imagine!

There will be high points and low points. But, progression of the soul is always inevitable. Even if you repeat the same cycle over and over, there is something to be gained. There is never a true repeat in life.

It's a good practice, and a better way to communicate. Taking it further, would mean no desire for any new laws that tell people what they "should" be doing. Just a joke, of course. But, the central point still stands as useful to know, because it is how reality functions on a fundamental level. Inherently, there is no "should". So why bother to insist?

Stuff like morality and what should and shouldn't be the standard of behavior are terms of convenience; ways of controlling others. I, of course, am not saying you should or shouldn't engage in this way, but you have to understand that you can't inherently make anyone do anything. Not even a threat of violence can physically make one behave the way you desire. Only perhaps through coincidence they will change their behavior in accordance to your preference. This is just an observation. That said, what you say is coherent to me, of course. But, everyone has their own way of interpreting reality. You could say a statement like 1+1=2 and many would not be able to understand what you mean. In their way of perceiving reality, they will continue to write out 1+1=4. What can change this? Maybe nothing, maybe anything. I feel emphasizing the first part of this post would be the ideal way to go about it. Since it is only an explanation of what is unconditional in reality and not a forcing of any perspective.

That one. From the left and the right.

Right. You have more control than you think.

Standing atop a hundred foot pole. Not moving; it falters. Make a single move, And it locks. --- This is what is known as "forever".

A will to will. That is all. Any perceived limitation is only as valid as it is to help others, help others. But, an excuse will never help you, help yourself.

This could be seen as a type of abuse of the imagination. If you are going to use your imagination, Why not imagine winning the lottery? The odds are the same. And yet, one situation feels good, the other situation feels bad.

People still believe they are gaining something by eating foods. Food is only a symbol. But, if you desire to be free of the symbols. You have to start somewhere.

You are definitely not wrong. They sometimes do have leverage, and just choose to never utilize it. They don't even bother voting by conscious anymore either. #ForceTheVote really highlighted how entrenched the Democratic party has become. It is all words that are never backed up with any inkling of action. Once you choose to go from Independent to Democrat, you have basically told everyone that you give up, and just want a nice cozy job that pays well.

There is no way of knowing that. People will be happy to say yes or no to you, but what matters more is how you respond to what you do know. In what ways are you willing to change yourself based on what you know about Facebook, Gates Foundation, Tesla. Because all of these organizations have verified sources of information that are heavily negative, and of course verified sources of information that are perhaps positive. It would be better to make your decisions on that instead of rumors steeped in ad hominem.

Yes, and reading the ancient literature, you see how often they emphasized the "getting it right now" part over the "getting it over time" part. A monk asked Kõyõ Seijõ, "Daitsû Chishõ Buddha sat in zazen for ten kalpas* and could not attain Buddhahood. He did not become a Buddha. How could this be?" Seijõ said, "Your question is quite self-explanatory."。 The monk asked, "He meditated so long; why could he not attain Buddhahood?" Seijõ said, "Because he did not become a Buddha." *a kalpa is 4.32 billion years