integral

Frogs have show to have a 24% increase in cardiovascular health if we appetite all four legs for a duration of six weeks. -science. There we go, now its "rigourous" and "rational". 😅 Next up, Bryan Johnson choppes his legs off.

Most supplements don't belong anywhere near a living thing

If you can handle BPD men, then you're operating at one of the highest levels of relationship maturity and emotional maturity. Did you have mature parents? Reading your reply, made me realize that my father had BPD, "huge burst of anger over spilled milk, followed by shame, regret and apologies, daily". Having him as a father taught me at a every young age that it was my responsibility to manage his emotions for him. That i was brainwashed into thinking the point of social interaction is to manage other people's emotions for them, tiptoeing on egg shells with everyone. Much of your reply directly reflects how I operate in relationships and there's overlap. The only difference would be that safety doesn't really play a role. Which is probably because I have a physically strong body so I never feel unsafe, there's also cultural role-play happening, where males just don't feel unsafe around women. The thing that would kill my sexual interest in a partner is them not seeing any value in me. If they don't see the work and value, I put into their lives then I am so repulsed that I don't want to touch them. I guess this could be framed as being looked down upon? And the opposite is also true the more you value everything I do for you, the more I want to do for you. The more that a woman expresses how they value their man's actions, choice or behaviour the more the man falls in love with them. Both use rationality to justify there emotions. I dont see the difference, from my experience with woman BPD, its a solid line of "rational" thinking leading there tantrums. The overlap with what you wroth is so strong that i see very few differences between the way we opperate. So there doesnt seem to be differences between the sexes in relationships when operating at a high level of maturity. There still seems to be differences with attraction and needs, like primary things closer rooted to biology. But secondary things at higher brain regions seems to overlap alot between sexes. I think a lot of the issues people have with sexism comes down to not making any of these distinctions and lumping any claim of difference in big soup of misogyny. --- There were alot of interesting differences doe. This is SO funny! I have to do the opposite, i enter into a feminine frame of play and love to counter the tantrum, then i go back to holding space in a default masculine mode. I know this is unpolitical but with BPD i see a child having a tantrum and empathy for it is important but not to much that you have your boundaries crossed. Especially when there tantrums are everyday. Obviously theres nothing to judge, there mentally ill. And even if there not mentally ill, there mentally ill, such is a living thing lol This is a good insight, Do you recover from emotions super fast? like a few minutes? and do you have healthy strategies to manage them? I agree men and woman will hold onto there emotions and try to validate a point with it, but emotions seem to linger much longer in woman.

It was a metaphor, for the gratification of winning, taking pleasure in winning. It wasn't about sex. But that was a mistake on my part, should've used proper vocabulary.

Everything I wrote was for the only purpose of clarifying my position, which is something you should already have done on your own. This is stonewalling (the childhood defence mechanism) and not caring at all to steal man someone's position. You win by distorting other people's perspectives, then wall off all clarity attempts. This is aligned with debate focussed people. When you distort their perspective, they seek clarity and then they engaged back with you and then you will deny them clarity. A person who is focussing since childhood to win, has distorted models of reality. The stoicism creates the feeling of rightness because after all if someone is stoic, the person who is not stoic is likely wrong. That's the vibe, and it's self reinforcing. I don't feel anything. But a misogynist would. If I belong to a pattern, I don't feel superior that I'm in a pattern. But you stated you enjoy crushing people, which is this superiority game that I'm not playing at all. Thinking that I say things for the purpose of stating superiority is because you are projecting how you operate onto me.

So we had similar experiences, I dated two BPD women, the main focus was the mature person as to compensate for the lack of maturity in the other. It looks like we had a role reversal. Did you feel a loss of sexual desire towards them the more emotional they became? I'm asking this because the typical pattern is women will lose sexual attraction the more childish they think he is. They don't want to babysit a toddler. I'm asking because you're atypical, and I want to know how many "norms" don't apply to you.

What is your experience?

Giving her what she wants, which is love, is precisely understanding her. The content of what she's saying has to be agreed with or if you disagree, you have to do it in a super playful way with the right affection techniques. It's not some easy thing to do, especially when they're not in the right mood all day, then it becomes a marathon a partner cant tolerate, people have limits. Most issues people have in relationships is that,. You're partner is in proximity and someone doesn't feel good. The fact that you being in proximity makes more opportunities to associate negative feelings towards you. To solve this, you just have to use playful techniques.

??? This is a super effective, loving technique! She wants to be kissed, hugged and told she's right!

I forgot to be balanced! And as a woman to get a man to be happy with your demands you say "Honey you have suck a big dick can you wash the dishes?". This solves his core problems with the demand and he will immediately obey all orders. lmfao You guys think I'm being foolish, but this works.

This is true. I FEEL SO SOOTHED 😂 lmFAOOO My default writing style is hyper "this is truth" autism. When I use words like "attacked" I do not personally feel attacked. I'm stating what people are doing. I found the right strategy is to just be playful (IRL), and that disarms all emotionally charged events. Say things like "oh nNnnooOo my sweet sweet sweeeeeet pumPkin (petting her head with 1000x kissis), your always right" This is a guaranteed technique. lmao

For the love of carl, ok you got me ill only generalize men for now on.

I do not feel negativity towards anyone. I'm pointing out everything that's happening, it's interpreted as defensiveness. Actually from your perspective i am a sexist, there is no other way to define it in that paradigm. I'm sorry people experienced sexism today. lmaooo

Its typical of ALL men to avoid wrong doing, thats what most men do. 😎 Make it a forum rule not to talk about the differences between the sexes. My instict when reading this topic was "oh thats one way woman become masculine". If that was my insight there is nothing i can do about it. I get the issues on this forum with male dominance, at this point just stop the discussions from happening with rules. Guys.. i thougth about this topic for a decade now, ive read and heard everything, im not misrepresenting anything in a pilled form... Being called sexist is the same as commiting a social crime, it also interpret the context at a super low level meaning what was said was misrepresented. This is like accusing someone of a crime then telling them they're not allowed to defend themselves? And if they defend themselves you tell them they lack confidence and self-assurance? And we call it "defence" and not seeking clarity, why? Yes i could of just ignored everything, would that of been better then seeking clarity and proven to the world im a "real man"? LMAO So you guys are not playing social games right now? Its one of does games were the more you try to seek clarity the more they think your childish.

I don't agree. I only went "on" and "on" because I was attacked. I went on and on because what i said was taken out of context and set on fire. Do you know how many times someone has told me I was sexist in my life, zero. The whole idea that I've made one basic statement and then I'm being attacked for being sexist, overgeneralizing and people are telling me I need to self reflect. Guys... stop the games.