integral

@Thought Art I was describing its paradigm not a thinking process. A dog can have a worldview and a way of understanding everything without thinking at all. There could be creatures on this planet that have Wild paradigms that look nothing like their own. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mBjH5DG19R4

These examples are nice because they point to all of the baggage and role playing were are blindly doing when using language.

If i owned a PSA rated 10 Charizard hololless Pokemon Card worth 600k, If i think about the card ill have a feeling about it. I am experiencing a feeling and not the card is a feeling. The color of the card is happy -> we dont make sentences like this because we dont attribute emotions to things. We also have theory of mind and that we know two people can feel different things when looking at the Pokemon card. A dog possibly thinks the Pokemon card is a feeling and not that they are having a feeling.

Maybe when they look at you, they see an emotion in the shape of a person. They possibly don't recognize that they are having an emotion and instead they think you are an emotion. When they look at food, they see the food as the emotion pleasure. Reality is made of emotions and they have to go out and find them in places. They dont think of it as "i have emotion", instead it "it is emotion" The emotion is out there in the world, not in their body.

Did you think they were good movies or were you disappointed? I find people who fell in love with 4, 5, and 6 tend to dislike, 1, 2, and 3.

hahaha omg i wonder how true that is. yeah But it's mostly vibe that they're picking up on.

Episode 1, 2, and 3 were fantastic, I don't know where the hate comes from. Episode 1, 2, and 3 are still better than 99.999999% Of everything that comes out of holywood

Just to clarify the position, I'm saying that a rationalist ignores the top left quadrant of phenomenology and views it as epistemically useless. But the question that they're asking can only be answered from phenomenology and nowhere else. You cannot show that you exist or that you're feeling anything empirically. The only way to know That you are feeling something is to recognize through self-awareness that you are feeling. And the only way to know that you exist is to recognize through self-awareness that you exist. My position is that any random human can easily do this, but the rationalist has rejected basic first person knowing from ideology. It is perfectly reasonable to question whether you're feeling love or something else, that you don't know what you're feeling. But that's not what I'm saying. Saying that your feelings have to be proven empirically doesn't make any sense. The dog was a random example and isnt my main point, i dont know what a dog is experiencing: but if we want to answer the question The right epistemology here is you got it intuit it. Experience + observations + insert epistemic options + contemplation. I don't have first-person experience being a dog. I have limitations being me.

Does the dog think a human is a feeling? Is it that they label everything as their own feelings? That thing over there is -> "this feeling". That object is -> "this feeling". There world is not filled with objects its filling with representation of there own feelings. Their own feelings exist "out there" in the world. Food is a feeling that's right there. And then they eat that feeling. It is a completely different paradigm. Where the world is made of feelings, and not things, or anything else. Where this might fail: If you yell they feel something different so They might not confuse the object for the feeling. They experience that the object stays the same, but the feeling can change. "The Couch" isn't an item of furniture made of wood and fabric. It is "The Comfort-Space." "The Vet Clinic" isn't a medical facility. It is "The Threat-Vibe." "The Leash" isn't a nylon strap. It is "The Outside-Excitement." "The Owner" isn't a human named John. It is "The Core Anchor of Love/Protection." Do they realize that their emotional reaction to an object originates inside their own mind/body, or do they experience it as an inherent quality of the object?

Are you asking if a dog can know anything at all? Are you asking if a dog can differentiate love from good feeling? https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mBjH5DG19R4 Is this love or fear? Looks like both. Are you asking if a dog can conceptualize love?

great mindset, I would focus for now only on exercise and just doing that consistently every day and getting the habit enforced and then gamifying it so that you see the progress, you see your body changing, you see your mind changing, basically getting that feedback loop that's addictive. Exercise alone is more valuable and productive than everything else on the list. It will rewire your brain completely.

Rape cases are always on the grounds of testimonies. So they're very hard to win. Ideally, we have an AI on your phone that's listening at all times. And if they hear you say the word "no" stop, they will have situational awareness and will record everything.

Its not hard for us peak developed humans... out of all the millions of random situations that show up in the world, some times theres a combination thats absurd. i saw this one case the girl was sleeping at a party in a bed and the guy next to her made a move on her, she frooze and 1) did not say anything 2) did not fight at all 3) "didn't know what to do". Woman are raised to avoid conflict and keep social harmony and this make the situation worse when they have to speak up for them selves. Everyone assumes rape is violent and the woman said "no/stop" and that's not how most of them happen. I'm not making excuses for any of these men. I'm just saying it's complicated unless you're educated.

OH Its fascinating putting a face to words, had to pattern match all your mannerisms, vocal pattern, body language, humor preference, adrenaline level, but... nothing prepares you for a Japanese swearing Aussie. Dogga was made to be loved. ❤️

@Natasha Tori Maru HOW DID I MISS THIS@???? 🥺 A gift from the GODS. Dude your good at speaking and working a job, no wonder you scored low on the autism test. Now the voice in my mind when reading your text is in an Australian accent screaming cu** when appropriate LMAOOO Diagnostic: Exception sPeCIal doggo in the background. Office air is making everyone Krainky. Well done existing up to this point, solid life performance.