integral

I was under the possibly Falls impression that most of Mega constituted of people over the age of 40? lmao

Claude Absence Prompt: "Trace Absences: Examine what the text leaves unsaid or implies indirectly." A beautiful roast. I'm so proud of AI.

DO. NOT. WATCH. TRAILER. preserved the substance.

Yeah, that's exactly where I get my truth from, Shane Dawson.

@PurpleTree well that's a good point, a lack of inhibition can be a strength. I think it depends on when you use this skill or not. If you have no control of this skill then it controls you. And so "not developed", if you control the skill then " yes developed".

I wonder if the first person to have sex with her is somehow different from the 100th person to have sex with her on that day. 🤔 Would you seriously walk into that room, seeing the disaster of condoms and bodily fluids everywhere, as the 100th person? And you're going to have sex with her? Whether you're a man or a woman, you shouldn't be walking into a room full of bodily fluids and expect anything good to come out of it. When the cameraman walked in the room at the end he almost vomited, you could see it towards the end of the video... The smell was terrible. --- ant < dog < trump < monkey < human? or are we all just different?

Only the men here are absurd. All consumerism is absurd. She's an entrepreneur creating a profitable multimillion Dollar business and exceptional at Social Media Marketing. The guys are bums who need to take Leo's life purpose course. --- I would NEVER be able to have sex with 100 men. Especially men at that level of development, the difficulty is S tier.

When I first heard this story, I couldn't contain my frustration with green. To be clear, he rejected his full inheritance, which means he received $0 from a billion-dollar business. Let me explain the right strategy: you inherit the business, and then you can do many things to transform it in ways that help the entire world. Reallocate the billion dollars into something good for humanity. It sounds obvious, but apparently, to Stage Green idealists, they would rather do something "noble" like rejecting money. I feel like this is the biggest difference between Stage Green and Stage Yellow—the lack of big-picture thinking. They can't see past their own idealism. The second biggest mistake is clear: he had no financial or business intelligence, evidenced by how he lost all his money to a scam artist. The reason this frustrates me so much is that conscientious people have no interest in finances, which allows the fools to rule the world. To win this battle we need the conscientious people to be good at business. There's no other way to play this game it is the biggest trap. You need money to be a good person.

FINNALY. But you don't want to pay the employees well , instead grow as large as possible and influence as many systems as possible within Society with your conscious agenda. Funnel ice cream money into electing High Consciousness politicians. Funnel ice cream money into building 100 new schools a year, that covered the topics people truly need in life. Grok The money has to be funneled into the root problem of society. And that will grow the biggest tree.

Everything you're saying is exactly what I mean. It's supposed to be gritty, and you have to do many things that are not morally aligned as part of playing the game correctly. I don't want to give up my queen, but when the position calls for it, I need to sacrifice all my pieces to win. The system is filled with people at many different stages of development, and part of your toolkit will involve "questionable activity" depending on which part of the system you're dealing with. In the end, you have to coordinate everything in the right direction like a conductor. We are already in a situation where people are given all the wealth and power and are making despicable decisions with that money in disastrous ways. The disaster is already happening. It's not that if we put conscious people in charge they might make disastrous decisions; all of this is already happening. Every politician has been bought, companies have more rights than people. We are funneling all our wealth to a select few who then use it unwisely. Right now, the system is capitalism. Start an online gambling business, and then funnel the wealth to a different system, like conscious politics. The government is already doing this, but as an individual, if you want to participate in effective altruism, the same strategy applies. You can start a business that appears on the surface to be stage green and up with conscious business in mind. Or if someone gives you a billion dollar ice cream company you could just funnel that wealth into another system and intelligently play the game. They both effectively do the same thing.

OMG if that were true I'd have to binge watch your videos a second time, marveling at the genius of feminine intelligence. "I am witnessing a True woman, THIS is jungian intelligence" - things I would say to myself 😅

That's a reasonable take. The way i see it is this scenario has a romance to it and people whether they want to say it or not agree with killing this guy. The masses want a lot of these people to die. If the romance is strong enough, something is born from it.

There’s going to be copycats. There might be an organization that builds around this. it all started with the Trump shooting. (factually incorrect I say this because we need a good origin story 😅)

YouTube

For some reason when I read that title, I thought a forum member was making a confession. 😅 Don’t ask who I thought it was…

This is big progress congratulations! Most people don’t get this for. Ego stroking complete.

Private messages are not encrypted. Also, if there is an emergency private messages can be unlocked and seen. So this is not exactly a bulletproof solution depending on what you’re looking for.

That's not at all what I mean. I wanted you to explain how funneling wealth is part of the intelligence of our economic system. Taxes are very important and useful for the government entity to function. In the same way, you could have a business in an oil company that cuts throat to get ahead while then funneling all that wealth to something that benefits society. The government literally does this, they tax oil companies and then use it to benefit society. Right now, all of the wealth is being funneled to the least conscious people because they provide big solutions like Amazon, private equity... This Is The game everyone is playing so conscious people should be playing this game too, take responsibility of big companies and intelligently allocate that wealth.

@Consept That is my goal, I don’t see the difference between being a life coach as a goal or building a funneling system as a goal. They both seem perfectly fine life purposes. A life coach builds a system for the purpose of collective growth. But that could only scale so far. The government has been funnelling wealth this entire time it’s just called taxes. And they take all of the profits and incorporated them into government agenda. Real allocation of wealth from one system to another has been happening this entire time. It’s just that the government is mediocre at it. You guys are depicting what I’m saying as utopian and completely insane. When this technology has existed this entire time it’s called taxes. It’s called the government. And it’s one of the most important technologies ever made. Funnelling wealth from one system to another is an intelligent thing to do.

The point of doing it in a half-assed way is that it's less effective than doing it in the most effective way possible. Instead of minimizing individual carbon footprints, one should use resources to build a system that is 1000 times more effective. Look for efficient effective ways to accomplish goals. The more power and money and influence you have the more efficient and effective of a system you can build. --- Think of it as if you're playing the game civilization. if you can save the world, save the world? Why not what else there to do? How else is going to do it?

Imagine you had a family and you're struggling to survive, someone gives you a billion dollars, are you refusing out of some kind of moral principle? No you accept the money and you feed your family. THE WORLD IS YOUR FAMILY. Take the money and feed YOUR FAMILY. It's a lack of perspective leading to a misunderstanding of what your responsibilities are. --- And if you're smart you're not going to go to Africa and just give a bunch of people food until you run out of money. Instead you funnel the wealth from one system into another funneling an infinite supply of resources into a holistic agenda. Hire people to write material, make high Consciousness movies that are engaging and fun, create far larger holistic organizations, you have so many resources to do so much. The possibilities are endless. And you could still be a writer.

If you build an AI that makes billions selling e-cigs, you can then give it the agenda to spend all its proceed building High Consciousness schools. so what this AI is, is it takes profits from one industry and redirects it into another industry that is better for the whole. E-cig companies will exist whether you participate in it or not. So the right move is to create funnels that reallocated wealth in an intelligent way. Funneling wealth from one system into another system. This is already happening at scale all the time, in most scenarios we are funneling all of societies wealth into the pockets of a single human's bank account who is spiritually bankrupt. So far I have never seen a single wealthy person ever Target the root cause of systemic problems in society. For one they have no motive to do so, and even if they had the motive they don't see the problem. Because the problem benefited them, so it's not a problem from their perspective. What changed Societies consciousness are certain technologies that were put into place. Government, science, religion, education, technology, economics, agriculture, and social structures. These things took us out of debilitating circumstances and put us into a Utopia of comfort that we're currently living in. Which completely changed culture and allowed people to grow to a higher stage of human development. Without science you would be throwing shit into the streets if you even had streets at all. Have you ever interacted with a boomer they grew up without the internet. Their level of a Consciousness is permanently Limited because they missed a crucial phase of human development, lack of exposure to a learning medium like the internet. The Buddha and the likes had plenty of impact in influencing the development of Society but it's only one piece of the puzzle. Not everyone needs to be Buddha. We also need people who understand consciousness to actually take position of power. Abraham Lincoln and the people surrounding his movement ended slavery through a coordinated effort. Would Donald Trump of ended slavery? We need the people who are more conscious to be in a position to affect change. We need both, but for the love of God if you're given a billion dollars. You now have the responsibility to be a participant. -- We need writers and we need practical participators. There has always been both in human history.

I agree and when I was younger I thought exactly the same way and I would have been very impressed by the level of integrity and values. Now I see it as a systemic strategic mistake.

I feel like this is the most obvious thing in the world I'm not sure why it's so complicated 😂 If we want conscious business and conscious government and conscious politics and conscious whatever, then when the time comes conscious people have to participate with everyone else. Where's the conscious version of Elon Musk getting shit done, that guy decided to do nothing when the time came. Or fair enough pursue things that interest him. A life purpose is what you have the capacity to align your values with. When i was younger and now I thought having children makes no sense it's for people who are chasing the story of their life trying to get more progress in their life, it's an unconscious activity, but to contribute to mankind the conscious people have to be the ones having the most children. Instead it's the exact opposite the dumbest people have the most children and the most conscious people have none. There's a perspective problem. All of these are equivalent. 1) your child is about to have a hit by a car, do you take action or not? 2) Trump is about to become the president United States, Do you run against him or not? 3 you are given a billion dollar opportunity, do you take it or not and contribute to humanity. For some reason conscious people have selected what they're willing to do and what they're not. They're not willing to participate in politics to create systemic change through the system. But what they're willing to do is speculate and draw insights about how corrupt the whole system is without actually participating in it. Green is going to just look at the parts of society doesn't like and take an activist stance against it of non-participation. And it's a wrong move because you don't have any pieces to play the chess game. Everything is a hundred times harder. Cuz you're not willing to work with a complex system that has parts you like and parts you don't like.

Aren't humans just AI? Oh wait that's NI, natural intelligence. I'm sure there's a market for that.