integral

Its typical of ALL men to avoid wrong doing, thats what most men do. 😎 Make it a forum rule not to talk about the differences between the sexes. My instict when reading this topic was "oh thats one way woman become masculine". If that was my insight there is nothing i can do about it. I get the issues on this forum with male dominance, at this point just stop the discussions from happening with rules. Guys.. i thougth about this topic for a decade now, ive read and heard everything, im not misrepresenting anything in a pilled form... Being called sexist is the same as commiting a social crime, it also interpret the context at a super low level meaning what was said was misrepresented. This is like accusing someone of a crime then telling them they're not allowed to defend themselves? And if they defend themselves you tell them they lack confidence and self-assurance? And we call it "defence" and not seeking clarity, why? Yes i could of just ignored everything, would that of been better then seeking clarity and proven to the world im a "real man"? LMAO So you guys are not playing social games right now? Its one of does games were the more you try to seek clarity the more they think your childish.

I don't agree. I only went "on" and "on" because I was attacked. I went on and on because what i said was taken out of context and set on fire. Do you know how many times someone has told me I was sexist in my life, zero. The whole idea that I've made one basic statement and then I'm being attacked for being sexist, overgeneralizing and people are telling me I need to self reflect. Guys... stop the games.

@Elliott I know from the many debates I've had with her that she will never fully represent a person's position, truthfully (steel manning). By doing so this fuels conversations to go on forever until the person gives up. Because of this need to win distorting everything the people she engages with feels wronged so they continuing engaging, when you misrepresent someone they want clarity they want closure and she will never give that to them. --- If I have any emotions towards this, is this dominatrix kind of mindset is the exact opposite of how I think about everything. The feeling of winning makes me feel bad and the idea that i will intellectually outperformed someone and win over them makes me feel bad. I have no interest in any of this. I want to raise people up to the highest level and nothing else matters. I have no interest in winning to gratify myself. I get absolutely no gratification socializing. So when she debates with me and pulls this stonewall games waisting my time, and now she confesses of how much she enjoys winning. It screams female empowerment games.

If you're going to misrepresent my position without steel Manning, that's your problem, I can't bend over backwards playing these games. What I said has nothing to do with anything black pill or red pill or any garbage like that. Apply yourselves next time. Does anyone realize how little you all care about truth? Social games you're playing? She just made an entire confession about all she cares about is winning. Please spare me the psychoanalysis. What insight do you think I'm gonna have reading this topic?, "a woman explains how she became obsessed with winning socially to protect herself" Please write a book about it.

You need to care about truth. That's all that it. When your top value is emotions and how things make you feel then you're gonna engage in all of this survival behavior and you're gonna have to set rules for yourself not to commit these acts.

Emerald is showing what masculine adaptation looks like in woman, the unhealthy distortion it takes to survive in a achievers world with feminine biology. Women are under more pressure then men in this world because its less suited for there nature. They have to fight the grain more.

The motivation is not the same. Everyone on the surface is trying to "win". The intention is different.

Yes and when they come into contact with people who dont do this, theres a clash. Why outsource emotional regulation to the sick and corrupt people around you? Its naive consumerism.

Believing in equality in biology that creates the mind is sexism. Equality is sexist! 😆 Men compete physically, woman compete socially. Men do not want to win in a conversation the way woman do, you guys are projecting and that creates sexism! Of course I need to buffer this by explaining I don't mean 100% of the population. I don't mean we are all 100% UN-EQUAL, I do not mean there isn't diversity. I do not mean genders don't exist or masculine and feminine polarity doesn't exist. I don't mean any of this. Thank you lol. I'm pointing to biological expression of how a mind is created through the female biology and through the male biology and the divergent trend.

You're definitely on the right track good job, overcoming self sabotage (drug abuse) is the first step to healing. Most of this is people unintentionally harming themselves through living a lifestyle the body was never meant to live. This is because our culture is sick and corrupt and has taught us nothing but sickness and corruption. Depending on how bad your genetics and environment are, it can be very challenging or very easy to heal the body and dig yourself out of this hole.

😂😂😂 oooooh k Accusing me of sexism is the lack of EQ here... If you felt what i felt you would see im not coming from a sexist point of view. It's like if someone only wants to win then they will represent a position from the most advantage starting point. A sexist fool is easy to defeat, so lets start there? The reason im responding this way is not because i lack empathy for your lifes journey, its because you misrepresented what i wrote... This constant distortion of other peoples perspective is the reason people keep engaging with you. Not everyone on the forum wants to win, most are just responding what they think is the wrong thinking of the person you're engaging with. And when someone else misrepresents everything you say, they're compelled to engage and keep engaging. Your emotionally stimulating people into arguing with you because if a person cares about winning, then they're constantly distorting everything to win. --- On the topic of EQ, people on the form have higher EQ than average. It's because they're not acting from that place when writing because they're not emotionally in that state of mind. In order to write that way you have to be in a Play state. @Natasha Tori Maru is always writing in play mode so is @Carl-Richard. It has nothing to do with having more EQ. Leo switches between play and focus modes. It's more important what state someone is in when they're engaging. If someone was on heroin they would have no need to win, or if your body is sick, you'll come off more hard and unpleasant. The unwritten rule right now is "someone shared something personal" so tread lightly and address what they said consciously with understanding. But people are not always in the right state for this and the general flow of the forum is very few posts are like this so we're not always ready to produce high EQ writing. It's easy to be deceived by social skills. Some of the worst people on earth speak so pleasantly and so enjoyable to listen to... It has nothing to do with EQ. If I spoke like Trump, I would have more EQ reputation to my name. But I would be a devil.

I cured my own schizophrenia, so if you have enough intelligence and motivation you could overcome these genetic problems. It's mostly cultural group think and can't see the cause of schizophrenia.

Most women have the problem where they engage in a conversation to win, and most men have the problem of not realizing that their partner just wants to win, and the whole conversation is about how the conversation makes her feel and nothing to do with solving problems or truth.

@LoneWonderer I agree that's basically what's happening. It's all artificial scarcity.

Not being exposed daily to toxic neurotic people.

Save the world.

LMAOOO, funnely Bryan is DickMaxxing with the world record for best erections and sperm count.

I don't have any need to live one second longer.

I can understand feeling 20 and good everyday like the world is brand new the way it was when we were children. StateMaxxing. Beyond that after 40 years of life its not really worth living. I don't think they really understand any of this.

Either way, the tech industry will do a far better job solving health problems then the corrupt healthcare cartel ever will.

If they make people immortal, they will make you pay to stay alive. Living tax.

EnthusiastMaxxing.

I think Brian takes it further than this, one of the main focusses is state and StateMaxing. Maxing state as part of maxing quality of your life and consistent energy/state throughout the day. This is the best part of his longevity brand. For this reason i like what hes doing because the quality of state that most people live by is just brain fog. And of course, quality state benefits everything associated with consciousness work. Request: We need a StateMaxing subforum lol

The bottom line is veganism is healthy IF you're heavily supplementing and tested. And after trial and error, it is found that your genetics and biology are suited for it. If you're not serious and educated about veganism, then you're doing it wrong and you should stop.

Extrapolation leap. "if less is better, none is best". "If fasting is good for you, not eating is best" "If exercise improves health, exercising all day is best" "If reducing sodium helps blood pressure, eliminating all sodium is best" "If sun exposure produces vitamin D, constant sun exposure is best" "If caloric restriction extends lifespan, severe restriction is best" "If antioxidants are beneficial, megadosing supplements is best" "If sleep is restorative, sleeping 12+ hours daily is best" "If reducing stress is healthy, eliminating all challenge is best" "If some alcohol has cardiovascular benefits, more alcohol is best" "If fiber aids digestion, maximum fiber intake is best" "If cold exposure activates brown fat, extreme cold is best" "If mindfulness meditation reduces anxiety, meditating constantly is best" "If processed foods are unhealthy, eliminating all processing is best" "If reducing sugar improves health, zero sugar is best" "If stretching prevents injury, stretching for hours is best" "If social connection improves wellbeing, never being alone is best" This is the mistake every scientist makes and every salesman exploits.