integral

@Consept It’s unlikely she’s purely using you as a sex object and its all a manipulation game to get in your pants. Women want to talk about how hot you are, it’s basic gossip. But if they’re shaming and making fun of genital regions, then they’re revealing their toxic character to you and nothing you say and do is gonna change that. it’s time to pack your bags. They’re not marriage material… gotta place them in some kind of category. Maybe she’s in the “have fun for a few months” category that’s how you should place her. not every relationship is gonna be a perfect compatibility deep holistic connection

I’ve had huge synchronicity many times in my life. I’m not denouncing all of this. lol is it a synchronicity or a coincidence? What’s the difference? And be careful I have epistemic allergies 🤧 , they’re very serious 😅

I agree I’ve been watching her since high school 20 years ago, I’m talking about clairvoyance, 5D entities reborn as humans on earth, magical thinking, energy, frequency… Stuff born from feeler types after stage green (ENFP, ENFJ, INFP, INFJ). Not that some of the stuff isn’t applicable real or anything like that, it’s that the epistemology that gives birth to it is deeply unserious, and a lot of it absorbed through culture and absorbed through identity alignment. If they never heard of these terms, they would never be using it and instead, they would have to think for themselves and actually makes sense of all this.

@Natasha Tori Maru positive thinking is useful in many aspects of life, it primes and set you up for success in many situations because your thoughts and actions will flow in a more aligned way. I was referring to toxic positivity, which is a huge trap that most feeler types fall for where they’re actively avoiding all negative aspects and skew everything in a positive way that is delusional. Also, conservatives are the way they are because they are more aligned with all the negative aspects in life, making them more fearful, progressive are more aligned with all the positive things in life making them underestimate corruption and resulting in naïve decisions. Both negative and positive thinking tend to be traps that avoid real epistemic awareness In chess, your punished very quickly for negative or positive thinking. Negative thinking makes you miss opportunities and positive thinking makes you relax and allow your opponent to catch up. Both are huge issues that you learn to avoid if you want to improve. in the real world, positive thinking allows corruption to catch up because you’re too lax on all subjects. You must strike a balance between lax and strict.

One of the things I learned from my green family is that they actively ignore and put a little effort in anything they perceive as negative. Half of reality makes them uncomfortable so there world view tends to be limited. You see this a lot in progressives where Leo made a recent explanation on how progressives underestimate how bad corruption really is. There’s a strong bias towards positive thinking but truth is not limited to that. We see this with the damage done with the legalization of marijuana, it’s positive thinking without true epistemic integrity. Positive thinking leads to a lack of epistemic integrity and you see this everywhere in green. It’s their biggest corruption.

@Aaron p 😂👏👏

It all depends if the people are ready, if the entire population is still at a low level of development quickly corruption will take Roots again.

This is just hilarious, you should be scared of a immortal life if anything.

@BlueOak I agree her emotional intelligence and insights our exceptional. I pointed out clairvoyance because it’s such a fuzzy gray concept, and its explained so poorly that it’s unclear how it fits into anything in a tangible way. I have plenty of stories where my insights told me something that happened to be true about the people around me or certain things and I just don’t call it clairvoyance. People that use the word clairvoyant tend to be hyper emotionally sensitive, but yet downplay feelings as a critical and important part of their clairvoyant state, they instead try to make it this mystical thing. It’s obvious conflict of interest and trying to distance themselves from clairvoyance being just a highly skilled use of feelings and intuition. When really if they explained it as a highly developed form of feeling, it would make so much more sense and bring a great deal of clarity to the whole thing. And then you could have an entire field of study dedicated to emotional epistemology. I find it a disservice to muddle the waters with magical vocabulary when there’s an entire field of emotional/intuitive epistemology ready to be born.

Admitting that you’re an epistemic scoundrel to show humility, which is just another ego defence mechanism to remain in control. You sneaky epistemic devil. 😈

@The Crocodile @Lyubov I wouldn’t go that far, watching her videos there’s plenty of great insights. She could very well be corrupt, but at the same time very skilled

@Leo Gura that’s reasonable, I still think though that they’re fundamentally corrupt as well genetically. They feel physical pain and emotional pain from birth, regardless of perfect conditions. They’re not born with top 1% spiritual genetics, for example. Some babies are more aggressive than other babies by the time they’re one years old and they haven’t had any life experience yet. They’re already kicking and screaming and wanting and desiring and there’s nothing going on besides sucking milk. Parental love is important at such a young age, but even if they receive it or not, they could behave a number of ways depending on personality traits genetically encoded. You would have to change there genetics to make the more resistant to corruption like top 1% spiritual genetics. The structure of the human brain is built for survival. It’s not built for truth. but maybe I’m wrong, maybe somehow with perfect survival conditions and no pressure whatsoever they all align with truth and are not corrupt. I don’t know.

Right, but you managed to uncorrupt enough to shit gold 😅 (golden insights)

“it’s all in your head” classic gaslighting. “the mind is powerful” spiritual gaslighting Epistemic Blindspot

It takes a baby 40 years to uncorrupt themselves if they’re lucky. I couldn’t sleep last night because of how profound this is, the word corruption has been uncorrupted lol I thought a baby was a blank slate and pure, do you realize how delusional I was????

@integration journey another cockroach will just take his place, not that I know who you’re talking about lol

This is not true you got to do your research. Also you could give police a relief by simply not incarcerating people who buy and use. Only pursue manufacturers.

Logical fallacy, just because repression wasn't perfect it doesn't mean the alternative is better. The alternative could very well be worse. Often the best move is to do nothing at all. Legalization will cause the consumption of weed to explode through the roof like it did in Canada. Consumption will 10x, it is not a win to Legalize It if you care about reducing consumption. The claim is weed manufacturing will produce healthier weed while as a trade-off 10x more people are going to smoke it. If cigarettes were illegal It would reduce cigarette addiction 100x. This is just a win. This happens to be a straw man that you've constructed because your sidestepping the problem of the rapid increase in weed consumption that will follow legalization. Just isn't true, this is Cherry Picked, the effects of weed are not minor at all, it has a strong impact on a person's life and anxiety levels especially when it's done as a teenager. You need to be more Vigilant about your own epistemology and not fall into the Trap of confirmation bias by citing studies, An epistemic wizard will carefully incorporating multiple epistemic approaches and combining them all together. It will make it a lot easier for people to get addicted now that it's legal. So again your sidestepping the problem. You can get better social workers, psychotherapists and all of that good stuff without legalizing drugs.

@Juns maybe the video wasn't that great I'm not sure but his writing on corruption was pure gold. Insights this profound can't be found on the internet.

Redirect the river of corruption instead of trying to stop it. Working with corruption instead of fighting it is actually the smarter move. Here's why: People are more corrupt than we admit. This is just reality. Fighting against this directly usually fails. Instead, smart people can: Build businesses that work within corrupt systems Make money from these businesses Then use that money for good things that raise consciousness For example: You could start an online gambling business. People will gamble anyway. Run it more ethically than others would Make lots of money from human addiction and weakness Use those profits to fund better education, spiritual growth, or community programs This is like redirecting a river instead of trying to stop it. The corruption is the river. You don't fight the river - you build channels that direct it where you want it to go. The idealists who refuse to touch "dirty industries" end up with no money and no power to change anything. Meanwhile, the most corrupt people run everything. This isn't about being corrupt yourself. It's about being smart enough to work with reality as it is - people are selfish, addicted, and corrupt - and use that reality to fund something better. Mankind is way more evil than it admits. Stop pretending otherwise. This is why people like Trump win while idealists fail. The corruption is so profound that only by working within it can you actually change anything. This is advanced thinking, not naive idealism. Stop fighting the demonic rhinoceros and learn to redirect it instead. @Leo Gura what do you think of this idea specifically?

Idealism itself becomes corrupt: The historical pattern of idealistic revolutions that ultimately fail or become corrupted is the most damning evidence supporting our thesis. Make no mistake about it: every revolution in human history eventually corrupts itself. Always. The French Revolution beheaded aristocrats only to crown Napoleon. The Russian Revolution overthrew the Tsar only to install Stalin. The Iranian Revolution toppled the Shah only to elevate the Ayatollahs. This sounds so biased and unfair, but that's just how the cookie crumbles. Mankind's corruption is so profound that even the most idealistic revolutionaries become the very monsters they sought to destroy. The corruption is inscribed into our souls. Che Guevara's face on t-shirts while his revolution rots from within. Mao's portrait watching over a hyper-capitalist China. This is not simplistically saying revolution is wrong—I'm saying something advanced and non-partisan. The corruption is so profound that idealism itself becomes weaponized, becomes the very vehicle of further corruption. -Claude Assisted

Technological advancement and material progress continue despite moral stagnation because they harness mankind's corruption rather than trying to overcome it. This works precisely because technology doesn't require moral improvement—it requires greed, competition, nationalism, fear, and status-seeking. Mankind builds iPhones and nuclear weapons with the same corrupt heart. The corruption is so profound that our greatest innovations emerge from war departments and profit-obsessed corporations. Progressives counter-intuitively go wrong in believing technology will save us morally, not understanding that technology itself is morally neutral at best and actively amplifies our corruption at worst. It's funny because progressives are portrayed as technological optimists, but in fact they underestimate how technology strengthens mankind's corrupt impulses while appearing to advance civilization. Our shiny gadgets mask our rotting souls. -Claude Assisted

The point of this system is that one president is elected for each party, so you have two presidents. Both of them keep each other in check and require consensus to get anything done. Would this work? 🤨 Another thing that you could possibly do is have a anti-corruption government section. Is well funded, and whose job is to prevent corruption in every possible domain of government. Which will likely never work because the anti-corruption section will be corrupt. But it’s worth a try. Lol

So he removed the two term limit and that’s why he’s a dictator now while all his predecessors weren’t corrupt enough to do that