integral

This would flip everything upside down and be that thinking is what then creates experience.

@Leo Gura they're confusing "what is existence?" with "How do i know i exist?". They think you have to answer the first one to answer the second one. The second one is self-evident but they wont accept self-evidence as evidence.

How I think of AI is that it's a rock that we tricked into computation. Computation is not the same as experiencing thinking. Is a calculator experiencing anything when it adds 2 numbers? No.

@Nemra I'm being too harsh because I had all the same way of thinking when I first did philosophy as a teenager so There's nothing wrong with what he's doing. But yeah, it's hilarious watching it. lmAOO What's interesting about all this is that AI is technically thinking and not experiencing. Only proving further that Descartes was 100% wrong.

More:

Being is itself value, rather than something that needs an external purpose to acquire value. The absolute ontological meaning of a cup would be its existence; and its relative meaning would be what it does (contains things) or how we feel about it (i love this cup). Relative meaning: The cup holds water. Subjective meaning: I love this cup. Instrumental value: The cup is useful for something. Ontological meaning: The cup exists. When we talk about meaning ontologically, we are talking about existence. The point of existence is what? To exist. What's happening is people are saying im projecting meaning, value, and purpose onto existence. That the question is loaded and wrong from the start. What I find funny about all that is that whenever they experience any kind of oneness or awakening experience, every psychedelic experience Or stillness, calmness or any nessness. what is their way of thinking about it? OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG Does that sound meaningless, valueless, purposeless to you? Of course not. So why would they doing this? Its because they're following the logic of deconstruction and non-duality and when you deconstruct everything there's just existence. knowing is content on the screen, Understanding is content on the screen... and so on. Logic: existence is not meaningful or meaningless. These are Appearances on the screen. Direct Experience: Existence is Highly personal, highly important, highly meaningful, infinite value. Non-duality is epistemically wrong.

But if it was an epistemic puzzle, then you might love it. Epistemic strategy game?

A example of People's facial expression at the moment when they connect the dots between one of the characters in game of thrones. **ignore if you dont want spoilers**

😂 hahahah this has to be built, its to good

Ye would be good if we made a actualized.org test. @Leo Gura a epistemology test would be awesome. How "Epistemically responsible are you" tests?

In my earlier years i couldnt understand what people were saying because i was focusing all my attention on this game. +social stress turning off the brain All social behaviour was a Conscious process and not automatic. But im sure most people are aware of all this to, its just it didnt distract them to much

@Clarence But to get 36, you have to have selected that you're really bad at reading between the lines and understanding the social cues and all that stuff, right?

only 2 wrong is out of this world, i dont think normal people can do that, unless i really am autistic, i am guessing in the majority of does I need to see there whole face, i cant do it with just the eyes. Might be because i struggled to make eye contact for most of my life and eye contact is torture. Eye contact is like sex, its extremely intimate

Yeah, that's western psychology for you. Each personality type would have its own way of being autistic. Some extroverts are autistic and they wouldn't show up on this test.

22/50 Im curious to see what questions lead to the 25 that you got.

Humans will invent all that tech, technological advancement means abit but not everything Elon cant wait to clone himself and invade other galaxies. We will not be more conscious then we are now when we explore the galaxy. We could say a selfish Species cant develop advanced technology because they kill themselves with it, its a possibility. But even a coordinated species doesn't mean they're more conscious than us.

Thats true, but for all we know they could be preparing the planet to sell. We have no idea what there psychology is. Probably the most selfish life forms survive better in multi planetary affairs.

Their psychology could be nothing like ours. Why are we assuming they're benevolent?

Do you think they're more or less conscious than us?

Only bond yourself to people who have a serious self-development mindset and who are at a threshold of self-development significantly higher than your own. It's going to be impossible for you to grow up when you're dating children.

I would work with a life coach to help make the right decisions, to help you stick to the vision/game plan and to take action NOW because right now you're just terrible at making Decisions and have stagnated from chronic stress.

People judge themselves for being born a crocodile that when eating, savagely kills animals by ripping them apart. You have always been a ruthless selfish crocodile. People forget what they are and they get rudely reminded everyonce in a while. Highly emotionally sensitive people will just keep running away from this for the rest of their lives and can never get to higher stages of spirituality.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rvy8aJkT/ Im happy for this because that means he's about to spend millions trying to cure this disease. This is how millionnaire money needs to be spent and they're only gonna do it if the problem is personal. If only Elon would break his back we would have a paraplegic cure within a year.

I just made this for fun. https://github.com/javalight/AutoFocusMonitor A mac app that auto-focuses the right window when you move your mouse to a different monitor. Its saves 1 extra click switching between monitors Cant live with out it!

lol What ends up happening is they abuse you if you don't set a boundary.