integral

Most people should not have children either lol

When a mature person gets angry it's because there's something very serious happening and it needs to get dealt with immediately. But our society doesn't allow for anger to happen in a healthy way and it to be recognized because there's just too much unserious unhealthy immature anger circulating. Angry is health if: its at the right things, in the right way, at the right time. It's to know what to take serious and what to not. Our society has created very soft people that are running away from any negative emotion and are trying to insulate themselves from The Real World. Sometimes when someone is angry at you you have to self reflect and not block it out and not defend yourself. The automatic defense mechanism because you have to Shield yourself from The Real World will make you very ineffective at getting through life. When there is anger or unpleasant emotions in the environment stop trying to run from it.

The epistemology you're asking for is scientific papers and an external authority figure as the source of truth. One of the many epistemologies i used to come to my conclusions was to experiment and observe. I took medication or drugs, people in my air space got high in various circumstances, context and situations. Using 1 epistemology to make sense of anything is terrible science. Got to practice holistic epistemology. The claim i made was that its transmissible in the air but to be clear its 100% with out question transmissible vay touch. If you take LSD and your dog licks your skin they will get super high.

Your right i made a mistake on the womans hormons as i was running off misconceptions culture told me instead of verifying it happen with my own eyes. My other points i have verified from first hand experience. Especially with air transfer of medication or psychedelics with people that your sleeping with in the same bed room all night. Its the hot boxing effect except your skin and breath release it into the air.

https://www.meshy.ai/ This website gives you 500 free credits to generate a bunch of 3D models, you could even rig the model and animate it. It's amazing

What is the quality of the place you moved into, is there mold damage?

The billionaire only cares about what is practical. You don't need to introspect when you're "winning".

@zurew I have a question: what makes Heaven's Gate and Flat Earth communities different from actualized.org? If we take the definition Leo gave of a cult very strictly like it's some list of rules (Playing devil's advocate), then Heaven's Gate won't fit into that definition of a cult. Leader 100% believed his worldview and everyone in the community went on board and fully adopted and altered their identity to match that worldview. Well let's say actualized.org did something similar pushing everyone to be epistemically responsible. And aligned with the higher Vision possibly that Leo has created. Why is actualized.org not just another complete load of arbitrary Belief systems like every other community?

Vocabulary is important but that's separate from obfuscation. We need jargon to describe very specific things in the field and that's perfectly fine. Math is defining important functions into short hand terms, this is a good use of syntax. "We conducted a survey" -> "We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 200 college students about their sleep habits." This is reasonable. It adds to the accuracy of the reading. The above is fine and it's explaining a system using terminology that is useful and needed. What's being smuggled in this text is the accuracy of the system. Because it's written with such certainty at every step, it doesn't take the time to place the epistemic humility, "it possibly does". It simply lays out a system as fact, and this fact-like speaking is a deception. Detail oriented people love FactSplaining.

I like how Bezos tried to smash... Let's keep it real

Self-obscure: To hide one's own weakness behind complexity. Works as a verb. "He self-obscures whenever the topic gets close to something he doesn't actually understand."

This is not the statistical worldview from a scientific lens. Statistics is the wrong word to use. You're mixing, probabilistic thinking + a multifactorial thinking + dialectical thinking + holistic thinking It makes more sense to call it probabilistic systems thinking. True scientific statistics is much closer to reductionist thinking method, trying to narrow down a messy world into variables we can measure. And then when you have no epistemic sense or integrity, they write a research paper pawning a correlation for causation

In practice we use statistics to prescribe medication to patients In practice doctors view all correlation as causation. They have no awareness of the difference Huge chunks of societal belief systems are based on false causation from statistical correlation At some point in the 70s it clicked that you could use science to run your scams, and they ran with it for 50 years

it's weird that she choose physics and space/time to push the boundaries on. You can't push the boundaries on these topics if you don't know what a paradigm is. All your imagination is wasted Inside the Box

Yeah so a person uses the word to point to something. So a word won't be meaningful put out the user.

@zurew Does this sum up both of our positions?

Words are sounds/symbols that humans make. If no humans existed, the sound "cult" wouldn't exist. So yes, words depend on users. Is this what you're asking?

No, we use words to describe something real from our direct experience. The word has to accurately model what is true. The point of a word is to create the distinction about reality, we draw a line and we created distinction between the left and the right. And then we give that distinction a "word", it's just a placeholder to help us communicate. Does gravity go up or down? Even a chicken understand this concept and has create that distinction in there mind. There mind understand what a direction is WITHOUT a formal language definition. And Einsteins mind understand that distinction at a far deeper level.

Even if every word Leo's ever said it's completely wrong this is still not a cult.

His survival interests are like everyone else, he just put more work into unraveling it, but he has blind spots like everyone else that will corrupt his insights. We are all like this. There's no Perfection going to happen here there's no Perfection anywhere. We're all corrupt, it's a matter of how conscious you are of it and how much you care about it

Because I verified everything he said independently. If anyone believes anything Leo has ever said to them then they're doing it wrong and they missed the core part of actualized.org. Leo is teaching you how to be Sovereign and independent at the highest level possible through the highest epistemology possible. He's teaching you to think independently and that means independence from him. he's not teaching you to listen or believe anything he says.

Truth has a Direction, it Narrows to the least corrupt state. It's not arbitrary and relative. You're also touching on the blurring of the lines, and that a word could be defined in Any Which Way someone feels like using it. But this is wrong because we have to consciously pick the right way to draw the line. There is a more conscious way to draw a line. Just like there's a more conscious way to do art. Not all art is equal. Quality exists You're using relativity to say that quality doesn't exist. This is wrong The dogs use of the word is less conscious than the humans use of the word. Basically you're saying they're different and therefore they're equal. This is a relativity trap The point of a word is not the sound of it, it's how we draw the line of meaning. There's a strategy to draw a line in a highly conscious way. It's very easy to make a word useless, and politicians are a masters at it, they corrupt the word to serve their interests, create cultural memes with it and so on.

A cult is when the leader warps his followers world view to match his survival interests, knowingly or unknowingly. Leo is not doing that. Normies are self-Paradigm blind, and call every community outside their Paradigm a cult

The proper definition of a word is the least corrupt or uncorrupted version of it while held by the highest perspective, most holistic, most inclusive and highest state of consciousness possible. A dog understand "sit" very differently then a human or an alien.