integral

Moderator
  • Content count

    8,036
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by integral

  1. Imagination as a game is gonna be the next big thing.
  2. Yeah knowwwww, it could be more twisted than that, unfortunately. We bred them to perfectly give us what we want at the emotional level. But we don't know what their lived experience is.
  3. victim mindset, yeah It's largely a disease inherited from parenting from what i can tell
  4. wow this is a old thread from 2021 Multiple companies, one is called Pascal. I do a lot of freelance work and other personal companies i own with near 0 success lol I honestly don't remember writing this thread lol its from 2021. I think I was mostly complaining about the lack of substance with all conversations. The point of conversation is entertainment and vibe, That is what everyone is conditioned to care about and want from it. Bad vibe is a social crime at this point.
  5. The title just makes me laugh every time I read it. "DO NOT APPROUCH WOMAN".
  6. To a dog, a human is their sense of safety and security. When the human goes away, let's imagine they leave the house, they often get abandonment anxiety. Let's imagine a CEO that has a business partner who their whole business depends on him. And the relationship with his business partner is everything. If they lose this partner, their whole business fails. The CEO will have severe anxiety making sure this partner does not die, nothing goes wrong and everything is perfectly in place and will stress like crazy about it. The CEO has a dependency. To a dog, you're that partner. Their life depends on you.
  7. It is confusing the way I communicated it. What I meant is the dog's relationship with everything, which is all an unconscious thing, might be a certain way. When we look at some random object, It's not thinking that causes it to be separate from us. It's an automatic association and relationship we've built. Which is a baked in paradigm. If we don't think at all and we're just being, we still have a default way of experiencing and relating to things.
  8. @Thought Art I was describing its paradigm not a thinking process. A dog can have a worldview and a way of understanding everything without thinking at all. There could be creatures on this planet that have Wild paradigms that look nothing like their own. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mBjH5DG19R4
  9. These examples are nice because they point to all of the baggage and role playing were are blindly doing when using language.
  10. If i owned a PSA rated 10 Charizard hololless Pokemon Card worth 600k, If i think about the card ill have a feeling about it. I am experiencing a feeling and not the card is a feeling. The color of the card is happy -> we dont make sentences like this because we dont attribute emotions to things. We also have theory of mind and that we know two people can feel different things when looking at the Pokemon card. A dog possibly thinks the Pokemon card is a feeling and not that they are having a feeling.
  11. Maybe when they look at you, they see an emotion in the shape of a person. They possibly don't recognize that they are having an emotion and instead they think you are an emotion. When they look at food, they see the food as the emotion pleasure. Reality is made of emotions and they have to go out and find them in places. They dont think of it as "i have emotion", instead it "it is emotion" The emotion is out there in the world, not in their body.
  12. Did you think they were good movies or were you disappointed? I find people who fell in love with 4, 5, and 6 tend to dislike, 1, 2, and 3.
  13. hahaha omg i wonder how true that is. yeah But it's mostly vibe that they're picking up on.
  14. Episode 1, 2, and 3 were fantastic, I don't know where the hate comes from. Episode 1, 2, and 3 are still better than 99.999999% Of everything that comes out of holywood
  15. Just to clarify the position, I'm saying that a rationalist ignores the top left quadrant of phenomenology and views it as epistemically useless. But the question that they're asking can only be answered from phenomenology and nowhere else. You cannot show that you exist or that you're feeling anything empirically. The only way to know That you are feeling something is to recognize through self-awareness that you are feeling. And the only way to know that you exist is to recognize through self-awareness that you exist. My position is that any random human can easily do this, but the rationalist has rejected basic first person knowing from ideology. It is perfectly reasonable to question whether you're feeling love or something else, that you don't know what you're feeling. But that's not what I'm saying. Saying that your feelings have to be proven empirically doesn't make any sense. The dog was a random example and isnt my main point, i dont know what a dog is experiencing: but if we want to answer the question The right epistemology here is you got it intuit it. Experience + observations + insert epistemic options + contemplation. I don't have first-person experience being a dog. I have limitations being me.
  16. Are you asking if a dog can know anything at all? Are you asking if a dog can differentiate love from good feeling? https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mBjH5DG19R4 Is this love or fear? Looks like both. Are you asking if a dog can conceptualize love?
  17. This feels really self-evident, So I'm asking this question to see if there's a bias I'm missing." When you remove all beliefs, all stories like that your mother gave birth to you. If you remove every possible story about your life, about everything, you deconstruct everything and you go back to just staring at your hand or staring at a table, with just with nothing going on. Completely back to a blank slate. it Is self-evident, that the reason you exist, the purpose and meaning of your existence is to exist. This existence, this moment, what's happening right now, is the reason, the meaning, and the purpose of your life and existence. Now, this is extremely obvious to me, so I'm asking, am I completely delusional? I don't know if this took an awakening to understand. And I just forgot when it happened. But if you try to explain this to anyone, they are 100% unable to understand what you're saying. They say some story like "there is no meaning to life" or you're here to learn something. No. You exist right now and that's the point. There's no other point... There is no esoteric meaning, there is no higher purpose meaning, there is no fantasy and story meaning that you're searching for. But there is an ontological meaning.
  18. great mindset, I would focus for now only on exercise and just doing that consistently every day and getting the habit enforced and then gamifying it so that you see the progress, you see your body changing, you see your mind changing, basically getting that feedback loop that's addictive. Exercise alone is more valuable and productive than everything else on the list. It will rewire your brain completely.
  19. Rape cases are always on the grounds of testimonies. So they're very hard to win. Ideally, we have an AI on your phone that's listening at all times. And if they hear you say the word "no" stop, they will have situational awareness and will record everything.
  20. Its not hard for us peak developed humans... out of all the millions of random situations that show up in the world, some times theres a combination thats absurd. i saw this one case the girl was sleeping at a party in a bed and the guy next to her made a move on her, she frooze and 1) did not say anything 2) did not fight at all 3) "didn't know what to do". Woman are raised to avoid conflict and keep social harmony and this make the situation worse when they have to speak up for them selves. Everyone assumes rape is violent and the woman said "no/stop" and that's not how most of them happen. I'm not making excuses for any of these men. I'm just saying it's complicated unless you're educated.
  21. OH Its fascinating putting a face to words, had to pattern match all your mannerisms, vocal pattern, body language, humor preference, adrenaline level, but... nothing prepares you for a Japanese swearing Aussie. Dogga was made to be loved. ❤️
  22. @Natasha Tori Maru HOW DID I MISS THIS@???? 🥺 A gift from the GODS. Dude your good at speaking and working a job, no wonder you scored low on the autism test. Now the voice in my mind when reading your text is in an Australian accent screaming cu** when appropriate LMAOOO Diagnostic: Exception sPeCIal doggo in the background. Office air is making everyone Krainky. Well done existing up to this point, solid life performance.
  23. For sure, there's a lot of truth to this, but there is a percentage of them that genuinely had no idea they were raping the woman. The problem is women will have the freeze response. And they won't say no, and they will just sit there and not fight back. And the freeze response is extremely common, and if this happens, you could accidentally rape her. I think the freeze response must be some kind of survival mechanism that prevents them from dying if they're raped. As it's the best thing that you can do as a woman to avoid being killed in prehistoric times
  24. A dog knows that they feel love, when you love them. A rationalist doesnt know they feel love, when you love them. They need third-person, empirical "proof." Ideology makes you dumber than a dog.