-
Content count
7,529 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by integral
-
This is a fantasy, that's not how people get to 100 partners. We're talking about the real world here
-
Having a new partner every month for 10 years straight to get to the super high body counts means you're not good at bonding. Or maintaining relationships or you have major trauma like there's so many things involved. Nothing about this is healthy.
-
That doesn't mean some of them weren't true, and it is certainly what every man feels For a woman to have sex with 100 men, they would have to have a new sexual partner every month for eight years. That doesn't sound like stability or a partnership. If I was investing my money somewhere, would I pick an unstable stock that crashes every month? Hoping that this time it's going to be different? That I'm not gonna lose all my money. If a company releases 10 products and all 10 products fail within a month and then they announce an 11th product that's about to come out, would I invest in that?
-
It represents partnership, people want a partner not a fuck buddy or a roommate. It represents trust, can i trust someone that needs all the "freedom", nope. It represents commitment, does that sound like a responsible commitment person? nope. Do they sound like there going to have your back and you can have theres? NOPE. Are they going to give your money to some other man? Probably. Do they sound like a team player or are they going to jump to another team any time? Probably. 100+ body count represents -> unstable -> low value. --- Do you know how hard it is to have sex with 100 people before your 30? You need to be finding a new person every month... this is a mental illness.
-
Realistic path: rich get richer Optimistic path: AI flattens the Playing field
-
LOEE??? I made a game engine from scratch in C++ 15 years ago, i wrote ray tracing shaders and did all the quaternion math 💪 The Reason I said slay the spire can be built is because: it won't have a physics engine. Basically the whole game is one big UI 1 gameplay page (combat). That consists of a couple of characters and 2d animation that have easy to map fixed movements. It's offline and solo single player. It can be built entirely with browser tech outside of game engine complexity. Platform to launch: web + mobile + steam, within a simple browser game architecture.
-
Im building a game fully with AI right now, but the scope is realistic inside the limitations of AI. A game like slay the spire can be done with AI right now if you know what your doing. Im also from montreal
-
LMAO one might or might not of merged my profile pic with the most important wizard beard ever grown.
-
It was a good decision, There are certain standards that you should hold yourself to when picking up partner and you should think of them as partners and not someone that's going to give you love. These are very different things A partnership is when two people support each other to build a life together, that involves much more than just receiving love and feeling loved. If you seek the emotion of love blindly you're not going to get the love you truly want
-
-
Okay so that's a definitely a different dynamic. It sounds like they were trying to control you and warp you into what they want to do to be. Were you in the provider role?
-
Ah that makes perfect sense, I couldn't understand why no reason works, even when it's like 2 + 2 = 4 the answer is just wrong. The emotion makes it so they have to be right or they rather die. And anything that keeps them right is true. Oh I 100% believe it, I've had knives thrown at me and slapped with absolutely no warning at all lmao Getting slapped out of nowhere without any communication or you not realizing her emotions changed because nothing happened and there's nothing happening. FLMAO so true. As a inappropriate side topic, BPDs tend to be really good in bed. Because they 100% lose themselves in the experience
-
wow i had no idea haha, what is the mindset when you know you're lying but the emotion is strong like you're about to die? lmfao
-
I think that there's something deeper here that might not be related to the relationships that you had later in life. I grew up in a very healthy family with integrity and receiving kindness was clear when it's done in good faith or not. It's easy to tell. It's possible you had a blind spot here. When someone gives me love I think "i am already full, i dont need more", and I have a sense of obligation to thank them and to give reciprocation and it's always a bit of a drag even though I understand where they're coming from. I'd rather give to them and not have them give to me. I'm here to give. "I don't need what you have nor do you understand what I need." is what they dont understand. Love has to be tailored to the persons needs and very few people understand me to do that, ___ With my first BPD relationship, I was blindsided by not realizing that they were lying with emotional tantrums, and I took all of these tantrums very seriously, and in the end they lied and cheated and did everything imaginable while requiring my 100% commitment and involvement in every single emotion, where every time they had an emotion, it was my full responsibility and problem. I did everything imaginable to help this person and immediately dropped everything to help them whenever they needed me. I still remember all of the lies that were uncovered at the end of the relationship and it blew my mind because I was completely convinced. And I'm not a naïve person. I'm naturally very sceptical of everything people say yet I believed everything that she said. She was so good at lying, people CANNOT imagine, and it was all masked with extremely strong emotions, her emotions were all part of a lie she was telling, but they were genuine emotions and so I couldn't differentiate and I couldn't see the lie. Then I dated a second BPD a while later while fully integrating the first experience, i handled it more like a caregiver would, like a parent with a child. I provided the self-development and healing that I did with the first one but without being sucked in to the corruption of the child. ___ sorry for the long reply, I wanted to show the differences between how we might have experienced our BPDs LOL Is this experience similar to yours? Or were you in a different role play scenario?
-
I thought about it more what you could do is ASMR to practice that voice, but also push it to social media and then you could start a business that way. So you could turn practice into a business
-
@Michal__ nice apps man! now all you got to do is get an audiance. I think the first one has potential for businesses. I also wanted to make a business focussed product but because I'm so disconnected from that business world I can't really come up with good ideas or I know I won't be able to polish it properly
-
I was so corrupt, but now i see the love I put what you wrote into a map ahah, maybe ill make a actualized.org AI that will map out our conversations and extract the insights. This was always one of my dreams to reinvent conversation from back and forward text to a map building system, were we collaborate to build a map instead of taking past each other. Then there could be a library of ideas we all gather and build that can carry over to other conversations automatically.
-
integral replied to Consilience's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Razard86 cults don't take epistemology seriously, they don't talk about it, it's not part of their vocabulary -
Watch on youtube so it loops. Loop: https://youtube.com/shorts/ogPVcIeE8a0?si=UHXN0A2q9ir5Y80X
-
You guys are right I changed my mind. If you look at Trump and how he uses emotional manipulation and empathy and all these emotional tactics to Rally up voters and sway the direction of the conversations through chaos, it is exactly what I've observed in most women I interact with. It's the same bullshit to build machine.
-
@Xonas Pitfall @Natasha Tori Maru it's true both men and women do this and it's definitely related to maturity or how conscious you are and self-aware. These are not equal at all, committing violence is not the same as creating an empathy social network to benefit yourself and women are more likely to do this than men. If a woman or a man commit some violence, they're ostracized, this is not at all what I'm talking about, it benefits no one Men are not creating empathy social network networks to the same degree women are, you guys gotta stop flattening this. The way men build social networks is by doing favours for other men, positioning themselves in a position of status and to be a trust worthy person for many things. They're climbing the ladder in a completely different way. Not the same thing because no one is coming to rush over to help a man. A man cannot cry for empathy, he gets punched in the face. Nothing I said, has anything to do with ideology and people ganging up on other people and cultures forming inside subcultures.
-
None of it is done consciously. Broadcast the problem in a likeable way to as many people as possible and that's the the survival strategy. The way women socialize with each other is this kind of rambling about all of their problems and other people's problems and they're trying to get their problems out there for everyone to know (unconsciously, it is just their desire), why? So that the network is always conscious of this data so that the network could come back and support her (they don't know they're doing it for this reason. It is what they were wired to enjoy doing.) And this feminized socializing has a little to do with facts or reason or problem-solving. It's about how likeable enjoyable and swayable the talking points are.
-
Girl power is when a girl gives up her survival strategy for a masculine one. Why would someone help you if they dont feel anything towards you? A woman solved this problem vai her entire survival strategy. Woman have power by emotional influence. They cultivate inside you empathy towards them. This creates a social network were agents act in favor of her best interests. When things dont go there way they double down on the chaos so more resources are pulled to her from every direction. The more she can rile up the emotions of everyone around her the better her survival chances will be. Whenever a woman has a problem there is always a man somewhere rushing over here to help her solve it. And if that man won't do it, another man will.
-
No one agreed with Einstein, they thought he was a crack pot. That slow, sluggish dragging of your feet to accept a new profound way to look at the same thing is the paradigm lock. They think right now they're model of the universe Is one of the highest models and they don't understand they're just sitting in a hole and can't see above it. More evidence and more rational thoughts does not get you there Measuring every banana in the tree will not get you to understanding reality, this is the materialism monkey bubble.
-
Epistemically Wrong: in chess the beginner tries to prove to himself his beliefs are true, and the master tries to prove to himself that his beliefs are wrong. The amateur asks "what does this move do for me?" and the master asks "what does this move allow?" The problem with the beginner isn't just that he gets attached, it's that finding a move feels like progress, so letting go of it feels like losing something. He's chasing the feeling of having an answer instead of the answer actually being correct. For those thirty seconds that move becomes part of his identity, and refuting it would mean admitting he wasted his time. The master does the opposite, he spends most of his calculation trying to refute his own ideas because that's where the real information is. A line that survives your best attempt to kill it actually tells you something. And chess punishes this immediately. One refutation you didn't look at loses you the game, while ten supporting reasons give you nothing you didn't already have. The game rewards falsification and punishes confirmation The master is building an accurate model of the position before he even thinks about the solution and the beginner is generating solutions from a model he never built, so he's finding answers to a question he doesn't understand or asked. Most people can't tolerate discomfort of not having an answer yet while the understanding builds.
