integral

Right, that's the implicit point but it was also said that all uses of it outside the social domain is hog feed to fatten the philosophy academics. lol

LMFAOOOOO My interpretation of Elton John is he has no interest in marrying a woman but because of social pressures he had to adapt There are people in Islam forced to marry when they have no interest in marriage. This is what I'm pointing to. It could be Elton John didn't know he was gay and he married a woman, in that case then it's pretty straightforward conformity. It could be, he knew he was gay, and he loved the woman and wanted to marry her, he is so brainwashed and conformist that he still marries a woman. The conformity is so deep that a gay man is marrying a woman. There's another level to conformity that you're not talking about. Telling me that genetics is not conformity is nonsense. It's hardcoded conformity unchangeable unavoidable. This whole experience was designed by things completely out of my control, and I am conformed to. Shaped to, formed to. Conformity is what your shaped by, if you don't want to define it that way no problem. Wearing a Waldo costume in an unconforming way, because your conscious of conformity is still another version of conformity because you're exposed to Halloween, you would never wear a Waldo costume if you knew nothing about Halloween. You would never use English if you're not exposed to English, we have conformed to English so hard there's no ability to do anything else. Most people cannot think without language, though it's possible. But it's so rooted into our experience. CONFORMING TO THE SYSTEM OF ENGLISH LMFAOOOO

The biggest impact is the tone of your thoughts, and the tone of your inner voice and the tempo of your inner voice. Right now you're reading this and you're reading it with a specific tone of voice, but you could choose any other tone of voice and rhythm and it would have a vastly different effect on your physiology. Try reading while rhyming in a kind of child's game, or reading it whimsically as if to exaggerate the lows and highs for every word, or reading it with a loving tone of voice like a feminine voice. You could change your inner voice to be a womans voice. There are a lot of studies where they analyzed people's inner voice, and they found that there's a huge correlation between inner voice and anxiety, level stress level levels, and the quality of the person's life. And the thing is, this is fully controllable. You could impersonate a highly loving, caring, gentle woman's voice, and you use only that as your inner voice to do all of your thinking contemplation or reading or daily operations. Also, the rhythm of your inner voice place a huge role, if you start off with a whimsical rhythm, you quickly find that you'll enter into a play state and your whole physiology will change into a play physiology and it allows you to enter into the zone much easier. Your inner voice directly correlates to how fluently you enter into the zone. This is where mantras are actually useful, a mantra has a specific energy. If I say the word. "My love" internally, it invokes the vagus nerve and warms the solar plexus with good feelings. It's similar to the inner smile, simply smile internally, and you could feel it changing your physiology. There's also the word "control" which facilitates a pause for about 10 seconds, and then you could repeat that word to facilitate another pause and another resenting. Each of these words has an energy that directly affects a physiological response because there's associations you're making to all of these things. All of your inner words, tempo are directly associated with your physiology. And it could all be designed where you self explorer the correct tempo and we have operating and then you simply practised it until it becomes your default network. You could read in "slow motion", it's all an act. But your body makes it real.

lmfaoooOOOOo Elton John by choice conformed to social norms because of social pressures So this is not unconscious social conformity identity alignment, but he did conform to a system. To conform is to shape into, to adapt to, to be formed by. The childs mind is shaped by a million factors: social, genetic, environmental, sickness, gravity... cows farting... chicken growth hormons... The child conformed to the push and pull of systems its entangled in. Most of does system are not social/cultural. So conformity happens in many domains, This is holism and practical. --- In the latest blog and videos conformity is used specifically in the social domain to explain the mass hallucination and consumerist regurgitation of ideas.

I didn't know a question like this made sense to ask? Truth is truth? What does it matter how smart or useful it is? Should we limit something if its not smart or useful? Yes if you choose to define conformity with this possibility? I breath as i conform to genetics. I am as i conform to god. "Where am i?" = I conform to the paradigm of distance/space/seperation. Conformity is the relationship between all things.

@Leo Gura The difference between conformist or not is if your aware of how you constructed it or how youve been constructed. But that could be another level of conformity, to be aware of comformity yet to choose it anyways can still be comformity just that its the natural state of being at that level of development. Everyone is conforming to wtv level of development there at. How are you defining conformity? If your defining it as group-think and external influences then its a lot simpler. Are you extending conformity to infinity? Or does it have limits?

@Daniel Balan Its all good my man, they did the same thing to me last week. there is a issue on the forum with making claims about peoples perspectives and then denying them clarity when they try to explain themselves. The problem is when you clarify with any hint of emotion this subconsciously reinforces there beliefs and that the explanation is "defence" there for "wrong". People care about vibe more then what is said.

Believing you have the right to vote when the rich select the candidates you choose. Believe your making choices at a grocery store. Believing any choice you ever made was not hijacked by trillions in marketing for centuries. Believing your thoughts are uniquely synthesized and not the product of mass conformist group think hallucination indoctrinated from birth. Getting a mortgage. Loving your children. Breathing air (genetic conformity)

I think the Korean market would like these videos, there's a lot of spiritual Korean Youtubers making a lot of money surprisingly doing very similar rogue, talking on a camera

I ate nothing but meat and vegetables for six months and lost 100 pounds. The moment you stop eating carbs the fat explodes off your body. But there are side effects if your body doesn't adapt properly. Try not to go this extreme.

I agree with everything Leo said I'd like to add that I've been making games since the beginning of time programming and I recently been using AI for about a year and it has replaced 100% of my coding. If you're very skilled with game development then at this point AI could could help you be at best be 5% faster. For very small basic simple projects, it could probably save you 90% of your time but that's if you already have years of hard experience. 3-D modelling is maybe 20% solved at this point and animation is 0% solved. But once these two things are solved and you could have fluid character interactions without having a manually create every animation. This would save unimaginable amount of time. Many parts of game development will be solved in a few years and that should cut time by 50%. But 50% is still a MASSIVE amount of work.

Frogs have show to have a 24% increase in cardiovascular health if we appetite all four legs for a duration of six weeks. -science. There we go, now its "rigourous" and "rational". 😅 Next up, Bryan Johnson choppes his legs off.

Most supplements don't belong anywhere near a living thing

If you can handle BPD men, then you're operating at one of the highest levels of relationship maturity and emotional maturity. Did you have mature parents? Reading your reply, made me realize that my father had BPD, "huge burst of anger over spilled milk, followed by shame, regret and apologies, daily". Having him as a father taught me at a every young age that it was my responsibility to manage his emotions for him. That i was brainwashed into thinking the point of social interaction is to manage other people's emotions for them, tiptoeing on egg shells with everyone. Much of your reply directly reflects how I operate in relationships and there's overlap. The only difference would be that safety doesn't really play a role. Which is probably because I have a physically strong body so I never feel unsafe, there's also cultural role-play happening, where males just don't feel unsafe around women. The thing that would kill my sexual interest in a partner is them not seeing any value in me. If they don't see the work and value, I put into their lives then I am so repulsed that I don't want to touch them. I guess this could be framed as being looked down upon? And the opposite is also true the more you value everything I do for you, the more I want to do for you. The more that a woman expresses how they value their man's actions, choice or behaviour the more the man falls in love with them. Both use rationality to justify there emotions. I dont see the difference, from my experience with woman BPD, its a solid line of "rational" thinking leading there tantrums. The overlap with what you wroth is so strong that i see very few differences between the way we opperate. So there doesnt seem to be differences between the sexes in relationships when operating at a high level of maturity. There still seems to be differences with attraction and needs, like primary things closer rooted to biology. But secondary things at higher brain regions seems to overlap alot between sexes. I think a lot of the issues people have with sexism comes down to not making any of these distinctions and lumping any claim of difference in big soup of misogyny. --- There were alot of interesting differences doe. This is SO funny! I have to do the opposite, i enter into a feminine frame of play and love to counter the tantrum, then i go back to holding space in a default masculine mode. I know this is unpolitical but with BPD i see a child having a tantrum and empathy for it is important but not to much that you have your boundaries crossed. Especially when there tantrums are everyday. Obviously theres nothing to judge, there mentally ill. And even if there not mentally ill, there mentally ill, such is a living thing lol This is a good insight, Do you recover from emotions super fast? like a few minutes? and do you have healthy strategies to manage them? I agree men and woman will hold onto there emotions and try to validate a point with it, but emotions seem to linger much longer in woman.

It was a metaphor, for the gratification of winning, taking pleasure in winning. It wasn't about sex. But that was a mistake on my part, should've used proper vocabulary.

Everything I wrote was for the only purpose of clarifying my position, which is something you should already have done on your own. This is stonewalling (the childhood defence mechanism) and not caring at all to steal man someone's position. You win by distorting other people's perspectives, then wall off all clarity attempts. This is aligned with debate focussed people. When you distort their perspective, they seek clarity and then they engaged back with you and then you will deny them clarity. A person who is focussing since childhood to win, has distorted models of reality. The stoicism creates the feeling of rightness because after all if someone is stoic, the person who is not stoic is likely wrong. That's the vibe, and it's self reinforcing. I don't feel anything. But a misogynist would. If I belong to a pattern, I don't feel superior that I'm in a pattern. But you stated you enjoy crushing people, which is this superiority game that I'm not playing at all. Thinking that I say things for the purpose of stating superiority is because you are projecting how you operate onto me.

So we had similar experiences, I dated two BPD women, the main focus was the mature person as to compensate for the lack of maturity in the other. It looks like we had a role reversal. Did you feel a loss of sexual desire towards them the more emotional they became? I'm asking this because the typical pattern is women will lose sexual attraction the more childish they think he is. They don't want to babysit a toddler. I'm asking because you're atypical, and I want to know how many "norms" don't apply to you.

What is your experience?

Giving her what she wants, which is love, is precisely understanding her. The content of what she's saying has to be agreed with or if you disagree, you have to do it in a super playful way with the right affection techniques. It's not some easy thing to do, especially when they're not in the right mood all day, then it becomes a marathon a partner cant tolerate, people have limits. Most issues people have in relationships is that,. You're partner is in proximity and someone doesn't feel good. The fact that you being in proximity makes more opportunities to associate negative feelings towards you. To solve this, you just have to use playful techniques.

??? This is a super effective, loving technique! She wants to be kissed, hugged and told she's right!

I forgot to be balanced! And as a woman to get a man to be happy with your demands you say "Honey you have suck a big dick can you wash the dishes?". This solves his core problems with the demand and he will immediately obey all orders. lmfao You guys think I'm being foolish, but this works.

This is true. I FEEL SO SOOTHED 😂 lmFAOOO My default writing style is hyper "this is truth" autism. When I use words like "attacked" I do not personally feel attacked. I'm stating what people are doing. I found the right strategy is to just be playful (IRL), and that disarms all emotionally charged events. Say things like "oh nNnnooOo my sweet sweet sweeeeeet pumPkin (petting her head with 1000x kissis), your always right" This is a guaranteed technique. lmao

For the love of carl, ok you got me ill only generalize men for now on.

I do not feel negativity towards anyone. I'm pointing out everything that's happening, it's interpreted as defensiveness. Actually from your perspective i am a sexist, there is no other way to define it in that paradigm. I'm sorry people experienced sexism today. lmaooo

Its typical of ALL men to avoid wrong doing, thats what most men do. 😎 Make it a forum rule not to talk about the differences between the sexes. My instict when reading this topic was "oh thats one way woman become masculine". If that was my insight there is nothing i can do about it. I get the issues on this forum with male dominance, at this point just stop the discussions from happening with rules. Guys.. i thougth about this topic for a decade now, ive read and heard everything, im not misrepresenting anything in a pilled form... Being called sexist is the same as commiting a social crime, it also interpret the context at a super low level meaning what was said was misrepresented. This is like accusing someone of a crime then telling them they're not allowed to defend themselves? And if they defend themselves you tell them they lack confidence and self-assurance? And we call it "defence" and not seeking clarity, why? Yes i could of just ignored everything, would that of been better then seeking clarity and proven to the world im a "real man"? LMAO So you guys are not playing social games right now? Its one of does games were the more you try to seek clarity the more they think your childish.