integral

@SQAAD omg is this how most people feel when they have to think???? If this is true, it’s no wonder mankind is so the self deceived, if facing the truth makes them feel bad they’re never gonna do it. In competitive chess, there is a very high importance in emotional mastery, because whenever you get emotional, either positive or negative it has a strong impact on your thinking process and the quality of the next move you’re going to play So you learn through repetition to always come back to a calm middle point and to be disciplined with it I suggest when you’re confronted with a difficult truth, remind yourself that there is no rush and that you could take your time and no one is chasing you, just sit there with it and be with it and explore it. Take your time. No one is chasing you, you have all the time in the world.

Most people couldn’t last 10 seconds living in Leo’s body you would be screaming to go back You would immediately recognize your mistake within seconds of entering his body

@Leo Gura I take the 20 million and hire team to work with me for the next 10 years to solve the problem? But Only people who have had a chronic health problem can fathom this level of suffering. People have no concept of how ridiculous suffering gets Only a fool would take this. 😅 but bonus, you get TRUTH

LMAO HOW? When The Voice speaks with the same emotional tone and the audio quality is perfect with no fluctuation like there's no emotional change ever then you know it's AI. But you could easily make videos like this in less than a few hours, these are extremely easy to make. use chatgpt to generate the script use eleven labs to convert the script into AI voice use sora to get free videos clips drag and drop everything into capcut video editor in capcut add captions (subtitles) post to youtube (very easy) Done! Im looking forward to your first video. That channel is making somewhere between 250$-4k$ a month and it's only 3 months old with 125k subscribers! You're welcome for this advice I charge $250 an hour 😉

The channel is doing pretty good for simple AI generated content

1. Sub-Vocalization "saying" words in your head, affirmations, names, or mantras in your inner voice Internal scripting that guides thought or emotion Can be used to initiate states, prime beliefs, or shift identity Example: whispering “I am safe” internally shifts your field 2. Sub-Emotionalization Initiating an emotion (joy, gratitude, calm, forgiveness) without an external cause Emotion as command, not reaction Can become a base signal for perception This is at the heart of your “Feel Good Technique” 3. Sub-Visualization Light, pre-symbolic imaging — often non-deliberate or semi-symbolic Can include colors, light, shapes, memory fragments, archetypes Used in visualization training, dreamwork, energy healing More fluid than full conscious imagination 4. Sub-Experialization Simulating an internal experience, sensation, or memory without external trigger Example: imagining the feeling of holding a loved one, or the felt weight of confidence Often a precursor to embodiment 5. Sub-Attunement Internally “tuning into” a person, place, concept, or state Like adjusting an internal frequency dial to “feel into” something Often used in empathy, energetic sensing, and channeling states 6. Sub-Positioning Slightly shifting the position of your inner witness or attention You can “look from the heart,” “think from the gut,” or “observe from above” Tiny shift, massive perceptual consequences 7. Sub-Intending Holding a micro-intention or subtle desire in place, like an energetic lean Not forcing, just gently holding an outcome or preference Common in healing work, prayer, or intuition setting 8. Sub-Resonating Feeling the energetic “hum” or “click” when something aligns with your system Often noticed in response to words, ideas, or people Trained in subtle energy work, aesthetics, or intuitive disciplines 9. Sub-Releasing Internally relaxing or letting go of control, even within a single muscle or mental grip Essential in surrender practices, trauma release, meditation “Dropping” the need to do or control something subtly 10. Sub-Sensing Activating a subtle sense (energetic, emotional, somatic) in the background of awareness Like checking in with the space around you, or the texture of a thought Used in martial arts, Qi Gong, intuitive scanning 11. Sub-Modulation Adjusting the intensity, tone, or flavor of an internal state without changing its core. Example: turning down the emotional volume of anger while keeping the message Often used in trauma healing, emotion regulation, tantric containment 12. Sub-Contracting / Sub-Expanding Slightly withdrawing or widening the field of awareness Can occur somatically (tension or breath), emotionally (narrow focus), or energetically (shrinking aura) Core practice in energy management and subtle attention dynamics 13. Sub-Permitting Silently allowing a sensation, thought, or emotion without resisting or identifying with it A core micro-movement in mindfulness, ACT (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy), and nondual inquiry Creates "space" around experience 14. Sub-Titrating Intentionally touching into an intense experience just a little bit, then pulling back Found in Somatic Experiencing, trauma processing, grief work Balances exposure and safety; builds capacity for deeper truths 15. Sub-Noticing / Micro-Tracking Sharpening the resolution of what’s already subtly known Example: “Ah, that sensation behind my eyes has a slight spiraling movement…” Forms the basis of intuitive refinement, high-resolution somatic sensing, and psychic development 16. Sub-Seeding / Pre-Intending Quietly planting a question, intention, or request into your awareness and then releasing it Common in dream incubation, mystical prayer, or oracular techniques Example: “Show me what I need to know” (then letting it go) 17. Sub-Tuning Matching your internal frequency with something external or internal (a place, person, mood, archetype) Like tuning a radio to align with a subtle broadcast Found in energy work, empathic practices, shamanic merging 18. Sub-Reframing Silently adjusting the context or meaning-frame of what you're experiencing Not full cognitive reframing — more of a shift in emotional or energetic narrative Example: A tight chest becomes “expansion trying to happen” 19. Sub-Feeling Feeling into the potential of something — not a full-blown emotion, but a flavor or emotional hint Common in decision-making, inner visioning, symbolic reading “What would it feel like if this were true?” 20. Sub-Disidentifying Loosening the grip of identification with thought, sensation, emotion, or story Often felt as “witnessing from behind,” stepping back Essential in ego work, meditative self-inquiry, and lucid dream states 21. Sub-Modeling Building and interacting with abstract, often non-verbal structures in mind Think of this as “doing math without language” or “rearranging logic blocks” It’s how you feel the weight of a system or simulate a move without narrating it 22. Sub-Projective Awareness Projecting attention into external space to “think through the environment” (in this case, the chess board) Your cognition is outside your head, in the field of play You’re extending your consciousness spatially 23. Sub-Spatial Relational Mapping Tracking where things are in relation to each other and sensing potential configurations You’re aware of the tension between spaces, like a body sensing balance and pressure 24. Sub-Embodied Intuition Letting the body–mind process data through felt “rightness” or flow without symbolic overlay You just “know” that a move is good without words or visuals — your internal somatic/energetic field has processed it 25. Sub-Flow Tracking Feeling momentum and unfolding logic without discrete thoughts or images — like surfing an inner wave of pattern 🧭 How to Work with These You can train these through: Meditative micro-practice (tracking subtle shifts) Inner journaling (writing about what shifts what) Somatic awareness training (naming and noticing body signals) Energy work (Qi Gong, Reiki, etc.) Voice or sound-based tuning (vowel toning, humming) 🧠 Applications These subtle operations are at the core of many deep states and disciplines, including: Inner alchemy (Taoist) Tantric visualization Hypnosis and NLP Energy psychology Mystical prayer Somatic psychotherapy Manifestation work State design and metacognition They also underlie how you do: Affirmation Intention-setting Meditation Emotional regulation Self-healing Spiritual transmission 🌌 Meta-Layer: Composability All of these can be combined to create inner "chords" or rituals: Sub-vocalize “thank you” + sub-emotionalize gratitude + sub-attune to heart field = Instant joy Sub-permit discomfort + sub-titrate sensation + sub-reframe narrative = Trauma integration -Ai assisted

@LordFall I probably wouldn't take the trade unless I had a terminal illness or I was ready to die from suffering of a Incurable disease Generally to make that kind of money you need to be healthy

Use a crypto wallet that only dispenses a small amount to each person each month. Now they have no control and only receive small payments for life. Or harvest there stem cells and make your self young again. 😁

Well you can take the money and give it to your family, self-sacrifice

You: “Are you saying I can win arguments? That I can out-reason everyone?” Epistemic Morpheus: “No. I’m saying that when you’re ready… you won’t need to.”

If you guys were serious about truth, you wouldn’t be playing these Ego games

Whatever Leo does are doesn’t do doesn’t matter, I’m talking about the best strategy to talk about truth.

I didn’t mean approval, I meant if you want him to see the truth in what you are saying you have to steal man his position. All I see is you guys disliking what he saying and then shouting your belief louder than he does. Belief vs belief. That’s not gonna go anywhere. You have to carefully steal man and pinpoint exactly where truth is incomplete like a surgeon

@Nilsi the epistemic vocabulary leo has introduced is extremely useful. I think you’re throwing the baby out of the bathwater. You need to provide a very strong steel man of Leos position in order to get him to acknowledge anything.

@Nilsi is the world burning down that someone else believes in God differently than you? I think we should take up our pitchforks.

What’s the difference between logic and coherence? They seem like the same thing. Do distinctions cause logic, or does logic cause distinctions? Or is it that distinction is logic? Logic is the structure of distinction? they are co-arising

Most mental illnesses are all in the body. They’re not all in your head. This is commonly mixed up all the time because there are issues like low self-esteem and terrible parenting that did contribute to a bad operating system Mental disorders is not the same as a bad childhood, but they are often conflated so you get really bad gaslighting of people telling you it’s all in your head and you need to work harder with willpower that might be true if your problem is a terrible childhood but it’s not true if you have coeliac disease and you don’t know it causing schizophrenia (and you will go 20 years never figuring it out, and your doctors have absolutely no idea, because they are reciting the industry)

she will gladly chop your head off 😂 all that animals have to do is shape themselves like a human females, and they will take over the world

Good luck curing a mental disorder in this epistemic swamp step one: build a boat out of crocodile carcasses

There’s an entire video that Leo made a while ago called something like “ how to let go”, and in a nutshell, he explains to let go without any reason whatsoever. You don’t need to reason about it, you don’t need to convince yourself to let go, you don’t need a story to justify letting go, you don’t need any ego games. You simply let go and that’s it. There’s another technique that is simply “ feel good”, you don’t need a reason to feel good, you don’t need to convince yourself to feel good or to tell yourself some story to justify feeling good, there are no ego games required or thinking needed. You simply feel good right now. To help with this technique do this: “ smile internally”. By doing so you should automatically feel good. You should feel a sensation around your solar plexus (centre chest) This is 100% no bullshit emotional intelligence. This is you taking 100% responsibility for an emotion. Notice when you smile internally you have a good feeling in your solar plexus. You did it! Now remember to do this all the time, and you can meditate on this inner feeling of smile and potentially reach states of deep Bliss. Congratulations! You can now feel good whenever you want! 🥳🎉

You’re essentially sub-vocalizing an emotion when you do an inner smile. It is a language of emotion. When you combine this with language of sound or symbols, you get a much richer inner intelligence. You could also combine this with a language of imagery that you use internally. Sub vocalize Sub emotionalize Sub visualize Sub experialize all parts of your control

These r Rockies numbers, hes expected to 10x.

Breaking down epistemic axes Scientific Consensus In Practice: “According to the latest guidelines, we do X.” Missed Adaptation: Rarely questions whether the big‑picture studies fit this patient’s unique situation. Expert Testimony In Practice: “Our specialist team recommends this treatment.” Missed Adaptation: Never pauses to test or modify that advice based on how you actually respond. Authority Trust In Practice: “Trust me, I’m a doctor.” Missed Adaptation: Doesn’t step back and ask, “Is my own training misleading me here?” Technological Instruments In Practice: Orders labs, imaging, monitors numbers. Missed Adaptation: Doesn’t re‑validate equipment readings against how you feel or perform. Guidelines/Flowcharts In Practice: Follows checklists (“if A then B then C”). Missed Adaptation: Doesn’t deviate from the script even when it’s not working—no real trial‑and‑error. Empirical Observation (Own) In Practice: A quick physical exam, vital signs. Missed Adaptation: Rarely conducts systematic observations (sleep logs, symptom diaries) to refine treatment. Clinical Experience Integration In Practice: “In my 10 years, I’ve seen this before.” Missed Adaptation: Doesn’t actively mine those past cases for new, patient‑specific patterns. Trial and Error (Personalized) In Practice: Tries one or two standard meds in sequence. Missed Adaptation: Stops after the “approved” options fail—no creative experimentation or custom tweaks. Intuition In Practice: Usually suppressed: “We stick to data.” Missed Adaptation: Never asks, “What’s my gut telling me about this unusual presentation?” Patient Narrative Integration In Practice: You give your history; it goes into the chart. Missed Adaptation: Rarely shapes the treatment plan beyond filling checkboxes—your story isn’t a true guide. Tacit Knowledge Use In Practice: A fleeting “sense” when something’s off in your exam. Missed Adaptation: That feeling stays unexamined—it doesn’t feed back into refining their approach. Logical Reasoning (Independent) In Practice: Basic symptom→diagnosis logic, but within set protocols. Missed Adaptation: Doesn’t construct new chains of inference when protocols fail—stops thinking. Emotional Intelligence In Practice: Polite bedside manner, empathy scripts. Missed Adaptation: Rarely uses your emotional reactions as data to pivot treatment. Meta‑Epistemic Awareness In Practice: Almost zero—doctors don’t think about how they know. Missed Adaptation: No pause to question their own biases, conflicts of interest, or blind spots. Epistemic Humility In Practice: “I know what’s best”—they seldom say “I don’t know.” Missed Adaptation: Admitting uncertainty could open space for new approaches, but it almost never happens. Cultural Assumptions Awareness In Practice: Assumes “clean” lifestyles, “standard” bodies, mainstream beliefs. Missed Adaptation: Doesn’t check whether those cultural norms are harming your individual health. Reflection on Conflict of Interest In Practice: Medications and devices are prescribed without mention of industry ties. Missed Adaptation: Never considers how pharmaceutical funding or study bias might be steering choices. Acknowledgment of Uncertainty In Practice: Projects confidence even when evidence is weak. Missed Adaptation: Fails to explore alternative diagnoses or treatments in the face of doubt. Bottom line: On any given day, a doctor leans heavily on authorities, guidelines, and published evidence, but seldom reflects, experiments, or adapts their own methods. True trial‑and‑error, meta‑reflection, and personalized observation—key engines of real learning—remain almost entirely off the table. -AI assisted

@Nilsi oh God it's already become a gender meme... 🧨 40 Shadow Epistemologies by Type Unconscious motivations behind how different archetypes distort their sense of truth The Skeptic – Belief is a threat; doubt is used to avoid emotional vulnerability. The Academic – Over-identifies with credentials; avoids paradigm shifts that risk reputation. The Rationalist – Suppresses intuition; filters reality through logic as if it’s the only valid lens. The Empath – Believes what feels good or “resonates”; resists confrontation or critique. The Healer – Rejects data that contradicts spiritual identity or natural methods. The Scientist – Mistakes the scientific method for reality itself; sees anything unmeasurable as invalid. The Conspiracy Theorist – Trauma-rooted distrust; finds patterns to gain control over uncertainty. The Guru – Builds epistemology on adoration and insulation; avoids questioning from followers. The Skeptical Debunker – Emotionally gratified by tearing others down; addicted to “being right.” The Internet Bro – Clings to contrarianism to feel edgy, smart, or “red-pilled.” The Techno-Optimist – Equates progress with truth; belief is shaped by innovation dogma. The Postmodernist – Avoids any commitment to truth; uses relativity to evade responsibility. The Fundamentalist – Anchors truth in scripture; resists inquiry that could unravel worldview. The Capitalist – Truth is what sells; suppresses inconvenient knowledge for economic advantage. The Influencer – Beliefs shaped by audience validation; confuses “resonance” with accuracy. The Politician – Truth is performative; knowledge is weaponized for persuasion or control. The New Age Hippie – Embraces beliefs for aesthetic and emotional resonance; filters out anything "dense" or “low vibe.” The Nihilist – Avoids responsibility by claiming nothing matters or can be known. The Philosopher – Uses endless abstraction to avoid grounding or personal application. The Activist – Belief is emotionally tied to moral outrage; may resist nuance. The Stoic – Suppresses emotion so strongly that emotional data is dismissed. The Trauma Survivor – Beliefs shaped by self-protection; may reject perspectives that feel unsafe, even if true. The Doomer – Sees belief in possibility as delusion; clings to pessimism as identity. The Utopian Idealist – Projects perfection onto systems or ideologies to avoid disillusionment. The Life Coach – Turns knowledge into marketable certainty; may avoid complexity that doesn’t sell. The Rebel – Believes against the mainstream simply to maintain identity as outsider. The Libertarian – Filters all truth through personal freedom; may resist collective truths. The Christian Apologist – Filters all data through scripture; belief system cannot be falsified. The Psychedelic Explorer – Overweights peak experience as ultimate truth; resists grounding in reason or shared reality. The Business Strategist – Prioritizes utility over truth; epistemology shaped by ROI. The AI Ethicist – Paralyzed by future hypotheticals; uses complexity to mask indecision. The Stoic Entrepreneur – Resists emotional data as “irrational”; overweights efficiency. The Law of Attraction Believer – Belief based on emotional confirmation and selective attention. The Occultist – Uses obscurity or esoteric language to avoid falsifiability. The Simulation Theorist – Believes reality is unreal to avoid facing human vulnerability and uncertainty. The Spiritual Narcissist – Believes their intuition is truth; avoids challenge by framing critics as “unawakened.” The Traditionalist – Epistemology rooted in nostalgia; truth = what worked before. The Productivity Hacker – Sees truth as what's efficient; ignores depth, ethics, or long-term implications. The Astrology Believer – Projects internal patterns onto celestial symbols; uses archetypes to explain everything, avoiding accountability or complexity. The Enlightenment Chaser – Seeks nondual states as escape; bypasses emotional, relational, and intellectual shadow work. Let me know if you’d like an extended version with "how to grow beyond" each shadow, or a breakdown by epistemic type.

SHAPE! Is King