integral

When a doctor destroys your life you'll stop putting authority figures on a pedestal. Also Chemo ages every cell in the body. His life specifically brain function will never be the same and the result of the DNA damage will slowly show up in the next 10 years.

@Michael569 Great talk, I love these guys. Im not getting one part, he goes in great length to explain how ApoB is a better risk assessment and has a very detailed explanation of how it all works, they seem to have good case to transition and advance the industry to move in this direction. Then at 1:08:52 they discuss people with normal to low risk assessment for ApoB but still contract Atherosclerosis young and have events young, he then say "I don't know, this is where research needs to be done". That would then mean his model of how and why Atherosclerosis happens within the human body is incomplete. Something is causing the ApoB protein to bind to the artery walls for some people and not others. That is what needs to be figured out, there is no model to be made with out this piece of the puzzle. The discussion about the guidelines was fantastic. The only criticism I have is they are 100% focused on data, studies, scientific evidence that represents the tip of the iceberg of known information on these topics. As far as I'm concerned no real effort was put into any of this yet, minimal innovation, the financial incentive is not aligned with health yet and until that happens there will be no real advancements in knowledge or technology. Its the stone age of health care. The tools they have to work with is abysmal and they lack the imagination to see how behind there tools are and the industry is. Create a machine that can see everything in the blood and display it in an app, on the app select the things you want to filter out and hte machine will filter out only does compounds. The application for this would be a endless, completely revolutionize health. Instead we have a archaic dialysis machine. INOVATE, DO SOMETHING! We need better tools. There is a multi billion dollar untapped consumer health care boom around the corner. Where is the innovation and creative thinking? There spending all there intelligence micro progressing a sub field of a sub field and then publish a research paper on it. Instead of focusing on the 10x to 100x improvements we could be making in this domain. The ball cant start rolling yet because the people attracted to health care careers are ISTJ and ESTPs and they love there comfort zone. Once the health care technology boom really starts to take off vai the incentive of consumer products more intuitive types will move into the domain rapidly progressing things.

In that situation agree with her.

@RebornConsciousness ?So good

On this topic is it possible that the reason chemotherapy works is because its a very effective way to get people to stop eating and fast? There so sick they don't eat and so kills cancer and the patients that eat normally don't show any improvement?

@RebornConsciousness He even waved for the camera, these insects have quantum entangled minds, incredible

All votes are anonymous.

Ive never seen that, id love to see that

That may be true, I think part of it is public confidence has been destroyed over the years with cereal companies marketing sugar as a healthy breakfast and the entire united state food pyramid scandal.

Do you have trauma, resentment or where hurt in a past relationships with a girl you fell in love with and now you don't want to get hurt again?

@Princess Arabia Ops haha, sorry about that, yes I quoted by mistake. To quote a section highlight the part you want and click the "quote" button that pops up.

@thenondualtankie Its more about waking people up on the forum who are not exercising and refuse to.

Most people don't have the time to do this and have no idea what overall direction the majority of evidence points to or the quality of that evidence. They also have no idea who knows this, cant trust professions and need to come to there own conclusions or else have there life destroyed by putting there health in the hands of the wrong person.

@Thought Art Is it possible for the government to put laws into place that would of protected you from making the decisions you made?

One interpretation is that heaven/hell are metaphor for your state of mind. You can view the present moment as hellish or heavenly, its a matter of perspective.

@Kalki Avatar Have you tried dating women over 30 and who spent time doing self-development work?

Im sorry to hear that, do you think there was a way that could of prevented this situation?

Linking a study is like linking a verse in the bible.

Thank you that was the answer I was waiting to get. Its very convincing logic and I see no reason why there criticism isn't valid. Its perfectly clear now how data focused approaches construct there paradigm. I'm obviously not going to play this game. I was not using that video to prove I was right, I linked the video to see what you had to say about and I personally don't think prescribing a statin to everyone at risk is what these studies should be used to justify and that opinion has nothing to do with studies or the paradigm of evidence derived from studies. I see studies as one possible perspective and not evidence and not a treatment strategy. I think the logic sequence in the debunking video is highly convincing and therefor that thinking process is a massive blind spot, I have no idea what that blind spot is its just intuition.

The video covered it. With most of these studies they show a risk reduction in one decease like coronary heart disease vs placebo group but both groups had a similar risk of death from all causes. Meaning it did not improve the quality of there life or health, they avoided one disease and suffered another. No, he's not the only one talking about this and if that study became popular then you must have a good reason to reject it, id like to understand that. I'm getting the impression your closed off to most perspectives that are "obviously" wrong from a pure data oriented approach. The trick would be the data is misleading and counter-intuitive, it logically all checks out and its not obvious why its wrong. Instead of focusing on data, look at the results practitioners are getting. What are your results, how is that data being tracked?

0 interest rogue crypto loans is where its at now a days.

Guys I'm not saying your practice has no value, of course you've helped people, but that guy prescribes a statin a day and tells me his patients all have fantastic results. I'm more interested in a more balanced view that some improved, most made no progress and some got worse. So from there I'm saying he's trying to prove he's right instead of the truth by cherry picking results. Most doctors focus on the things they have a good track record of success and ignore the areas they don't have much success and point to "we are doing the best we can with the data with have" with out questioning there epistemology. @undeather Explain why these studies don't change how you feel about statins?

There is nothing better to replace it with. When your 100% focused and passionate about what your doing your less likely to be distracted.

Ye the double standard is set by biology. lol

I don't believe you. I think your focused on being right and that's more important then the truth.