mattm33

chatgpt words good better than me...

I get that. I'm not a horror movie fan so I'm definitely biased. With the great reviews it got I was hoping for more I guess. I don't like it when movies sacrifice their own internal logic for the sake of making something more dramatic or emotional. That feels lazy to me and it takes away from or negates the impact. But I'm probably asking too much from a monster movie. How do I delete the extra quotes? Never mind... it let me delete them when I tried a fifth time?

Chatgpt for you... It's better than your takes at least. Maybe you should read through the responses to your "We Are Fucked" thread a few more times Religion as a "cancer on humanity: While many atrocities have been committed in the name of religion (such as wars, inquisitions, and discrimination), it is an oversimplification to label all religion as purely harmful. Religion has also inspired countless acts of compassion, charity, social justice, and community building. Organizations like churches, mosques, and temples often provide social services, help the poor, and offer a sense of community, belonging, and purpose. Historical figures like Martin Luther King Jr., Mahatma Gandhi, and Mother Teresa were deeply motivated by their faith in their pursuit of justice, peace, and service to others. Intellectual dishonesty, prejudice, misogyny, homophobia, death, and fear: It’s undeniable that some religious institutions have been vehicles for prejudice and discrimination, particularly regarding women's rights and LGBTQ+ issues. However, many religious movements are also at the forefront of promoting equality and social change. Progressive interpretations of religious texts challenge these injustices, and many religious communities work toward inclusivity. In many instances, it's the misuse or misinterpretation of religion for political or social power that leads to harm, rather than the core spiritual teachings. Taxing religious organizations: This argument often arises from concerns that some religious organizations abuse tax exemptions. While there may be cases of financial misuse, many religious institutions genuinely use their funds for charitable activities. The question of taxation should focus on transparency and accountability rather than blanket assumptions of wrongdoing. Religion in schools: In secular societies, it’s generally agreed that religious indoctrination has no place in public education. However, teaching about religion—its history, diversity, and influence on cultures and societies—can be essential for developing a well-rounded understanding of the world. Studying religion academically fosters critical thinking and tolerance, rather than promoting any single belief system. Children and religious indoctrination: Protecting children from harmful practices is important, but labeling all religious upbringing as harmful overlooks the fact that many children raised in religious families grow up to be healthy, compassionate, and well-adjusted individuals. Encouraging critical thinking and offering exposure to diverse worldviews, including secular perspectives, is key. A total prohibition against religious exposure could be seen as an overreach. Religious circumcision: The topic of circumcision, whether for religious or cultural reasons, is indeed controversial. Ethical discussions should be had about the practice, especially with respect to bodily autonomy. But it’s important to note that circumcision practices vary widely across religions and cultures, and many who practice them do so with deep respect for tradition and identity. Instead of dismissing them outright, respectful dialogue and public health considerations should guide any policy changes. Religious garments: The critique about face-covering garments, such as the burqa, raises important questions about individual freedom and societal norms. However, for many, wearing religious garments is an expression of personal faith and identity, not a sign of oppression. Balancing security concerns with the right to religious expression requires nuance and understanding of the cultural significance behind these garments. Religion as belief in a “fairy in the sky”: Reducing religious belief to a simplistic caricature (e.g., a fairy in the sky) overlooks the complexity and depth of theological thought. For millions, religion addresses existential questions and provides ethical frameworks that help guide their lives. Dismissing religion in such terms alienates those who find meaning and value in their faith and ignores the role that spirituality plays in the human experience. Science vs. religion: Science and religion need not be in conflict. Many religious believers embrace scientific discoveries and incorporate them into their worldview. The idea that science is still in its infancy, particularly in understanding consciousness, is true. However, science and religion serve different roles: science explains the “how” of the universe, while religion often addresses the “why,” focusing on meaning, morality, and purpose. Both domains have their limitations, but they can complement rather than contradict each other. Vedic knowledge vs. Western religions: The statement promotes Vedic knowledge as superior to other religions. While the Vedas offer rich spiritual insights, they, like other ancient texts, can be interpreted in different ways. Suggesting one spiritual tradition holds all the answers risks falling into the same absolutist thinking that the critique of religion opposes. Just as with any tradition, it’s essential to approach the Vedas critically, appreciating their wisdom while also considering modern ethical and scientific understandings. Conclusion: While this statement raises important concerns about the harmful aspects of religion, it paints religion with too broad a brush. There are legitimate critiques of how religion has been misused, but there are also countless examples of religion fostering positive personal and societal growth. The answer likely lies in promoting secular values alongside religious freedom, ensuring that individuals can make informed choices without being forced into belief systems, while also respecting those who find meaning and ethical guidance in their faith.

I just watched "a quit place" and was frustrated with it. It started strong with the unique premise and seemed good at the tension building without resorting to jump scares. It's inconsistency with it's own logic ruined that by the end for me. The monster's strength and hearing ability changes based on what the scene needs. That wife and baby should have been dead so many times. The monster could hear the gentle hum of the tv screen but not her heavy breathing or body noises. They have to use fabric for board game pieces but the monster couldn't hear the kid loudly running through the cornfield? In another tense scene they go from using a door as a raft after they almost die in the "quicksand" like grain. To hiding under that door in the same grain invalidating the previous tension and making me laugh. Sand path...implausible... I could keep going. Maybe I'm just too OCD or something? https://screenrant.com/quiet-place-universe-things-make-no-sense/

It's not that great yet... They other day it was gaslighting me about a beef jerky recipe lol.

Touche sir....Touche

This. I would like to ask how @spiritual warfare knows they are "god imagining they are not god"

Some people might call that a crazy belief and they might want to suppress your rights. You have been talking like a religious fundamentalist. Like a Muslim wanting to jihad. Funny how everyone seems to think they have the one absolutely true truth all for themselves.

"The chemistry teacher is now obsessed with fixing brakes instead of making meth!" I tried it's not perfect. I'm only on the free version...

@Spiritual Warfare So are you an agnostic?

That's like saying people who play paintball shouldn't be offended by an actual war. Fantasy versus reality...

This is what it said about internet. I have had to correct it a couple times. I asked which version I was using and it gave me the wrong answer.

This is the best answer. Why all this drama and BS needed? You can actually meet people who share the same interests as you this way. That's much better than going to a club with random drunks. No need to game anything. Cold approach outside of social settings can be awkward/creepy in my opinion. I don't think most women want to be approached when they are buying groceries or whatever.

Honestly this is so childish I didn't want to take the time to respond myself, so I asked chatgpt... 1. Comparing Religious People to Victims of Genocide The most glaring issue is the reference to Hitler’s view of Jews. This comparison is not only offensive but dangerous. Hitler’s views were rooted in hatred and led to mass murder. To apply that mindset toward religious people, or any group, is harmful and dehumanizing. You might say: "Comparing religious people to the way Hitler saw Jews is not only deeply inappropriate but also dangerous. Hitler’s views led to the Holocaust—a genocide. Drawing a parallel between a group’s beliefs and such a hateful ideology goes beyond criticism and veers into bigotry. We can disagree without promoting harmful thinking." 2. Exhaustion from Studying Religion The person claims that studying religion led them to find religious people exhausting, but frustration from personal study doesn’t justify broad condemnation. Here, you can point out: "Just because you find something frustrating doesn't mean it warrants dismissing or despising an entire group of people. Religion, like many complex subjects, can be difficult to understand or relate to, but that doesn't mean it deserves hatred." 3. Implying Superiority The commenter assumes they possess a level of knowledge that justifies their disdain for religious people, but having knowledge doesn’t give anyone the right to belittle others. You could say: "It’s great that you’re committed to learning, but claiming that your knowledge makes you superior to others or allows you to look down on them is flawed. Real understanding comes from empathy, not from contempt." 4. Admiring a Lack of Anger While the commenter admires Leo for not being angry at religious people, they themselves seem to embrace anger and contempt. It would be good to mention: "It’s worth reflecting on why Leo can disagree with people without being angry. Disagreement doesn’t require disdain. In fact, it’s often more productive to engage people with respect and patience, especially when discussing deeply held beliefs."

I do love good satire.

South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut is my favorite musical

I love the dark night but his batman voice is the worst. I try to justify it something like batman is a master ninja and detective but he's no actor and trying his best.

Take out the word religious and answer your own question.

Interstellar was a good movie ruined by a bad ending in my opinion.

Dead Poets Society. I thought every character was an annoying idiot. It felt the the cheesiest of made for tv dramas. It actually bothered me a little at the time that it got such high reviews.

This kind of thinking must be how the fox news anchors are able to sleep at night. I heard something similar from JD Vance. He probably thinks he knows what's best for everyone as well. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/jd-vance-haitians-if-i-have-to-create-stories-1235102572/

the big lebowski terminator 2 tropic thunder shawshank redemption forest gump

Watch the show "It's always sunny in Philadelphia" It gets really good when Danny Devito joins the cast.