Sucuk Ekmek

Still a better love story than twilight

We don't need to find alien life out there We can just tell we found them. Assuming general population don't have generic skill and knowledge about this phenomenon they can just believe there are aliens out there. Plus we have the technical superiority for justification purposes. We can setup debates about this new phenomenon and let everyone speak their BS or truth etc.., but since we have the technical narrative, we shall be glorius.Nobody cares about conspiracy or coincidence theories I mean who do you think people side with? God(their model) or science? To strengthen our narrative we must detonate some nucler bombs in some cities. AND BLAME THE ALLIENS for their outrageous attack! Now, it's time to declare war and we have demands.(not from alliens ofc.) Here comes the ten command. You shall not leave your home. In case they don't obey or revolt... Now these alliens are shapeshifting, they can replace you. So we can replace you aswell. Like synths in fallout 4. We can also make other people fight aganist these pesky synths. Not a big deal.

I don't understand this... Why do you guys frame someone like Trump as a person. Theese people are the products of multiple interests. Its not like he supports left or right. You can say I am pro for this or pro for that but this is not the case for theese dudes. If they say what they really want to achive they'll be gone. It's all over.

Excuse my ignorance but what is capital?

This aswell

That's what I say

There is nothing wrong or right with eating humans or plants, it's how you do it.

Dedcided to share my song with you all, go on roast me. I wonder what you think.

What do you guys think?

Good idea, I could use more ambient qualities. Yeah, I lost that register. It was II-V-I at beginning, It just stands there unresolving because it was an imported idea and my chords are just out of touch from that form, I could've used something very simple. Never thought about frequency... Well now I know. It's just one guitar for all sounds so yeah makes sense. This is my first atempt to record something. If I get serious with new material i'll pm you They are ! Fck poetry, I prefer painting who cares intent Thanks for bearing with me

Hats off, this is the best post on the forum.

It's not demonising. CIA raises awareness by inventing hippe culture. https://www.cracked.com/blog/five-fun-facts-about-the-cia-and-lsd https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKUltra

You mean something like this? Well, I appreciate that.

Paradox is not coming from english, french or latin... https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/παρά https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/δόξα#Ancient_Greek https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxa#:~:text=The term doxa is an,by the Septuagint as doxa. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/παράδοξος#Ancient_Greek

Do nothing is the hardest one, it's imposible.

Don't let stupidity fool you. Right in the middle of video he says you can buy it with crypto, now this is interesting. I don't know if Ethereum is centralized or not but decentralized coins are against the left agenda. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/biden-labels-crypto-a-national-security-threat

Just paused video at 0:21 that airports architecture looks like a beehive.

These new techs gonna be like V-2 rockets. Once you hear them you'll know it's over.

This is a interesting book https://archive.org/details/endofownership00perz/mode/2up '' If you buy a book at the bookstore, you own it. You can take it home, scribble in the margins, put in on the shelf, lend it to a friend, sell it at a garage sale. But is the same thing true for the ebooks or other digital goods you buy? Retailers and copyright holders argue that you don't own those purchases, you merely license them. That means your ebook vendor can delete the book from your device without warning or explanation—as Amazon deleted Orwell's 1984 from the Kindles of surprised readers several years ago. These readers thought they owned their copies of 1984. Until, it turned out, they didn't. In The End of Ownership, Aaron Perzanowski and Jason Schultz explore how notions of ownership have shifted in the digital marketplace, and make an argument for the benefits of personal property. Of course, ebooks, cloud storage, streaming, and other digital goods offer users convenience and flexibility. But, Perzanowski and Schultz warn, consumers should be aware of the tradeoffs involving user constraints, permanence, and privacy. The rights of private property are clear, but few people manage to read their end user agreements. Perzanowski and Schultz argue that introducing aspects of private property and ownership into the digital marketplace would offer both legal and economic benefits. But, most important, it would affirm our sense of self-direction and autonomy. If we own our purchases, we are free to make whatever lawful use of them we please. Technology need not constrain our freedom; it can also empower us.''

It IS this: no more humankind. While I agree with you. I won't take my chances with faith, I rather celebrate my chance to be or not to be.

I'll give it a shot. I think you are kinda crossing the border. So my fish and his lucky bamboo friend at turquoise .

First huawei and now this. I thought we are globalized. It turns out to be it's my data vs yours. What is the point of cockblocking certain information or data? Who benefits from that... 9/11 changed the definition of national security and now the new informations are national security breach... If you are not subscribed to certain narrative you are a national security breach. Gotta love national security club. When they gonna reset the economy and replace it with centralized coins they will justify it as national security. Politics is like a child commiting ''suicide'' from balcony because he thinks hes a Pokemon. Maybe he is a pokemon? not a pile of meat? Politics is creation.

They had the word strategos for general. Indeed he was a master strategist. How can it be peaceful or warful when it's all staged. It's not a matter of debate , for example when I employ the both sides outcome is irrelevant, as long as you guys are in a certain circle of thinking I am fine. He also said ''The empires of the future are the empires of the mind..." "...Gentlemen, I make you my compliments. I do not wish to exaggerate, but you are the head-stream of what might well be a mighty fertilising and health-giving river. It would certainly be a grand convenience for us all to be able to move freely about the world - as we shall be able to do more freely than ever before as the science of the world develops - be able to move freely about the world, and be able to find everywhere a medium, albeit primitive, of intercourse and understanding. Might it not also be an advantage to many races, and an aid to the building-up of our new structure for preserving peace? All these are great possibilities, and I say: "Let us go into this together. Let us have another Boston Tea Party about it." Let us go forward as with other matters and other measures similar in aim and effect - let us go forward in malice to none and good will to all. Such plans offer far better prizes than taking away other people's provinces or lands or grinding them down in exploitation. The empires of the future are the empires of the mind..."

This won't make the decision stupid because when average sperson is stupid enough you can take any action and justify it as good or bad. Because they don't know what is good or bad anyway. So you have more room to make intelligent decsions. This is a double edged sword.