Sucuk Ekmek

One of the landmark is at 11:00

My assumption is this: Let's say I am living in a village in Africa and I am using whatsapp on daily basis for my broad survival purposes. What happens is I am using a specific art, whose is not belong to me, i.e. I have no ownership of it. Those who have the ownership are the masters, and their art is not tied to whatsapp but rather on human, because like everyone they have their own survival agendas, in order to push these agendas there is only one way out and it's all about the knowing of the future. In our current epoch or paradigm whatever you call it, if you want to profit (push your agenda) there is one way out and it is how you shape your product or rather human , so they will respond accordingly because you need to know future. (I think this is why Leo accused for forming a cult, I don't think that was coinsident). Uncertainty is the last thing you'll ever want. You and me are not living in USA, but at the same time we do. USA is a multipurpose model about how the things get done. It's not an area of land but an area of mind, to some extend actualized is USA. I would say my bias is a particularly dangerous one. It's wellbeing bias. Yeah, I don't like that idea and there is more, I think no parrent should be able to distinguish his&her children, let all be his or her. But if this is not possible for now so let's look for alternatives and 2nd best option. I don't know if this is liberal or something but sounds good and I am interested with this stuff. Sounds good. This is what they autonomously do. From my bias this is their art and they are the masters of it. Of course mine, It would be a dull place without variety of biases. I agree, we are not the direct actors for this matter.In a sense here we are acting like little USA's, about how to things get done. From my bias ones with more understanding should exposure the change. But who are the ones that knows? Again this coming from my bias, we lack serious ground for epistemology. Sorry for my english got little rusty. Peace!

In ancient greece a medical exam used to begin with dreams.

Meanwhile

Yeah, remnants of it still do but I think more or less we are all living in Anywhere City, USA. I am trying to be realistic. I also guess here and there, for me Trump has legimate reasons too. But concerning Indonesia now that sounds fishy. I approve no premartial sex but enforcing it is another thing. Yeah, maybe they don't want new products to tinker with. It's all speculation, a question of good will or bad will. See I am very Blue concerning good or bad will.

This is not Blue. In any country*(if such a thing still exist) you can't be a lawmaker or technocrat with your Blue absolutist ideas. This is heavy materialism abusing leftover blue values. Are you messing with sex in the year of our Lord 2022 ? It's like Apple scanning your device for C.P. Sounds promising !

Eyvallah moruk

Here goes my another 3 minutes. William Blake's vision; Dark satanic mills&Jerusalem

Sorry for the late reply. Hard to recall excact prompts but I remember mentioning ''everlasting fire'' ''heraclitus'' ''ancient theather''

Money? that's shallow... We can make human from creating controversy.

also instructions of the holy book of ''science'' ''democracy'' ''freedom'' ''insert popular word here'' etc... ''subscribe'' I think this verb is the stage blue in a nut shell. here is little etimology subscribe (v.) early 15c., "to sign at the bottom of a document," from Latin subscribere "write, write underneath, sign one's name; register," also figuratively "assent, agree to, approve," from sub "underneath" (see sub-) + scribere "to write" (from PIE root *skribh- "to cut"). The meaning "give one's consent" (by subscribing one's name) first recorded mid-15c.; that of "contribute money to" 1630s; and that of "become a regular buyer of a publication" 1711, all originally literal. Related: Subscribed; subscribing.

Wow, process of not understanding is so mind boggling. It requires lots of insight. How do you know that you don't understand. We suppose there are intending things and you know the right one(s) and I know the right ones. We mess up nature of reality and come up with something. We can go on and say this is not it! or this is not what I meant! But philosopher knows It's always not that or this or what he meant but yeaa it's that! That's so amazing and daring in a sense... Perhaps this went a bit off but it looks like we are after the intend and we got the theories! Perhaps this caused even more confusion but these are my different words lol.

Then you do not love?

Instant coffee is a coffee. So you mean there are better coffes? Because if it is in fuller sense, you have a larger spectrum which you can define the '' is coffee'' and If you know the coffee, can't you show us all the best coffee?

Good question, let me know if you come up with something.

Yeah, it's not about the meat, it's about their desired human model.

Yea It's long but worth to watch. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3VR93URWBhQ

Any rule, nonspoken or law. When things become intertwined and centralized govts are losing their power to regulate. I didn't see any govt criticising the faults of Covid situation. They took it like a religion almost like their life depends on it and suddenly it's gone.

Fact is nobody gives a fck about his father's place or his animals anymore. I would say he is not acting with raw anger, he knows he is doing the right thing and paying the price for it. Seems legit.

I prefer the real thing. Not the ways around. New tech means new rules. Who gonna set the rules? Consumers of virtual reality? Now these massive techs are in decline and they will reflect even more survival agendas. I am not aganist tech but who will set the rules? I think whole situation of Covid is a good example of a new tech and it's rules.

If you haven't watched the movie Whiplash I recommend it.