Sucuk Ekmek

These new techs gonna be like V-2 rockets. Once you hear them you'll know it's over.

This is a interesting book https://archive.org/details/endofownership00perz/mode/2up '' If you buy a book at the bookstore, you own it. You can take it home, scribble in the margins, put in on the shelf, lend it to a friend, sell it at a garage sale. But is the same thing true for the ebooks or other digital goods you buy? Retailers and copyright holders argue that you don't own those purchases, you merely license them. That means your ebook vendor can delete the book from your device without warning or explanation—as Amazon deleted Orwell's 1984 from the Kindles of surprised readers several years ago. These readers thought they owned their copies of 1984. Until, it turned out, they didn't. In The End of Ownership, Aaron Perzanowski and Jason Schultz explore how notions of ownership have shifted in the digital marketplace, and make an argument for the benefits of personal property. Of course, ebooks, cloud storage, streaming, and other digital goods offer users convenience and flexibility. But, Perzanowski and Schultz warn, consumers should be aware of the tradeoffs involving user constraints, permanence, and privacy. The rights of private property are clear, but few people manage to read their end user agreements. Perzanowski and Schultz argue that introducing aspects of private property and ownership into the digital marketplace would offer both legal and economic benefits. But, most important, it would affirm our sense of self-direction and autonomy. If we own our purchases, we are free to make whatever lawful use of them we please. Technology need not constrain our freedom; it can also empower us.''

It IS this: no more humankind. While I agree with you. I won't take my chances with faith, I rather celebrate my chance to be or not to be.

I'll give it a shot. I think you are kinda crossing the border. So my fish and his lucky bamboo friend at turquoise .

First huawei and now this. I thought we are globalized. It turns out to be it's my data vs yours. What is the point of cockblocking certain information or data? Who benefits from that... 9/11 changed the definition of national security and now the new informations are national security breach... If you are not subscribed to certain narrative you are a national security breach. Gotta love national security club. When they gonna reset the economy and replace it with centralized coins they will justify it as national security. Politics is like a child commiting ''suicide'' from balcony because he thinks hes a Pokemon. Maybe he is a pokemon? not a pile of meat? Politics is creation.

They had the word strategos for general. Indeed he was a master strategist. How can it be peaceful or warful when it's all staged. It's not a matter of debate , for example when I employ the both sides outcome is irrelevant, as long as you guys are in a certain circle of thinking I am fine. He also said ''The empires of the future are the empires of the mind..." "...Gentlemen, I make you my compliments. I do not wish to exaggerate, but you are the head-stream of what might well be a mighty fertilising and health-giving river. It would certainly be a grand convenience for us all to be able to move freely about the world - as we shall be able to do more freely than ever before as the science of the world develops - be able to move freely about the world, and be able to find everywhere a medium, albeit primitive, of intercourse and understanding. Might it not also be an advantage to many races, and an aid to the building-up of our new structure for preserving peace? All these are great possibilities, and I say: "Let us go into this together. Let us have another Boston Tea Party about it." Let us go forward as with other matters and other measures similar in aim and effect - let us go forward in malice to none and good will to all. Such plans offer far better prizes than taking away other people's provinces or lands or grinding them down in exploitation. The empires of the future are the empires of the mind..."

This won't make the decision stupid because when average sperson is stupid enough you can take any action and justify it as good or bad. Because they don't know what is good or bad anyway. So you have more room to make intelligent decsions. This is a double edged sword.

It's 4 hours long and not for beginners.

Agnoia: lack of knowledge, ignorance esp. of divine things of moral blindness https://www.biblestudytools.com/lexicons/greek/nas/agnoia.html

One of the landmark is at 11:00

My assumption is this: Let's say I am living in a village in Africa and I am using whatsapp on daily basis for my broad survival purposes. What happens is I am using a specific art, whose is not belong to me, i.e. I have no ownership of it. Those who have the ownership are the masters, and their art is not tied to whatsapp but rather on human, because like everyone they have their own survival agendas, in order to push these agendas there is only one way out and it's all about the knowing of the future. In our current epoch or paradigm whatever you call it, if you want to profit (push your agenda) there is one way out and it is how you shape your product or rather human , so they will respond accordingly because you need to know future. (I think this is why Leo accused for forming a cult, I don't think that was coinsident). Uncertainty is the last thing you'll ever want. You and me are not living in USA, but at the same time we do. USA is a multipurpose model about how the things get done. It's not an area of land but an area of mind, to some extend actualized is USA. I would say my bias is a particularly dangerous one. It's wellbeing bias. Yeah, I don't like that idea and there is more, I think no parrent should be able to distinguish his&her children, let all be his or her. But if this is not possible for now so let's look for alternatives and 2nd best option. I don't know if this is liberal or something but sounds good and I am interested with this stuff. Sounds good. This is what they autonomously do. From my bias this is their art and they are the masters of it. Of course mine, It would be a dull place without variety of biases. I agree, we are not the direct actors for this matter.In a sense here we are acting like little USA's, about how to things get done. From my bias ones with more understanding should exposure the change. But who are the ones that knows? Again this coming from my bias, we lack serious ground for epistemology. Sorry for my english got little rusty. Peace!

In ancient greece a medical exam used to begin with dreams.

Meanwhile

Yeah, remnants of it still do but I think more or less we are all living in Anywhere City, USA. I am trying to be realistic. I also guess here and there, for me Trump has legimate reasons too. But concerning Indonesia now that sounds fishy. I approve no premartial sex but enforcing it is another thing. Yeah, maybe they don't want new products to tinker with. It's all speculation, a question of good will or bad will. See I am very Blue concerning good or bad will.

This is not Blue. In any country*(if such a thing still exist) you can't be a lawmaker or technocrat with your Blue absolutist ideas. This is heavy materialism abusing leftover blue values. Are you messing with sex in the year of our Lord 2022 ? It's like Apple scanning your device for C.P. Sounds promising !

Eyvallah moruk

Here goes my another 3 minutes. William Blake's vision; Dark satanic mills&Jerusalem

Sorry for the late reply. Hard to recall excact prompts but I remember mentioning ''everlasting fire'' ''heraclitus'' ''ancient theather''

Money? that's shallow... We can make human from creating controversy.

also instructions of the holy book of ''science'' ''democracy'' ''freedom'' ''insert popular word here'' etc... ''subscribe'' I think this verb is the stage blue in a nut shell. here is little etimology subscribe (v.) early 15c., "to sign at the bottom of a document," from Latin subscribere "write, write underneath, sign one's name; register," also figuratively "assent, agree to, approve," from sub "underneath" (see sub-) + scribere "to write" (from PIE root *skribh- "to cut"). The meaning "give one's consent" (by subscribing one's name) first recorded mid-15c.; that of "contribute money to" 1630s; and that of "become a regular buyer of a publication" 1711, all originally literal. Related: Subscribed; subscribing.

Wow, process of not understanding is so mind boggling. It requires lots of insight. How do you know that you don't understand. We suppose there are intending things and you know the right one(s) and I know the right ones. We mess up nature of reality and come up with something. We can go on and say this is not it! or this is not what I meant! But philosopher knows It's always not that or this or what he meant but yeaa it's that! That's so amazing and daring in a sense... Perhaps this went a bit off but it looks like we are after the intend and we got the theories! Perhaps this caused even more confusion but these are my different words lol.