Yog

It had a potential for a spooky conspiracy theory, you guys ruined it.

He did a reddit thread a week ago: Seems legit https://www.reddit.com/r/Coronavirus/comments/fksnbf/im_bill_gates_cochair_of_the_bill_melinda_gates/?sort=qa I've also read that he quit Microsoft. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/13/bill-gates-leaves-microsoft-board.html

Its wort a watch I'd say. Turned my mind a bit more towards the hard and the practical.

@Michael569 Thanks a lot for the info and the care man. I'll do research before doing anything clumsy ofc, these were some isolated cases

A metaphor my friends. One that you will probably find - duuuh Imagine digging a hole in order to find water without knowing how deep you have to dig. At first glance you might think it is not so deep, so you'll dig with your hands, on the way you'll realize this is not working so you'll grab a shovel. It turns out that you'll have to dig 5 miles deep, going trough rocks and shit, but you don't know that, you think it is probably 10 meters. Folk that are just 2 meters deep in their work will probably say: oh is it hands that is better or a shovel, or maybe 2 shovels, I'll first learn how to work with my hands, than with a shovel ect.. But someone that has dug deep knows that those tools ain't gonna cut it, its 5 miles deep, there are huge boulders on the way, you need bigger tools, you might still carry shovels and use your hands, but its not going to do the bulk of what is needed, what is needed is at least an excavator. Now imagine someone saying,: I will find the best, the highest quality shovels, buy two of them, and than I will work night and day. What do you imagine an experienced digger would reply to that. Wouldn't it make sense for him to say: man grab an excavator, this shit is deep, your pretty shovels will not help you, you'll probably make it deep with humongous amount of work and time, but still those shovels will not turn boulders, grab an excavator.

Yea it sounded like that to me too. He is going for the superpowers now, will see how will that turn out. @bazera Thanks mate

@calibrate Oh, just saw it, there is a new video, he is going on a retreat. "I'm leaving for 30 to 90 days to deepen my latest awakening and learn how to heal people. I'll be back stronger than ever."

What has happened ?

Sailing on top of a sea of never-ending change, pushed and pulled by the waves of concractive and expansive love. How poetic am I this morning.

Can probably go here. Differently worth a good watch. It generated quite a few insights for me. Note: There is a lot of physics stuff in it, some might find those parts boring

@Pacific Sage Thanks for sharing mate. I've tried something like 10 minute gazing ,straight at it, at sunset ofc, it was totally inconsistent though, so I could not observe if there were any benefits. I'll do some research in the near future for sure, there is not much Sun around yet, so it can wait But yeah, I ll post it around here somewhere.

By the very design modern science is reductionist and intellectual. Astrology is not a modern science, it is ancient. It existed far before people started to thing in scientific way. It is more of a holistic discipline and has elements that have nothing to do with the intellect. In this regard modern science will always fail to see the consistency of astrology because its probing tools are so narrow and limited. Imagine trying to read ancient hieroglyphs, and your method is to force yourself to look for modern Latin letters, ofc you wont find any, that does not mean that there is no text.

Has anyone around here tried a 5-MEO or just a regular NN extracted from the Phalaris weed ? Most commonly Phalaris aquatica or Phalaris arundinacea. Known by folk as "canary grass" Any form of DMT is hard to get around here, so I did a semi-research and saw that people were extracting it from it. Its a weed so abundant and all over the world. Has anyone tried this, it has mainly 5-MEO and also some NN in it.

@Pacific Sage Hey hey. Do you know any specific sun-gazing techniques and where did you get them from? I heard people talking that one has to gaze at a specific angle, turning the head, or the eyeball, something in those lines.

These sessions are also amazing.

Did a regression once, took me a week to gather myself. I even managed to pinpoint my house in radius of 100 meters. Will visit the spot at some point, I am just kind of afraid of how will I manage to deal with that wave of depersonalization again.

I feel like this is something that everybody that is on this path struggles with. How does one remain extremely open minded while being able to be extremely skeptical. How does one not harm the depths of his knowing and intuition with the mechanism that prevents self-delusion. No one around discusses this, not that I've seen. An in-depth and nuanced video on this would be the best porn I've seen in years.

@Enlightenment ... reminded me of this short insight.

If used very carefully, in conjunction with other perspectives from which some are out of the post modern branch, than yes, it can be a useful lens, one that can help see things. Its better to see it as majority-group-privilege, or group-in power-privilege I think. This saves one from getting locked inside this premade box. The reason I feel the concept itself gets into questionable waters is because 99% of the time, we see it being used in a religious way as an ideological weapon, mostly by integral green. When adopted by T1s mind it behaves as racism 2.0, a nuanced form of discriminating based on low-rez snapshots, you can also away with it, so there is that. There is nothing wrong with the concept per se, its the way it is most commonly used. So in this sense I find the question quite valid. T2 will grapple with it in a far more graceful manner.

You might have been in a very realistic OBE or lucid dream and didn't know it. Its a common thing in that state.

@Johnny5 We are in agreement. Thanks for elaborating. Its was just a fun extra chameleon thing.

@mind_blown Hm, try this, it has worked for me in the past. -When someone talks, just forget that you have to reply. -This in turn will force you to just listen, instead of listen in order to reply. -You will only listen, for the sake of listening. -Why ? Maybe because you really care about what they have to say, and even if if you dont, its fine, you at least care about yourself, so you will listen very closely on the off-chance that you will hear something that may not know and can be useful to you. No matter what the topic is. -To make sure you are doing it right, when someone ends the sentence, instead of throwing something back at them, try to reinterpret what they have said t in your words, you will either get a nod, or if you have missed the point, you'll get further explanation. -If you get triggered, its a bingo! You remember that trigger and do shadow work at home. -This works best when you are not just talking nonsense and joking around ofc, it works better with more serious topics. Test it out for a month or so. Its just practice, you wont have to listen to everything that speaks for your whole life

@Johnny5 Chameleons, yea... they really are. Got a friend like this, we share the trait of enjoying and absorbing the life out of anything. Where we differ is that I can perfectly listen and enjoy, for eg.... a stage blue nazi ranting about stuff that most would perceive as toxic, or a stage purple talking of how the moon came to be. I can do that, sometimes even match the talking style and get in sync. But that guy can just fully become anything he perceives, at any time, in a snap, consciously.

@Danioover9000 Oh yea, mm... mmMMMm. I feel like most personal development topics, lower or higher ones have been beaten to death in both well understood ways and in misunderstood ways. Talks about open mindedness and skepticism are also very common. But I am yet to see a high quality explanation of how to navigate in between. So yea, if it comes out, i will turn the lights of, grab that potato chip and fap !!!

Re-watched some of Jackue Frescoes stuff after 5 years. I loved the guy back than. I would say he had a great capacity for yellow thinking, but is mostly grounded in green, seems a bit paradigm locked with the social constructionist stuff. Something that yellow is beyond . He also looks like he had well integrated orange, at least when it comes to science.