Yog

Well, buy a ticket to Belgrade than, look at some civilian death monuments, what can I say.

You probably could, but the menu would be tighter. You would have more meat heavy diets in the north and more diverse in the south.

If its about balance, you would need more countries on the Russian side, militarily an economically strong. Just powerful enough so they would be able to keep USA and NATO in check. Buffer states look like a good idea too, as an extra layer of security.

Dude so good, I dying of laughter.

Archaeological and linguistic evidence seems good enough. You also have to take into account that in some areas the influence will be partial. Somewhere only language or culture will pass to certain degrees. Invading, migrating cultures don't override everything. So in that sense there will always feel like somewhere there is lack of evidence.

There is translation if you open it directly on youtube.

This one probably deserves a spot here too:

Sorry for the late reply guys, need to set up my notifications properly lol. I also tend to vanish from here quite often. @Danioover9000 I think there is a lot of that going on, he even said it in few podcasts. There is also type, temperament, generation, the way he expresses his passions and probably more. The whole mess happens when people perceive this mix and make snap judgements. I think the same way, even Ken Wilber mentioned this in his analysts of him. Anyway aside from the energy some people perceive/project on/from him, he tends to talk in these baked and refined snippets (load file: clean your room ), which in a weird way is his point, to say things so simple that both a juvenile kid, your grandma and a developed adult can understand, or at least its his aim. Anyway it would surely be better to always elaborate more, provide more context and examples, which is something he does not do, or rarely does it. He just blasts phrases. Another thing is that such simple phrases are very open to projection. The simpler, the more open. So a lot of miscommunication is happening because of that. People tend to easily assume some hard-bias, but if they were to talk with him in a nuanced way he would probably agree with most of the contra points, or at least recognize them. The problem is that most people think that what he is saying is his opinion and that he is standing behind it, at the same time that he is against what is "the opposite" in that case. When in many cases he states things that he does not like, nor are his opinions, but he finds them to be important in some manner, so he wants to bring them forward. The popular appearance is that he is hard-biased and both balls in with everything he utters. I don't find this to be true. He is biased ofc, not denying, nor have something against that, but as I see it, its way softer and more nuanced than what people usually assume. Its his language, energy + all the pot stirring of the media/internet that makes it a mess. That was my point.

One of the basic psychological things you learn when dealing with art or other creative work is to detach the work itself from the artist. The work will get released, it will intertwine with the subjectivity of many people, be experienced uniquely and it take a life of its own, regardless of what the creator does, even if he wanted to control it. Just as it would with lets say his kid. So I see no reason why would I not enjoy the work of anyone if I happen to be aligned with it.

Yeah, I guess one factor might be personality, another might be that she is less familiar with the whole territory, so she is more careful. JP can also be good in conversations, but sadly he can get triggered and go on some rand very easily. So it takes a good faith host for him to turn out fine, if not it can turn into a wreck. I wonder how much of that is caused by his physical pain problems, he can appear grinded and irritated to death even before the interview has started at times.

Its a brave thing she did, we need more people doing this. Especially if you take in consideration that its extremely difficult to talk with Vaush, the usual case is that he talks to people and rarely with people. Anyway he did a good job in laying out the broad picture of CRT, which is something conservatives need to look more into. It could have ended up as a disaster very easily, but it didn't, so that's also a good plus. As much as I disliked the interview format she did for the video, I see it as necessary and a good start. Btw here is the full interview.

Think about layering your music so that each instrument will have a story to tell, each part complementing another, each with its own character, having a conversation with the "others". Try to see the instruments as living beings and let them do what they will. Its also good idea to make parts of it loopy, hypnotic, trance-like, so one wont be sure where something begins and where it ends, this only enhances the psychedelic effect. I tripped on acid this weekend while listening to this and watching the cover.... omg, felt like I was on double the dose, my being flooded with realizations and understanding, tears and laughter

It takes at least lvl3 to stop mistaking toothaches for ill hearts.

Acid + this = 0

This was surprisingly good watch

Because there is a real and danger in leaving excess progressives do their thing unchecked, so the push-back imo is totally warranted, maybe not in the format he is putting it out, but it needs to happen. Progressives are playing around and pressuring archetypal structures, deconstructing them ect,. That wont work ofc, it will only resurrect them and possess people leading to more division and very potentially bloodshed.

One of the main features of the dreamer/sleeper is the conviction that what you have in front of you is "the reality", not "a reality" The ego mind likes things to be predictable and in control, something that we can find very easily and abundantly in "this reality", or the physical world. You go home, the door is at the same place, you eat food and than you poop, you fall off the balcony, you suffer physical damage, your friends can be found at the same place, there is a sense of temporal continuity, things are quite stable. Now its easy for the ego mind to brand it as "the reality" given its attributes and needs and on-top get addicted to it. The creation of "the reality", by default creates the pole of "the fake/not real", which is comprised of things that are not stable, lack the sense of temporal continuity, can not be controlled. Something that is often attributed to the imaginary. Going by this logic, the imaginary is fake/not real. In actuality the distinction of the real vs the imagined is not there. Its something that we make with our ego. Dissolve that and there wont be a difference.

Boredom = Aversion

Touch me more, touch me more!

Its easy, you mutilate your body and avoid taxes.

Gratitude is prerequisite for forgiveness, try practicing general gratitude mate. Also shadow work would be no brainier. If you have a grudge against a group, there is most definitely a solid shadow there.

I draw an arbitrary but fun language distinction. Alone (all-one) - to be with oneself. Lonely -to be without oneself.