bennett oppel

Member
  • Content count

    47
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bennett oppel

  1. Non existent non existence = existence. The universe started in a state of non existence and then its non existence multiplied across itself popping itself into existence.
  2. Really, you look inside yourself and find nothing. I look inside myself and see a lot more than nothing, quite literally,
  3. Well the universe in my view is still being created like an ongoing event. Evidence is that rather than going backwards to a state of oneness everything is heading to a state of maximum diversity. Your reality is different from my reality and your reality is going to be different from anyone else's reality. Unfiltered reality is simply seeing this process across a massive scale. To put it simply consider a single infinity, well from this singular infinity you can create an infinite number of infinities that are all different but which have their origin in a singular infinity,
  4. Actually "God's mechanism" is probably -1. Why well for the following reasons Whats an impossible impossibility well its a possibility Whats non existent non existence well its existence Whats a paradoxical paradox well its logic All of the above are examples of -1 x -1 logic Start with nothing you get nothing. All that happand was the universe applied its non existence across itself and popped into existence. That really only happens if -1 is primary rather than 0.
  5. -1: But 0 and 1 are just figments of my imagination because its easy for me to create them both
  6. I've noticed that people can get a bit boggled by infinity but you can reduce the infinite to a finite number of concepts. Take the language that I am using, it has a finite number of letters and grammar but it can generate an infinite amount of structure depending on how its used. A better example would be a game engine. The game engine can generate an infinite number of computer games but is itself only a finite structure (a number that is interpreted by a system). The game engine is more primary than the structure it generates. So for people who want to appeal to the infinite just be aware that the finite structure that generates it is much more fundamental without any need for infinite this and infinite that except as possibilities from the underlying finite reality. Note this does not have to be finite in time because you can generate an infinite amount of time by looping a system.
  7. I'm just someone who knows who he is, that's all I need to be
  8. In a sense that character has always been me, My mundane identity is really just remembering that I've always been that character Lots of people suffer from a sort of amnesia as to who they really are. My life sometimes seems more like a work of fiction these days as a result.
  9. I treat reality like a role playing game, I think its a much better metaphor than a materialistic belief from a certain perspective. You have to understand that by creating this "super character" the mirror reflects it and it becomes something that is from my perspective because the mirror reflects it as something that always was.
  10. I've constructed a higher identity for myself like a character in a computer game, your higher self is something you can actually have control over if you direct it. This identity is in the reality I've created for myself. I'm careful to separate it from my mundane existence though otherwise madness awaits
  11. The universe is just a reflection of current beliefs. I don't really care if the universe is timeless or not because its irrelevant to me. Rather than concentrating on this universe i design my own reality or rather plane of existence as I like to think and the mirror or whatever it is that shows me the images I see has shown me that reality being created. You have to understand that its a perfect mirror. Come up with a belief that makes you happy, You don't need to follow logic but sometimes it helps. All I do is construct the most perfect belief I can and the mirror reflects it back at me. You have to believe that everything is perfect even when its horrific which is quite hard sometimes
  12. I'll be quite blunt. To my way of thinking the universe is totally flexible in that it can both have multiple origins and multiple endings. There is no one true answer to it. To my mind there is not one source but multiple sources of existence. The universe is basically a timeless mirror that simply reflects back on us what we believe. I have plenty of evidence on this from what I have a) seen and b) experienced. Provided what you believe does not hinder the mirrors perfection than it will reflect what you believe and make it a reality.
  13. Not really, I think that we are just aspects of timeless objects which are objectively real and beyond the scope of concepts such as something and nothing.
  14. It is most certainly not. Nothing creates nothing. A state of nothing cannot create or cause anything because it has no means to do this. why? Because its bloody nothing. Better to start with something that I'll call potential rather than something that is nonexistant. You can create from potential but you can't really create from nothing. People get bogged down with the current fad in science to think that things pop into existence from nothing with no cause but I tend to shy away from that madness.
  15. So what came first, the alphabet or the books they created later? With just 1 number and a few operations I can create all numbers. with a powerful enough game engine I could create all computer games. The thing that creates everything is the primary thing not the infinity that follows it. The cube is dimensionless, it does not matter what measurement you give it technically, either way I can image it so I don't care No matter what scale you give the cube it can still create all space.
  16. I'm talking about something my brain does automatically, which is to produce high def images whenever I want,sort of a gift so to speak. I'm not cutting anything out of infinity. I'm saying that you can create an infinite number of things from a finite structure. After all we are using a finite number of letters and grammar to communicate complicated ideas and theoretically the rules of languages and letters could encapsulate an infinity of things. Your getting bogged down with things that don't really matter to the point I was trying to make.
  17. I can go below zero by just measuring a point as a meter. Its a visualisation trick which works quite well for me although it creates a very strange image. Similarly i can measure a meter as a point and truncate an infinite shape into something I can image as well. I'm not going to get into whether apples are illusions or not, that was not the point of the topic. As for "nothingness" well you can have less than it depending on how you measure it. As an example if we measure "nothingness" using symmetry then it has an infinite value. The universe though has finite degrees of symmetry and is hence less than nothing from a particular perspective, hence my theory that the universe is less than nothing rather than more which explains why it can exist
  18. If I have one apple how many apples do I have. The apple is a unit of something , i.e an apple, its not an infinite number of apples unless I grow an infinite number of apples from that one apple. The line begins at its beginning and ends at its end what else would it do?
  19. I'm talking about a 1d line which is finite in length but can tile or be divided forever. A finite seed with infinite potential. The line though is the fundamental thing because it creates everything. As for your letters turning into lines good luck pronouncing them
  20. Its a cube. A cube can tile to create space perfectly with no gaps. You would just have one finite cube of space to generate all space. A line of length 1 is a finite object i can measure and image. I'm not saying you can't divide the line forever or even tesselate the line forever but the line generates those quantities from a finite starting point. It encapsulates the infinite even though it can be measured as being finite from a certain perspective. This is the point I'm trying to make the line is finite but has an infinite potential. Technically you can create everything from the line apart from colour if you know what operations to use. As an example of something that is actually finite how about a word. I can only divide it up into letters, no more no less.
  21. I can quantise time just by using a single cubic unit that tiles forever. As for moments that depends what clock your using
  22. You can do this however using a finite system of rules. Even the sentence you just wrote encapsulates this. I'm not saying you can't perform an operation forever but i could write a computer program in a finite amount of space than did this. The finite is a seed for infinite potential.
  23. Not sure what you mean by this. The loop would be finite in the moment but go on for ever.
  24. Ok well you can have your imperfect belief in an entity that can commit acts of stupidity and evil. If you believe that perfection is elusive to human concepts than you will never really understand perfection. If you can't understand how to answer the questions I set you then you don't really understand the paradox of god.
  25. I've noticed that a lot of people talk about one god a lot or being god. To my mind though one god is really just a very trivial part of the infinite. Infinity is a lot bigger than a very small concept of one entity or structure being everything. There is to my mind an entity that is the one god that people talk about but still this is just one insignificant part of the infinite. Infinity of ideas captures all these things and as such infinite goddesses or gods exist in this space but as a flash in the all. Relatively speaking we have the powers of god but relative to each other it creates a very absurd illusion where all this cancels out. That's the brutal truth of it. If you can think of a bigger concept than one god then you might expand past what is a very limiting barrier and actually start seeing things in a much more expansive picture.