Inliytened1

No...he's made plenty of disrespectful, rude comments in the past. I'm not sure what his deal is with spirituality but it seems like he has some type of internal battle going on there.

But what was the difference - we were explaining the same things to you post after post.

It wasn't just the video

Some day you will face it head on. You are a super smart guy. I'll even wander into the brilliance level. Because I know you. You are me. So yeah...some day you will face yourself and see that you alone as God. But then you will be a mystic.

I love science. He made a mockery of this work.

It's just you.

Am i not good enough? ?

Eh no. You are imagining all of that. We are alone as God. Actually there isn't a we but I throw that in so I am not talking to myself.

No. You are God. Time is something within this dream - no different than space. It is a d immersion being imagined right now.

Exactly

Awakening

Exactly. But even after all of that concept you wish to stay In denial and believe there are others..well..

@RMQualtrough banned. Leo can reverse it if he chooses

So you are a materialist and rationalist. It's OK. You have had your glimpses on DMT. But then you doubt those awakenings and you return to science and the materialist paradigm.. you are the worst of the worst. You are one who has seen the Truth but then turns their back on it for their culture. I pity you.

Healing is an actual phenomenon ?

What you mean unlocked this thread because you tried to call him out? Do you really think if I banned you right now he would question that?

If u continue to speak ignorance you will be banned on this forum

This is the perfect unbiased view and I commend you for it. Excellent.

Hey listen we all are born with certain genetics. I'm not 6"2. Leo is not spiritually gifted and requires psychedelics. It does not mean he is any less awake.

I like you although normie might be cutting him to the quick

Don't take this the wrong way. But you have no idea what you are talking about. You are not God realized let alone had an experience of God.

Where does he claim that he already possesses these abilities? I went back and listened to the beginning of the "I'm leaving" video. What he says is that reached levels of consciousness where it became evident that healing is indeed possible. Levels of consciousness where miracles are possible. He does not claim that he has the ability to perform these miracles yet (and specifically states so) - merely that they are possible. There is a distinct difference there. First off - any experience of God or expanded state of consciousness is a miracle in itself...and I've no doubt from the levels of consciousness and realizations that I have had that healing is indeed possible. I understand the difference. But I think you misunderstood Leo's claims because you are so quick to jump the gun. Of course. But I don't think this a fair comparison to someone claiming he could heal, when in fact that wasn't even the claim. The claim was that levels of consciousness were accessed to where this is possible. Btw - Once you are God realized you also realize that you are creating reality, thus who else would be able to perform miracles but you at the highest levels of Consciousness. Of course these things would be possible because you are Infinity. Many doors open that were previously closed to you under the materialist paradigm. Miracles in themselves are something you've created. So..these things may seem totally outlandish to you if you come from a rationalist paradigm. But you say you don't right? And you had had 30 or more years of experience where you have reached mystical states of consciousness. If that is the case then how could you be so quick to denounce the fact that it could be possible. And if you aren't denouncing that fact, then could you really so quickly jump to criticize that one could not attain this ability? Again, not that Leo did, nor did he claim so.... but do you see where I'm going with this? For someone that claims to understand spirituality it seems your specific criticism doesn't measure up with what you portray.

And I agree with that. But in life you want to have and experience attachments. When you lose a loved one there will be suffering from the loss of part of your identity. Part of you. That's OK. It doesn't mean you are not happy. You just suffer a loss of part of you.

I'm not saying you can't be happy. Don't misunderstand.