Extreme Z7

It's not about quitting WoW. It's about finding a higher purpose so great, WoW becomes insignificant to you.

More Musk libertarian dipshitery Just the individual tweet? Apparently, he has never heard of copy-paste.

Atheists are so full of shit. Literally no arguments made against the metaphysical irrelevance of God. It's just talking about debating Christians and how they only believe what they believe in order to have a sense of belonging. Technically true, but it also ignores that a lot of Atheism is about that too. Neither the Theist nor Atheist side genuinely cares about Truth. And a lot of them make an identity out of wasting time debating the other side. Both sides are chimps in suits pretending to be intellectuals.

There is not enough popcorn in the world.

Not me. I've had this same idea for a couple years now. Although, I was mostly thinking in relation as to whether AI will ever become smarter than humans and enslave humanity. I always thought that when AI reaches a level of intelligence equivalent to that of a human that it's basically similar to just another human. I don't think there's anything unique to AI that allows them to easily become smarter than all humans. (Or I don't know, maybe someone can create a Psychedelics.exe someday ) So just fucking compete I say. Adapt. Be Creative. I've already used Dall-E Mini in the past to create references for art I had trouble finding with Google Images. I've envisioned using AI Art in the future to hasten the relatively-boring process of making a background so I can just focus on the character art. There's so much more possibility for its use in art and also beyond it.

Just because @Leo Gura teased a future episode on "Clarity", I thought I'd share this recent vid that seems very relevant.

Elon Musk can't police immature people on Twitter because he himself is immature.

@Leo Gura Any clear links between your experiences of Alien Godhood and. . . well. . . actual alien beings?

https://medium.com/tech-titans/why-elon-musk-fired-twitter-ceo-who-asked-for-a-hand-raise-emoji-f3747c55b3f4

Leafyishere deliberately bullied and harassed people and Andrew Tate is Andrew Tate.

Right off the bat, his immature troll of a profile bio is a start.

Make America Anti-Intellectualism Great Again

@Thought Art Who else?

https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxuH6Mzjzqt-0PaCVtxBaM0vsNsLHuI4zD Kanye West in a nutshell.

I'll take that as a 'no' then.

Speaking of which, any "retro" games you like?

Inspired by @Leo Gura's recent How The Left Goes Too Far series, I thought it'd be a good idea to share examples of people from the developed world whining about the most petty stuff. Considering that I myself am from The Philippines, a third world country, I am particularly sensitive to examples of privilege corrupting the development of human psyches. I recently saw a video talking about how the majority of people on YouTube, especially young people, use Adblock to avoid. . . well, ads, and it's caused Google to take some serious measures to try to mitigate the issue worsening the problem for people who don't block ads. This isn't YouTube's fault, this is a problem with people wanting free content for nothing in return. Of course, there is YouTube Premium which I've been subscribed to for months, but good luck trying to tell that to the majority of millenials who think "Why should I pay for content I can already access for free" is a smart response.

Reminds me of this:

@Vibes Limbo was overrated imo. Haven't played Inside, though.

Haven't played Scorn yet but I actually admire its lack of gameplay. If the developers of the game want to create an action-ey game that sells, they should do it in a future project.

I'm already pretty insane. I'm just very good at hiding it.

This whole respawn count business sounds extremely silly. So it's probably true.

@Leo Gura Yeah, sometimes game reviewers just have really weird experiences with games sometimes. They (as in this particular reviewer who is NB so I should use 'they/them' pronouns, I guess) make some very good critiques but they're overly harsh towards the overall game to the point of ridiculousness. I mean a 2/10? Even if I experienced the problems they described, I still probably wouldn't rate it that low. Here's a recent response on the comment section on their review: "I beat the game first and read this review second. The detail in the environment was so allutring, that I didn't notice any of the problems mentioned in your critique. I was immediately engrossed by the art and didn't even think about running until like 50% thru the game. I walked thru the entire first level like twice trying to solve that stupid sliding puzzle, and immediately forgot how frustrating it was when I completed it (won't spoil anything here). Same story with the final encounter. I had to replay that part at least 6 times before coming out alive. This game stands on the merit of its own art alone. Its could be a fucking walking simulator and I would be happy."