ProMetEVS

Member
  • Content count

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About ProMetEVS

  • Rank
    Newbie

Personal Information

  • Gender
    Male
  1. My ego is running amok. If you want a schoolbook example of an orange ego running amok trying to achieve enlightenment look at my posts on this forum no one acknowledges poor little me and my greatness haha Now I have to stop posting here and start work because as hilarious as it is this stops now!
  2. In this post I will deliver a step-by-step description of the general theory. When Einstein formulated his theories about the universe he said it was intuitive work. Living in a time and place where enlightenment wasn't well formulated he took the concept of now and formulated it into the language of science based on his intutition. In general relativity, Einstein says that time and space are connected and exist as what is called space-time. As you read this text you will notice that you do so at a specific time in a specific place. You cannot remove the place or the time, they are tied together. Every time you experience something you are in a place, and every place you have been to was at a time. This is space-time. From space time Einstein started to draw natural conclusions. One realization he made was that if space and time are connected, everything that has an effect on space has to have an effect on time. He described gravity as geometry of space time, and the consequence is that gravity also has an effect on time. Light has shorter wavelengths near heavy objects, and longer wavelengths near lighter objects. Another consequence is that speed effects space. Normally we think of speed as something that concerns time and speed. But space and time are connected, so velocity also has an effect on space. Objects traveling at high speed experience a different space compared to objects traveling at lower speed. A man who had been on a long journey in space traveling at high speed comes back to earth barely older than when he left. So far so good, space time exists. However, here is where we have to back to the original concept and once again examine this concept of space time. Space time is the concept that space and time are connected. What this means is that you can not go back in time without also going back in space. You can not go forward in time without going forward in space. In other words, and this is crucial, there is only now. I repeat, as you read this text you do so at a present time in a present space. They are connected and can not be separated. This "moment" is the only space time "moment". If you have to read the last paragraph again please do so, because from this point on I will cover the natural intuitive response to Einsteins theory. There is only space time. Einstein knew this, but he missed out one crucial piece of the puddle. There is a difference between cultures on how we imagine our lives through space time. In western culture we walk into the future, with our backs to the past. This was the way Einstein saw reality. However, a more intuitive answer is given in some cultures and that is we move with our backs to the future and see only the past. This is important! In the current version of space time, we view ourselves as seeing the past and being in the present while at the same time were are walking with our eyes towards the future! This is intuitively wrong. Einstein didn't see that space time exists not only in the past and present but it is also the future. How can we verify this to ourselves? Imagine a coin toss. From our perspective we know the past (heads or tails) and the present (probability of landing heads or tails) but we cannot say anything about the future. This is not intuitive because space time exists also in the future, as soon as the coin lands we know if it is heads or tails. Now imagine walking with your eyes into the future, what would this look like. It would mean that we know the future (how it landed) and the present (probability of landing heads or tails) but we couldn't say anything of the past (heads or tails). Now do the thought experiment of walking with your back into the future and witnessing an event that happens from the future. Intuitively this would be very confusing because it would only exist as a probability until the future arrives at which point it would be heads or tails. This is what we see in the so called schroedinger equation, where until the future arrives we cannot know if the coin is head or tails. Of course, this is simply an observer in positive space time (present and past) witnessing an event in negative space time (present and future). I know this seems counter intuitive at first but if you accept that space time is real, then it is the intuitive conclusion that space time exists both in past, preset and future. This has a number of verifiable conclusions. When the universe was born, from our perspective there was no future yet and so there should be no negative mass at that point. Negative time means there should be negative mass that is distributed in a way that we can predict. Finally, this means that all is everything there is and nothing. In the manner of Watson and Crick, I don't have to exaggerate the importance and impact of what I have written here.
  3. Present: no time for this have to get the kid to kindergarten and my ass to work
  4. The process goes like:1) here I am in the now, I get it 2) what are the practical implications of this? 3) let's start with trying to get an intuitive feel for general relativity 4) ok I have an intuitive feel for it now but it is missing the concept of future 5) I am insane 6) how do I communicate this? 7) am I insane!?
  5. To "me" as a scientist it was "the natural reaction of my ego" to speak in jargon.
  6. Is there really no one else that has tried to communicate the practical implications of enlightenment to science. I am not talking in a "spiritual" sense but in a "factual" sense?
  7. This is my problem, I have an intuition but I don't know how to formulate it. There are many good mathematicians and physicists that know how to do it and it strikes me like a more direct path?
  8. I know, thank you Saitama. I am a chemist, I am bad at maths but have studied a little physics.
  9. Another analogy is that we are walking with our backs into time, seeing not lies ahead. Knowing that all there is, is now, we can also "see" ahead of time. Just that it doesn't look like what we imagine in our heads.
  10. My intuition tells me one aspect of "future" is like a reversed coin toss. The "future" can tell the outcome (future) and the probability (present), but not the "reality" (past). To a human this would be like something is only a probability (doesn't exist) until it happens, then it becomes either heads or tails. This is the schroedinger equation? We live in "reality" so we "know" past and probability (present) but not the future.
  11. I made a spelling error. Should say: "the future exists now and we should be able to detect the future with our sense...".
  12. I need a mathematician to tell me I am wrong basically and that I just imagine stuff. My intuition tells me that I live in the now but I also have an experience of the past and the future. Doesnt this mean that the future exists now and that we should be able to "detect" the future with out senses just that we dont have a clue thats what we are looking at because our senses arent wired that way?
  13. I hope I wont have people eat my liver now, if a picture of Mohammed or saying lords namn in vane pisses people of imagine what will happen to "me" when they hear about this...
  14. Ofcourse to someone who is not enlightened it all seems counterintuitive!
  15. He based his theory on the assumption that there is only now (called roomtime) but he did only include the past and the present in his theory. He didnt include the future (which is obviously completely counterintuitive). Now is not only the past and the present, it is also the future.