Joshe

😂So true. Also, the fact that there was no crowd, this was a total blow for him because he didn't have an audience to validate his responses. When they all laugh at his attacks or cheer him own, it puts him at ease and thus, less defensive. He didn't know how to act in this setting. Also, I noticed when his popularity was attacked, like World leaders who laugh at Donald Trump Donald Trump was fired by 81 million people his eyes went wide as hell. Everytime. So that was interesting. Also, you could see him plotting. He would listen intently for attacks and you could see him nod his head every time he figured out his response to the attack. IDK what the hell he was doing with this new "I'm gonna whip you if you don't shut up" tone.

No Trump supporters were swayed by Kamala, nor will they be. If you want to assess their performance, you've got the right idea of stepping into the shoes of the uninformed, apolitical, everyday American. I can tell you, the majority will not see a "polite" Trump. He will appeal to some, but once the clips and analysis of this debate are done circulating, the majority will have seen an unhinged, angry liar who is desperate to avoid prison time because he tried to steal the last election and some will see a man whose face is synonymous with legislation that stripped women's right away. Those clips will be what does him in. He's cooked.

I'm referring to typical cognition where a person is capable of reflecting on their thoughts and actions with the ability to pass the reflection to executive function for quality assurance and to adjust their thoughts and actions based on QA's findings. You could have strong opinions that you know are arbitrary biases but you can suspend/surrender them and adopt other arbitrary biases and cognize with those plugged in. This is basically the mechanism of empathy. It can be used for observation and simulating potential realities as well as going meta on your thought processes. Here, it's possible to observe objectively enough to be what I thought was the bare minimum entry to yellow. No?

EXACTLY! I did not expect it to go this well. He looked like a mean old asshole yelling at a calm woman and they were letting him do over and over and over.

I'm glad it went this way. It benefits her. Think about how hard it will be to say Kamala received preferential treatment. I saw it all happening and was excited as hell. I think ABC knew what they were doing. The fucked him good. Edit: I spoke too soon. They're doing it anyway. lol

The clips and analysis that will come out in in the following days will be disastrous for Trump. No doubt. He looked like a mean old dumb asshole yelling at a calm woman making sense.

I thought yellow was so advanced that it had the ability to go meta on all its thought processes to uncover flaws and inefficiencies in any domain. That's the standard that I've always applied to yellow. In other words, if you can't escape your biases in one domain, you are not yellow... at all, but maybe I misunderstand SD.

She's winnng

@Karmadhi You're 100% right but there are Elon fanboys here who will call you stage green if you bring up the reality.

She baited the fuck out of him on rally crowd size, which triggered him to bring up the animals.

This does a lot to explain the sentiment that women are cold-blooded heartless bitches. Men feel like they give everything and are dedicated because they're just virtuous like that. 😂 Then, the woman intuits the truth of their weakness and eventually can't bring herself to even look at it anymore, and so the man says "how can she be so cold?" 😂 😂 I remember thinking that.

RIP. My first experience of him: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_of_the_Best_(1989_film)

Women are animals, just like you. Men want women to never leave them and to adore them no matter what, but that's not how reality works. If you can give a woman what she wants, she MIGHT stay with you. There are no guarantees because humans get bored and change their minds about what they want. If you had endless mating opportunities, you might be prone to ditching some poor girl because she's boring, but because you don't have endless opportunities, you cling to one and demand that your clinginess be reciprocated. It's a bias that you can become free of only by becoming free of the neediness and fear. It is normal for all young men to have to learn this lesson, so don't worry too much about the negative comments. You'll figure it out. Women are not bad. Respect them and they MIGHT stay with you. Do not be surprised if/when they leave you. Keeping them takes work. Too much work for my liking.

@Something Funny https://polymarket.com/

@Keryo Koffa That's a worthwhile theory! Scientists don't even understand how LLMs output what they do. They can't trace the outputs back to anything. They can only tweak parameters and feed it an input and magic happens. AKA, black box. Something is going on in there! To build on your theory, what if the initial spark of consciousness would occur when humans train the AI to understand itself. If we trained it to understand the black box phenomenon, in that moment of knowing, that could be when consciousness ignites. Scientist: Hey you, AI, go inside all your neural nets and understand yourself and come back to me and explain it. AI comes back all fucked up.

@yetineti I have a mom about as stubborn as you can get. Once, she couldn't stand up and was faint. I took her to the hospital. She had a mountain dew stuffed between her legs while sitting in the wheelchair. Turns out, she was about to go into a diabetic coma because her sugar was 550. I know stubborn, but I was never very effective at dealing with it. Good luck with everything.

Allegedly paying tens of millions to a Russia Today (RT) shell company in TN : Aljazeera: US accuses Russia of election disinformation campaigns. What to know Then this dropped: Russia Secretly Paid Tim Pool Millions Also, it seems the bot farm business model is on the rise. If you can set up a stealthy and effective network of bots, you can sell that service. Social manipulation as a service. SMaaS.

@shenanigans It's so customizable that you really have to just go through and familiarize yourself with its features, but here are a few tips you might find useful. Number 1 is a must IMO. Aside from that, get good and formatting text with the keyboard. I highly recommend the code editor shortcuts so you can better manipulate the text. You can select multiple instances of words, have multiple cursors, delete lines, all sorts of stuff. Control + b - bold Control + i - italic Wrap any text in "== ==" to highlight. e.g: ==I'm highlighted== - + space to create a list Also, go through the "core plugins" and figure out what you don't need and turn everything else on. Also, for me, the aesthetic is really important. I couldn't get into obsidian until I built a custom theme for it. You can customize the font, colors, everything.

@Nemra lol. I didn't even think of that. First cat ladies, now cats being eaten. Hmm...🤔 Cats being eaten.... hmmmmm. Here pussy pussy pussy. 😂

The potential in this idea gives me cold chills. People have not understood the implications. Have you heard of "AI agents"? The idea is, you take some data and pass it to an AI Agent, which has been trained on a very specific set of skills, like Liam Neeson, and you have them work together. The possibilities are insane. You can programmatically tie into the ChatGPT/Claude APIs so you don't have to go through their websites to work with them. Just collect some data and then have a specialized agent do whatever you want with it. You can have them reflect and summarize their reflections and train them to spot problems and when they spot them, engage specific processes or consult other agents. I like the idea of "departments". You could have a data analysis department, a research and development department, predictive modeling department. My favorite idea is a prediction machine. I need to stop fucking around and dive deep into all this tech.

Does this not make sense?: He gives them support, and in exchange, he gets their validation. He doesn't care about Trump or the MAGA agenda. He cares about having his ideas validated by as many people as possible. The only viable dissemination route for him is right wing/MAGA. This is why. He did not earnestly deploy logic and rationality to arrive at his support for Trump, because that's impossible. The only way he could arrive at such a position is self-deception. He did not make an error in logic. He's smarter than that. He didn't use logic to arrive at being a Trump supporter. He used something else. What might that something else be? Interesting. I'll check that out. In Leo's post, he mentions a "profound example of the levels of creative self-deception". I wouldn't doubt that Bret believes in such things but the thing is, we have reasons that drive our beliefs. An adult might want people to look at their intellectual musings for the same reason a child wants everyone to look at their artwork. For a child, they just say, hey, look at my artwork. For an adult, they might say, hey, this is important goddamnit, here's why... now.. look at my musings.

I think that's what it means. I've experienced this on some AL-LAD trips a long time ago. I lived other people's lives. Once, I was a half-wit with a retarded brother and we were obsessed with killing animals in the woods. It was sick. I walked away from those trips with this: What can be sufficiently imagined can be witnessed. That's what it seems like anyway. It's hard to imagine this happening without psychedelics though. So that is interesting.

@Nemra What's worse is it appears he got the idea from Charlie Kirk.