Jahmaine

Considering there is only the NOW, the present moment, what would it mean if there actually was “a future” or “a past” as a ‘thing’.

The way Leo described it in the context of how the universe even exists was: ”Imagine a magician tricking himself into thinking he exists”. The nonexistent pretending to exist. It’s the strange loop paradox.

It’d be interesting for high profile people in areas like maths, science, philosophy or spirituality, people that would actually entertain what’s being said seriously, then see what they think, maybe it could aid them in their work or they could maybe give some insights Leo’s missing. Most people that try give criticism on Leo generally aren’t considered “experts” in their field, it doesn’t mean they’re not right, but a more knowledgeable and articulate person could maybe make better use of it. Personally I just feel Actualized is due some crossover or acknowledgement in a wider sense. So for example: Neil degrasse tyson, Joe Rogan, Russel Brand, Eckhart Tolle, Sadhguru, Elon musk, Brian Cox, Dr Kaku. Since Leo ranges over different subjects, certain particular videos could be beneficial or insightful for these, or even it’d just be curious to see what someone like Eckhart Tolle or the Dalai Lama would think of the 5-meo trip or the different facets of awakening, what if something is brought to their attention that they otherwise wasn’t aware of.

Large amounts of suffering is happening as a result of meanings and projections I have about myself and the way I wanted life to be, rather than just accepting what is. An injustice “happened to me” and my ego wants to hate, wants to dislike and criticise that which I perceive to have done the injustice, yet at a deeper level, I know it wasn’t done in a conscious malicious way, it was an unconscious manipulation in the hope of gaining love, not realising that truth and genuineness will lead to love, not manipulation and deception. Summerising- how do I let go when I know I should but my ego really doesn’t want to?

@Javfly33 thank you @WelcometoReality thank you Thank you; I do literally feel like my ego’s being destroyed, in the sense of realising that I’m not my ego in such a raw way, it’s what allows for acceptance.

Why is it that pretty much everyone find it’s very difficult or overwhelming to just accept an individual for who they are and their work and presentation style; if they don’t present it in a particular style that they like then they supposedly aren’t able to engage or interact with the content. An example would be Leo, some people find his style “too monotone ”and focus on that, rather than seeing the value in the video. or someone like Alex Jones, understandable his character can be a bit OTT, but for some people it can be an impossibility to watch him and extrapolate what’s true from the character, which again is just a particular presentation style ; this doesn’t mean that I’m either of these situations that they’re both always true and have to blindly believe; I’m more focused on the mechanism, why don’t people see the value in things? - in the abundance of water, the fool is thirsty. Smh.

Yeah I know what you mean. Although I did say people that would entertain it seriously, if they’re really “experts” in their field, for them to blindly ignore something, especially the scientists that love to prove things, I just don’t see that happening personally - they miss the point but I reckon they would at least hear what’s being said. also I don’t think anyone needs anyone’s permission to send a video, what’s going to happen if I do? Obviously I’m not proposing harassing people or causing all sorts of drama and blaming Leo. It’s like I don’t need to ask Eckhart Tolle if I can show Leo a video, so I don’t see why it’d be an issue. I do understand what you mean though, I just don’t think it’s a big deal really. Especially in the pursuit of growing and sharing knowledge for the greater good.

I know exactly the feeling, I understand where they’re coming from but to dismiss valuable information because you don’t like the character, it’s astonishing. Just take what’s helpful and move on. Dan Pena can be difficult for some people, but he does speak a lot of valid points.

God = The universe ”You” = a part (distinction) of the universe God + “You” = The universe The ego didn’t create the universe, “God” “Universe” “Inifinte Awareness” did. You are an expression of the universe and thus “God” created “you” in his image. “You” cannot be separate from God and the universe because by definition the universe is literally everything there is. The apparent separation of “You” and “God” are actually One “thing”. Akin to saying your hand is an expression of your body, your body is body, the hand and body and actually part of thing one. The labels (words) create an apparent separation, but that’s just a way of talking.

Just thought I’d share this book here for people to see, it’s written by a physicist that took LSD and then ended up writing a book about time. It’s an interesting resource. - : “Penguin presents the audio edition of The Order of Time by Carlo Rovelli. The best-selling author of Seven Brief Lessons on Physics takes us on an enchanting journey to discover the meaning of time. Time is a mystery that does not cease to puzzle us. Philosophers, artists and poets have long explored its meaning while scientists have found that its structure is different from the simple intuition we have of it. From Boltzmann to quantum theory, from Einstein to loop quantum gravity, our understanding of time has been undergoing radical transformations. Time flows at different speeds in different places, the past and the future differ far less than we might think and the very notion of the present evaporates in the vast universe. With his extraordinary charm and sense of wonder, bringing together science, philosophy and art, Carlo Rovelli unravels this mystery, inviting us to imagine a world where time is in us and we are not in time. “

What is the function of laziness or procrastination? Not why does it happen, or how to solve it, but what value does it serve as a mechanism?

Does anyone know any “advanced” Wiccan practices or books? Every book I’ve found so far are “beginners”, just curious are what the practices are and how they go about it, as well as the background behind it.

What resources do you recommend for witchcraft?

Thank you, that’s quite helpful @Bill W lol yeah bro, let’s make it happen.

Thank you that’s quite insightful

@Highest what types of places in India?

@Highest Yeah exactly. And I hear what you’re saying and it’s been acknowledged, but the question I was asking if where such a person is found? For general inquiries sake.

@Shin that’s what gives them their beauty.

@leogura

Has there been any other research and creations of a model in relation to the evolution of the psyche?

In the theme of Leo’s video about Unity vs Division, he was talking about how a collection of divisions come together and unite, then go through the process again as a new division and then unite again down the line. So if everyone went from being unconscious and divided to conscious and united, what would be the next division from that standpoint? And I guess what would we the unify into after that?

@V-8 That is exactly what it is. Perfect examples. @Nahm I understand it’s useful, was just asking why it happens.

Does anyone know or think that it’d be possible to hold dmt in a saturated vapour form and then could be inhaled in something like an asthma pump style device? Maybe some electrical device to heat it in its transmission to you if the heat is needed to activate it. Was just thinking of ways to make the process easier and more accessible, it would be very useful for measuring dosage as well. “Saturated vapour is a state where the system is holding the maximum amount of water in vapour (gaseous form) at corresponding temperature and pressure.”

Why do some people not like Dan Pena soo much, his character, that they can’t see the difference between what’s true and what’s a belief. Spiral dynamics yellow

It’s doesn’t have to just be them two, I’m talking about the principal itself; someone could listen to Bob Marley but because they dislike reggae, they don’t hear the messsge of the song, their focus is more on the dislike for the genre