Jahmaine

Yeah me in my Leo form.

Nah I meant his course to God Realisation.

Is God/Godhead/Infinite awareness etc... full of shit? Or is it just the illusion that's full of shit? Or are we just full of one big solipsistic shit in oneness? This is in reference to Mankind is the bullshitting Animal.

I'm not really bothered about what it is or what else it could be My main question is just Why? I have no desire to change what is, only understand what is, going deeper and deeper

Why is it that being full of shit is embedded in reality? Is it just part of the "thing to do"? Is it just god having a sense of humour?

Nothing. It's just a trivial question. I guess it'd open up more curiosity for more questions.

Does anyone remember or have the link for a fan made song about leo? It was kind of psychedelic and had a video with it, floating heads and all sorts. It was on this forum about 3 years ago or so. Someone on this forum made it.

You are the best !!

It's all one action.

So you know how people say theyve experienced time in various different ways, for example instead of going forward in time it goes back in time, but then there's different dimensions of it, so there's "diagonal" in time or "up" or "down" in time, just imagine x,y,z axis and such like; if anyone has experienced that, using the limitation of words, how would you describe the experience or observation of those? Even if you haven't experienced or observed it, then just as a thought experiment. So what would a day of my life look like going diagonal in time?

Conflict on one level is harmony on another. - Alan Watts

I’m asking you questions to see your conclusions, the fact I’m asking has nothing to do with where I’m at, it’s a presupposition you’re making i haven’t made any statements about my positions, I’m asking you clarify yours, since you invited it. And you hand waved away most of the questions, so in the same way I can make my own assumptions as to why you’re doing it - in this case you don’t have the answer, which is fine, easier to admit it instead of sidestepping. Or you can try explain how your same as the above - being “ as long as you’re asking these questions it’s clear you are not awake” - is an answer to “if I want to dream forever and not wake up then why did I create spiritually” as well as the rest? This isn’t a competition, you can say if you don’t know. Just being pedantic and a bit immature to be honest. You (I) invited us to ask questions, then coz you don’t have an answer it proves I’m not awake (by whatever measurement) - I’m asking you to validate your position, so that includes showing understanding of the basics.

If there's no you, just me, then how can there be just me? Aren't you a relative distinction making you real? (To me)? But not to you? How do you know solipsism isn't another illusion? If there isn't levels of solipsism, then what's the difference between thinking that I'm just brain in a vacuum in a simulation and being god consciousness imagining everything? Are they not both solipsism? How can you have all the answers but I don't if you're not real? How do you know that I am not awake yet? What makes your think your presuppositions about me are true if you don't even exist? Why do you sound like Leo in your choice of language and mannerisms? I didn't imagine you that way? How do you know there is no point? How do you know you're not imagining there being no point? If I am the only thing that exist then why did imaginary Leo say that "reality is like a magician tricking himself into thinking he exist"? Did I imagine Leo tricking me or being ignorant? If I want to dream forever and not want to wake up then why did I create spirituality? Why did I imagine awakening? Why I'm I imagining you who doesn't exist giving me the answers to ruin the dream? - how do I know that I'm not tricking myself into pretending solipsism is real? Just saying I'm not awake enough isn't an answer - that's no different from people who say "use logic - it just FEELS right"

Did you know that everything is existence is basically a super advanced bot and "we" all have auto responses to make it realistic to you?

So am I imagining you imagining me imagining you on this forum as someone that has complete understanding of solipsism as a way for me to understand what solipsism is? If you have a true complete understanding, how do you know that solipsism is actually true? How do you know that the opposite of solipsism isn't true? If "you" had this complete awakening, what do that mean for "me"? What came first, the chicken or the egg? Are "you" just a brain in a vacuum? Or are "you" god consciousness? Are there different levels of solipsism like my previous question assumes? What is a distinction? What is relativity? Why does consciousness choose to imagine everything instead of actually "creating" "real" infinite "things"? So is it really I and I? Or is it me and you? Why did "I" imagine language limitations as such that "I" cannot be told, only realised? Why couldn't infinite nothingness be made to be fun? What's the need for illusory separation? What don't "I" - you,have all the answers? What is the point of solipsism? Do "you" personally feel happier/sadder now? Why cant "I" just do the things Leo was worried about and justify any action because "I" am the only thing in existence? Why am "I" giving "you" these questions when "I" create this forum? - why does God consciousness need something to do? Can't "I" just be satisfied as infinite consciousness doing nothing for infinite/no time? Do "I" exist?

Yellow - bordering Turquoise, only because I respect what a true “spiritual master” is. But I’m multi-perspectival, can easily detach and not shoot the messenger, I can meet people where they’re at without getting into conflict and I do see the interconnectedness of everything and how it all works together, plus various mystical experiences as to why I said bordering turquoise (as would be described in the model), I wouldn’t say I’ve fully embodied it in a way I’d expect from an Eckhart tolle, Dalai Lama or such like though. But yeah yellow primarily if I have to pick one.

Fair enough, thanks for your honesty.

If you had to pick ONE, that you inhabit the most, we are all a blend. it’s not that deep, if you don’t want to answer then don’t and just say you’d rather not. No one’s judging you, just curious at your own personal analysis.

The question I asked was “which stage do you think you inhabit the most?” If you had to self analyse, gun to your head. i didn’t ask what it was.

@Inliytened1 regardless of the conversation happening here, you do seem quite pedantic. If you had to self analyse, gun to your head, which spiral dynamic stage would you say you inhabit the most?

This is what it looks like to me when I read some of the convos here.