Jahmaine

Yeah I know it’s nuance, it doesn’t really mean anything, I’m glad you said what you said though, because that’s all I was saying, there’s no dispute about the infinite nature of god etc, this convo just got too focused on the words, my original point back at the start is that could someone say that they “accessed the 10th dimension” akin to Leo saying he “accessed God” Akin someone else saying that “accessed infinite awareness”. I’m not looking to make it an ideology, it’s just another contextual framework. ; Do you think that it’s acceptable to say it in that way or is the 10th dimension something separate from God per se and if so then how? That’s all I been trying to say, sorry if it’s coming across a certain way, it’s just been slightly irritating to get the convo this far.

1. I was asking for you personal standpoint, not what could be said; I’m not trying to box God into anything, because evening using the word God would be then would it not? Because the point I’m making is that the description could be considered the same thing. - based on that logic why can you say God, or other people could say infinite awareness, etc... but I can’t say 10th dimension? 2. If your standpoint is that God is the 10th dimension without love and intelligence, then how would that be the case? So I’m literally saying if “God” and the “10th dimension” can be a synonym (for the sake of this convo) for each other and you yourself are saying that God is all those things just with love and intelligence, then how would the “10th dimension” be lacking in Love and Intellect, what would it be then? As in what is separating love and intelligence from God, based on what you are putting forward. And if your answer to the last question is honestly no, then what are you talking about exactly when you’re saying that it is that? If you’re saying that the 10th dimension could be considered akin to god, just with more facets, then how does it make sense for you to say that No it doesn’t make sense that God without absolute love cant be considered the 10th dimension. Honestly I thought this conversation would be a lot more fluid and understood here but there seems to be a mistranslation or miscommunication. I’m not even trying to be right about anything, I’m just putting a point across. It’s like imagine I never said 10th dimension and said Infinite awareness, would you argue that “well infinite awareness is God just without love and intelligence” - that’s basically what it looks to me. In this case though, that convo would be based upon saying that the “10th dimension” and “God” are considered interchangeable...which you said is the case, expect that God is more because of love and intelligence? If the “10the dimension” is God without love and intelligence, then what exactly is the 10th dimension then? - What is “all that is, has been and every can” devoid of love and intellect- based on what you yourself said.

Yeah I understand that. It’s just that I asked 5 questions which weren’t rhetorical. I’m trying to have a conversation here in the pursuit of advancing knowledge, I’m not making any particular bold statements, I’m posing these questions from a genuine curiosity point of view.

This just seems pedantic. Keep tip toeing around what I’m saying. The description of how the 10th dimension describes is similar to how God is described, which is similar to how ONENESS/INFINITE AWARENESS and all the other synonyms. I’m just asking whether you agree that the description is similar or if it can be considered a synonym. I’m not prepared to continue this conversation until we’re talking about the same thing. I fully understand what you’re saying but i don’t think you understand me, I failed at translating what I’m saying.

Just completed ignored me...

So for argument sake, is your standpoint that the “10th dimension” is God without divine love and intelligence? If so, then how would you say that is the case? And how would love be “added” to it? What is God with the only reduction being “absolute love”? Does that even make sense?

I don’t think you understand what I’m saying...or I’m not articulating it well I used quotation marks to show that I didn’t literally mean access as a place to go. I mean you become directly Aware of the of everything. So going back to my point, the point that’s being made... do you think description of the 10th dimension which I put above, is the same as how “God” is described. That is all that I’m saying. It’s a yes or no. And if no, then could someone clarify the distinction. I’m not trying to trip you up or anything, I’m literally just saying that.

It fits the theme of Oneness. One everything.

@Serotoninluv In the same way I can say the word “Universe” which is a descriptive word to describe everything, the 10th dimension in the video above is described as “imagine all the possible branches for all the possible timelines of all the possible universes” I’m literally just saying if that is the case, could it not be an interchangeable word with God/Oneness/InfiniteAwareness and such like... and that one could argue that certain experiences from psychedelics (and other mystical experiences) could be “giving you access to the 10th dimension” if you like; not as a literal location in Space that you enter. Or to simplify it even more, does the description of the 10th dimension not sound akin to the experience of Oneness, being infinite, nothingness, God, etc...? Leo - “there cannot be a limit to any limit within reality”

I have personally listened to all of these on psychedelics and would recommend all of them. Bonus:

Yeah of course, there’s no doubt in that, but what I mean is the “10th dimension” is supposed to be all possible beginnings to the universe too all the possible endings, literally encompassing everything; it’s like in one of your videos you said that because you have enough theoretical understanding you can have an experience and say “that’s ego death” “that’s the void” etc.. so just as symbol in the same way, could it be said that when you experience God, you’re experiencing the 10th dimension, an interchangeable word maybe? Or would you say there’s a distinct difference and if so what would that be, what’s different from how the 10th dimension is explained?

I remember Leo talking in one of his videos that he likes to explore the deepest and most conscious teacherings and understanding's that are humanly possible... and it recently reminded me of this, especially because of how far Leo has come since making that statement and just in his journey in general. The ascended masters are suppose to have reached a level of consciousness where they was able to be immortal - i'm not sure if this was through reincarnation or they managed to keep their body somehow, but it'd be interesting to know what it takes to get there, even just in theory. They're briefly spoken about here at 21:16 Here's two other videos about them.