Aaron p

I actually completely get that. Good way of putting it. Another thought I was thinking is looking for the edge of my perceptive field. Like I can feel the edge/end of my phone, same thing for my car steering wheel and my TV remote. Can I feel the edge of my field of perception? Interesting thought. Cuz the perceptive field exists, here it is. It is here. So logic would tell me it has an edge or point at where it ceases. Also in terms of solid objects. It's interesting cuz if you look closely, what we define as a "solid object" is only that which our limbs can't pass through. Water wouldn't be, hard jelly wouldn't be, hardened glue...kind of. We could pass through it with lots of effort. And what about materials like oobleck (cornstarch and water), it's a solid object if it's hit with a car, but a fly will easily sink into it if it lands on top of it. Technically hardness Vs softness (solidity) would be the arrangement of molecules, or more specifically, their relationship to eachother, or even more specifically the speed of the vibration of the molecules in relation to eachother. Solidity seems to be determined by just how fast or slow something is vibrating.

@Basman technically not just men, but I was just following your lead But to add insult to injury, the various ways in which governments cripple people. It's not to say that one specific system or area has stupidity. Every area of humanity has stupidity. So the question isn't "does this area have stupidity?" The question is "how much damage does this area of stupidity inflict." What's even more incredible is that many of the government officials and policy developers are fully aware of the hundreds of thousands of crippled lives and the thousands, if not tens of thousands of suicides, including young people. They fane stupidity and ignorance to pretend like they're not aware that they're contributing to the suicides of thousands. When the inevitable time of reckoning comes, and it will, you can actually pay close attention and see the very moment when they start to panic. Which then clarifies that they aren't fighting for the freedom of civilians, they're fighting to continue their paying reputations. In their minds they know these facts are indeed true, and so they are forced to make a choice between 2 options: Option 1: Admit they directly contributed to the suicides of tens of thousands and lose their reputation, career and salary. Option 2: Continue causing suicides, keep their reputation, career and salary. Of course many will have chosen never to enter the system because they know they'll cause thousands of suicides and hundreds of thousands of broken lives and careers, but those people will never be seen. What's useful is how easily seen the ones who stayed now are. In other words, they continue causing suicides to save face.

Actually you raise a good point, probably to stop others from getting ideas. What I find more interesting however, is the government officials that make the systems that cause the suicides. The thing is, it happens. These are facts that are being spoken with minimal judgement. If I see a tree I say, "there is a tree." Or if I see a car I say, "there is a car." Or perhaps I see my dog and I say "there is my dog." These are statements that reflect reality. by this, what I mean is: what is being said, happens. What I also see is governmental systems that cause tens of thousands of males to commit suicide and they just brush it under the rug. And the ones who don't kill themselves either speak out or act out (some more subtly than others). And the ones that speak out or act out...the government points to these reactions as evidence that they they were correct, even though the only reason these people are behaving badly is because the government crippled them. See, if you just cripple peoples lives it's much easier to make them quiet and thereby maintain an illusion that everything's calm and beautiful, unless they interact with a particularly strong individual. If they commit suicide they are no longer a voice to be heard, and they point to the "speaking out" of the ones who don't commit suicide and say, "look! This individual is a dangerous person, this confirms it!" (In spite of the fact that they were the ones who caused the speaking out in the first place) which enables them to continue to be heavier and heavier and heavier. Until of course the system breaks after a couple hundred thousand suicides. It's like a suicide feedback loop that confirms it's own bias by crippling people then pointing to their bad behaviour thereafter and using it as evidence that the initial crippling was justified. what really gets me is that, statistically, there are children who are males who exist right now for whom it on only a matter of time before they grow up end up being victims to this. And within further statistics, some of them will be crippled so badly that, not only will they not be able to speak out, they won't be able to speak about it to anyone and some will simply commit suicide.

Leo's extremely opinionated. Just a good job most of them seem to be extremely accurate and helpful 🤩

Preach

Did some research, according to data, of all the people who enter an extremely negative situation in life in the UK and USA combined, lots commit suicide and it's not even reported. Of all of them, over the last 20 years, if 1% commit suicide that's 18,000, if 0.5% commit suicide that's 9,000 and if 0.1% commit suicide that's 1,800. From 2005. What's strange is, it doesn't get much media attention and that's a conservative estimation. There are different procedures in other countries. Namely, what is reported on

Put a bit of pressure on them and see how they behave. This works for me. Talk is talk

Careful, assuming you are wrong is as much a trap as assuming your right. The objective is to avoid assumptions altogether. It's a paradox, most people think they're right. Most people would be deluded. We understand this so we anticipate our own delusion. However doing this makes us less susceptible to delusion, and more likely to be right. Knowing this, we can practically assess that if we possess this level of mental agility, it's only appropriate to admit that this makes us more likely to be right in the end. However then also remembering that thinking your right, even with this meta perspective, once again makes you susceptible to being wrong, as per the initial logic. This can be combatted again with a further layer of meta perception. You just keep attacking it with layer after layer of meta intelligence. 2 supplementary insights: - usually it's safe to assume that there's a lot that we don't know. I'd say the entirety of mankind still doesn't know how gnarly reality can get. - don't fall into the trap of being right without being loving. Or perhaps this point could be better articulated by saying; there's a difference between theoretical/knowledgeable correctness and spiritual, energetic or loving correctness.

I've noticed something similar. Most Western countries are the same with some exceptions. I think what it is, is a lack of reality. When you create a safety net, barrier or "bubble" around reality so people can live in basically a false reality of handshakes, polite words and Starbucks...something in the human can't function. If society isn't setup in a way that admits the natural state of the human condition and tries to make it some kind of politically correct padded cel it can eventually drive you a bit nuts. As I'm becoming more conscious of certain things now as a young adult I'm starting to think "how did I survive 20 years of this?" If the dogs are hungry, feed them.

And it being wrong would be god too

One of the most unexpected and negative effects of increasing. I sort of thought "ah yes, I'll develop myself and be so powerful and smart and strong and everyone will see." The catch 22 of this is that, by definition, if you become more highly developed, you value the opinions of others less because you can see it for what it is. Impressing other people could be likened to trying to impress a bunch of chimps. When this recognition starts to actually set in, it's less about impressing others and more about loving them, helping them get bananas and acorns

I think you have a misguided idea of what god is. True humility is unafraid of how it makes It look when it says I am god. If it is true, then lying to protect an imagine of humility is itself, egotistical

Epic new series!!! -> pluribus By makers of breaking bad, actor that played Kim wexler main character. About aliens

This is the path my friend, I have a very similar experience. Having disillusionment and transcending it is itself the path. I been scammed, fucked over, I'm actually 27 as well. You just have to develop a taste for it. It's like a wall of reality that you have to pass through. It kinda of feels like your talking about this stuff like it's not the path. All of this stuff is exactly the path. You now have a new test, the test of your will, your spirit. Reality is saying, "look at this, you failed! Lol it wasn't real and you are not real (your spiritual drive)." You have to decide if you're cut out for it. But if you are, the answer is to simply give reality the finger and keep going. To sort of see through the illusion that your infinite mind is spinning as some kind of excuse to stop the path. Employ some limitless adaptability and realignment. This isint failure, this is breakfast, lunch and dinner.