Aaron p

I am less concerned with how likely it is to happen to me, than I am with the fact that is does happen to many. In fact, pointing to the unlikelihood of me having to experience it personally as a means by which to try end the debate (not our conversation but the debate at large) is only congruent with my previous statement that this is all simply being swept under the rug. Tens of thousands of innocent men (hundreds of thousands if not millions at a global scale, according to the stats) are being named publicly as having been investigated for rape. This naming alone is devastating, as previously mentioned. I don't want to come across to heavy here but saying "it'll probably not happen to you, don't think about it." Is kind of literally the definition of sweeping it under the rug... Well first of all let me correct the phrasology of this statement. I think it's slightly more accurate and phrasologically coherent to say "...by focusing too much on false accusations, you risk discouraging vulnerable people from reporting real sexual crimes." Because...they happen. They exist, they are real. And becoming more frequent. A lot more frequent. But yes This is very very true and probably one of the primary reasons why more action hasn't been taken thus far. And the reality is that particularly females have been undermined and treated terribly for thousands of years and that this has gone unquestioned. My estimate is that everything that is happening in this region is essentially a mass energetic reaction to many many years of bigotry, violence and sexism against women. On this point we agree. However there are laws that put a lot of effort into ensuring that misinformation is limited and simple objective reporting of facts is maintained. And so I'm not suggesting that we focus too much on the tens of thousands of false allegations destroying men's lives, I'm simply saying that we report on the false allegations as frequently as they occur...just like how we do with what we assume are legit cases. Simple objective reporting on facts. Of course then identifying which ones are false in which ones are legit is very difficult given the fact that 97% of cases don't result in convictions... But bro just open your eyes, there is virtually no one standing up and making any effort at all to try and correct any aspect of this devastating area of criminal justice as it continues to destroy. And like I also mentioned even people who do break the law...a growing number of those people have been coerced themselves. Lots of victims of sexual or psychological abuse become perpetrators. Tarring all perps with the same brush, and even using words like perpetrators, is sending the wrong message. Actually stigmatising perpetrators actually increases recidivism rates according to studies. There are many things that need to be changed in this area. I don't claim to have all the answers, but i have eyes and I have ears and a reasonable degree of cognitive functionality and critical thinking ability. This area is seriously unintelligent and fucked up. Just wait till it's your family who get falsely accused of being rapists or paedophiles... you'll think, damn...that guy on actualized...I think I need his help now. Like think about this logically...with so much effort being put into punishing socially unskilled people as heavily as physically and psychologically possible...and making them out to be rapists and creeps and degenerates and spreading that shit for all their families and lifelong friends to see...such that everyone abandons them and they are completely psychologically isolated and devastated...do we expect this to somehow help them reintegrate? Does this result in the decrease or increase of angry, isolated perpetrators... The likes of Holland for example has methods, when dealing with serious and less serious crime, that are much more intelligent than that of the UK and US. Holland prioritises education, liberty, compassion, understanding, firmness and actual rehabilitation. UK and US seem to have many leaders who display low levels of intelligence.

Boom

@Davino Bro you have got to make more this shit is off the chain. I'm getting murphed as we speak. Try make one that is less coherent and normal. Just keep in contact with friends and don't go too deep. Keep control. Can't stop listening to this. This is genius level material. My ass is off.

Bro this is so good lol. this is mad chaotic and I LOVE chaos. Love it love it love it. There are probably many ways this could be interpreted. I personally love the random chaos insanity of it. Beautiful masterpiece. You should make way more. Just be careful who you let listen to it, people will give you insults or think your mad lol. Madness makes the best material. I'm getting notes of levity and freestyle fun. I dont want to misinterpret this, but bro, it's quite funny. Like very.

Any videos on how to become a dopamine priest?

The whole thing is one giant immature clusterfuck of psychological retardation and mass emotional reactivity.

So firstly id like to just say thank you for your cordial replies, it's nice to be able to have a genuine intelligent conversation about a subject that can be somewhat emotionally charged and polarising. So in the UK in 2024 there were a recorded 67,460 reports of r made to the police. 2% - 8% of which is estimated are false allegations.With 2% - 3% of being convicted. 98% - 99% of which were male with the "vast majority" of accusers being female. (Per year) So that's 67460 r allegations, 1349-5397 of which are estimated to be fabricated, with around 66111 not convicted for any reason. (Per year) So my first observation is that we have a broken system. Quite clearly. In the UK it's safe to assume that many (probably most) of these are published and the UK names and shames people, the outlets also freely fabricate additional facts that the "perpetrators" can do nothing about...if they contact the outlets the outlets just report again. So we are talking realistically estimated around 2000-4000 innocent [mostly] males per year who have been reported as having been investigated for r per year. Also just because there are more people who have their lives destroyed by car accidents doesn't mean that we can continue allowing a broken system to destroy three thousand innocent men's lives every year. I see what you're saying and I of course deeply empathize with people who have horrific rape experiences and the terrible trauma that causes. But let me illuminate something about this system using the base statistics. As you have quite correctly stated, and as the statistics back up, in the UK at least around 97% of cases are not convicted. The police are aware of this statistic, as such they rely on media reporting to be a strong deterrent. It would definitely be fair to say that the media reporting is probably the strongest thing the police are leaning on to to combat this problem. I think this is quite obvious. The problem is they are reporting on hundreds of thousands of men over the years who have been investigated but not been convicted and tens of thousands the police know are innocent over the years. And there are no doubt multiple thousands of people who we have labeled perpetrators who simply don't understand that if they have sex with a girl after having 4 glasses of wine, then have sex with her again after she has 2 more...their careers could be ended, their family relationships could be ruined, the legacy that they have worked their entire lives to create could be annihilated. And by such a simple mistake (possibly galvanised by a sadistic female). Put yourself in this man's shoes... He has now been convicted of r because he had sex with her again after she she two more glasses of wine. How does this man's daughter feel about her daddy who is now a convicted rapist and how does the mother feel, looking at her newly brandished rapist of a son. After he is forced to leave his job, he'd be lucky if he could get a job in McDonald's as a newly convicted rapist. Or the young person who places a hand on a girls body too fast during kissing. How does this young person now feel about his future as a freshly convicted S.O and his prospects of becoming a doctor half way through his $10,000 medical degree, let alone being completely isolated and branded as a pervert or creep or deviant in front of all of his friends. At a young age this kind of material is extremely devastating. Society's current strategy in combating this is to report on everyone (or most) equally. In the UK they are named and shamed. The psychological ramifications are instrumental and monumental. And in relation to how I would go about fixing this situation... Ultimately I don't know how to fix the situation, but I'm intellectually rigorous enough to be able to identify that there's a massive problem. I think firstly dropping labels and category names that are so unnecessarily triggering or at least modifying the names of the convictions to be more specific rather than giving the same conviction name to a 16 year old who doesn't understand consent and a 60 year old who premeditatedly r'ed a 20 year old. Also I think launching a massive media campaign in all schools giving extensive education to people who have reached a certain age. And I'm not talking about the birds and the bees, I'm talking about the slip up areas that exist in reality (having sex with drunk girls, learning that consent can be withdrawn halfway through an interaction and that this can be completely nonverbal, I'm talking realistic detail). This would be a decent start.

Correct. But they do make fabricated or exaggerated allegations. Also males do it now too so it's not just girls. This depends on where your from. Many legit perps don't get charged yes but have you considered the teenaged adult who's religious parents never educated what consent was...or that they just advanced too fast in a sexual interaction... Or perhaps the man who has consensual sex with a woman who has had six glasses of wine as opposed to four. That a simple lack of mindfulness or social skills could result in growing numbers of young people to be forced to live as rapists. And what about the straight up false allegations... What happens when they lose their careers and families and experience permanent psychological devastation? Even if found innocent. People will assume the results are just as you've described...incorrect. these are innocent lives being devastated (targeting young people who don't understand it). Well either your country or region operates differently to mine and many countries I see this happening in, or your statement is inaccurate. Could you substantiate your claim that false allegations don't name people.. This statement reveals to me that you have not been deeply exposed to the reality of how much damage this area can truly inflict. Society just brushes this extreme damage under the rug so that well off people don't have to think about it.

You could try what I call the "be god" technique. Kinda simple, you just sit there being God lol

Actually it's a very good deterrent of unintelligent people

(This set of insights is extremely selfless and accurate and will likely trigger many egos) Yeah bro that's why I used the word "much" of course there are many legit cases, but the government have not yet found a way to deal with evil people (many of whom are female) who are either extremely mentally ill or just insanely sadistic to exaggerate or fabricate information to policing bodies. I think some people just have so little going on in their lives or their identities are so unfound and hopeless that they need to find their abuser so they can claim "some" form of an identity (in this case a victim identity). Very central truth in a lot of emerging cases these days. This doesen't discount from the legitimacy of real cases, but young mens lives are being annihilated over exaggerations. First and second wave feminism was extremely good and wholesome, but now much of third wave feminisms is just predicated on the single central assumption that all men are bastards. These kinds of people will seriously need to watch their backs over the next 40 years as the pendulum will inevitably swing back in the opposite direction, likely causing themselves a degree of destruction.

Lol legendary

It's all completely imaginary. A lot of what people call rape and sexual assault these days (like a guy having sex with his sleeping gf, or hand placed on a specific bodily area at an incorrect time) is nothing other than exaggerated horse shit and it only becomes "traumatising" for the "victim" when they are told to be traumatised, almost as if the people involved are intentionally going for dramatic effect. To me it points to major collective and individual psychological immaturity. Unbelievable levels of immaturity. I'll be a proud owner of the following statement: sexual assault is massively exaggerated in society today. MASSIVELY. Much of the time It's not as big of a deal for the people it happens to than what we and they are being led to believe and is only as big as it is today because jackass governments, with high degrees of idiocy, have put a LOT of money and effort into making it look as bad as possible... probably because it makes them a lot of bonuses of the cash money variety. "Ohhh you can't say something like that in this day and age". Watch me. Most cops involved either consciously or subconsciously know this of course...but why would they stand up against mainstream dumbassery (that is extremely damaging)...when that would risk their comfortable job, their nice salary and their convenient government pension. "Who cares if our inaction destroys people's lives. Nah, let's just keep rolling with it...don't rock the boat." The only caveat I'll add to my statement is that I have major respect for law enforcement entities that do stand up for it. Though they are few are far between. The real heros that put the lives of young people above their profession stability. These kinds of agents are badasses of the Sylvester Stallone variety.

Well the word offence literally means to attack, advance in martial arts. I legal realm it means to break or breach a rule or set standard. In simple emotional terms I think it probably means just that someone has advanced past your boundaries and broken your set standards. If I'm not mistaken this means that offence and anger are often closely related and intertwined. I'm pretty sure that this directly relates to you are sense of self and your identity which has been formed since you were a child. If you have a dense ego you will probably experience more offence and anger. Check out this cool insight about the subjectivity of offence; I heard that in a certain Asian country if you don't burp during or after your meal, this can be offensive for the chef or cook! Lol

Such a powerful testimony

We are careful talking about solipsism here bro, underdeveloped minds can take It the wrong way and feel trapped. The ego can use this to create mad fear. Massive potential for epistemic and ideological bastardization. Most here will be hesitant to give info on it I think

@Verg0 Leo said in the past that not using psycs in your practise is just directly wasting your own time. However my is understanding that this was assuming that the goal of your practise is god realisation, hardcore enlightenment and mystical awakening. If this is your goal (and you aren't bullshitting yourself about this actually being your goal) then I think you probably have to listen to that advice. Sober practise can also be good if your goals are a lot smaller like mind calibration, focus, increased peace, contemplation. I use contemplation all the time it's basically my base operating software. I question everything lol. Also sober is safer and requires much less skill and care. Do be mindful of the risks of taking psycs. They range from mild anxiety to literal permanent insanity unfathomable interdimensional torture that makes physical torture look like a walk in the park so be careful. You can also check out Leo's core psyc videos like "understanding psychedelics" and "top risks of psychedelics." Take it slow and give the compounds the respect they demand or they'll quickly force you to. They can make you veeeerrrrrry strong. I personally recommend considering starting with phenythylamines (2C, mesc, etc.) over tryptamines or lysergemides which tend to be more harsh. You're basically guaranteed to eventually run into some difficult experiences if you choose this path so I also recommend making a note in your mind about being able to distinguish when you're experiencing what I call bad pain... Kind of similar to how you might be able to intuitively discern whether the pain you were experiencing during a weightlifting session is good or bad and when you need to stop.

But it's so tasty

Left = all men are predators (let them into women's sports). Right = Zelensky is a dictator (negotiate with russian terrorists).

Very powerful recognition. I see the feminine attributes of god everywhere. I sometimes think god is a female flirting with me. I suppose It would also be accurate to say that god is a pansexual hermaphrodite

There are subtle dynamics in this whole area that target young people and forces them through lengthy and heavy processes forcing them to represent the worst kinds of people. On certain levels of this general area of law enforcement, there is massive massive damage being done. And it's being done to young people who have been coerced into being labeled as perps. These processes are extremely damaging. It kind of competes well with the witch trials. I personally think making uninformed youngsters live as r's and p's ranks highly in the most dumbass moves mankind has ever made. And continues to do so.

So now the UK government has taken another step in the name of prevention of the exploitation of young people and terrorism and essentially banned free speech. You can now go to jail in the UK if the authorities *think* you did something online to cause someone distress. Next their going to be asking for our papers at every checkpoint.. Also no consequences for licensed media outlets (BBC, court reports etc.) even if their misinformation.

I think your unfamiliar with this area of law enforcement

Why don't they just educate parents on how to install child protection programs...would it not be more logical to promote a highly contained, carefully thought out, widespread media campaign educating EVERYONE on how to be aware of the dangers online and how to protect themselves and their children from becoming perpetrators...rather than targeting the dumbest (often most mentally challenged young people) who have simply not been informed...and doing some kind of covert attack at the last minute on uninformed, mentally underdeveloped young people, destroying their lives and thinking that this is somehow better. Then expecting this to what...help them? And what about young people who don't know what cyber flashing is. And we all know what people of all ages get up to. What about them...the cops seem to like arresting kids. This particular area of government failure and dumbassery infuriates me. GTG mediate