Jack River

An I resists what-is An I resists now An I resists love An I IS and depends on conditions. What-is/Love/the now is not dependent upon conditions The I (time) denies what-is/love/THE NOW We tend to wish/hope things were other than they are. Is it necessary to have this preference? Is this not to a self imposed condition the self imposes on itself in which freedom is denied to stay with what-is? Does this not prevent love/what-is/now?

Let’s not exclude now heh?

@SoonHei we are student/teacher/listener/speaker

Any action taken by choosing between “should I, or should I not change something”, is still based on the response of memory and is still resistance to what is.

Can we see that Identification in general is reactionary/mind movement. Saying I am this(awareness), but not that(mind/thought) is still divisive/a self imposed reality/distortion. The totality of what is, is what-is. Saying I am this and not that is still mind movement/resistance. Mind is pretty subtle fosho.

@SoonHei thank you, dude.

Also can we be aware that the habit of acting on behalf of a goal will sustian the reaction of mind and limit its own quietness/silence? Something we can also notice through observation.

We may find that a subtle conflict can arise because of this. We may be inattentive, and the mind reacts to itself not being attentive. This seems to keep mind in movement. Reaction and mind go together. I found that trying to be aware(trying to be attentive), is inattention..to see that then that inattentivenes is the fact and stands by itself. This seems to cancel out all conflict that arises out of the duality the mind imposes on itself.

Truth is insight, insight is action. Undivided/non-fragmented SEEING/PERCEPTION is freedom

The attantion, which isn’t cultivation/control/effort is indeed necessary, but there is not attention when moving dualistically. That is trying to control inattention, which remains inattention. We can be aware of that though??

The journey is you. We soon may see that the you will very subtly superimpose/fix its own end with your conditioned means.. There does demand a certain degree of freedom to not project such falsitys. This freedom comes with self knowledge.

You may see as well that the goal sets the conditions on the end. This can be a big road block for seeing what-is in ourselves. Any such resistance denies death/freedom/love.

? you need nobody. Observe what-is in yourself.

Maybe...or Love is death Become Nothing ?

Is there love when I project images (self/the past) onto what-is/others? It’s wise to start with all the actions in our life that can be identified as not love. This way you are always learning from everyday experiences/relationship. And include the relationships between you/me and our pleasures/desires. To observe all that.

If I am always in a steady state of conflict can there be Love? If I am seeking psychologically all of the above will be conditioned reactions of fear. Therefore there will be no freedom, Love, silence etc.

Well I can’t exactly convey it to anybody, especially by internet communication. But is love a feeling/emotion...no. Is there love when I am perpetually striving towards subtle forms of pleasure/experiences? If I am constantly concerned with my self, is there love?

Love, the ending of becoming(psychological evolution).

It’s a solo type of deal. There can be communication of time/duality.

Perhaps they too do not conform to any authority. Especially there own heh..Haha?

Haha dude. You crack me up. With centerlessness there is harmony with all things. That is universal communion with all. That is the action of love/truth... But be aware of the superimposing of human bias that @Preetom spoke of. Stepping out of the field or reality is exactly what I’m speaking of. The ground or non-being is still limited to human conditions..not mind of brain/conditions...but mind that stands outside of brain. It seems we are still limited to the vessel that bridges that connection. When conciousness is empty of its contents that does not mean we necessarily share the same empty space/field of that bird/animals/trees. In that empty/no-thing-less realm there is a more receptive relationship to nature for sure, but thought will still enter in and create distortions if we are not attentive of such. In centerless non-being this has been actualized with sea life from day to day in ‘my’ life. And as long as ‘you’ are experiencing, there is still a fundamental barrier of time dividing you and other/nature. Actualized centerlessness is no-thing-ness. And you don’t experience it. Self-conscious is still a movement within the field of your own superimposed reality.

?

hehe. cant speak for the bird.

Hehe. Nowhere.

I see you haha? I’m not saying any concept/reality is more relevant. I’m not following where you are going with this. We are not on the same level here for some reason. My point was simply I can not speak for a bird.