Jack River

Yes (the placeless place)❤️

Definitions are imaginary...I’m going to have to change you into a different character, thing, or event, if you don’t straighten up up you imaginary rascal you?❤️

@zeroISinfinity ❤️

You’re imaginary...and remember my beautiful imaginary friend, I’m calling the shots here. This is my play-write??

The headless map isn’t a map. It’s just an expression so to speak. Headless is not mindless..it is simply order of BEING.

Well I’m ultimately inclined to say I’ve literally never experienced anything but MYSELF. Anything else would be an assumption...a useful one?

Yet does that mean I don’t appreciate a brain? Of course not?

All there is to that thing called a brain is a perception. And all there is to perception is MYSELF.

Indeed..understood? also second order. Interesting way to put it?

I’ve never actually experienced a brain?

“I do” “everything” without a head??

@Aeris through identification with the self arises a world of dimensions(the map). Can this map be rolled up and put away? Yes...it’s called headlessness. as I use the term..the head=the map(the reality construct of subject—object duality.

Haha!!? no...the map is used when needed. But the map isn’t introduced unless I actually choose to use it. To bring order to living(KNOWING-BEING). It seems until there is order the map is taken as the territory compulsively.

This seems to be the gradual realization, right? This is why I think many teachers start with the end. Or loose their imaginary heads? This letting go or choicelessness path of no path helped a lot. Seems to bypass all the resistance phases.

I’ve literally only ever experienced MYSELF ?

?

??‍♀️ I’ve never actually experienced a thing, object, place, and event. “All” such stuff is empty. Yet beautifully perfect?

With thought arises dimensions...seemingly?

Yes...but I’m not talking about an idea? there is only HIM and HIM ALONE? OR HER?

Well I’m more of a non-thinker? depends on the context.. To be simple..:simply seeing that all there is to “everything” is MYSELF ALONE. Love has nothing to do with anything/one but MYSELF.

Prior to do I exist or don’t exist....the rest is SELF EVIDENT?

LOVE being simply a recognizing that there are no others. As in the experience of Love is WIDE OPEN embracement. Choicelessness. Not an emotion.?

Like Happiness...it seems from the egos point of view a state in which one must achieve and maintain in order to be fulfilled.. But when that is seen through, Happiness is not a state, but that which states are able to arise and subside.

Following Love, as I see it, seems a kind of misconception. As I see LOVE tacit as what I am essentially.

Yet I cannot say anything exist outside of MYSELF(KNOWING) As that implies this “thingification” I mean I have never found a thing, even when apparently observing one.