Jack River

Member
  • Content count

    3,279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jack River

  1. Or actually mend itself back together as a coherent whole
  2. For me, I don’t follow mostly when you were speaking of Spinoza or any other philosophical type of stuff. I’m not a reader of txt or anything like that so that goes right over my head..I’m interested in self observational/direct experience. That’s how I was able to understand what you meant in reference to equal distribution or balance of the senses. Your welcome my dude? Your a most excellent read.
  3. You at times seem foreign in communication, but as I have noticed with time I can understand more and more. I think I only have trouble understanding if what is being communicated has to with a certain concept/philosophy or something along those lines.
  4. Your a most excellent presence on here. Thanks buddy?
  5. @tsuki I’m enjoying your posts man. Great communication skill
  6. Nice!! Perhaps venerate or veneration. Desire influenced by Beauty/Love/SELF.
  7. I think he is referring to desire in the psychological sense. Desire and image projection imply one another and are not really distinct. This movement implies premeditation or pre-formulation as @Preetom mentioned. Image projection itself is a self sustaining cyclic process that feeds the continuity of psychological time(desire). I think that is what @Preetommeans, but I could be wrong.
  8. If you stay with what your experience says then ethics, the relative perspective and what not is all belief based, which inherently makes for conditioned action, and is not “ethical”. If you see that YOU are all there is, such questions of ethics are quite silly
  9. It’s not about helping others as a duty/obligation, but about being purely SELFISH
  10. i graduated from headless to FORMFULL —DIMENSIONLESSNESS
  11. Perhaps a ZERO perspective is DIMENSIONLESS?
  12. There is no moment, there is only You. All of these questions are questions that arise from not observing experience as it is.
  13. He’s just adding a little rascality into the thread
  14. The 0 perspective contains all perspectives. There is never any other perspective but that perspective?
  15. Becoming/doing and desire co-arise as simply activity of mind, which derives it’s substance from/as YOU. So if you see that directly, which is not an extraordinary experience by any means, then you see that desire is not essential.
  16. Right dude! The image and desire co-arise. Which also says that desire is not a essential to KNOWING/living.