charlie cho

Member
  • Content count

    782
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by charlie cho

  1. I'm not accusing anyone here. I'm mostly talking about myself. I used to feel that the studying the "scientific method" won't bring any practical usefulness in ones personal or spiritual development. Maybe, it will bring one success, material wealth, or a good analytical mind, but I was so sure that "Science" had nothing to do with spirituality. Recently, I've come to a realization that it is the scientific method that borne out DNA finger print testing. Blood type tests. Texture analysis. Color tests. For us to assess which type of chemicals were inside something or somebody. Using UV light, we are able to see chemicals that we weren't able to see with our bare eyes. This "Scientific method" of analyzing and sensing our world had brought out a normal person, who simply understood this logic, to find a criminal, save a victim from immense psychological and physical harm, even save a criminal from hurting others, thus saving him from hurting himself. These scientific analysis and tools had helped us navigate through manipulation and the deceit those vile people had created for us. It's the weaker evil that is brutal, honest, boasts, and is like a lion when causing harm. The greatest evils are quiet, kind, dishonest, secretive, and highly skilled in hiding. Science excels in exposing the greater evils. I can't imagine or fully take in the emotions of how much this "scientific method" had benefited a person's spiritual development, saved a person from suffering (often horrible and unspeakable ones), and even healed a person's physical body (by medical science). Science did not benefit only physical comfort, the economy, leisure, or the intelligence of the common people. It helped us become more healthy, and it is a irrefutable fact that it contributed much to justice. And these values of health and justice is high consciousness, no?
  2. I have seen many of my heroes were achievers but at the same time who had deep compassion for the world. It wasn't enough if they were just compassionate. It wasn't enough if they were conquerors and achievers. To me, the best man represented a person who loved achieving and conquering, contributing and creating, but at the same time having that achievement be based on compassion and love. My heroes are usually 3w2, or 2w3. But I've taken the test and I also got a 3w2. It was a 1% difference from me having a 8w7, but I knew I was a 3, because I was more ashamed by the weaknesses 3 and 2 had more than the 8 and a 7. Meaning, there were much more painpoints that I could relate to being a 3 and a 2. 2s are famous for either being needy and approval seeking or being a tremendous lover and giver who loves to give service. 3s have a reputation for either being a dancing performer wanting attention for his achievements, or a just being plain old bad ass achiever who GETS THINGS DONE. We obviously want to embody the latter and be the positive sides for our personalities, but I struggle to understand... whenever I see videos explaining the enneagram 2, they keep demonstrating the 2 as if they are just needy little nurses. As if all their talent relies not on giving and loving, service, but their talent solely relies on being liked? Nothing wrong with being liked and loved. Yes, I see that 2s do have a particular talent for being loved, but these videos continuously emphasizing this fact disturbs me. Because to my understanding, the specialty of the twos are not that they are "talented" at being "liked" but it is their devotion to service and love, and how great they are being a lover and a compassionate person. Probably Jesus was a two. Idk. And I can be confident that Jesus didn't care less about being accepted or loved, yet he was loved and accepted more than anybody. So I felt like 3w2 was labeled as a needy performer continuously, which doesn't fit well into my description of what a true healthy 3w2 would be or a 2w3. 3w2 would put achieving a little more important than loving, while the 2w3 will be more compassionate then be achieving. I don't get how being a two makes us needy. Being a lover, giver has nothing to do with being needy. Can't wrap my f*ing brain around this.
  3. Ive edited it before you answered. Again you assume things without looking at the reality of it. Dude, youre a funny guy
  4. @BenG yes. I was caught in that trap in the past. Studying the scientific method a little more deeply by myself, i changed my mind about that
  5. @HypnoticMagician hey, read carefully and see whether i specifically said scientists are low consciousness or high consciousness, you uninquisitive mind. Read the last paragraph before you accuse me of your own projection of idiocy
  6. I'm curious how Leo and all of you think of Confucius. I always had a suspicion for him. Always felt something fishy going on with the person. Overly political. Too disciplinary. Has no understanding of the essence of human nature. Status based. Rituals and history is more important to him than the future or the present. Chinese legalist philosopher, Han Fei Tzu, an author that the first emperor of China, Qin Shi Huang, adored most as a political writer, used to criticize Confucian principles saying, "They think that wisdom comes from the past and they try to implement those ideas to the present. They think they can hunt a bunny the same way they had killed an old bunny yesterday. They pollute the realm with their fixed ideas and make people fixed in the past. We are now seeing how deluded people are becoming, how ugly their mannerisms have become because of their traditional ritualism, how vile they have become of their fixed principles of the past. They destroy the human soul and body, thus destroying the whole country of China because they cannot see what's happening now. The principles of the past do not apply to the future. The prince should understand this and apply current principles for the future, not the past like those vile Confucian scholars." Funny enough, Emperor Qin went too far and dumped all those Confucian scholars in the ground burying them alive. Lol. (One of the reasons he is crowned as one of the most evil emperors ever. But there is no doubt he was talented in leadership and managing a country.) It's hard for many to conceive that a philosopher in East Asia would think like this 2500 years ago, but they indeed existed. It's doubly hard that an Chinese Emperor was able to understand what the philosopher had just said about how the past do not apply to the present, and how fixed ideas in the past will destroy a clear perception of the world. We would normally think these high status people in ancient times would be traditional, fixed, and disciplinary. And don't get me started on how much Chuang Tzu calls Confucius a hypocrite, a world destroyer, a mere failing student of Lao Tzu, a status seeker, a failing preacher of his foolish ideas. I can go on and on. If you have any ideas on Confucianism, ask me. If you have any opinions. I would love to hear it. If you would like to argue that my scornful attitude on Confucius is wrong, then I welcome the challenge.
  7. dude, the shit you wrote just broke my heart
  8. @Preety_India No I'm not happy you left. I want you to stay
  9. @Preety_India I thought you were leaving
  10. Learn martial arts, you'll naturally have a change of body language. It doesn't mean you willingly be violent, yet it does mean you will kill anybody who is willing to kill you. In fact, you will give him more pain for ever trying to give you some. That isn't a crime. It's just fair.
  11. @Harlen Kelly theres a saying from sun tzu. Win the war with minimal effort and casualties. Preferrably do not even attack the opponent and win the war. This is plan A. Plan B is sliding her panties to the side and and sticking your condom worn dick in her. Whatever get things done right? But it seems its better to get our priorities right whenever we go to war
  12. @LordFall I guess spatial awareness cannot be confused with the aptitude needed for parking a car. I used to think women were just physically weaker, that's all. But no. Women and men, when they play billiards, men far exceeds women in the game. Billiards and pool do not require any physical strength, yet men do much well. Spatial analytics? is important in this game. Women may have better spatial awareness. I think since women are more relaxed, they will have their peripheral vision more intact. But analyzing spaces wouldn't be their forte.
  13. that's what they want you to think
  14. Well, what's the difference between Leonardo conceptualizing and imagining how to draw the mona lisa and a scientist theorizing a new model for how nature behaves. To me, there is not much a difference, yet, in my mind. It's just that painters can paint and be kinesthetic a little more quickly than the scientist. Both Leonardo and the scientist are muddled up with concepts, ideas, and imaginations. No? We can say scientists paint more on their minds than on their research paper.
  15. concise and onto the point. A true student.
  16. @FlyingLotus did you finish it
  17. Start from "How to make a girl squirt" A good place to start Leo's quality content
  18. I love it when the girl spits at me and calls me harsh things. I love it when the girl expresses admiration. What i cannot stand is when the girl ignores me. Whether it is on text or real life. I actually get emotional when she ignores me. In my observation, when she ignores me, over 50% of the cases, she is really not interested in me. Genuinely. And I understand. She has the permission to not be interested in me, of course. My question is... are there times girls use "ignoring" the guy to shit test him? In my experience, this happens quite sometime Its a nuanced question, but its very dear and important to me to get the answer right here. Can a girl ignore me because she likes me? In other words shit testing me? Please, write your honest opinion and observations.
  19. Read the Art of War. Your very desire to "win" or take "revenge" on your materialist teacher will backfire and will not have you take proper stance on warring with that materialist. Kobe explains why your desire to "win" makes you susceptible to fear and emotion and not be connected to truly playing the game. when you are emotional and want "revenge" to win, you will not be intangible but very tangible. You will be loud with emotion. You won't be able to control the rival's fate. And this very intangible mysteriousness will control your rival's fate. Don't be consumed by anger. Be cool.
  20. @Wilhelm44 I'm watching the 3 and the two of the this guy. What's special about this man?
  21. @Javfly33 Hey, I've already got a person to give 50 dollars to. If you're still interested in keeping me accountable, I'd share to you still haha
  22. For going out to get phone numbers in the DAY I'd like to give 50 dollars to anyone whose a good fit for signing this up to keep me accountable getting girls' phonenumbers , if I don't get 5 women's phone number in the coming weeks. (I know, in the era of corona, it's a doubly challenging, but I want to do it anyways. Tired of talking to girls online only) If you give me your paypal account, I will pay if I don't get a number and evidence from the girl. Maybe I'll pay you in advance 50 dollars, and you will have to pay me, if I give you the evidence. You just need to be a person wants to get the money in a fair way
  23. @Waves sure thing. Actually, I already got one accountability partner telling me that, so I changed it to how much I approach a day, and to months.