charlie cho

Well, his top book for success is the book 'Mastery' by George Leonard. Am I wrong?

@Enlightement Watch the Michael Jordan documentary 'the last dance' and you will understand. Or just read a Steve Jobs biography. Or read the book 'Titan'. Being a nice guy does not equal effective genius. Bunch Leo's supporters out here thinking exactly this idea.

This is exactly the case. People think someone needs to be a good person if one is talented. Simpletons, and anyone who will continue to think as if morality is tied to ones mastery of any artistic endeavor is bound to not even enact what Leo preaches, which is mastery. Not only that, they will live mediocre lives, not separating reality from fiction.

I don't. Lol.

You call me deluded. I call you low IQ. I didn't say you insulted me. And you say I insulted you. You tell me to get off any forum. I didn't ask you to get off any forum and shut up like you did to me. Lol, to sum it up, for your sake, I'll do the calculation. That this is just the indication of your low score. All in all, lets make a good environment in this forum @Kshantivadin and stop wasting other people's time. Haha. Or what I've learnt by texting a few crazy chicks, is not to reply to inept people from now on.

Smell what bait? Indication of your low IQ? Or not getting jokes? Either way, it's low IQ. Don't be so angry, you're an insignificant part of anyone's life, and I think you struggle to understand that due to your low score. Or at least to me, just nothing. Haha, I want to make a good environment in these forums. Let's everyone here have a good space and not criticize other people wasting other people's time like @Kshantivadin.

Lol, the irony of people here telling me I idolize Andrew Tate. It's my fault to waste my time on some to arguing.

Yeah, I know he's not an adult chess champion. I think he was a champion when he was 13 years old. But it's a mark of wisdom not to continue more than that. 'Being able to play chess is a sign of a gentleman, but more than that is a sign of a wasted life' as the saying goes. But technically, when he was in school, he was indeed a champion, so I said that which is true. The Go player in Korea, Sedol quit playing Go after playing AlphaGo by Google. The reason he quit is he thought maybe playing Go isn't the wise way to live life. Go is considered much less rote, more creative, deeper history, much more optional ways to play, harder to AIs to master than chess. But even Sedol says Go isn't the wise way to live life wasting on, and he realized that at age 30. And Bobby Fischer used to hate chess, saying it's a rigged game, and he hated chess players attitudes. It's a sign of intelligence to quit chess professionally at an early age.

No bro. Whatever country you are in, as I am in Korea, you don't need to be disrespectful. Off hand cocky comedy, but respectfully is important, because having cockiness, comedy, and respectfulness shows the girl you don't need to 'show' that you are cool by being disrespectful. Unless she's an idiot, they won't be attracted by disrespect, and I would only say less than 3% of women are really idiots. However, even if your face doesn't need to be very attractive, it is indeed important to be physically fit, and wear clothes nicely, and design your face nicely. Almost to the artistic extent. Kind of like how Confucius liked to order his disciples to wear nicely and act like a true scholar and saint, the expression of your consciousness may need to be spot on, Manners. Then even if you are not very attractive, if you are physically fit, and can wear clothes nicely, do your hair tidy, clean, no women (even if you are a midget) will frown at you for approaching them. Just say 'I was walking by, and to just go by without speaking to you would have been a waste, because I thought you were cute', or something to that extent. Now the real question is, how do I get that design sense? I know many people have their own stupid opinions, but listen to me, because only I'm right. Learn to draw or something like that, and instantly you get what it means to have good design sense. Just like many musicians (even if they aren't singers) have great voices, because playing with sounds make them sensitive to how they sound to others, practicing drawing will make you sensitive how you will be visually percieved. This is the no nonsense way to learn fashion. I mean, learning to facepaint, and learning to do fashion, the base level is to learn to draw even for those university students who have fashion degrees or for make up artists. And I'm assuming you're not a 5'1 inches tall, or very dumb. Take care of how you act (expression of good spirits), take care of fashion, and speak in a straight forward way with no bullshit, the women love men with no bs.

@something_else Yes, I am young. If I sound like Ive been heavily influenced, then yes you are right. I learn from Allen Iverson, Hitler, and Genghis Khan, and Krishnamurti, all from different backgrounds and morals. Perhaps the more evil the person is, I learn more about goodness. Because even idiots influence me lots. They teach me more about success. Perhaps you think I can't separate the wheat from chaffs, or maybe it is actually you who fail to learn from people you think are more 'bad' than you. But because I'm young but mature unlike you who is older than me but is 'mature', I learn from anybody, whether that person is good or bad, I am beyond those petty immature things, and learn from whoever, as long as they teach me what 'works' in my artistic endeavors, or my spiritual endeavors. Mind you then, I should teach you a lesson about maturity, if I dare as a younger person to teach against your 'grey hairs' that you can learn from anybody regardless, and that doesn't mean you need to eliminate that person out of your life to learn anything profound. Be more mature please, as indeed you are older than me but perhaps fail to learn from a wide-arrange of people, and is very narrow in your learning, even as an older person than me.

@itsadistraction Ask any forensic scientist or a police detective, he'll laugh at you, because they don't have time for the things Tate does whilst they are fighting homicidal serial killers and rapists. What is this watered down thing that you call a criminal. It's an embarassment to the profession that has to put Tates in jail.

https://youtu.be/9oX2xFo7JA4 Watching this show was like reading a Dostoevsky Crime Novel.

My God. After watching the BBC interview of Andrew Tate and comparing that shit to how Patrick Bet David interviews him, it's imcomparable, laughable how the BBC interviewed Tate. My favorite interview of PBD is with him and Steve Wozniak and Robert Kiyosaki, but I didn't recognize his talent and the ability to empathize. I labeled him as just as 'orange' system thinker. I don't care if he is or not, his ability to empathize and ask good questions makes that BBC interviewer look really bad. I don't care if you like Andrew Tate or not, neither do I care if I like him or not because I don't care about him myself. But I was amazed at PBD's empathy.

@zurew Lol. your words are continuous proof of such a waste of everyone's time. Please, I wish to cancel you. Or at least, stop talking to me, because you just seem, at least for me, if you have any compassion for me, only you have I said this to the whole forum of actualized.org. Only, you just never talk to me. You remind me of people who just speak without saying anything. I always try to get rid of people who waste my time. Don't waste space in this post. Please, I speak to you with much compassion. I don't care about you. Please. Thank you. And if possible, I saw your previous post. Stop wasting other people's time, whilst you never speak to me. Please get out. Mind you, @zurew, I never canceled anyone from me in this forum. You are the first one i ever said in this forum to get out of my business. You need some soul searching to do. And you need to go out, go to the gym, and be more social. Pray to your life. But I will heavily recommend you not to talk to me in this forum, or something not good will happen to you with my words to you in this forum with everyone watching. I know you enjoy talking to me, but please think of me. I dont care about you. Your time and space. Its a waste to me And i know its hard for you. But i have hope for you. Dont waste not only my time, dont waste other peoples time too. But i have hope for you so its good. But dont talk to me ever in this forum.

By the way, rape isn't so easy to define. No Sherlock can define what rape is. Rape cannot be just indicted by law, and people who tell you it's behavioral is kidding themselves. Kobe Bryant got vindicted because rape is nearly impossible to define. Why, was it because Kobe was a celebrity? The best scientists won't be able to see if Kobe truly raped her. Choking the 18 year old waiter whilst having sex, Kobe admits it. So wtf. That's rape? No. So a semen is in her underwear. That's rape? Impossible. It's not that simple. So rape charges must come from psychology. All of you, read articles and videos without even seeing the evidence of Andrew Tate's criminal record. Did any of you see him do it? You just believe what articles tell you? You just believe videos tell you? That is evidence? Lol. Analyze evidence yourself. People convicting him without seeing the evidence themselves. Such imbeciles. Also people trying to save Tate without seeing the evidence themselves. So fast to rush and convict him or vindict him. Such imbeciles. Can't believe Leo was so eager to convict him, without seeing the evidence empirically. Leo needs to learn when to be quiet in convicting or vindicting someone of criminality with or without evidence. He obviously loves to convict people very very easily. Lol as if it's so difficult to stop yourself from taking your clothes off for simps. "It's so difficult! These Women are victims of the evil sorcery of Tate!" Lol, all this is too funny. Making Andrew Tate so powerful like this. He doesn't have any sorcery powers to hypnotize women to take their clothes off. Lol. These women caved in themselves, and we are making them heroes. If this is rape, of course it's debatable, but 'coersion'? Lol. As if we don't pretend Cleopatra didn't coerce Julius Caeser to save Egypt from destroying itself from common enemies? As if Cleopatra didn't coerce Mark Anthony. When Cleopatra coerce Julius Caeser to use his Roman Powers for Egypt, that is not rape? Not sex trafficking!? Because she's a beautiful woman! "But the women didn't have the power!" Such imbeciles. Underestimating how easy it is, even for a retarded beautiful woman, to tell a Tate "No, fuck off Tate. I'm not taking my clothes off on camera." How much do I have to say than this. Congratulations for indicting those women lesser than retards who can't tell a man to fuck off from taking their clothes off for simps.

@Danioover9000 Are all pimps supposed to go to jail? Pimps as in A man who has many women he fucks. But doesnt use them for prostitution. But Andrew Tate did have the former. Tate also made the women he was with do cams. Cams were and are legal, tf women do it to themselves for fuck sake. and Andrew coerced them? Or isnt it very very simple for those girls to just tell Tate to "Fuck off I'm not doing this shit." Then shall we say Tate hypnotized or manipulated the women? But how? Are women so weak? Or idiotic? If a fucking man tells a woman to take their clothes off in front of idiots; she has no strength to tell that man to fuck off? And we call that woman a victim? How dare we? Are you telling me those women couldn't tell Tate to "fuck off"? Okay. If they did not have power. I will leave people to be. Take the girls as the victim. Fair enough. This will only exacerbate the problem of prostitution. Because we now have catered to the weak woman who have caved into Tates suggestion to take their clothes off. Its a very simple question. And we have made those women heroes. Such idiotic tropes. To make such women heroes is only an idolization of prostitution. Saying its okay to let women do onlyfans but leftists not calling out the company of onlyfans. You make heroes of these 'victims', you are admiting that women have no power to resist a simple question "take your clothes off in front of simps." Such demeaning to women. So antifeminist. I am for feminists, and for women. To make these women who has accepted and said yes to Andrew Tate's stupid suggestions, however clever Tate was with his lies and manipulations, heroes and victims of crime, what are you truly saying to these women by making them win lawsuits? We are telling those women "you are not able to say 'no' to a man, albeit very very clever, who suggests you to take your clothes off for simps." How dare we say this to women! This is the most demeaning most arrogant thing we can tell these women. And we make these women weak and unresponsible for saying "yes" to an idiot suggestion! Laws need logic. Of course its like a circuit! @Danioover9000 That is why there cannot be any justice in circuits! No justice can be written by words and statements! But as the world isnt perfect, we write laws to try to create justice. and the best way to make this is by circuits and algorithms! circuits and algorithms and words and statements and logic are bound by time and space. Of course it needs time if its any good! But at the same time, anyone who seeks justice in the 'written law' doesnt know what true justice is. Justice cannot be written or be said. Like the Dao cannot be written or said, the first fucking sentence of the Tao Te Ching! For God's sake. People need to listen to these songs. Learn and try to learn from how Kelly Clarkson deals with her problems! She repents! Lol.

wow, the dedication you put in these posts, it's admiring.

@zurew again, doesn't know when to just be quiet. You do this not only to me, but to everyone else don't you? You're a waste of my time, I don't want to be wasting time on you. Hated people who waste other's time. Lol, you don't even formulate any writing to argue with me, such a waste of space and time with yours.

@zurew Then stop talking nonsense. You obviously need some help with this.

lol, your desparation to make me an Andrew Tate devoter. Pathetic.

@zurew stop projecting your idiocy to me. I didnt worship him. Andrew Tate spoke more truth online than you spewing attacks on me

lol fine. Like your opinion matters to me in the first place. And stop starting fights online if you have nothing to do in your life.

@Danioover9000 because logic even on lawful circuits need time to develop. Evidence and its connectivity needs time. Its not that hard to understand. Even if Andrew has done something unlawful, judges and lawyers need formulation. And formulation requires time. Its not that easy, mind you. You need to become more patient. And laws itself cannot convict Andrew Tate. Written words won't do justice. You have to really look at Andrew Tate objectively. Of course he was a fraud sexually in making money with sex cams. But don't just look at the surface value, look at what he has accrued, and did that create unlawful behavior? Unlawful behavoir is very difficult to define, and to rush in and call him out is very very unwise behavior. It lacks cirtical understanding of any situation. IDGAF if he manipulated his girlfriends to just make sex cams. That doesn't automatically mean he's 'unlawful'. If that is the case, I can't survive in the justice system, You can't, no one can't. More than this, I don't even care more for it even if Leo thinks this is wrong. And I don't care if most of you think hes a piece of shit. I dont care if hes unlawful. But he says tremendous truth than most of you, right now. To me, unlike most of you, truth is more important than mere words and laws.

It was very obvious to me note taking is overrated when doing spiritual work. I've tried it inspired by The Meditations by Marcus Aurelius. One soon realizes however one tries, it's all a lie. Not only do people lie when writing to others (it's very easy to see if one is very conscious), but people (in this case, me) lie to themselves in their own diary! God's sake. But I didn't know that note taking could be overrated when one studies for self-actualization. Note taking mindlessly is, not can be, but is! an excuse to think critically, rationally, and deeply about a topic. Pythagoras had said, never speak in many words if it can be said in a few words. He also said 'think before you speak'. Well... this applies to note taking and writing. It's very easy to see academics speak nonsense without speaking about anything, and teaching students to do the same. See Jordan Peterson, for example. Though I like him, he does make this mistake from time to time.

I didn't know this about myself in the past. But doing the personality test really gave it out for me who I was personality-wise. Though, I always had a tough harded minset throughout my life, I knew I had a soft side to me from the very start, despite computers, tests, people telling me otherwise. I was tough enough to counter them. Maybe that's why I always crutched onto how I was a pisces, that I always had a soft side to my personality. Recently, doing an enneagram test, I realized one of my tritype was enneagram 6. Anxiety was indeed part of my life from the very start. And I learnt enneagram 6 was the most conservative type among the head/mind types. So I asked ChatGPT4 if I could categorize enneagram 6 as a conservative intellectual thinker, whereas enneagram 5 is more of a progressive intellectual thinker and enneagram 7 simply being neutral or being individualistic in its endeavors in the intellectual space. The machine agreed to how I saw it, so I accepted my analysis of my personality type. That I am quite conservative in the way I thought. This has nothing to do with political conservatism, maybe it influences it very little because my main personality types are very head strong and individualistic. Enneagram 6s tend to look for authority, (I remember Leo commenting on my being too reliant on authority figures to believe) because it's in constant anxiety from danger. So its prime motivation is security. There is nothing wrong with seeking for security. When it is healthy, because it is secure, it can be courageous and the most loyal friend type amongst others. My concern is this. My whole life, because I was so scared of danger, I found it hard to make friends. It was easy for me to cut people off. I even posted on this forum how I will not accept stupid behavior when people text with weird emojis and emotional crap over my text box. This isn't because I'm a narcassist ego maniac, but it's because I'm scared as fuck. I'm scared of idiots ruining my life either emotionally or physically. Emotions are the worst, because I know I can defend myself physically. Since I'm not completely enlightened as maybe how Leo is (haha), I can be prone to emotional dangers from either women, or stupid chumps. But this conservative mindset had made me study things too long, and maybe not take action unlessI knew everything, I mean every fucking thing by the T. To the point that may be even progressive thinkers would think I'm too security oriented. I would not advance unless I know all the minute proofs of a mathematical equation, no matter how a teacher would just pass me an A. If I didn't know, fuck that teacher, I don't give a fuck, I will understand it to the bitter end, before I advance. This mindset isn't superior or inferior to a progressive mindset. It is indeed less goal-oriented, and it is more safe. But it can create a lot of enemies and misunderstandings if it additionally pairs up with enneagram 3 and 8, where it's constantly combative and doesn't gives a damn about others too much. "Not only is he bossy! He will not do what I tell him to do fast! He must be lazy and bossy!" I got this many times in my life, people thinking I'm lazy. But I'm simply secure-oriented to the T, paranoid. Mindset comes from 'only the paranoid survive' type. But I feel this is driving me crazy a little bit, because it has come to the point where I know myself it has got out of hand. Micromanagement and scared of advancement (unless I know all the fucking technical details!), this mindset is detoriating. Maybe it's coming to good results at this point, since I know where my situation now is, but still, it's mentally toiling me. What should I do? I would need help with people who progress faster with their knowledge work, or are more individualistic in their work. If you are a scared person like me, please comment on this post too, tell me how you feel about this situation. I will not comment on how technical I am with my life, because it's embarassing how detail oriented my mind is. Just imagine, how Germans invested in chemistry education in their schools, just so they could get a competitive advantage in terms of military strength, when they had nothing other than great scientific minds in their military security defense, before WW1, and how that led them to dominate so much in the later wars in Europe, because they invested in studying 'chemistry' and 'math'. To the neighboring country, this investment on 'education' may seem too trivial, but it was really something that differentiated power militarily against france and england. One of the many problems I have is this: I wouldn't write a song, unless I've understood all the minute details of studying fundamental music theory. Despite me having enough knowledge to write. Just to give you context, but I have far more bad situations than just this stupid situation.